On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Claudio Jeker <cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com> wrote:
...
> Any DB that needs human help after a crash is in my opinion a bad choice.

So that would rule out the ldbm backend, no?  Last I checked the libc
btree code, a crash while writing out a page split would corrupt the
subtree.


> If a servers freaks out and reboots for whatever reason I expect that the
> database will recover from this event without having to recover, repair or
> optimize datasets.

So write-ahead-logging is ruled out because the database has to rerun
the tail of the log?  Then I don't think OpenLDAP has any databases
that will satisfy you.


Philip Guenther

Reply via email to