Den tis 29 aug. 2023 kl 17:10 skrev Samuel Jayden :
> Is it possible to bind source address on wireguard as the source address of
> the connection?
> Thanks.
There isn't such an option now, outgoing udp will choose the interface
which currently is deemed "best" on which the destination IP can be
r
Thanks, working like a charm.
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org on behalf of Stuart
Henderson
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 12:15 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: bind dhcpd to IP address
On 2021-06-10, Ralf Horstmann wrote:
> Hi Valdrin,
>
> that se
On 2021-06-10, Ralf Horstmann wrote:
> Hi Valdrin,
>
> that setup works fine. You would use "ip helper-address" on the Ciscos to
> forward the DHCP requests to your OpenBSD box. The forwarded requests use the
> specified helper address as unicast destination. No need to have the VLANs
> present on
Hi Valdrin,
that setup works fine. You would use "ip helper-address" on the Ciscos to
forward the DHCP requests to your OpenBSD box. The forwarded requests use the
specified helper address as unicast destination. No need to have the VLANs
present on your OpenBSD box.
I'm running dhcpd without -u
On 19/11/2018 12:30, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018-11-16, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> after upgrading one of my bind (cache resolver) machines to 6.4 (release)
>> I'm getting these errors quite often:
>>
>> Nov 16 15:55:14 server named[30616]: client: warning: client @0x6591da0244
On 2018-11-16, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after upgrading one of my bind (cache resolver) machines to 6.4 (release) I'm
> getting these errors quite often:
>
> Nov 16 15:55:14 server named[30616]: client: warning: client @0x6591da02440
> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx#39702 (a1928.d.akamai.net): erro
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 03:26:21AM +, Maurice McCarthy wrote:
> Have a look at the documentation installed with the port.
>
> $ pkg_info -L cmus
>
> will list all the files installed. There maybe something in
> /usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes
> Check the configuration files to see if you nee
On 2014-12-24 03:15, Maurice McCarthy wrote:
I don't use cmus but it is something to do with keybindings
https://github.com/cmus/cmus/blob/master/Doc/cmus.txt
Have a look at the documentation installed with the port.
$ pkg_info -L cmus
will list all the files installed. There maybe something
On 2014-12-24 02:49, Henrique Lengler wrote:
Hi,
When I try to run cmus in a normal user, I get
$ cmus
cmus: bind: Permission denied
I never heard about bind before, so I can't imagine a way to solve
this.
Can someone help me?
Regards,
I don't use cmus but it is something to do with keybi
Le mardi 20 mai 2014, 12:41:35 Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> Stéphane Guedon 22decembre.eu> writes:
> > I don't know if I am doing things ok, but the Bind9 port seems
> > broken (in a fresh 5.5 install).
> >
> > Thanks if someone fix it.
>
> Is there a particular reason you're not just using the
Stéphane Guedon 22decembre.eu> writes:
> I don't know if I am doing things ok, but the Bind9 port seems broken
> (in a fresh 5.5 install).
>
> Thanks if someone fix it.
Is there a particular reason you're not just using the packages provided?
I see no advantage to building it yourself.
# pkg_
Stéphane Guedon writes:
> Le lundi 19 mai 2014 14:59:54, vous avez écrit :
>> You provide zero details on what you are doing, how can someone know
>> what to fix without the minimum bits of information.
>
> I was aware of the thing, yet didn't know what to do since I have done
> really really few
Le lundi 19 mai 2014 14:59:54, vous avez écrit :
> You provide zero details on what you are doing, how can someone know
> what to fix without the minimum bits of information.
I was aware of the thing, yet didn't know what to do since I have done
really really few.
I just placed myself in /usr/por
Jeff Powell wrote:
> I've been tearing my hair out trying to get this to work. I'm running
> OpenBSD 5.3 x64 and I'm trying to build isc-bind from ports using the
> -with-gssapi in the Makefile (I want to have the -g option in nsupdate so
> I can use iscp-dhcp to register dynamic DNS updates aga
On 3/1/2011 8:20 AM, David Vasek wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Eric Kom wrote:
On 3/1/2011 7:31 AM, David Vasek wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Eric Kom wrote:
hi
please i'm a new on openbsd, someone can give me the name of bind dns
package?
base49.tgz
bind is provided by base49 package or named
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Eric Kom wrote:
On 3/1/2011 7:31 AM, David Vasek wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Eric Kom wrote:
hi
please i'm a new on openbsd, someone can give me the name of bind dns
package?
base49.tgz
bind is provided by base49 package or named package?
Well no, I meant it as a joke
On 3/1/2011 7:31 AM, David Vasek wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Eric Kom wrote:
hi
please i'm a new on openbsd, someone can give me the name of bind dns
package?
base49.tgz
bind is provided by base49 package or named package?
Really, reading the FAQ first will make your life easier.
http://ww
On 3/1/2011 7:26 AM, Vivien MOREAU wrote:
Tuesday 01 Mar 2011 ` 07:17 (-0800), Eric Kom a icrit :
please i'm a new on openbsd, someone can give me the name of bind
dns package?
Bind is part of the base system.
man 8 named
Thanks a lot, I was already lost.
Thanks to welcomes me in OpenBSD
Tuesday 01 Mar 2011 ` 07:17 (-0800), Eric Kom a icrit :
> please i'm a new on openbsd, someone can give me the name of bind
> dns package?
Bind is part of the base system.
man 8 named
--
Vivien
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Eric Furman wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:08 -0600, "Theo de Raadt"
> wrote:
> > The point is that you are a crybaby.
> >
>
> and he can't follow simple instructions.
>
Most interestingly, crybabies have an enormous understanding of
communication, in contrast
The problem here is not the list attitude, but your silly "That's right,
I've already done it, I know, I know" when somebody corrects you. That
makes developers angry.
Obviously something was wrong with your configs, and you think you know
what, but don't. And that's worse than knowing you don
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:08 -0600, "Theo de Raadt"
wrote:
> The point is that you are a crybaby.
>
and he can't follow simple instructions.
* Nice Daemon [2009-08-14 13:08]:
> The point was that Henning started insulting.
I didn't.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:55:03PM +0200, Nice Daemon wrote:
>
> The point was that Henning started insulting.
If you were truly upset you would have just gone away. Instead, you
chose to stay here and troll. You try to sound like a martyr but just
come off as an infant. Go cry somewhere else,
> I'm very sorry do disappoint you, but I'd have found it (on
> my own). But it's nice of you to underestimate other people,
> as it fits in your role model. I don't mind.
Then why didn't you? (find it on your own)
The developers seem to have a rather precise idea of their own
Competence and the
, August 14, 2009 6:17 AM
To: t...@servacorp.com
Cc: Claudio Jeker; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Bind ntpd on certain interface?
No.
The point is that you are stupid.
Pretending to be otherwise is extremely insulting to my intelligence.
Please stop insulting my intelligence.
You demonstrate being
t; -Original Message-
> > From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org]
> > On Behalf Of Nice Daemon
> > Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 5:55 AM
> > To: t...@servacorp.com.
> > Cc: Claudio Jeker; misc@openbsd.org
> > Subject: Re: Bind ntpd on certa
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Nice Daemon wrote:
> You are the kids that nobody wants to play with. That nobody wants to fall
> in love with, that will die alone. Unloved. But it would be so easy to
> change: Just say 'hi!' instead of 'what do you motherfucking prick want?!'.
> :)
>
Nice,
Wha
y, August 14, 2009 5:55 AM
> To: t...@servacorp.com.
> Cc: Claudio Jeker; misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: Bind ntpd on certain interface?
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Tony Aberenthy
> wrote:
>
> > Nice Daemon wrote:
> > > No, I'm certainly not stupid.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Nice Daemon [2009-08-14 08:48]:
> > Second, that coders (like you, Henning) feel like 'Gods', untouchable (I
> > never had any intention in this) and 'above all others', which leads to
> the
> > above mentioned tone or harsh atmosphere.
> The point is that you are a crybaby.
>
> Yeah, and you have the biggest and strongest and most beautiful dick on the
planet, and you spray tons of sperm on every female around. Ah, yeah, and
onto your nieces and nephews, as you told to fuck children.
OMG
The point is that you are a crybaby.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Tony Aberenthy wrote:
> Nice Daemon wrote:
> > No, I'm certainly not stupid.
>
> Invariably the mark of someone who IS stupid.
>
> Longer version.
> If I am not stupid then I can say something intelligent to make the point.
The point was that Henning started in
* Nice Daemon [2009-08-14 08:48]:
> Second, that coders (like you, Henning) feel like 'Gods', untouchable (I
> never had any intention in this) and 'above all others', which leads to the
> above mentioned tone or harsh atmosphere.
I could just have decided to not help you. You'd still be looking
Nice Daemon wrote:
> No, I'm certainly not stupid.
Invariably the mark of someone who IS stupid.
Longer version.
If I am not stupid then I can say something intelligent to make the point.
If the only thing I can come up with it to say I am not stupid, then that
implies at least a total lack of im
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Nice Daemon
> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > You probably rape children in your spare time,
> >
> >
> > This is obviously the point you enjoy to tell the world for the nth time
> > that you're totally insane.
> >
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:31:38 +0200, Nice Daemon wrote:
>
> >The OpenBSD mailing list is the only place I don't seem to be welcome.
> Some people are desperate for "market share"...
>
> What don't you understand about the oft expressed p
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Nice Daemon
> wrote:
> ...
> > No, I'm certainly not stupid. I'm just *re*acting (to remind you; in case
> > you are actually able to *read*, you should already know it). People
> > (Henning, Theo) started
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:31:38 +0200, Nice Daemon wrote:
>The OpenBSD mailing list is the only place I don't seem to be welcome.
Some people are desperate for "market share"...
What don't you understand about the oft expressed project aims of
having an operating system for its developers? The f
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Nice Daemon wrote:
> >
> > You probably rape children in your spare time,
>
>
> This is obviously the point you enjoy to tell the world for the nth time
> that you're totally insane.
>
> Why don't you tell people that they're reincarnations of Adolf Hitler?
Cong
> > No, I'm certainly not stupid. I'm just *re*acting (to remind you; in case
> > you are actually able to *read*, you should already know it). People
> > (Henning, Theo) started to bark at me when I asked for help. They didn't
> > provide any help, they just needed someone to throw their words at.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Nice Daemon wrote:
...
> No, I'm certainly not stupid. I'm just *re*acting (to remind you; in case
> you are actually able to *read*, you should already know it). People
> (Henning, Theo) started to bark at me when I asked for help. They didn't
> provide any help, t
> No, I'm certainly not stupid. I'm just *re*acting (to remind you; in case
> you are actually able to *read*, you should already know it). People
> (Henning, Theo) started to bark at me when I asked for help. They didn't
> provide any help, they just needed someone to throw their words at. Seems
>
> > > Can you please leave?
> > >
> >
> > Can you please force me?
> >
>
> Honestly are you really that stupid to not understand when your welcome?
No, I'm certainly not stupid. I'm just *re*acting (to remind you; in case
you are actually able to *read*, you should already know it). People
(Henni
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Can you please leave?
>
Can you please force me?
Can you please leave?
Hi Theo :D
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > First, the very harsh atmosphere that prevails on the mailing lists.
>
> You know, you have an option available to you regarding this.
>
I know. Thanks for this redundant hint. One word: ADHD.
>
> You could come to the concl
> First, the very harsh atmosphere that prevails on the mailing lists.
You know, you have an option available to you regarding this.
You could come to the conclusion that you are not entitled and
stop posting, and it will work out better in the long term.
I did not read anything more you said.
On 2009/08/14 08:20, Nice Daemon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > On 2009-08-13, Nice Daemon wrote:
> > > inet xx.yyy.253.225 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 (this is
> > > carp IP in upstream VLAN, AFTER your hint)
> >
> > that's defin
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Nice Daemon [2009-08-13 17:00]:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Henning Brauer >wrote:
> > > * Nice Daemon [2009-08-13 16:33]:
> > > > inet xx.yyy.253.225 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255
> (this is
> > > > carp IP
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009-08-13, Nice Daemon wrote:
> > inet xx.yyy.253.225 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 (this is
> > carp IP in upstream VLAN, AFTER your hint)
>
> that's definitely wrong, you ended up setting your broadcast address t
On 2009-08-13, Nice Daemon wrote:
> inet xx.yyy.253.225 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 (this is
> carp IP in upstream VLAN, AFTER your hint)
that's definitely wrong, you ended up setting your broadcast address to
255.255.255.255 instead of setting the netmask.
most likely you got b
* Nice Daemon [2009-08-13 17:00]:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > * Nice Daemon [2009-08-13 16:33]:
> > > inet xx.yyy.253.225 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 (this is
> > > carp IP in upstream VLAN, AFTER your hint)
> > it might be after my hint, but you
Hi Henning,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Nice Daemon [2009-08-13 16:33]:
> > inet xx.yyy.253.225 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 (this is
> > carp IP in upstream VLAN, AFTER your hint)
>
> it might be after my hint, but you didn't follow my advice.
I
* Nice Daemon [2009-08-13 16:33]:
> inet xx.yyy.253.225 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 (this is
> carp IP in upstream VLAN, AFTER your hint)
it might be after my hint, but you didn't follow my advice. you want
netmask 0x there. aka /32. aka 255.255.255.255.
--
Henning Brau
Hi Henning,
thanks, that fixed that issue.
However, I don't think that the routes/networks are messed up:
inet 10.10.0.3 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.10.0.255 (this is backend
server VLAN)
inet 10.20.30.11 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.20.30.255 (this is for
pfsync)
inet xx.yyy.254.231 netm
* Nice Daemon [2009-08-13 16:04]:
> Hi list,
>
> getting nearer to the point of deployment of a really nice relayd/pf/pfsync
> setup I came across an issue.
>
> I'd like to run ntpd to syncronize against ntp servers that are in our
> network.
>
> However, it only works on the machine with *acti
configure: error:
ar program not found. Please fix your PATH to include the directory in
which ar resides, or set AR in the environment with the full path to ar.
*** Error code 1
The likely solution is listed in the error message.
dark knight neo wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm trying compilin
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#AddFileSet
On 2009-08-03, dark knight neo wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I'm trying compiling the patch of bind .. and the following error occur:
>
> # patch -p0 < 007_bind.patch
> Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> ---
Read the error in your best pirate voice and you'll find the answer.
-B
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:21 PM, dark knight neo wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I'm trying compiling the patch of bind .. and the following error occur:
>
> # patch -p0 < 007_bind.patch
> Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The patch has dark night magic in it!oneONE!!!
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 06:21:43PM -0300, dark knight neo wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I'm trying compiling the patch of bind .. and the following error occur:
>
> # patch -p0 < 007_bind.patch
> Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Maurice Janssen wrote:
> I noticed that there's a patch for 4.4 , 4.5 and 4.6 on the FTP-servers,
but
> a checkout of the -stable tree still gives me the unpatched revision.
> Shouldn't this fix be in CVS with a OPENBSD_4_x tag?
Appears these commits were made a
Robert wrote:
Short followup:
Theo has commited an identical diff to -current.
Looking at the cvs tags for update.c rev 1.7,
this patch applies to 4.6, 4.5, 4.4 and 4.3.
I noticed that there's a patch for 4.4 , 4.5 and 4.6 on the FTP-servers,
but a checkout of the -stable tree still gives me
Short followup:
Theo has commited an identical diff to -current.
Looking at the cvs tags for update.c rev 1.7,
this patch applies to 4.6, 4.5, 4.4 and 4.3.
Because i was asked offlist before:
You can wait for the errata, apply the unofficial patch from my
previous mail or get the updated file fr
On Jul 28, 2009, at 8:40 PM, Robert wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:57:29 +0200
frantisek holop wrote:
morning,
https://www.isc.org/node/474
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/725188
-f
Hi,
it's late/early so the following comes without warranty.
Compiles, install and works for me on -current
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:57:29 +0200
frantisek holop wrote:
> morning,
>
> https://www.isc.org/node/474
> http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/725188
>
> -f
Hi,
it's late/early so the following comes without warranty.
Compiles, install and works for me on -current amd64/i386 both on master
and slave
On Jul 28, 2009, at 7:57 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
morning,
https://www.isc.org/node/474
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/725188
-f
--
if its stupid and it works - its not stupid
Works great vs. this snapshot:
OpenBSD 4.6-current (GENERIC) #46: Wed Jul 15 20:15:31 MDT 2009
dera...@spa
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 02:00:44AM -0700, sexyboy wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have applied the 004 and 005 patches and I still have a same problem.
> The named kick itself out, I can not see anything suspicious in a log file
> the only massage is when hit top command I can see this:
> PID USERNAME P
Hi All,
I have applied the 004 and 005 patches and I still have a same problem.
The named kick itself out, I can not see anything suspicious in a log file
the only massage is when hit top command I can see this:
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATEWAIT TIMECPU COMMAND
4670 named
Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 07:36:43AM +0200, Guido Tschakert wrote:
>> Stuart Henderson schrieb:
>> > On 2008-07-24, Mike Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Regarding the cache poisoning patch (which I see for 4.3). Are there
>> >> any effective workarounds for OpenBSD 4.0/
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 07:36:43AM +0200, Guido Tschakert wrote:
> Stuart Henderson schrieb:
> > On 2008-07-24, Mike Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Regarding the cache poisoning patch (which I see for 4.3). Are there
> >> any effective workarounds for OpenBSD 4.0/4.1?
> >
> > The 4.2 patch
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:22:15PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> The key is question is: do you see named processes in the state
> ip6_opt in top(1)? If so, patch 005 certainly will help, even if you
> are not actively using ipv6.
correction, that should be wait channel (column WAIT), not state.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 03:08:19PM -0400, Steven Surdock wrote:
> Steve,
>
> I saw this exact same behavior on a couple of servers with a 4.3-stable
> build from 7/28. Due to some differences in the way I built the -stable
> release I decided to try again from scratch. The 8/4 build of bsd +
>
Steve,
I saw this exact same behavior on a couple of servers with a 4.3-stable
build from 7/28. Due to some differences in the way I built the -stable
release I decided to try again from scratch. The 8/4 build of bsd +
base43.tgz have been working fine. This seems to support the suggestion
that
On Aug 11, 2008, at 8:34 AM, Steve Shockley wrote:
Is anyone having issues between patched BIND and running out of
file descriptors?
If you run a nameserver that has any kind of significant traffic at
all, I suggest you subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . There have been
many discussions on
On 8/11/08, Steve Shockley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is anyone having issues between patched BIND and running out of file
> descriptors? I saw the thread at
> http://marc.info/?m=121711077022388, but that's somewhat
> vague.
>
> The problem: I deployed two OpenBSD 4.3 BIND servers to replace a
o redirect with. Please
correct me if I'm wrong.
--- On Mon, 7/28/08, Parvinder Bhasin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Parvinder Bhasin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: BIND and CNAME-ing
> To: "Paul de Weerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMA
Thanks Paul!!!
Wow!!! is the only thing that comes to my mind. Didn't even know that
DNAME existed.
I will definately read up on it.
Thanks a bunch!
-Parvinder Bhasin
On Jul 25, 2008, at 12:14 AM, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:49:55PM -0700, Parvinder Bhasin wrote:
Thanks
> Just a simple question: is the OpenBSD patch for bind is the same
> solution as ISC ? Are they use the same RN ?
The patch release for older OpenBSD releases contains the same horrid
solution that ISC came up with, since it is 100% their code. Of
course, the bind included in all OpenBSD release
On 7/25/08, Amaury De Ganseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a simple question: is the OpenBSD patch for bind is the same
> solution as ISC ? Are they use the same RN ?
It's not identical to what you'll find on the ISC servers.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:49:55PM -0700, Parvinder Bhasin wrote:
> Thanks guys for clearing this up. So in short you cannot CNAME an entire
> domain (domain.com IN CNAME google.com < can't do ).
You should google for DNAME some time. Then form your own opinion on
the topic matter ;)
Stuart Henderson schrieb:
> On 2008-07-24, Mike Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Regarding the cache poisoning patch (which I see for 4.3). Are there
>> any effective workarounds for OpenBSD 4.0/4.1?
>
> The 4.2 patch should also work for 4.1
>
>
I can confirm that the 4.2 patch works with 4.
Thanks guys for clearing this up. So in short you cannot CNAME an
entire domain (domain.com IN CNAME google.com < can't do ).
Thanks for the input. Really appreciate it.
Cheers!
-Parvinder Bhasin
On Jul 24, 2008, at 6:10 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Almir Karic escreveu:
On W
Ah...perfect. Thanks Stuart and Aaron.
-Mike
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Aaron Stellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:48:45PM -0500, Mike Shaw wrote:
>> Regarding the cache poisoning patch (which I see for 4.3). Are there
>> any effective workarounds for OpenBSD
On 2008-07-24, Mike Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Regarding the cache poisoning patch (which I see for 4.3). Are there
> any effective workarounds for OpenBSD 4.0/4.1?
The 4.2 patch should also work for 4.1
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:48:45PM -0500, Mike Shaw wrote:
> Regarding the cache poisoning patch (which I see for 4.3). Are there
> any effective workarounds for OpenBSD 4.0/4.1?
>
> I have a couple older boxes I will be upgrading, but I'd like to CMA
> in the meantime.
>
> Thanks!
> -Mike
>
Pe
Almir Karic escreveu:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 01:17:04PM -0700, Parvinder Bhasin wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am stuck at this situation:
>>
>> Where I have a domain: abc.com :
>>
>> I would like to have user who type http://abc.com (without the www)
>> redirected to a a different site for exam
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 01:17:04PM -0700, Parvinder Bhasin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am stuck at this situation:
>
> Where I have a domain: abc.com :
>
> I would like to have user who type http://abc.com (without the www)
> redirected to a a different site for example : www.xyz.com
> Redirection for
Parvinder Bhasin wrote:
HTTP redirects don't apply to our setup.
From the info that I gather, I really can't do CNAME so I will just
write small script to accomodate changing of Ips.
May we the question wasn't so clear.
You refer to "Redirection" in the original question, now you say IP's
HTTP redirects don't apply to our setup.
From the info that I gather, I really can't do CNAME so I will just
write small script to accomodate changing of Ips.
-Parvinder Bhasin
On Jul 23, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Jussi Peltola wrote:
Short answer: use HTTP redirects.
Long answer: provide more inf
Parvinder Bhasin wrote:
Hi,
I am stuck at this situation:
Where I have a domain: abc.com :
I would like to have user who type http://abc.com (without the www)
redirected to a a different site for example : www.xyz.com
Redirection for www.abc.com to www.xyz.com works fine.
From memory, t
Short answer: use HTTP redirects.
Long answer: provide more information, and read about the HTTP Host:
header and think how it applies to your setup.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bind is no longer listening on udp 127.0.0.1.53.
Are you basing this conclusion on something other than the absence of
the word "LISTEN" on the UDP lines? (UDP sockets are stateless, so
netstat doesn't print anything out f
Hello,
As of netstat's output, there's something using port 53/udp.
Using 'lsof -i udp' (if 'lsof' is already installed) should
give more informations about the program using this port.
If it's "named", use 'dig +trace @127.0.0.1 www.google.com'
to see the responses (where the data are going/co
Siju George wrote:
Hi,
I was using the Internet and name resolution suddenly stopped.
When I checked I found out
=
$ netstat -an |grep 53
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1.953 *.*LISTEN
tcp0 0 59.93.35.248.53
ntract man.. Otherwise I would never worry about
it..
:)
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: Unix Fan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 12:48 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bind 4.9.2
Michael Spratt wrote:
> ...
> I obtained the list of po
Michael Spratt wrote:
> ...
> I obtained the list of pornographic sites from urlblacklist.com The DNS
> server will then respond to users who query port sites with an A record that
> points to a local web server that will serve them a "nono" page and log
> their ip.
>.
> ...because we ar
o: Michael Spratt
Subject: Re: Bind 4.9.2
Now, it's a bit more clear. :)
I've installed a chrooted bind server from scratch about 3 years ago and
it's no easy job.
My guess is you have everything under control right now, but I'd recommend
using Perl instead of plain C. It&#x
HI thanks for responding..
www.unixwiz.net/techtips/bind9-chroot.html
Gave me the instructions I needed to get going with the BIND install. I
believe OBSD 4.3 will have bind 9.4.2 in the base install however I couldn't
wait. I'm currently running OBSD 4.2 and now have bind 9.4.2 running on it
a
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:57:02AM -0700, Darren Spruell wrote:
> >
> >
> > But nothing gets logged to the file. I see entries in /var/log/daemon when
> > I
> > do a rndc querylog and I see entries in /var/log/messages.
>
> Doesn't seem to me that you're actually sending any log messages to
> th
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
