On 05/16/12 08:14, Mihai Popescu wrote:
Ralph Ellis wrote:
I understand that Intel is much more open with their documentation and
specifications.
As someone said, it is "open for business." As for the review, I'm
asking myself why people publish a review and then ask for opinions.
It should be
> Ralph Ellis wrote:
> I understand that Intel is much more open with their documentation and
> specifications.
As someone said, it is "open for business." As for the review, I'm
asking myself why people publish a review and then ask for opinions.
It should be the other way around, not making sta
On 05/15/12 05:58, Alexander Polakov wrote:
* Ralph Ellis [120515 02:22]:
Hi,
As a relative newcomer to Openbsd, I decided to write a review of
the 5.1 release for Distrowatch.com from a desktop user's
perspective.
Openbsd has come a long way in terms of improved hardware support
and ease of se
On Tue, 15 May 2012 13:58:57 +0400
Alexander Polakov wrote:
> You forgot "in my case" part. There're no proprietary video drivers,
> right, but free drm infrastructure provides acceleration for many cards.
ATI and AMD but NOT NVIDIA?
May as well give nvidia a kick wherever possible to go open as
On Mon, 14 May 2012 20:13:39 -0400
Weldon Goree wrote:
> flash
> > via linux emulation
Flash has never really been supported on Linux with poor video
performance. Yes flash has more overhead than just playing a video, but
not that much! (A system that runs doom 3 at full can't run semi-HD
when a
* Ralph Ellis [120515 02:22]:
> Hi,
> As a relative newcomer to Openbsd, I decided to write a review of
> the 5.1 release for Distrowatch.com from a desktop user's
> perspective.
> Openbsd has come a long way in terms of improved hardware support
> and ease of setup and my experience has been very
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 01:55:32AM -0400, Ralph Ellis wrote:
> For some reason, even though dmeg sees the printer at ulpt0, I could
> not get cups to see the printer connected to my usb port.
That is because you did not read the package documentation available at
/usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes/c
On 05/14/12 23:09, Daniel Melameth wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Ralph Ellis wrote:
As a relative newcomer to Openbsd, I decided to write a review of the 5.1
release for Distrowatch.com from a desktop user's perspective.
Openbsd has come a long way in terms of improved hardware suppor
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Ralph Ellis wrote:
> As a relative newcomer to Openbsd, I decided to write a review of the 5.1
> release for Distrowatch.com from a desktop user's perspective.
> Openbsd has come a long way in terms of improved hardware support and ease
> of setup and my experience
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 16:48 -0400, Ralph Ellis wrote:
> >
> You are quite right. I meant that the i386 version could access flash
> via linux emulation through Opera.
This is no longer true.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/www/opera-flashplugin/Attic/Makefile
NB "Kill it with fire".
On 05/14/12 16:16, David Coppa wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Ralph Ellis wrote:
Hi,
As a relative newcomer to Openbsd, I decided to write a review of the 5.1
release for Distrowatch.com from a desktop user's perspective.
Openbsd has come a long way in terms of improved hardware suppor
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Ralph Ellis wrote:
> Hi,
> As a relative newcomer to Openbsd, I decided to write a review of the 5.1
> release for Distrowatch.com from a desktop user's perspective.
> Openbsd has come a long way in terms of improved hardware support and ease
> of setup and my expe
12 matches
Mail list logo
