On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Claudio Jeker <cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com> wrote: ... > Any DB that needs human help after a crash is in my opinion a bad choice.
So that would rule out the ldbm backend, no? Last I checked the libc btree code, a crash while writing out a page split would corrupt the subtree. > If a servers freaks out and reboots for whatever reason I expect that the > database will recover from this event without having to recover, repair or > optimize datasets. So write-ahead-logging is ruled out because the database has to rerun the tail of the log? Then I don't think OpenLDAP has any databases that will satisfy you. Philip Guenther