110.1215843515313;
>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.114.179.20 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 08:18:35 +0200
> From: ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pau
2008/7/11 Paul de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I must admist, I've only read the parts you pointed out, but so far
> I'm very much impressed with how they managed to totally confuse the
> reader with incorrect statements and wrong examples. The section on
> IPv6 is probably best removed or mostly
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 02:01:46PM +0200, ropers wrote:
| However, there's a part of the document (
| http://www.3com.com/other/pdfs/infra/corpinfo/en_US/501302.pdf ) that
| I haven't yet corrected, and can't/won't correct on my own without
| asking for your opinion. I'm talking about the section o
>> Another solution would be to find/write a replacement document/site.
>> (HTML preferred over pdf).
No HTML version yet, and it's not in the same depth as the 3com
document, but the first part of the Network Design chapter in
"Wireless Networking in the Developing World" (ports/books/wndw
in -cu
[ This message is in continuation of this old thread:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=121151167724118&w=2 ]
2008/5/23 Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ropers wrote:
>> 2008/5/21 ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Kendall Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
ropers wrote:
> 2008/5/21 ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Kendall Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> ...
I'm having a hard time understanding it. In many places they use 2
numbers, e.g. 2(21) or 232 (4,294,967,296). Can you understand what they
are s
2008/5/21 ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Kendall Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ...
>>> I'm having a hard time understanding it. In many places they use 2
>>> numbers, e.g. 2(21) or 232 (4,294,967,296). Can you understand what they
>>> are saying?
>
> I am reall
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Kendall Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
>> I'm having a hard time understanding it. In many places they use 2
>> numbers, e.g. 2(21) or 232 (4,294,967,296). Can you understand what they
>> are saying?
I am really heartened to see how quickly everybody here
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Kendall Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks everyone.
>
> How about this then from page 4, about class A networks:
>
> "Each Class A network address has an 8-bit network prefix, with the
> highest order bit set to 0 (zero) and a 7-bit network number, followed
>
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 13:10 -0700, Kendall Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 12:46 -0700, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Kendall Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > "IPv4 defines a 32-bit address which means that there are
> > > only 232 (4,294,967,296) IPv4 addr
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 01:10:56PM -0700, Kendall Shaw wrote:
| Thanks everyone.
|
| How about this then from page 4, about class A networks:
|
| "Each Class A network address has an 8-bit network prefix, with the
| highest order bit set to 0 (zero) and a 7-bit network number, followed
| by a 24-
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 12:46 -0700, Chris Kuethe wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Kendall Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "IPv4 defines a 32-bit address which means that there are
> > only 232 (4,294,967,296) IPv4 addresses available."
> >
> > 232 what?
>
> Typesetting error. That
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Kendall Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> I'm having a hard time understanding it. In many places they use 2
> numbers, e.g. 2(21) or 232 (4,294,967,296). Can you understand what they
> are saying?
Sounds like the superscript notation for exponentiation was los
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:36:05PM -0700, Kendall Shaw wrote:
| In the networking section of the OpenBSD FAQ it suggests reading
| "Understanding IP addressing":
|
| http://www.3com.com/other/pdfs/infra/corpinfo/en_US/501302.pdf
|
| I'm having a hard time understanding it. In many places they use
Looks like the exponentiation operator got eaten up somewhere. 2 to the 32nd
power (2^32) is
4,294,967,296. 2^3 == 8.
HTH,
Jose.
Kendall Shaw wrote:
> In the networking section of the OpenBSD FAQ it suggests reading
> "Understanding IP addressing":
>
> http://www.3com.com/other/pdfs/infra/corp
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Kendall Shaw wrote:
>In the networking section of the OpenBSD FAQ it suggests reading
>"Understanding IP addressing":
>
>http://www.3com.com/other/pdfs/infra/corpinfo/en_US/501302.pdf
>
>I'm having a hard time understanding it. In many places they use 2
>numbers, e.g. 2(21) or
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 03:07:23PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
>> 23 or 8 what? Bits?
>
> 23 = CIDR notation, .. i.e. 32 bits - 23 bits for the network = 8 for the
> subnet
>
> Written as: n.n.n.n/23
You should work on your mathskills a bit, Lee ;)
Cheers,
Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd
--
>
At 12:36 PM 5/21/2008 -0700, Kendall Shaw wrote:
For example, on page 3:
"IPv4 defines a 32-bit address which means that there are
only 232 (4,294,967,296) IPv4 addresses available."
232 what?
It should read:
2^32(to the 32rd power)
Could be an issue with special characters in
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Kendall Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 232 what?
2^32
--
For far too long, power has been concentrated in the hands of "root"
and his "wheel" oligarchy. We have instituted a dictatorship of the
users. All system administration functions will be handled by the
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Kendall Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "IPv4 defines a 32-bit address which means that there are
> only 232 (4,294,967,296) IPv4 addresses available."
>
> 232 what?
Typesetting error. That should be 2^32 or 2**32 or pow(2, 32) or
232
> 23 or 8 what? Bits
20 matches
Mail list logo
