On 11/16/2020 6:52 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
...actually I have now added a workaround to the databases/openldap port
in 6.8-stable to disable TLS 1.3, so either rebuild or wait for -stable
packages and it should fix things.
Cool, I was actually already building from source in order to enabl
On 11/16/2020 2:30 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Yes OpenLDAP is broken with TLS 1.3 server-side unless you have that
commit (or build LibreSSL with TLS 1.3 server support disabled). As far
as I can tell there's no method to disable TLS 1.3 via config.
Hmm, yah, you can disable old versions, but
On 11/15/2020 10:18 PM, Brad Smith wrote:
I remember seeing this commit recently. Not sure if this is your problem
or not.
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=160511882917510&w=2
That definitely looks like it, thanks for the pointer.
On 2020-11-16, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Yes OpenLDAP is broken with TLS 1.3 server-side unless you have that
> commit (or build LibreSSL with TLS 1.3 server support disabled). As far
> as I can tell there's no method to disable TLS 1.3 via config.
...actually I have now added a workaround to the
On 2020-11-16, Brad Smith wrote:
> On 11/16/2020 12:08 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
>> I just updated one of my servers running 6.7 to 6.8, and am having a
>> problem with openldap. I have the intermediate cert and root CA in a
>> file referenced by the openldap config:
>>
>> TLSCACertificateFile
On 11/16/2020 12:08 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
I just updated one of my servers running 6.7 to 6.8, and am having a
problem with openldap. I have the intermediate cert and root CA in a
file referenced by the openldap config:
TLSCACertificateFile/etc/openldap/cabundle.crt
Under 6.7 with the o
On 2017/08/05 21:39, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> I took a look at the patch in head; you should assign the failure code to rc
> before calling Debug, as it refers to rc...
Thanks, fixed.
On 2017/08/05 21:40, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 12:35:24AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 07:34:11AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Feel free to try it, I believe the required patch to force MDB_WRITEMAP
> is still in there..but I don't think there were any major changes upstream
> since the last attempt so I wouldn't hold out too much hope for it working
> st
On 2017-07-10, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> mdb has been disabled in the openldap port since it looks like
> 2015/02/16, I was wondering if anyone has tried it since then to see if
> maybe the issues with it have been resolved? The other backends are
> deprecated upstream, it would be nice to get mdb w
hello,
ros...@ghweb.de (Markus Rosjat), 2017.04.27 (Thu) 12:59 (CEST):
> I basically want to know if its okay to set permission on a file or
> directory for a LDAP user even if there is no local user on this machine.
>
> Hope someone understand what I mean, background is setting up a mailserver
Le samedi 8 mars 2014, 14:20:23 Matthew Weigel a écrit :
> On 03/08/2014 12:16 PM, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> >> I am looking through logs and config since the beginning of the
> >> day... Actually, asking help on forums or mailing lists is always
> >> my last step in solving problems...
>
> We try t
Le samedi 8 mars 2014, 16:14:53 Matthew Weigel a écrit :
> On 03/08/2014 03:11 PM, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> > when I use 127.0.0.1 in php scripts, I can use ldap.
> > if the script is running with 'localhost' then, no ldap data...
> >
> > Any idea why ?
> > I have checked host resolution...
> > tel
On 03/08/2014 03:11 PM, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> when I use 127.0.0.1 in php scripts, I can use ldap.
> if the script is running with 'localhost' then, no ldap data...
>
> Any idea why ?
> I have checked host resolution...
> telnet localhost ldap gives the good behavior
Is PHP running inside a c
Le samedi 8 mars 2014, 19:16:07 Stéphane Guedon a écrit :
> Le samedi 8 mars 2014, 17:21:26 Stéphane Guedon a écrit :
> > Le samedi 8 mars 2014, 09:09:08 Matthew Weigel a écrit :
> > > On Mar 8, 2014, at 6:29 AM, Stéphane Guedon
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > Notably, the user fails to auth and do login
On 2014-03-08, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> Notably, the user fails to auth and do login (with openbsd login
> system AND webpages) eventhough password is correct according to ldap
> itself !
How are you doing ldap authentication? (i.e. what software are you
using, and how does it authenticate? attem
On 03/08/2014 12:16 PM, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
>> I am looking through logs and config since the beginning of the
>> day... Actually, asking help on forums or mailing lists is always
>> my last step in solving problems...
We try to help.
But... giving detailed descriptions of the problem, and sh
Le samedi 8 mars 2014, 17:21:26 Stéphane Guedon a écrit :
> Le samedi 8 mars 2014, 09:09:08 Matthew Weigel a écrit :
> > On Mar 8, 2014, at 6:29 AM, Stéphane Guedon
>
> wrote:
> > > Notably, the user fails to auth and do login (with openbsd login
> > > system AND webpages) eventhough password is
Le samedi 8 mars 2014, 09:09:08 Matthew Weigel a écrit :
> On Mar 8, 2014, at 6:29 AM, Stéphane Guedon
wrote:
> > Notably, the user fails to auth and do login (with openbsd login
> > system AND webpages) eventhough password is correct according to
> > ldap itself !
>
> That's a lot more moving pa
On Mar 8, 2014, at 6:29 AM, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
>
> Notably, the user fails to auth and do login (with openbsd login
> system AND webpages) eventhough password is correct according to ldap
> itself !
That's a lot more moving parts than just passwords in LDAP. Have you checked
your configurati
Le samedi 8 mars 2014, 12:23:19 Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> On 2014-03-07, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> > But when I try to change this user password it fails :
> >
> > # ldappasswd -x -v -D "uid=test,ou=users,dc=22decembre,dc=eu" \
> > -w somesecret -s anothersec
> > ldap_initialize( )
> > Result:
On 2014-03-07, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
> But when I try to change this user password it fails :
>
> # ldappasswd -x -v -D "uid=test,ou=users,dc=22decembre,dc=eu" \
> -w somesecret -s anothersec
> ldap_initialize( )
> Result: Other (e.g., implementation specific) error (80)
> Additional info: pass
On 03/07/2014 04:22 AM, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
# ldappasswd -x -v -D "uid=test,ou=users,dc=22decembre,dc=eu" \
-w somesecret -s anothersec
ldap_initialize( )
Result: Other (e.g., implementation specific) error (80)
Additional info: password hash failed
I'm sorry, it's not clear that this is
On 2013-11-10, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> Hi Misc,
>
> I am playing with OpenLDAP and I have a question about OpenLDAP server.
> I see in ports OpenLDAP server version 2.3.43 and the client version
> 2.4.36 even though current release is 2.4.37. Is there a particular
> reason besides lack of man p
j...@wxcvbn.org (J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas) wrote:
> Predrag Punosevac writes:
>
> > Hi Misc,
>
> Hi,
>
> this is a question for ports@.
>
I was not sure but I didn't want to cross post.
> > I am playing with OpenLDAP and I have a question about OpenLDAP server.
> > I see in ports OpenLDAP se
Predrag Punosevac writes:
> Hi Misc,
Hi,
this is a question for ports@.
> I am playing with OpenLDAP and I have a question about OpenLDAP server.
> I see in ports OpenLDAP server version 2.3.43 and the client version
> 2.4.36 even though current release is 2.4.37. Is there a particular
> reaso
On 2013-01-14, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 05:41:36PM -0200, Friedrich Locke wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i am trying to get openldap running, but my experience has been not that
>> good.
>> I have built and installed from ports. I can get it up and running but as
>> soon as qmail tries
I am using db-4.6.21p4
Quoting Friedrich Locke :
Hi,
sounds strange. Claudio said it was borked for amd64.
Are you using BDB ? Which version ?
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Vijay Sankar wrote:
Quoting Friedrich Locke :
Hi,
i am trying to get openldap running, but my experience has b
Hi,
sounds strange. Claudio said it was borked for amd64.
Are you using BDB ? Which version ?
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Vijay Sankar wrote:
> Quoting Friedrich Locke :
>
> Hi,
>>
>> i am trying to get openldap running, but my experience has been not that
>> good.
>> I have built and ins
Quoting Friedrich Locke :
Hi,
i am trying to get openldap running, but my experience has been not that
good.
I have built and installed from ports. I can get it up and running but as
soon as qmail tries to bind into it, it begins to consume memory up to all
my available memory.
I asked for hel
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 05:41:36PM -0200, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i am trying to get openldap running, but my experience has been not that
> good.
> I have built and installed from ports. I can get it up and running but as
> soon as qmail tries to bind into it, it begins to consume memory
On 2011-06-29, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011-06-29, Remco wrote:
>>
>> Apart from the other advise you got I think you need to set the KRB5_KTNAME
>> environment variable to tell slapd where to find your LDAP keytab, e.g.:
>> (yeah, I edited the default slapd rc script, I don't know if there'
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011-06-29, Remco wrote:
>>
>> Apart from the other advise you got I think you need to set the
>> KRB5_KTNAME environment variable to tell slapd where to find your LDAP
>> keytab, e.g.: (yeah, I edited the default slapd rc script, I don't know
>> if there's a better w
On 2011-06-29, Remco wrote:
>
> Apart from the other advise you got I think you need to set the KRB5_KTNAME
> environment variable to tell slapd where to find your LDAP keytab, e.g.:
> (yeah, I edited the default slapd rc script, I don't know if there's a
> better way)
this will cause you hassle
Friedrich Locke wrote:
> Dear list members,
>
> i have just installed openldap from ports (OpenBSD 4.9/amd64) and i am
> testing it. My doubt is:
>
> It seems to me that openldap should be run as user "x" and group "y"
> accordingly the ports collection. The problem is that i want to use
> kerbe
2011/6/28 Friedrich Locke
> Dear list members,
>
> i have just installed openldap from ports (OpenBSD 4.9/amd64) and i am
> testing it. My doubt is:
>
> It seems to me that openldap should be run as user "x" and group "y"
> accordingly the ports collection. The problem is that i want to use
> ker
Friedrich Locke writes:
> How could i run openldap as another user not root and provide it with
> a ldap/x.y.z ticket?
Use kadmin and ktadd -k.
Remember that openldap (and only openldap) should only
have read access to the new keytab.
Hi Friedich
It's in current: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=129440451210138&w=2
Regards,
Remi
On 01/11/2011 12:56 AM, Friedrich Locke wrote:
Hi folks,
is there plan for openbsd support openldap with recent version(s) of bdb ?
Thanks in advance,
Gustavo.
Henning Brauer(lists-open...@bsws.de)@2009.01.06 14:42:09 +0100:
> * Toni Mueller [2009-01-06 12:25]:
> > > openldap is still a piece of shit, but the ldbm backend is probably the
> > > sanest one.
> >
> > This pattern comes up often, but almost noone suggests an alternative
> > LDAP server packa
* dan-openbsd-m...@ourbrains.org [2009-01-16
19:38]:
> Henning Brauer(lists-open...@bsws.de)@2009.01.06 14:42:09 +0100:
> > I am not aware of any. Lack of options doesn't make openldap better.
>
> There is an option for people who have very basic LDAP needs - tinyldap
> from fefe.de. It's high q
Henning Brauer(lists-open...@bsws.de)@2009.01.06 14:42:09 +0100:
> I am not aware of any. Lack of options doesn't make openldap better.
There is an option for people who have very basic LDAP needs - tinyldap
from fefe.de. It's high quality but lacks many features at the time.
On Tue, 06.01.2009 at 06:27:17 -0500, ppruett-lists wrote:
> Actually a lot linux users suggest using mysql for the non relational
> authentication tables
> ;)
I knew you've got to be kidding!
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Tue, 06.01.2009 at 14:42:09 +0100, Henning Brauer
wrote:
> * Toni Mueller [2009-01-06 12:25]:
> > This pattern comes up often, but almost noone suggests an alternative
> > LDAP server package.
> I am not aware of any. Lack of options doesn't make openldap better.
agreed, but it makes ba
* Toni Mueller [2009-01-06 12:25]:
> > openldap is still a piece of shit, but the ldbm backend is probably the
> > sanest one.
>
> This pattern comes up often, but almost noone suggests an alternative
> LDAP server package.
I am not aware of any. Lack of options doesn't make openldap better.
--
Moving this to po...@. Reply-To/MFT set, please honour it.
On 2009/01/06 06:11, ppruett-lists wrote:
> > Here's an untested tarball of an updated openldap port, split into
> > directories for 2.3 and 2.4: http://spacehopper.org/tmp/openldap.tgz
>
>
>
> This issue has been kicked around for maybe t
> This pattern comes up often, but almost noone suggests an alternative
> LDAP server package
Actually a lot linux users suggest using mysql for the non relational
authentication tables
;)
Hi,
On Tue, 06.01.2009 at 01:08:27 +0100, Henning Brauer
wrote:
> I am using openldap with ldbm backend in an not exactly small
> installation for 9 or 10 years now. I have never ever experienced a
> broken database. never.
my last encounter with ldbm, a few years back, drove me to bdb really
f
> Here's an untested tarball of an updated openldap port, split into
> directories for 2.3 and 2.4: http://spacehopper.org/tmp/openldap.tgz
This issue has been kicked around for maybe two years, it has been on
the misc list before,
https://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2007/5/20/149
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Philip Guenther [2009-01-06 00:40]:
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Claudio Jeker
>> wrote:
>> ...
>>> Any DB that needs human help after a crash is in my opinion a bad choice.
>> So that would rule out the ldbm backend, no? Last I checked the libc
>> btree code, a
* Philip Guenther [2009-01-06 00:40]:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Claudio Jeker
> wrote:
> ...
> > Any DB that needs human help after a crash is in my opinion a bad choice.
>
> So that would rule out the ldbm backend, no? Last I checked the libc
> btree code, a crash while writing out a
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
...
> Any DB that needs human help after a crash is in my opinion a bad choice.
So that would rule out the ldbm backend, no? Last I checked the libc
btree code, a crash while writing out a page split would corrupt the
subtree.
> If a server
On 2009-01-05, ppruett-lists wrote:
>
> So choices for those with older openbsd port of openldap with bdb flavor
> are:
> * don't upgrade ( bad choice)
> * upgrade to openbsd 4.4 or current using the official port and renter
> data storing in the obsolete backend ldbm (ughhh)
> * Or go ahead and
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 01:46:30PM -0500, ppruett-lists wrote:
>> >If your LDAP environment is anything at all like the majority I've
>> seen >you will not notice any difference whatsoever (except you'll be
>> free >from BDB corruption during a crash).
>>
>
> Yep since I am not write heavy the
For OpenBSD 4.4 and current the flavor "bdb" is broken on openldap
BROKEN=OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible with Berkeley DB 4.6
So, what to do? My experience is that compiling BDB and OpenLDAP
yourself isn't hard,
yep, I remember compiling apache back in the middle 90's
For security and la
>If your LDAP environment is anything at all like the majority I've seen
>you will not notice any difference whatsoever (except you'll be free
>from BDB corruption during a crash).
Yep since I am not write heavy then the non bdb could be okay,
but as an afore mentioned in this thread I am co
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:30 AM, P.Pruett wrote:
> For OpenBSD 4.4 and current the flavor "bdb" is broken on openldap
> BROKEN=OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible with Berkeley DB 4.6
>
> Most past articles have strongly suggested haveing openldap use "bdb"
> as its storage method. Seeing that even t
Damn, forgot to send my response to list:
Message-ID: <49624a88.3020...@raapid.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:59:36 -0600
From: tico
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "P.Pruett"
Subject: Re: OpenLDAP w/o bdb okay?
References
P.Pruett wrote:
For OpenBSD 4.4 and current the flavor "bdb" is broken on openldap
BROKEN=OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible with Berkeley DB 4.6
Most past articles have strongly suggested haveing openldap use "bdb"
as its storage method. Seeing that even the current port is not ready
to implemen
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:33 PM, John Nietzsche
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i would like to know if openldap (in ports collection) will be shipped
> with suport for BDB in openbsd 4.4 ports infra structure?
Since the release is frozen, UTSL:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/databases
web-markup
2. MARC.info - OpenBSD-misc, 'Re: OpenLDAP' by Philip Guenther (2008/09/03)
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=122046507630763&w=2
--
If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there.
--- On Wed, 9/3/08, Philip Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Philip Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: OpenLDAP
> To: "John Nietzsche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "misc"
> Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 6:00 PM
>
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:15 AM, John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
I presume you're referring to the port/packages version. The answer
depends on whose definition of "unbroken" you prefer.
The last word I heard fro
John Nietzsche schrieb:
I am in need for performance. Is replacing bdb with ldbm a good ideia?
Thanks once more.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-03 13:22]:
is there any chance the next openbsd rel
On 9/3/08, John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am in need for performance. Is replacing bdb with ldbm a good ideia?
Is working faster than not working?
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:15 AM, John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
>
Since openbsd doesn't include ldap, I would guess that
I am in need for performance. Is replacing bdb with ldbm a good ideia?
Thanks once more.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-03 13:22]:
>> is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:15 AM, John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
>
> Thanks in advance.
And how is it broken exactly? I was able to install it just a month
ago and I didn't see anything obviously wrong.
-N
* John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-03 13:22]:
> is there any chance the next openbsd release holds an unbroken OpenLDAP?
I'd say the chance of ever having an unbroken OpenLDAP release on any
OS is pretty damn low.
that said, openldap works as well on openbsd as it does on other oses.
t
On 2008-09-02, John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i have just installed OpenBSD and i would like to use it (the server
> with OpenBSD) as a directory services. When i try to install openldap
> from ports i am prevented with the following message:
>
>===> openldap-client-2.3.39 is marked a
On 2008-08-14, Ross Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to set my new OpenBSD 4.3 installation up as a PDC for a
> windows network. I am following directions from
> http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/pdc/pdc2.html but I cannot get
> openldap-server to build from the ports, because the b
--- On Tue, 8/5/08, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: slapd hangs, was: Re: OpenLDAP and Berkeley DB 4.6
> To: "Toni Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> port
* Toni Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 09.03.2008 at 16:31:27 +, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > You have several recommended options:
> >
> > - dump your database, uninstall, install the unFLAVORed version
> > and restore your database.
>
> I tried that, but now run into
Hi,
On Sun, 09.03.2008 at 16:31:27 +, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> You have several recommended options:
>
> - dump your database, uninstall, install the unFLAVORed version
> and restore your database.
I tried that, but now run into the problem that now, slapd can't be
stop
--On Sunday, March 09, 2008 11:13 PM +0800 Dongsheng Song
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible[1] with Berkeley DB 4.6,
so I must stick to BDB 4.5 or upgrade to OpenLDAP 2.4 ?
Yes.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
On 2008-03-09, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since OpenLDAP 2.3 is incompatible[1] with Berkeley DB 4.6,
it is incompatible with DB 4.6.3 and up (where they quietly
broke the API). 4.6.2 and below are ok.
> so I must stick to BDB 4.5 or upgrade to OpenLDAP 2.4 ?
You have several re
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:13:26 -0600
Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On December 31, 2007 06:59:06 am Vijay Sankar wrote:
> >
> > env CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/local/include/db4 -I/usr/local/include/sasl" \
> > LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib/db4 -L/usr/local/share/libtool/libltdl
> > -L/usr/local/lib/sas
On December 31, 2007 06:59:06 am Vijay Sankar wrote:
> On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > > On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
> > > > > > Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openlda
On 1 January 2008, Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vijay Sankar mrta:
[...]
> >> there's support in 2.4 but iirc it's not a simple thing to
> >> backport.
> Why should we backport the db4.6 support? We just need to use 2.4.
[...]
(1) Historically, upgrading existing OpenLDAP databases to new f
On 2008/01/01 13:27, Daniel wrote:
>>> there's support in 2.4 but iirc it's not a simple thing to backport.
> Why should we backport the db4.6 support? We just need to use 2.4.
Well, you mentioned one reason why not just upgrade:
> With openldap-2.4, one can not use the ldbm backend anymore, but
Vijay Sankar mrta:
On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
openldap
Quoting Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
> > > > Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
> > > >
> > > > Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
> > > > the bdb b
On December 30, 2007 08:03:09 pm Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
> > > > > Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
> > > > > the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree
> > > On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
> > > > Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
> > > >
> > > > Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
> > > > the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
> > > > openldap-{client,server}, dbv4 and cyrus-sa
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:49:20 -0600
Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On December 29, 2007 02:15:15 pm Daniel wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:41:06 -0600
> >
> > Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
> > > > Hi (again, sorry, now with
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:41:06 -0600
Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
> > Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
> >
> > Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
> > the bdb backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built
On December 29, 2007 02:15:15 pm Daniel wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:41:06 -0600
>
> Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
> > > Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
> > >
> > > Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using
On December 29, 2007 11:23:19 am Daniel wrote:
> Hi (again, sorry, now with Subject)!
>
> Anyone experiencing or experienced segfaults with openldap using the bdb
> backed? I'm using -current ports tree, and built the
> openldap-{client,server}, dbv4 and cyrus-sasl2 packages from there.
>
> I will
On Saturday 26 May 2007 14:14, Vijay Sankar wrote:
> I have been using the openldap (openldap-server-2.3.33p1-bdb) from
> ports and it works great when I use slurpd for replication.
>
> I would like to use syncrepl instead of slurpd, just to see what the
> benefits are. However I don't know how to
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 07:29:45AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Uv Pzaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-20 23:12]:
> > I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
> > uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks are
> > stating that this is no good an
I still want to push this little points directly from the OpenLDAP faq:
* back-ldbm is /obsolete/ and /should not be used/.
*As a historical note, the back-ldbm code is a direct descendant of the
original University of Michigan code. The age of the code and its
byzantine data structures were beco
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Dave Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-21 08:26]:
>> Henning Brauer wrote:
>>> * Uv Pzaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-20 23:12]:
I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP
* Dave Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-21 08:26]:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> > * Uv Pzaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-20 23:12]:
> >> I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
> >> uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks are
> >> stating th
* Bryan Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-21 09:01]:
> Older versions of bdb went bad a fairly regular basis. I had DB's go
> corrupt as often as once a day under older verson of OL using bdb.
> This hasn't been a problem for a while though. I havn't had a db go
> bad in 2 years, even after powe
On 5/20/07, Dave Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Uv Pzaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-20 23:12]:
>> I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
>> uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks are
>> stating that this is
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Uv Pzaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-20 23:12]:
>> I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
>> uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks are
>> stating that this is no good any more:
>> (http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/
* Uv Pzaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-20 23:12]:
> I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still
> uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks are
> stating that this is no good any more:
> (http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/756.htm) and not bdb o
On Monday 12 February 2007 09:27, Antonis Faragitakis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> im trying to install openldap-server-2.3.11p4.tgz (i386) and
> openldap-client-2.3.11p4.tgz (i386) under OpenBSD3.9. After
> i've configured my slapd.conf im trying to start the server (slapd -d4 )
> but the i get the foll
Hi,
On Fri, 08.12.2006 at 10:02:37 -0800, Bryan Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been running 2.2.27 (with db4 FWIW) since august-ish of last year
> with zero corruption problems.
please also be sure to enable the sync option on bdb databases. I've
only experienced data loss when slapd we
> I installed the package. However, on the mirror I used I don4t find any bdb
> version.
On a side note, some people obersved data corruption or even data loss
when using the bdb backend. The gdbm backends on the other hand, is stable.
I don't remember the specific details, but there was a ve
Dr. Harry Knitter wrote:
Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2006 20:23 schrieb Bryan Irvine:
I have installed the following binaries:
openldap-server-2.3.24
openldap-client-2.3.24
db-4.2.52p8
OS is OpenBSD 4.0
You need to install openldap-server-2.3.24-bdb
If installed from ports use env FLAVOR=bdb make i
> > You need to install openldap-server-2.3.24-bdb
> >
> > If installed from ports use env FLAVOR=bdb make install to get it, or if
> > you used packages then use the bdb version.
> >
> > --Bryan
>
>
> I installed the package. However, on the mirror I used I don4t find any
> bdb
> version.
>
So it
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
