There is a fuse implmentation, however as mentioned, it is rather slow.
It's main targets were reading ZFS volumes on Linux and OSX. It is also
rather outdated in favor of the native Linux port (abandoning OSX.) A
better starting point would be the FreeBSD port, but it will still
remain CDDL licens
Paolo Aglialoro [paol...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Considering that OpenBSD is implementing fuse, cannot then ZFS be included
> just like package/port (using fuse infrastructure as in linux) to
> circumvent licence issues?
Yeah, if you want your filesystem to be some huge monster slow bloated
piece of s
Jiri B [ji...@devio.us] wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:37:49AM -0500, patric conant wrote:
> > http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/Announcement
> >
> > It supposed to be open-er. I didn't find a license, thought it might be of
> > mild interest.
>
> bitrig (OpenBSD fork) has ongoing work to intergr
Of course it can. It depends on time, resources, which basically means
programmers who are interested in this.
It will happen when it happens. Asking won't help. Giving money would
help... :)
If enough people are interested, you can work with the openbsd foundation
to fund a programmer to work
Considering that OpenBSD is implementing fuse, cannot then ZFS be included
just like package/port (using fuse infrastructure as in linux) to
circumvent licence issues?
Il giorno 18/set/2013 16:09, "Kenneth Westerback"
ha scritto:
> http://open-zfs.org/wiki/About_OpenZFS
>
> Under 'Other' at the b
http://open-zfs.org/wiki/About_OpenZFS
Under 'Other' at the bottom:
"ZFS source code is copyright various contributors, and available under the
CDDL open-source license."
The second paragraph is amusing:
"OpenZFS is not associated with openzfs.org. Don't forget the dash in our
URS: open-zfs.org
Hi assume that OpenZFS will continue to be CDDL-licensed, and just start
incorporating the changes that were developed for Illumos and FreeBSD
(zpool version 5000, etc). Nothing new here.
Bernd
On 9/18/13 7:37 AM, patric conant wrote:
http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/Announcement
It supposed to
for sure !
>
> From: Jiri B
> Sent: Wed Sep 18 09:12:58 CEST 2013
> To: patric conant
> Subject: Re: OpenZFS announcement
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:37:49AM -0500, patric conant wrote:
> > http://www.open-zfs.org
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:37:49AM -0500, patric conant wrote:
> http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/Announcement
>
> It supposed to be open-er. I didn't find a license, thought it might be of
> mild interest.
bitrig (OpenBSD fork) has ongoing work to intergrate
hammer filesystem from DragonflyBSD. If t
It is still CDDL with all the (dis)advantages that brings; depending on your
perspective - nothing has changed in that respect.
I.e it's purely a branding relaunch from what I can see.
-Joel
patric conant wrote:
>http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/Announcement
>
>It supposed to be open-er. I didn't
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:37 PM, patric conant
wrote:
> http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/Announcement
>
> It supposed to be open-er. I didn't find a license, thought it might be of
> mild interest.
Odd: the wiki search on that Announcement page finds the word
"license" in the FAQ.
No single entity h
11 matches
Mail list logo
