On 12/15/10 18:31, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Snoop wrote:
Already recompiled the kernel and the whole userland approximately three
weeks ago on the patch/stable branch. It didn't fix the issue.
No further kernel patches have been released since then
(the last is 004:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Snoop wrote:
> Already recompiled the kernel and the whole userland approximately three
> weeks ago on the patch/stable branch. It didn't fix the issue.
> No further kernel patches have been released since then
> (the last is 004: RELIABILITY FIX: November 17, 201
Thanks, I'll give it a try.
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 12:31 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Snoop wrote:
> > Already recompiled the kernel and the whole userland approximately three
> > weeks ago on the patch/stable branch. It didn't fix the issue.
> > No further kernel
Already recompiled the kernel and the whole userland approximately three
weeks ago on the patch/stable branch. It didn't fix the issue.
No further kernel patches have been released since then
(the last is 004: RELIABILITY FIX: November 17, 2010). :(
I hope a solution would come up soon, I really l
Perfect!
The answer is yes, it's also an NFS server, probably not for long but at
the present time yes.
Anyway, you're the second person that confirms the correct functionality
of the ral as an AP on the 4.8-CURRENT (the first that I found was
Stephen Biggs on Tue, 2010-11-30 at 03:33). I'm wonderi
Am 15.12.2010 12:38, schrieb Snoop:
> Hi everybody.
> Sorry to re-post this issue but nobody replied and I don't think me and S.
> Biggs are the only one experiencing this issue.
>
> I'm experiencing the same problem Stephen has (described below). I was
> looking for a solution on the
> web but
6 matches
Mail list logo
