On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, J.C. Roberts wrote:
SNIP
> Speaking of day jobs, vendors, vaporware and stuff that goes *REALLY*
> fast, have you gotten to play with the 10G myrinet stuff yet?
>
> I'm still suffering from dehydration due to drooling at the
> announcements on their website.
>
> JCR
Not doin
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:21:22 -0600 (MDT), Diana Eichert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Daniel Polak wrote:
>SNIP
>> Bill,
>>
>> As it happens I have been e-mailing with SysKonnect about the SK-9S22
>> and a possible quad port card today!
>> They are thinking about a doing a qua
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 04:06:33PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> can sombody just GET one and stuff it in a machine? chances are good
> supporting them is as easy as adding the IDs to pcidevs.
I tried contacting syskonnect about an evaluation unit which they
mention on their site but the mail bo
* Jon Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-22 15:01]:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 03:19:48PM -0400, Brad wrote:
> > Note, there are cards that are supported that are not listed in the
> > man page. It's hard to have an exact list when there are so many cards
> > out there and sometimes even different re
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 03:19:48PM -0400, Brad wrote:
> Note, there are cards that are supported that are not listed in the
> man page. It's hard to have an exact list when there are so many cards
> out there and sometimes even different revisions with the same name
> and different chipsets. The ch
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:35:27 -0500
Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To be blunt, because when an enterprise just needs pure unfiltered
> inter-VLAN routing, Cisco has CEF products which can route between
> interfaces at bps and pps rates unapproachable using a general purpose
> Unix OS and COTS
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Brad wrote:
> > Brad, think you can get them to start producing the 10Gb card I've
> > been talking to them for almost 2 years about?
> >
> > diana
>
> It would be nice if they even sent us the hardware that was offered via you
> quite some time ago nevermind vaporware 10Gb
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:23:04PM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Brad wrote:
> SNIP
> > I do not have any SK-based cards using the newer Yukon-2 chips. If someone
> > could get me a card or two then it would provide incentive to support the
> > cards. SysKonnect stuff is much b
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Daniel Polak wrote:
SNIP
> Bill,
>
> As it happens I have been e-mailing with SysKonnect about the SK-9S22
> and a possible quad port card today!
> They are thinking about a doing a quad port card but need to be sure
> that there is enough interest.
> Anybody interested in a
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Brad wrote:
SNIP
> I do not have any SK-based cards using the newer Yukon-2 chips. If someone
> could get me a card or two then it would provide incentive to support the
> cards. SysKonnect stuff is much better than all the other Gig stuff out there.
Brad, hink you can get the
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 09:13:48PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-21 20:06]:
> > On 7/21/05, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > * Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-21 09:21]:
> > > > Alternately, if you really do need router throughput at or above
* Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-21 20:06]:
> On 7/21/05, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-21 09:21]:
> > > Alternately, if you really do need router throughput at or above 1000Mbps,
> > > you might want to consider a purpose-built gigabit route
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 09:05:13PM +0200, Daniel Polak wrote:
> Original message from Bill Chmura at 21-7-2005 20:02
>
> >All of the traffic pretty much will be passing over the router. I see
> >the wisdom of what you are saying with redesigning the network and I
> >will give it some thought
Original message from Bill Chmura at 21-7-2005 20:02
All of the traffic pretty much will be passing over the router. I see
the wisdom of what you are saying with redesigning the network and I
will give it some thought, but the majority of the resources are
located in one spot. I will mull
All of the traffic pretty much will be passing over the router. I see
the wisdom of what you are saying with redesigning the network and I
will give it some thought, but the majority of the resources are
located in one spot. I will mull that over though. As it stands, only
some students doing fi
On 7/21/05, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-21 09:21]:
> > Alternately, if you really do need router throughput at or above 1000Mbps,
> > you might want to consider a purpose-built gigabit router from Cisco :)
>
> why would you want to deal with suc
Hi,
...on Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:50:20AM -0400, Bill Chmura wrote:
> Ethernet wise, currently the whole mess is at 100MB... It will be that
> way at least for 12 months after this. As far as heavily used, I just
> got on the scene myself and the usage is way down. School, summers
> off.
For the sk(4) cards, if you buy the Linksys ones (only single seaters i
believe) you should make sure to get the rev.2 ones, as the rev.3 is realtek
based, you can tell on the retail box, it shows the little crab on the chip.
Happy hunting
- J
On 7/21/05, Bill Chmura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Bill Chmura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-21 18:12]:
> I too looked for the sk cards, but there is no Quad for them. I was
> hoping to reduce interrupts by using Quad cards...
wrong assumption.
quad card does as many ints as 4 one port cards with the same type of
chip.
> If I went with
> sever
After getting some much needed sleep I realized the key things I left
out of the last post.
Ethernet wise, currently the whole mess is at 100MB... It will be that
way at least for 12 months after this. As far as heavily used, I just
got on the scene myself and the usage is way down. School, s
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 01:37:52PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-21 09:21]:
> > Alternately, if you really do need router throughput at or above 1000Mbps,
> > you might want to consider a purpose-built gigabit router from Cisco :)
>
> why would you want to dea
* Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-21 09:21]:
> Alternately, if you really do need router throughput at or above 1000Mbps,
> you might want to consider a purpose-built gigabit router from Cisco :)
why would you want to deal with such crap? geez.
> > I was contemplating a
> > Quad gigabit card a
On 7/21/05, Bill Chmura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We finally got some money to build a router for the center of a 200-300
> user network. Upon arrival I found it to be one giant segment with old
> old switches (sort of - not real ones) and terrible sprawl.
>
> I need to build a router that wil
We finally got some money to build a router for the center of a 200-300
user network. Upon arrival I found it to be one giant segment with old
old switches (sort of - not real ones) and terrible sprawl.
I need to build a router that will handle 7 segments, 4 of which are
very heavily used, 3 of w
24 matches
Mail list logo