Re: Samba as AD DC

Original Message On 6/20/25 01:00, jslee wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jun 2025, at 08:17, otto.cooper wrote: > > I see there is no package for the kerberos server... > > > > If I were the maintainer, I would apply for a GSOC and supervise a pair > > or students to get it done. >

Re: Samba as AD DC

I converted the GPO script into a .reg file, uploaded and imported via ssh. Microsoft AD, Samba, and the long list of alternatives, they can go screw eachother for the next 10 years. By the time they are done, I'll probably be dead already. Original Message On 6/20/25 02:35,

Re: Samba as AD DC

> On 20 Jun 2025, at 8:56 am, jslee wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Jun 2025, at 08:17, otto.cooper wrote: >> I see there is no package for the kerberos server... >> >> If I were the maintainer, I would apply for a GSOC and supervise a pair >> or students to get it done. > > Supervising students is l

Re: Samba as AD DC

On Fri, 20 Jun 2025, at 08:17, otto.cooper wrote: > I see there is no package for the kerberos server... > > If I were the maintainer, I would apply for a GSOC and supervise a pair > or students to get it done. Supervising students is labour. You are asking for free (to you) labour from others w

Re: Samba as AD DC

Original Message On 6/19/25 21:50, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote: > On Thu 19/06/2025 18:11, otto.cooper wrote: > > > > Original Message > > On 6/19/25 19:51, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote: > > > > > > Is the samba package broken? > > > > > > No, the samba package

Re: Samba as AD DC

On Thu 19/06/2025 18:11, otto.cooper wrote: > > Original Message > On 6/19/25 19:51, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote: > > > > Is the samba package broken? > > > > No, the samba package is working. At least as long as you do not need AD > > DC support. Support for the latter has been

Re: Samba as AD DC

Original Message On 6/19/25 19:51, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote: > > Is the samba package broken? > > No, the samba package is working. At least as long as you do not need AD DC > support. Support for the latter has been dropped some time ago because of > crashes [0]. > > [

Re: Samba as AD DC

On Thu 19/06/2025 17:31, otto.cooper wrote: > I am afraid of asking. > > Suppose your /etc/samba/smb.conf includes the following line. > > > server role = active directory domain controller > > This is what happens. > > ``` > > doas testparm > > Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf >

Re: samba maps nodoby as a home share

On Wed 26/10/2022 08:55, kasak wrote: > hello misc! > > Just want to share you some interesting samba behavior after update to 7.2 > > Samba now creates a share named "nobody" when it should not! > > The config is very simple: > > [global] >     map to guest = Bad User >     server min

Re: SAMBA 4.15 share and compatibility with older Macs

> 3 мая 2022 г., в 18:39, Riccardo Mottola > написал(а): > > Hi, > > I have a samba share which is accessible to both windows (7, 10) and > Mac, including old Macs (10.5-10.7) which use samba. > Unix accesses through NFS. > > MacOS uses an old version of Samba, I always had issues. I added

Re: Samba server issue with Windows file properties

Correct fix, thank you for spotting this. Jean-François Le 07/04/2021 à 11:14, kasak a écrit : hello. You should look the option "store dos attributes" quote: When this parameter is set it will override the parameters map hidden, map system, map archive and map readonly and they will behav

Re: Samba server issue with Windows file properties

hello. You should look the option "store dos attributes" quote: When this parameter is set it will override the parameters map hidden, map system, map archive and map readonly and they will behave as if they were set to off. this option is by default ENABLED in samba 4.9. And when it is enab

Re: Samba server issue with Windows file properties

Good day, Sorry to bother with this issue, if someone has a few minutes to check for hint that'd be very helpful. Thank you. After trying everything I could think of, still samba doesn't seem to properly work with windows special properties: map archive map ... From windows's properties

Re: Samba server : issue with file transfer from Windows network with share special properties

Thanks Le 24/03/2021 à 17:00, Kenneth Gober a écrit : On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 9:11 AM jeanfrancois > wrote: It has sometimes error messages when copy which I tracked to being from Windows network to the Samba server where source files or folders's p

Re: Samba server : issue with file transfer from Windows network with share special properties

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 9:11 AM jeanfrancois wrote: > It has sometimes error messages when copy which I tracked to being from > Windows network to the Samba server where source files or folders's > properties are not supported (like archiving option). > > Has someone a fix for this, or can poin

Re: samba macos epic fail

kasak writes: > The one thing you should know about, is fact, that OpenBSD doesn't > support extended attributes. > So, basically, you cannot use streams_xattr module. And that explains why this works on FreeBSD but not on Open. Thanks for clarifying this. --lyndon

Re: samba macos epic fail

23.11.2020 00:45, Lyndon Nerenberg пишет: Somebody please tell me what the hell I am doing wrong here. OpenBSD 6.8, samba 4.9.18 via pkg_add, MacOS 10.15.7 fully patched. My main goal is to get Time Machine backups running, but I keep getting all sorts of inscrutable errors about file permiss

Re: samba macos epic fail

On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 01:45:13PM -0800, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > Somebody please tell me what the hell I am doing wrong here. > > OpenBSD 6.8, samba 4.9.18 via pkg_add, MacOS 10.15.7 fully patched. > > My main goal is to get Time Machine backups running, but I keep getting > all sorts of ins

Re: Samba on obsd

On 03-25 12:42, Lars Bonnesen wrote: > It seems that Debian is also recommended as an AD replacement. And in my experience with packaging tools internals, policies, standards support, etc (which was not with anything related to AD), far superior to other Linux distros. Ask me off-list if you want

Re: Samba on obsd

It seems that Debian is also recommended as an AD replacement. On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:13 PM David Sastre wrote: > Depending on your requirements, e.g. Windows machined in your setup, you > can also try > https://www.freeipa.org > I would use Fedora, not CentOS. > It is an umbrella project f

Re: Samba on obsd

Depending on your requirements, e.g. Windows machined in your setup, you can also try https://www.freeipa.org I would use Fedora, not CentOS. It is an umbrella project for LDAP, Kerberos, DNS, NTP and some added functionality on top you might or might not need/use. It can also establish trust relat

Re: Samba on obsd

25.03.2020 02:06, Lars Bonnesen пишет: Hi. I am having a project on setting up Samba to work as a replacement for MS AD. I would prefer to do it on OpenBSD, but how is the implementation of Samba on OpenBSD? Is it enhanced in a way that will cause any known problems that would not be on say...

Re: Samba on obsd

As a replacement for MS AD you have no chance with OpenBSD.Sadly.� --� Maksim Rodin� � � 25.03.2020, 02:10, "Lars Bonnesen" : Hi. I am having a project on setting up Samba to work as a replacement for MS AD. I would prefer to do it on OpenBSD, but how is the implementation of Samba on

Re: Samba rlimit on OpenBSD 6.5

On 2019-05-22, Stephane HUC "PengouinBSD" wrote: > > Hi, all. > > How resolve 'rlimit' in Samba on OpenBSD 6.5? > > $ testparm > > rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (512) to minimum Windows limit (16384) > Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf > rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (512) to

Re: samba : snapshots of 6.5

hi all ! yesterday i newly installed openbsd snapshots , i managed to start samba . hi# date ; /etc/rc.d/samba start ; date Tue May 14 02:36:22 JST 2019 smbd(ok) nmbd(ok) Tue May 14 02:36:48 JST 2019 namely 26 seconds hi# hi# testparm rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (128) to minimum Windows

Re: samba : snapshots of 6.5

I think that the microsoft will continue to change its network system in order not to be invaded by free UNIX . If so, the pursuit of samba will be painful . But it is only a personal imagination

Re: samba : snapshots of 6.5

hi,all i reinstall samba by using ports . dell# ps ax| grep bd 72188 p0 S+p 0:00.00 grep bd dell# /etc/rc.d/samba -f start smbd(timeout) dell# ps ax| grep bd 71545 p0 R/1 0:41.36 /usr/local/sbin/smbd -D -D 52315 p0 S+p 0:00.00 grep bd i think '-D -D' is perhaps bad . by the w

Re: samba : snapshots of 6.5

It is known/expected that smbd startup is very slow on OpenBSD at present, https://marc.info/?t=15500795593&r=1&w=2

Re: samba : snapshots of 6.5

On 4/15/19 8:38 AM, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: On 14.4.2019. 20:10, Tuyosi T wrote: hi all . the samba of snapshots does not start . dell# /etc/rc.d/samba start smbd(timeout) I have similar problem with samba after upgrade to 4.8.11, smbd timeouts but it starts. # rcctl stop samba nmbd(ok

Re: samba : snapshots of 6.5

On 14.4.2019. 20:10, Tuyosi T wrote: > hi all . > > the samba of snapshots does not start . > > dell# /etc/rc.d/samba start > smbd(timeout) > I have similar problem with samba after upgrade to 4.8.11, smbd timeouts but it starts. # rcctl stop samba nmbd(ok) smbd(ok) # rcctl start samba s

Re: samba at snapshots

i thank for kasak's nice advices of samba . yesteday's perhaps today's snapshot is stable . i am looking forward to 6.4 . --- regards

Re: samba at snapshots

11.07.2018 18:04, Tuyosi T пишет: hi all . it is supprising openbsd snapshots runs samba . and windows 10 accesses "OpenSamba" . but this may contain some errors . then please point them . 1)/etc/samba/smb.conf [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP server string = SAMBA SERVER Version %v netbios

Re: samba client

I also recommend curl if you know exact address of receiving/sending resource. It needs zero config and works great in non-root users.

Re: samba client

On 02/10/2018 10:50 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: I can get this to work for root, but not for a regular user. (I get "fuse mount: permission denied" for a non-root user, with the exact same usmb setup that works for root...) https://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20160715125022 Thank you

Re: samba client

On 2018-02-10, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > > > On 02/09/18 18:20, listo factor wrote: >> On 02/08/2018 11:44 AM, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: >> ...> cd /usr/ports; make search key=smb >>> yields among other things >>> Port: usmb-20130204p4 >> ... >>> which might fit the scenario. >> >> Thank you, i

Re: samba client

On 02/09/18 18:20, listo factor wrote: On 02/08/2018 11:44 AM, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: ...> cd /usr/ports; make search key=smb yields among other things Port: usmb-20130204p4 ... which might fit the scenario. Thank you, it appears it does. However...: I can get this to work for root

Re: samba client

On 02/08/2018 11:44 AM, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: ...> cd /usr/ports; make search key=smb yields among other things Port: usmb-20130204p4 ... which might fit the scenario. Thank you, it appears it does. However...: I can get this to work for root, but not for a regular user. (I get "fuse

Re: samba client

On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 11:33:01AM +, listo factor wrote: > On 02/08/2018 08:58 AM, Stephane HUC "CIOTBSD" wrote: > > install package gvfs if X, to use with xfce or gnome... > > Unfortunately, this is an "X-less", non-graphic "portal", > the only computer open to the world, and only via ssh, >

Re: samba client

On 02/08/2018 08:58 AM, Stephane HUC "CIOTBSD" wrote: install package gvfs if X, to use with xfce or gnome... Unfortunately, this is an "X-less", non-graphic "portal", the only computer open to the world, and only via ssh, on a LAN full of Linux and Windows computers that are samba servers. The

Re: samba client

install package gvfs if X, to use with xfce or gnome... Le 08/02/2018 à 01:18, listo factor a écrit : > I have a need to mount existing samba shares on a linux box, > on the  openbsd 6.2 computer. There is no use for a samba server > on it, and I would prefer not to install one. What is the > appr

Re: SAMBA CIFS/SMBMOUNT

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2015/06/10 13:33, sven falempin wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Stuart Henderson > > wrote: > > > > On 2015-06-07, Max Power wrote: > > > Hi guys! > > > Question about OpenBSD 5.7 amd64. > > > How

Re: SAMBA CIFS/SMBMOUNT

On 2015/06/10 13:33, sven falempin wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Stuart Henderson > wrote: > > On 2015-06-07, Max Power wrote: > > Hi guys! > > Question about OpenBSD 5.7 amd64. > > How to mount shared device via samba fs? > > > > I tried in this way: >

Re: SAMBA CIFS/SMBMOUNTysutils/usmby

On Wed Jun 10, 2015 at 01:33:35PM -0400, sven falempin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Stuart Henderson > wrote: > > > On 2015-06-07, Max Power wrote: > > > Hi guys! > > > Question about OpenBSD 5.7 amd64. > > > How to mount shared device via samba fs? > > > > > > I tried in this way:

Re: SAMBA CIFS/SMBMOUNT

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2015-06-07, Max Power wrote: > > Hi guys! > > Question about OpenBSD 5.7 amd64. > > How to mount shared device via samba fs? > > > > I tried in this way: > > # mount -t cifs //192.168.2.111/raid5/download /BACKUP -o > > username=user,

Re: SAMBA CIFS/SMBMOUNT

On 2015-06-07, Max Power wrote: > Hi guys! > Question about OpenBSD 5.7 amd64. > How to mount shared device via samba fs? > > I tried in this way: > # mount -t cifs //192.168.2.111/raid5/download /BACKUP -o > username=user,password=passwd > and this returns: > mount: no mount helper program found

Re: SAMBA CIFS/SMBMOUNT

Max Power said: > How to mount shared device via samba fs? You may use sharity-light package. -- Dmitrij D. Czarkoff

Re: samba and e2fsprogs packages -- 5.4

On 2013-12-04, Brad Smith wrote: > On 04/12/13 4:44 PM, Vadim Zhukov wrote: >> 2013/12/5 Peter Fraser : >>> samba required the e2fsprogs package. The problem occurs when trying to use >>> samba's net command. >>> The net command requires libuuid. >>> It was not easy to find where libuuid was lo

Re: samba and e2fsprogs packages -- 5.4

On 04/12/13 5:37 PM, Philip Guenther wrote: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Brad Smith wrote: On 04/12/13 5:23 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: Brad Smith wrote: ... Even if that tool was installed that would not locate anything if the package in question is not already installed, right?

Re: samba and e2fsprogs packages -- 5.4

Peter Fraser writes: > samba required the e2fsprogs package. The problem occurs when trying to use > samba's net command. > The net command requires libuuid. > It was not easy to find where libuuid was located. This kind of report should go to ports@... (redirecting there on purpose). What's

Re: samba and e2fsprogs packages -- 5.4

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Brad Smith wrote: > On 04/12/13 5:23 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: >> >> Brad Smith wrote: ... >>> Even if that tool was installed that would not locate anything >>> if the package in question is not already installed, right? >> >> Wrong. > > How does it find the

Re: samba and e2fsprogs packages -- 5.4

On 04/12/13 5:23 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote: Brad Smith wrote: pkg_locate libuuid.so - no? Even if that tool was installed that would not locate anything if the package in question is not already installed, right? Wrong. How does it find the file then? -- This message has been scann

Re: samba and e2fsprogs packages -- 5.4

Brad Smith wrote: > > pkg_locate libuuid.so - no? > > Even if that tool was installed that would not locate anything > if the package in question is not already installed, right? Wrong. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de

Re: samba and e2fsprogs packages -- 5.4

On 04/12/13 4:44 PM, Vadim Zhukov wrote: 2013/12/5 Peter Fraser : samba required the e2fsprogs package. The problem occurs when trying to use samba's net command. The net command requires libuuid. It was not easy to find where libuuid was located. pkg_locate libuuid.so - no? Even if that

Re: samba and e2fsprogs packages -- 5.4

2013/12/5 Peter Fraser : > samba required the e2fsprogs package. The problem occurs when trying to use > samba's net command. > The net command requires libuuid. > It was not easy to find where libuuid was located. pkg_locate libuuid.so - no? -- WBR, Vadim Zhukov

Re: Samba ID Mapping Question

On 03/11/2009, at 12:24 PM, Erin O'Meara wrote: I have Installed an OpenBSD 4.6 Server with Samba + Active Directory + Cups. The OpenBSD Server is a Member Server in the Active Directory and Everything is working great. I have read about automatic ID mapping using Winbind. I realize that

Re: Samba printing, OpenBSD client to Windows server

Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: OK, I've installed Samba, and gotten printcap set such that I printed a straight text fire, but nothing else works now that I tried to print other formats through gv and open-office. Perhaps Samba is not the way to go? Printcap below. #$OpenBSD: printcap,v 1.4

Re: Samba printing, OpenBSD client to Windows server

Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: Alexander Hall wrote: Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: OK, I've installed Samba, and gotten printcap set such that I printed a straight text fire, but nothing else works now that I tried to print other formats through gv and open-office. Perhaps Samba is not the way to go?

Re: Samba printing, OpenBSD client to Windows server

On 20:33:56 Nov 29, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Unless your printer supports postsript natively (most cheap printers > don't) you need some kind of converting filter. > You mean like a2ps? /usr/ports/print/a2ps -Girish

Re: Samba printing, OpenBSD client to Windows server

Stuart Henderson ha scritto: On 2008-11-29, raven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stuart Henderson ha scritto: On 2008-11-29, Ed Ahlsen-Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alexander Hall wrote: Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: OK, I've installed Samba, and

Re: Samba printing, OpenBSD client to Windows server

On 2008-11-29, raven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stuart Henderson ha scritto: >> On 2008-11-29, Ed Ahlsen-Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Alexander Hall wrote: >>> Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: >OK, I've installed Samba, and gotten printcap set such that I

Re: Samba printing, OpenBSD client to Windows server

Stuart Henderson ha scritto: On 2008-11-29, Ed Ahlsen-Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alexander Hall wrote: Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: OK, I've installed Samba, and gotten printcap set such that I printed a straight text fire, but nothing else works now that I tried to print

Re: Samba printing, OpenBSD client to Windows server

On 2008-11-29, Ed Ahlsen-Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexander Hall wrote: >> Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: >>>OK, I've installed Samba, and gotten printcap set such that I >>> printed a straight text fire, but nothing else works now that I tried >>> to print other formats through gv and op

Re: Samba printing, OpenBSD client to Windows server

Alexander Hall wrote: Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: OK, I've installed Samba, and gotten printcap set such that I printed a straight text fire, but nothing else works now that I tried to print other formats through gv and open-office. Perhaps Samba is not the way to go? Printcap below. #$O

Re: Samba printing, OpenBSD client to Windows server

Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: OK, I've installed Samba, and gotten printcap set such that I printed a straight text fire, but nothing else works now that I tried to print other formats through gv and open-office. Perhaps Samba is not the way to go? Printcap below. #$OpenBSD: printcap,v 1.4

Re: [Samba] Re: Winbind syslog errors and Domain Local Groups

rors by enabling Kerberos >> and changing the security model from domain to ads, but now >> I've run into the same problem reported here: >> http://www.usenet-forums.com/samba/394092-re-samba-accessing-member-server-prompts-credentials.html >> >> After about 5 minutes

Re: Samba performance question.

Hi, i can only say something for very small networks, 2-4 machines on pretty old hardware as p3 500 MHz and 192 MB ram and i cant see any differences in speed compared to slackware which i was running before openbsd. At work i have a few somewhat bigger nets that ranges from 100 to 300 users althou

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

I was under the impression kerberos support was only available with NFSv4 - looking at the manpages, it seems OpenBSD is using NFSv3 On 19/03/2008, Almir Karic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Barry Commander > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You could still eith

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Barry Commander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You could still either su to the user whos files you want from root, or you > could map their UID. > Both would allow you access to other users files. yep, welcome to the wonderful world of NFS :-), a toy such as kerber

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

You could still either su to the user whos files you want from root, or you could map their UID. Both would allow you access to other users files. On 19/03/2008, Almir Karic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Barry Commander > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Doesn't NF

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Barry Commander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Doesn't NFS mean restricting root access on each client in order to prevent > people accessing other files? Is there a way (short of restricting root > access) > to prevent this? > RTFM. -maproot is what you want, s

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

Doesn't NFS mean restricting root access on each client in order to prevent people accessing other files? Is there a way (short of restricting root access) to prevent this?

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 01:01:45AM +1100, Sunnz wrote: > Basically I want to set up a network share on my OpenBSD box which my > Mac laptops and Linux laptops can access to. > > Smb (...) was a breeze to set up. > > I also tried out NFS in the past on OpenBSD. Got it to work but I > don't really

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:37:16PM +1100, Sunnz wrote: > Oh, so you need to change the user id on the client computers to use > NFS properly... that seems kind of like a hack... is that the usual > way NFS is used? What if there are multiple accounts on the client > that you like to share? You us

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

Oh, so you need to change the user id on the client computers to use NFS properly... that seems kind of like a hack... is that the usual way NFS is used? What if there are multiple accounts on the client that you like to share?

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

On 18:59:06 Mar 11, Sunnz wrote: > But... the user account on the clients already has their own > uid/gid... do I have to make new accounts? Or am I missing something? > vipw ;) -Girish -- "unix soi qui mal y pense" UNIX to him who evil thinks +-

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/3/11, Karl Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Just use the same uid/gid on the client as you have in your export file. > > As simple as that. > > > > > > > But... the user account on the clients already has their o

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 06:59:06PM +1100, Sunnz wrote: > But... the user account on the clients already has their own > uid/gid... do I have to make new accounts? Or am I missing something? You can change the uid and gid, but please read up on the implications first - it is not always as simple a

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

2008/3/11, Karl Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Just use the same uid/gid on the client as you have in your export file. > As simple as that. > > But... the user account on the clients already has their own uid/gid... do I have to make new accounts? Or am I missing something?

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

2008/3/11, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > My environment... I am not sure what kind of description is needed... > but computers need to be first to authenticate and get an IP from > OpenVPN before they can send any packets through the network... so I > suppose I don't really need additional securit

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

My environment... I am not sure what kind of description is needed... but computers need to be first to authenticate and get an IP from OpenVPN before they can send any packets through the network... so I suppose I don't really need additional security from NFS? I still don't understand how the ui

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

Sunnz wrote: Basically I want to set up a network share on my OpenBSD box which my Mac laptops and Linux laptops can access to. Smb seems kind of weird in a environment with no M$ systems... however this is probably what I am most familiar with because I did it in the past on OpenBSD and it was

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

On Mar 11 01:01:45, Sunnz wrote: > Basically I want to set up a network share on my OpenBSD box which my > Mac laptops and Linux laptops can access to. Then use NFS, the standard UNIX technology for this. > Smb seems kind of weird in a environment with no M$ systems... however > this is probably

Re: Samba(SMB) or Netatalk(AFP)?

On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 01:01:45AM +1100, Sunnz wrote: > Basically I want to set up a network share on my OpenBSD box which my > Mac laptops and Linux laptops can access to. > (snip) > So now I am looking at AFP via Netatalk, which seem to be Unix like > enough but have password authentication lik

Re: Samba files used logging

You need to use at least samba-2.2.7a and use the audit.so module. The samba source code has what you need. Check out the information in ~samba/examples/VFS/audit.c and in the README file in that directory. -- Calomel @ http://calomel.org OpenSource Research and Reference On Sun, Oct 28, 2007

Re: Samba files used logging

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've set up a little samba server on my OpenBSD box. I would like to know which files are being accessed (write, copy) by smbd. I tried fstat, pstat but none of them give me the name of the files. Try combining it with ncheck(8) for inode to filename conversion. /Alex

Re: samba performance redux

On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:04:41PM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote: > am having trouble getting samba on my 4.1-release machine to deliver > more than 3-7 MBps transfer speed. this is horribly slow, even on 100 > Mbps, and i'm hoping there are folks out there who can assist me in > tuning this pr

Re: samba performance redux

Jacob Yocom-Piatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > am having trouble getting samba on my 4.1-release machine to deliver > more than 3-7 MBps transfer speed. Just to eliminate the obvious, you *have* checked full/half duplex mismatches? - P -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 im

Re: Samba-3.0.25a and ext2-partitions

Yes, mounting SMB-share. smb-log yields NT_NO_SUCH_FILE as soon as I try to 'ls' this mounted share. The strange thing is what everything worked fine with older Samba (I think it was older 3.x). I have not changed smb.conf for a while. On 12 aug 2007, at 21.44, Joachim Schipper wrote: On

Re: Samba-3.0.25a and ext2-partitions

Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Via SAMBA, I suppose (you're also doing NFS, I see)? Samba has a silly amount of options, most of them dictated by the idiocy^H^Hsyncracies of Microsoft networking. However, Unix file permissions are not always irrelevant and possibly worth checking

Re: Samba-3.0.25a and ext2-partitions

On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:20:17PM +0200, Maxim Bourmistrov wrote: > Hello! > This is a very odd problem and I have not found any answers on the net. > Hope some one can give a hint. > > OpenBSD-machine (4.1-current some how) with Samba-3.0.25a serving 3 > shares: > NAS,MP3 and OpenBSD. > NAS an

Re: samba: tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME

Chris wrote: I'm running samba on 4.1-release but every time I try to connect (smbclient -U chris 192.168.25.18\\tmp), I get this error - Domain=[BLUE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.24] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME Did you try adding "-M " (or "-W workgroup")? I seem to r

Re: samba: really low throughput

Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote: got a 4.1-release machine that shares its disks via samba to a few windows xp workstations and is transferring files slow as molasses (1 GB file takes ~30 min to transfer). this machine serves FTP at ~10 MBps, close to linespeed for 100 Mbit, so disk speed is not the bo

Re: samba: really low throughput

Timo Schoeler wrote: Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote: socket options = TCP_NODELAY dan's suggestion of replacing the above line with socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 has helped a bunch. now transfers are going at ~5 MBps. what about a dmesg? maybe there

Re: samba: really low throughput

Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote: got a 4.1-release machine that shares its disks via samba to a few windows xp workstations and is transferring files slow as molasses (1 GB file takes ~30 min to transfer). this machine serves FTP at ~10 MBps, close to linespeed for 100 Mbit, so disk speed is not the bo

Re: samba: really low throughput

On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 10:59:42AM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote: > got a 4.1-release machine that shares its disks via samba to a few > windows xp workstations and is transferring files slow as molasses (1 GB > file takes ~30 min to transfer). this machine serves FTP at ~10 MBps, > close to li

Re: samba and ldap

* Dr. Harry Knitter wrote: > My goal would be to use ldap alone for authetication for my samba users and > circumvent the use of /etc/passwd at all. I. e all authtication requests > should be managed by my ldap database. On OpenBSD, this is not possible. I.e you have to add all accounts to /et

Re: samba and ldap

Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2006 22:15 schrieb Bolke de Bruin: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2006 15:26 schrieb Vijay Sankar: > >> Sorry, I meant to write smbldap-useradd. > >> > >> FWIW, all I had to do were the following three steps: > >> > >> 1) added an OpenBSD user acc

Re: samba and ldap

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2006 15:26 schrieb Vijay Sankar: >> Sorry, I meant to write smbldap-useradd. >> >> FWIW, all I had to do were the following three steps: >> >> 1) added an OpenBSD user account called FTL37$ >> 2) smbldap-useradd -w FTL37$ >> 3) did a smb

Re: samba and ldap

Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2006 15:26 schrieb Vijay Sankar: > Sorry, I meant to write smbldap-useradd. > > FWIW, all I had to do were the following three steps: > > 1) added an OpenBSD user account called FTL37$ > 2) smbldap-useradd -w FTL37$ > 3) did a smbpasswd -a FTL37$ > With the normal users th

Re: samba and ldap

Sorry, I meant to write smbldap-useradd. FWIW, all I had to do were the following three steps: 1) added an OpenBSD user account called FTL37$ 2) smbldap-useradd -w FTL37$ 3) did a smbpasswd -a FTL37$ Currently I am using samba-3.0.21bp3-ldap and samba-docs-3.0.21b packages on OpenBSD 3.9. Rely

  1   2   >