Re: Quick question regarding puffy

On 2025-01-10, Gwen Nelson wrote: > --fe4768062b5781e3 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Bumping this because it just spiralled into a pointless "discussion" and I > never got any actual answer. > > So, who do I need to speak to about permission to use a modified puffy?

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

Bumping this because it just spiralled into a pointless "discussion" and I never got any actual answer. So, who do I need to speak to about permission to use a modified puffy? On Tue, 3 Dec 2024, 01:06 Gwen Nelson, wrote: > Hi > > I'm setting up a pubnix server for LGBT people running the best

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

I use Posteo and can comfirm its great. On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 08:37:07PM GMT, Polarian wrote: > Hello, > > Although this is offtopic I will respond to it quickly. > > I wouldn't say protonmail is a good idea, in my opinion everything they > stand for is a lie. Firstly, email is not secure, som

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

On 2024-12-03, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > I am not an admin of any of the openbsd.org lists, so would not have > access to measures such as removing subscribers. The somewhat obscure > sentence is more of a pointer to the various local filtering features > we have at the client end. exactly.

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

Polarian írta 2024. dec.. 3, K-n 21:37 órakor: > As for self hosting (like I do), it is rather painful. Setup is > annoying enough, but the worst part is being filtered into spam by > every major email provider despite having spf, dkim, dmarc and rDNS with > good IP reputation, simply because you

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

Hello, Although this is offtopic I will respond to it quickly. I wouldn't say protonmail is a good idea, in my opinion everything they stand for is a lie. Firstly, email is not secure, some email servers still do not use TLS, so a "privacy focused" mail server isn't always beneficial. Secondly, i

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 05:37:00PM +, Rubén Llorente wrote: > John wrote: > Honestly I am a bit pissed off because we are discussing this subject which > does not mean anything for the project and meanwhile we have unattended port > submissions timing out in ports@. True that.. Qbittorrent is

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

OK, this is a good point, I was thinking lately about getting a protonmail, but they do not offer IMAP for free and now I know that they encode everything in base64 my decision not to pursue this is final. On 03/12/2024 18:07, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2024-12-03, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 07:03:23PM +, Polarian wrote: > Hansteen: > > > some frequent posters here also have a habit of activating > > auto-ignore mechanisms > > There is an auto-ignore mechanism? How do you trigger said mechanism? > Is there any documentation on said mechanism? > > I haven'

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

Hello, Firstly, sorry for breaking the threads, I see multiple different threads coming off the original email but I would like to respond to all of them at once so I am replying to the most recent email. Secondly, I was originally not going to respond to this, as I am unable to provide any advic

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

John wrote: On the wider 'it could be considered political' point - it's time everyone in or near tech understand that pretty much everything is political, including technology. If the OpenBSD Foundation want to avoid 'party political' - sure, understandable. But 'anything' political? Impossi

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

On 2024-12-03, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > It is worth keeping in mind, though, for the archives if nothing else, that > some frequent posters here also have a habit of activating auto-ignore > mechanisms > in order to avoid seeing posts by users with high off-topic content. Fortunately a lot

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

On the wider 'it could be considered political' point - it's time everyone in or near tech understand that pretty much everything is political, including technology. If the OpenBSD Foundation want to avoid 'party political' - sure, understandable. But 'anything' political? Impossible. Good l

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

That would be why I'm asking for permission of course. On Tue, 3 Dec 2024, 17:09 Stuart Henderson, wrote: > On 2024-12-03, izzy Meyer wrote: > > Also- all this image appears to be intended to do is have puffy holding > a = > > progress flag=2E This would be a rather simple GIMP job, especially

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

Hi I actually had a good friend of mine do the edit, he rescaled it a bit and edited the border. He did not use any AI to achieve this. Obviously I don't consider the pride flag a political statement, because being LGBT isn't political - it's just how some of us "are". If I was asking to use it f

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

On 2024-12-03, izzy Meyer wrote: > Also- all this image appears to be intended to do is have puffy holding a = > progress flag=2E This would be a rather simple GIMP job, especially cos bot= > h of these pieces of art are fairly easy to come by online=2E (could be as = most of the actual artwork o

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

Hi Gwen Like others have mentioned- this could technically be considered "political". However, thats the least of my concerns as social science is not political science. I would only consider this "politicised" in recent times, rather than "political". I say you should be fine, although I carr

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 10:50:57AM +0100, Janne Johansson wrote: > > Hi Gwen > > I don't represent OpenBSD at all. > > Your logo is well done. > > You should have left it there. The rest is offtopic and not > interesting to this list at all. Thanks! You beat me to it, my just-abandoned response

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 07:40:35AM +, tux2bsd wrote: Hi Gwen Kind of related. The guy called "Solene", another they/them, was quite a fan of OpenBSD but felt it necessary to broadcast why he moved on: https://www.osnews.com/story/141170/ First Solene is a woman.

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

kef> From: owner-m...@openbsd.org on behalf of tux2bsd Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2024 2:40:35 AM To: Gwen Nelson Cc: OpenBSD general usage list Subject: Re: Quick question regarding puffy Attention : courriel externe | external email Hi Gwen I don't represent OpenBSD at all. M

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

On 3.12.2024 02:06, Gwen Nelson wrote: Hi I'm setting up a pubnix server for LGBT people running the best OS (OpenBSD of course) and was wondering if it'd be acceptable to display puffy holding a pride flag on the project's website as a logo. Apart from below info you are hitting trigger

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

> Hi Gwen > I don't represent OpenBSD at all. > Your logo is well done. You should have left it there. The rest is offtopic and not interesting to this list at all. -- May the most significant bit of your life be positive.

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 11:44 PM tux2bsd wrote: > > I hope you make it out of that train-wreck of a cult one day. > > tux2bsd > As many hope you make it out of whatever oppressive cult you're in some day.

Re: Quick question regarding puffy

Hi Gwen I don't represent OpenBSD at all. Most BSD/GNU people are hard-line leftists, my response won't be typical. The ideology that has a hold over you demands the denial of reality. It strongly encourages the chemical and physical mutilation of children, young adults, and adults. Your logo is