2008/7/11 Paul de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I must admist, I've only read the parts you pointed out, but so far > I'm very much impressed with how they managed to totally confuse the > reader with incorrect statements and wrong examples. The section on > IPv6 is probably best removed or mostly rewritten.
I could use pdfedit to remove pages 43 through 51 (pages 45 thru 53 of the pdf), and I also had that thought. But entirely removing that part may make it harder to get 3com to accept the changed version. OTOH it may make it easier to get their permission to host the edited pdf (because then it's no longer the full document). I agree that the IPv6 section is crap, and it just makes me think that management came down and said "oh, we have to talk about IPv6 as well". It's a shame because except for the formatting issues, the rest of the PDF, the part that's about IPv4, is really quite good. Thanks and kind regards, --ropers
