Re: Updating Ports Question

On 1/5/2015 7:46 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2015-01-05, trondd wrote: On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:00 PM, John Merriam wrote: If I then do another /usr/ports/infrastructure/bin/out-of-date I still see this: Collecting installed packages: ok Collecting port versions: ok Collecting port sign

Re: Updating Ports Question

On 2015-01-05, trondd wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:00 PM, John Merriam wrote: > >> >> If I then do another /usr/ports/infrastructure/bin/out-of-date I still see >> this: >> >> Collecting installed packages: ok >> Collecting port versions: ok >> Collecting port signatures: ok >> Outdated port

Re: Updating Ports Question

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:00 PM, John Merriam wrote: > > If I then do another /usr/ports/infrastructure/bin/out-of-date I still see > this: > > Collecting installed packages: ok > Collecting port versions: ok > Collecting port signatures: ok > Outdated ports: > > devel/quirks # a

Updating Ports Question

Hello. I am running 5.6-stable amd64 and using the -stable ports. I must be doing something wrong when I am updating ports. I do: cd /usr/ports cvs -q up -rOPENBSD_5_6 -Pd infrastructure/bin/out-of-date and I see: Collecting installed packages: ok Collecting port versions: ok Collecting por

Re: general ports question

Ok, thanks for the help. Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network. From: Marc EspieSent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 6:24 PMTo: Richard ThorntonReply To: espie@nerim.netCc: OpenBSD general usage listSubject: Re: general ports question On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at

Re: general ports question

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:16:20PM -0400, Richard Thornton wrote: > So if one has a 5.3 release system running, but finds a desired package in > say 5.1, will pkg_add work on this, assuming I adjust the PKG_PATH to point > to a 5.1 package folder? Or will doing this cause other instabilities? The

general ports question

So if one has a 5.3 release system running, but finds a desired package in say 5.1, will pkg_add work on this, assuming I adjust the PKG_PATH to point to a 5.1 package folder? Or will doing this cause other instabilities? Thanks, Richard

Ports question, net/pidgin (Finch bug)

Hey misc readers, (I don't see general questions on ports@, is this the right list?) As an avid user of Pidgin I decided to look into the distributed console based client "Finch", after sifting through the man pages I managed to make the context menu work properly in xterm, but when I tried to use

Re: Ports Question

On Nov 27, 2007 9:56 PM, Manpreet Nehra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i am using the 4.2 release and that's why wondering if the ports tree > is a little outdated, since alot of stuff has changed over from > september 1 to Novemeber 1 when 4.2 actually released. Arent the > release base and ports i

Re: Ports Question

On 11/27/07, Manpreet Nehra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i am using the 4.2 release and that's why wondering if the ports tree > is a little outdated, since alot of stuff has changed over from > september 1 to Novemeber 1 when 4.2 actually released. Arent the > release base and ports in sync? it'

Re: Ports Question

--- Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/27/07, Manpreet Nehra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i am using the 4.2 release and that's why wondering if the ports > tree > > is a little outdated, since alot of stuff has changed over from > > september 1 to Novemeber 1 when 4.2 actually rele

Re: Ports Question

i am using the 4.2 release and that's why wondering if the ports tree is a little outdated, since alot of stuff has changed over from september 1 to Novemeber 1 when 4.2 actually released. Arent the release base and ports in sync? On Nov 27, 2007 7:59 PM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

Re: Ports Question

On 2007/11/27 08:53, Juan Miscaro wrote: > --- Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2007/11/27 08:08, Juan Miscaro wrote: > > > --- Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On 2007/11/27 13:55, Manpreet Nehra wrote: > > > > > I have been compiling the ports and so

Re: Ports Question

--- Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007/11/27 08:08, Juan Miscaro wrote: > > --- Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 2007/11/27 13:55, Manpreet Nehra wrote: > > > > I have been compiling the ports and some of the ports fail > flat. On > > > > checking the ft

Re: Ports Question

On 2007/11/27 08:08, Juan Miscaro wrote: > --- Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2007/11/27 13:55, Manpreet Nehra wrote: > > > I have been compiling the ports and some of the ports fail flat. On > > > checking the ftp.openbsd.org, I found the ports.tar.gz was created > > on > >

Re: Ports Question

--- Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007/11/27 13:55, Manpreet Nehra wrote: > > I have been compiling the ports and some of the ports fail flat. On > > checking the ftp.openbsd.org, I found the ports.tar.gz was created > on > > Sep 1. Will there be a newer ports file > > ftp> ls

Re: Ports Question

On 2007/11/27 13:55, Manpreet Nehra wrote: > I have been compiling the ports and some of the ports fail flat. On > checking the ftp.openbsd.org, I found the ports.tar.gz was created on > Sep 1. Will there be a newer ports file ftp> ls /pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/ports.tar.gz 227 Entering Passive Mode (

Re: Ports Question

On Nov 27, 2007 1:55 PM, Manpreet Nehra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been compiling the ports and some of the ports fail flat. On > checking the ftp.openbsd.org, I found the ports.tar.gz was created on > Sep 1. Will there be a newer ports file, since a lot ports dont > compile some because o

Ports Question

I have been compiling the ports and some of the ports fail flat. On checking the ftp.openbsd.org, I found the ports.tar.gz was created on Sep 1. Will there be a newer ports file, since a lot ports dont compile some because of missing files to be downloaded, Others just give error that kernel interf

Re: ports question

PKG_INFO(1)OpenBSD Reference Manual NAME pkg_info - a utility for displaying information on software packages [...] -D Show the install-message file (if any) for each package (depre- cated option). -M Show the install-message file (if any

Re: ports question

On 10/11/06, Matthew Weigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Bryan Irvine wrote: > Sometimes these get installed as a dependency of another app though > and so the screen just keeps right on trucking and you don't have time > to read it. Is there some command or somewhere you can go to see what > the

Re: ports question

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 03:28:08PM -0700, Bryan Irvine wrote: > Sometimes these get installed as a dependency of another app > though and so the screen just keeps right on trucking and you > don't have time to read it. Is there some command or somewhere > you can go to see what the message was?

Re: ports question

Bryan Irvine wrote: > Sometimes these get installed as a dependency of another app though > and so the screen just keeps right on trucking and you don't have time > to read it. Is there some command or somewhere you can go to see what > the message was? $ man pkg_info The argument you're lookin

ports question

Sometimes ports have helpful messages that tell you the proper way to start it from rc.local or some other set of instructions that shoudl be your next step etc... Sometimes these get installed as a dependency of another app though and so the screen just keeps right on trucking and you don't have

Re: Upgrading packages from ports question

Sorry, meant to send to list as well... On 5/24/06, Tobias Weisserth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi everybody, I'm getting familiar with ports at the moment since I restricted myself to using packages exclusively in the past. I have been skimming throught the FAQ and the manpages covering ports a

Upgrading packages from ports question

Hi everybody, I'm getting familiar with ports at the moment since I restricted myself to using packages exclusively in the past. I have been skimming throught the FAQ and the manpages covering ports and the possible make targets. I have also read the chapter covering ports in "Secure arch

Re: Upgrade + ports question

On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Keith Richardson wrote: > Hello, > > This is my first attempt at actually upgrading a system. Usually, it was > quicker to simply reinstall from scratch but now that is not the case. So... > > When I upgrade to from 3.7 -> 3.8, I know I have to update my ports as well. > Be

Upgrade + ports question

Hello, This is my first attempt at actually upgrading a system. Usually, it was quicker to simply reinstall from scratch but now that is not the case. So... When I upgrade to from 3.7 -> 3.8, I know I have to update my ports as well. Before I do any "Oh My God!" blunders, I would like to s

Re: Ports question

On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 03:12:33AM +0100, the unit calling itself Stuart Henderson wrote: > --On 29 September 2005 20:36 -0500, J Moore wrote: > > >Can someone tell me if and when the clamav in the -stable tree is > >going to have the security flaw patched? > > On Wednesday just gone. >

Re: Ports question

On 9/29/05, Chad M Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While not at all supported and could break things I have done in the > past > > > ## CLAMAV on OpenBSD > cd /usr > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs cvs get \ > -rHEAD -Pports/security/clamav > > then go make a package and assuming that works, install

Re: Ports question

While not at all supported and could break things I have done in the past ## CLAMAV on OpenBSD cd /usr [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs cvs get \ -rHEAD -Pports/security/clamav then go make a package and assuming that works, install it. YMMV and use at your own risk or demise. :) I did it this wee

Re: Ports question

--On 29 September 2005 20:36 -0500, J Moore wrote: Can someone tell me if and when the clamav in the -stable tree is going to have the security flaw patched? On Wednesday just gone.

Ports question

I know ports questions are not supposed to be posted to misc@, but I've been unable to get a response there, so ... I run 3.7 -stable. A significant security issue with clamav was announced a week or so ago. I checked, and found no patch was available, so I posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The maint

Re: Ports Question - Update

On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 05:03:34AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > I tried using "pkg_add -r unzip...". That didn't work, but I think the > reason is that both the new and the old had the same version number > (5.51). This is 3.7 behavior, newer pkg_add will update if something useful actually chang

Re: Ports Question - Update

On Tuesday 16 August 2005 03:41, Uwe Dippel wrote: > On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 21:22:15 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > > > So I attempted to pkg_delete unzip and then got the following: > > === > > /usr/ports}cd archivers/unzip > > /usr/ports/archivers/unzip}sudo pkg_delete unzip > > Password

Re: Ports Question - Update

* Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-16 10:53]: > On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 21:22:15 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > > > So I attempted to pkg_delete unzip and then got the following: > > === > > /usr/ports}cd archivers/unzip > > /usr/ports/archivers/unzip}sudo pkg_delete unzip > > Passwo

Re: Ports Question - Update

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 21:22:15 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > So I attempted to pkg_delete unzip and then got the following: > === > /usr/ports}cd archivers/unzip > /usr/ports/archivers/unzip}sudo pkg_delete unzip > Password: > Can't remove unzip without also removing: > xmms-1.2.10p0 kde

Ports Question - Update

I'm running release 3.7 and I've put the release src and ports trees in /usr. I've updated both trees using cvs. I remade unzip as per the instructions in ports.html. When I attempted to make install, I got an error message saying that unzip was already present (which it was). So I attempted to p

Re: Ports Question

On 8/14/05, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm running release 3.7 and I've put the release src and ports > trees in /usr. I've updated both trees using cvs. > > I remade unzip as per the instructions in ports.html. > When I attempted to make install, I got an error message > saying tha

Re: Ports Question

On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 01:51:02PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > I'm running release 3.7 and I've put the release src and ports > trees in /usr. I've updated both trees using cvs. > > I remade unzip as per the instructions in ports.html. > When I attempted to make install, I got an error message >

Re: Ports Question

On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 01:51:02PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > I'm running release 3.7 and I've put the release src and ports > trees in /usr. I've updated both trees using cvs. > > I remade unzip as per the instructions in ports.html. > When I attempted to make install, I got an error message >

Ports Question

I'm running release 3.7 and I've put the release src and ports trees in /usr. I've updated both trees using cvs. I remade unzip as per the instructions in ports.html. When I attempted to make install, I got an error message saying that unzip was already present (which it was). So I attempted to p