Hi,

sounds strange. Claudio said it was borked for amd64.
Are you using BDB ? Which version ?

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Vijay Sankar <vsan...@foretell.ca> wrote:

> Quoting Friedrich Locke <friedrich.lo...@gmail.com>:
>
>  Hi,
>>
>> i am trying to get openldap running, but my experience has been not that
>> good.
>> I have built and installed from ports. I can get it up and running but as
>> soon as qmail tries to bind into it, it begins to consume memory up to all
>> my available memory.
>>
>> I asked for help in the openldap mailing list and they got baffled, pretty
>> baffled.
>> I was told that in linux some special flags need to be supplied to BDB in
>> order to get it working well.
>> What about OpenBSD ? Have you tryied qmail-ldap + openldap on OBSD ? Faced
>> anything similar ?
>> I am aware that this problem persist from about two years ago, when i
>> tried
>> to get them working and the same problem arose.
>> I waited beleving it would be fixed in a near future ...
>>
>> I am really interested in get it solved, although i have no knownledge on
>> BDB internals ......
>>
>> I am willing to hear ....
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>>
>>
> I have been using OpenLDAP on OpenBSD (OpenLDAP 2.4.12 on OpenBSD 4.7 i386
> as well as OpenLDAP 2.4.26 on OpenBSD 4.9 amd64) without any problems for a
> few years now.
>
> I use sendmail as MTA and use the LDAP database for vacation, address
> books, distribution lists, etc. OpenLDAP also is used to authorize Windows
> users. dovecot users, iphone and blackberry users etc. I use BDB so that
> syncrepl etc. works well.
>
> Since knowledgeable people have mentioned that there are problems with
> newer versions of LDAP, I wonder if it is advisable for you to use the
> older versions on OpenBSD to run OpenLDAP. Not sure, just a thought. Since
> the ports.tar.gz file is on the CD, you may be able to build the older
> packages even though they are obsolete and not available at the OpenBSD FTP
> site.
>
> Vijay
>
>
> Vijay Sankar, M.Eng., P.Eng.
> ForeTell Technologies Limited
> vsan...@foretell.ca
>
> ------------------------------**---------------
> This message was sent using ForeTell-POST 4.9

Reply via email to