On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 09:05:13PM +0200, Daniel Polak wrote: > ==== Original message from Bill Chmura at 21-7-2005 20:02 > > >All of the traffic pretty much will be passing over the router. I see > >the wisdom of what you are saying with redesigning the network and I > >will give it some thought, but the majority of the resources are > >located in one spot. I will mull that over though. As it stands, only > >some students doing filesharing would not pass the router. > > > >I am liking the VLAN concept more and more for the less active > >segments. The whole thing has to fit into the budget. We have a few > >Cisco 3500XL switches that I think support VLAN, so I could task one of > >those to the job probably. > > > >After Henning pointed out to me with the SK cards I don't need to go > >the route of the quad, I am planning on the SK dual port cards. > >http://www.syskonnect.com/products/sk-9s22.htm - but when I searched it > >seems like the .2 revs are becoming hard to find and the .3 is > >unsupported. > > > Bill, > > As it happens I have been e-mailing with SysKonnect about the SK-9S22 > and a possible quad port card today! > They are thinking about a doing a quad port card but need to be sure > that there is enough interest. > Anybody interested in a quad port SysKonnect card please e-mail me and I > will pass on your e-mail address to SysKonnect so they can let you know > when the quad port card becomes available. > > According to the SK man page at > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=sk&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386&format=html > > the SK-9S22 is currently not supported by OpenBSD. > > Daniel
Note, there are cards that are supported that are not listed in the man page. It's hard to have an exact list when there are so many cards out there and sometimes even different revisions with the same name and different chipsets. The chipset revision is what really matters.
