Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2007-01-03 Thread Tom Cosgrove
(I'm posting this for the archives.) Thanks to a donation from Steven Fettig we have fixed the problem with using the keyboard at the boot> prompt. This is in CVS, and in the latest snapshots. The keyboard does work under OpenBSD (including the installer), as long as ACPI is used. The keyboard

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-12-05 Thread Theo de Raadt
>> Not working for me. I get this far: >> >> CD_ROM: 90 >> Loading /CDBOOT >> probing: pc0 com0 mem(699K 991M a20=on) >> disk: hd0+* cd0 >> boot> c >> >> and there it stays forever. I suspect the "c" following the boot prompt >> is left over from "hold c to boot from cd". The keyboard at this p

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-12-03 Thread Pierre Riteau
On 12/1/06, Marco S Hyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Not working for me. I get this far: CD_ROM: 90 Loading /CDBOOT probing: pc0 com0 mem(699K 991M a20=on) disk: hd0+* cd0 boot> c and there it stays forever. I suspect the "c" following the boot prompt is left over from "hold c to boot from cd

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-12-03 Thread MikeM
On 12/1/2006 at 9:51 AM Jason Dixon wrote: |You can pick up cheap VLAN-capable switches on eBay. I have a Dell |3024 at home which works fine and runs $100-150 used. I'd never use |these in an "enterprise" environment, but they're fine for home testing. = Quick comment: the Del

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-12-02 Thread Tasmanian Devil
> Hmm... sounds like I shouldn't update my source tree (it's still from > Nov. 12, 2006). I had no crashes at all here so far. Are you running stock Nov. 12, 2006 or that code plus patches? My kernel and kernel sources are from Nov. 12, 2006, there's no important kernel patch since that date

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-12-02 Thread Marco S Hyman
Miod Vallat writes: > > I've a config file that works, but I'm still tweaking it. When I'm > > finished I'll post it. The biggest issue is that option SMALL_KERNEL > > cant be used with the ACPI devices so, to make space, you have to > > remove many of the unused devices. I wound up removi

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-12-02 Thread Miod Vallat
> I've a config file that works, but I'm still tweaking it. When I'm > finished I'll post it. The biggest issue is that option SMALL_KERNEL > cant be used with the ACPI devices so, to make space, you have to > remove many of the unused devices. I wound up removing just about > everything that

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-12-02 Thread Marco S Hyman
"Tasmanian Devil" writes: > Hmm... sounds like I shouldn't update my source tree (it's still from > Nov. 12, 2006). I had no crashes at all here so far. Are you running stock Nov. 12, 2006 or that code plus patches? As for creating a bsd.rd that works with the mini... The easiest way to do tha

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-12-02 Thread Tasmanian Devil
No, building an ACPI enabled bsd.rd was quite easy. It took more tries to build a working bsd for the running system -- just adding ACPI and MP to the generic kernel does NOT work with -current code -- than it did to get a working bsd.rd. However, the system dies under load. Took be about 4 tr

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-12-02 Thread Marco S Hyman
"Tasmanian Devil" writes: > > Well, at least theoretically, one could just replace the install script > > by one that does whatever you want it to, without asking any questions. > > Maybe that's easier than building an ACPI enabled bsd.rd? No, building an ACPI enabled bsd.rd was quite easy.

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-12-02 Thread Tasmanian Devil
Any ideas? I'd really like to get OpenBSD up on this beasty. There could be another way to install OpenBSD if you can't make the USB keyboard work while installing, I saw that in this post: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=116432931720765&w=2 Well, at least theoretically, one co

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-12-01 Thread Tasmanian Devil
I'm not being so lucky :-( I'm sure you will not give up, it's worth it! :-) > Some recent CD: The 4.0 release CD and snapshots from Nov. 12, 2006 or > later should boot fine, a few snapshots between that didn't work. You > don't need a -current boot CD to install a -current (or snapshot) f

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-12-01 Thread Marco S Hyman
> Ah, yes, booting from CD. Maybe I was really a little bit lucky with > that because it worked quite well here right from the beginning. ;-) I'm not being so lucky :-( > Boot Camp: No, it's not required, it works fine with a usual > OpenBSD-only configured internal harddisk, at least with >

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-12-01 Thread Brian Keefer
On Dec 1, 2006, at 8:25 AM, J.C. Roberts wrote: On Thursday 30 November 2006 15:34, Tasmanian Devil wrote: Boot Camp: No, it's not required, it works fine with a usual OpenBSD-only configured internal harddisk, at least with Boot-ROM-Version MM11.0055.B05 and Boot-ROM-Version MM11.0055.B08. Of

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-12-01 Thread Tasmanian Devil
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-sparc&m=116483175532387&w=2 It may be possible to do something similar with the mini? Maybe, yes. Interesting! :-) At least Macs can do a netboot. Though you'd probably need an EFI guru to make that work... Bsically there might even be a more easy way to

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-12-01 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Thursday 30 November 2006 15:34, Tasmanian Devil wrote: > Boot Camp: No, it's not required, it works fine with a usual > OpenBSD-only configured internal harddisk, at least with > Boot-ROM-Version MM11.0055.B05 and Boot-ROM-Version MM11.0055.B08. Of > course you can only upgrade if you install a

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-12-01 Thread bofh
- Original message - You can pick up cheap VLAN-capable switches on eBay. I have a Dell ... Bleh - the last time I messed with them (2-3 years ago), they were crap. On 12/1/06, Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Dec 1, 2006, at 1:16 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, J

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-12-01 Thread Jason Dixon
On Dec 1, 2006, at 1:16 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Jason Dixon wrote: Yes, too bad it only includes 1 ethernet adapter. That's what VLANs are for. Just make sure your switch doesn't allow hopping. :) Ah yes ;-) Although, playing with the mini as a server looks more

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-11-30 Thread Tasmanian Devil
>> Yes, too bad it only includes 1 ethernet adapter. > > Um, no, there are two ethernet adapters included, the Marvell Yukon > and the wifi adapter: Since when is a wireless adapter an ethernet adapter? Ah yes, sorry. You're right! Tas.

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-11-30 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Jason Dixon wrote: Yes, too bad it only includes 1 ethernet adapter. That's what VLANs are for. Just make sure your switch doesn't allow hopping. :) Ah yes ;-) Although, playing with the mini as a server looks more like something I would do at home where I don't have

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-11-30 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Tasmanian Devil wrote: Yes, too bad it only includes 1 ethernet adapter. Um, no, there are two ethernet adapters included, the Marvell Yukon and the wifi adapter: Since when is a wireless adapter an ethernet adapter? -- Antoine

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-11-30 Thread Jason Dixon
On Nov 30, 2006, at 5:43 PM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Marco S Hyman wrote: Thank you. The goal is to have the mini replace my dying sparc64 as a web server. Small, low power draw, quiet: I like that. Yes, too bad it only includes 1 ethernet adapter. That's what VLANs

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-11-30 Thread Tasmanian Devil
> Thank you. The goal is to have the mini replace my dying sparc64 > as a web server. Small, low power draw, quiet: I like that. Yes, too bad it only includes 1 ethernet adapter. Um, no, there are two ethernet adapters included, the Marvell Yukon and the wifi adapter: $ dmesg | grep ath ath

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-11-30 Thread Tasmanian Devil
I don't have a bluetooth keyboard to play with. I can, however, make a bsd.rd that has ACPI it that's what it takes. Time to play some more. Yes, that should work if you can build the bsd.rd just like the bsd.mp with ACPI enabled, even configuring the network while installing should work the

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-11-30 Thread Marco S Hyman
> Some recent CD: The 4.0 release CD and snapshots from Nov. 12, 2006 or > later should boot fine, a few snapshots between that didn't work. You > don't need a -current boot CD to install a -current (or snapshot) file > set. The CD I tried was a home grown snapshot of -current from October Tha

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-11-30 Thread Tasmanian Devil
Stupid question number eleventy seven... is boot camp required? I tried booting a someone recent i386 CD by holding down the C key while powering on and got to the OpenBSD cd boot -- where the system seemed to hang. Guess: it needs a keyboard, doesn't recognize the USB keyboard, I need boot camp.

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-11-30 Thread Luca Losio
Your comment on its own is of little value since most of us are already aware of the pricing of the Mini, or we can easily find out if we aren't. Oh sorry for ruining your day with this...

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-11-30 Thread Tasmanian Devil
Yeah, I saw that one. Since the server won't live in my pocket it'll be something that I add to rc.local. Or earlier in the boot process, like in /etc/rc.securelevel. I was even a bit more adventurous, I've put this right after the mount commands and this lines: # pick up option configuration

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-11-30 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Marco S Hyman wrote: Thank you. The goal is to have the mini replace my dying sparc64 as a web server. Small, low power draw, quiet: I like that. Yes, too bad it only includes 1 ethernet adapter. -- Antoine

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-11-30 Thread Breen Ouellette
Luca Losio wrote: Thank you. The goal is to have the mini replace my dying sparc64 as a web server. Small, low power draw, quiet: I like that. Quite expensive also When you compare its price/performance versus something like a Soekris, it looks pretty good and is still a reasonably s

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-11-30 Thread Luca Losio
Thank you. The goal is to have the mini replace my dying sparc64 as a web server. Small, low power draw, quiet: I like that. Quite expensive also

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-11-30 Thread Tasmanian Devil
as a web server. If your server will not be near by, this post might also be interesting for you: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=116443142317676&w=2 :-) Tas.

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-11-30 Thread Marco S Hyman
> Yes, works really fine on my mini. :-) Last time I installed a Thank you. The goal is to have the mini replace my dying sparc64 as a web server. Small, low power draw, quiet: I like that. // marc

Re: Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-11-30 Thread Tasmanian Devil
What is the status of the Mac Mini? I saw some messages and patches regarding the mini flowing by a week or three ago but didn't own one at that time so wasn't paying attention. Are the patches in CVS? Yes, works really fine on my mini. :-) Last time I installed a snapshot (from Nov. 24, 2006

Mac Mini (intel) status

2006-11-30 Thread Marco S Hyman
What is the status of the Mac Mini? I saw some messages and patches regarding the mini flowing by a week or three ago but didn't own one at that time so wasn't paying attention. Are the patches in CVS? Thanks, // marc