edgarz wrote:
I got the IBM 326m and I have to say each day make me wonder why I got
the HP to start with.
RAID mode is working or no?
Last answer I got on that one was:
"To answer your question. Don't create any kind of logical volume
(RAID0/1), just use the physical disks. In short, IM (int
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Just my own feedback on this.
I have both the DL 145 & DL 145 G2. The first generation was much better
to the point that I look at alternative to the G2 version.
I got the IBM 326m and I have to say each day make me wonder why I got
the HP to start with.
RAID mode is w
On 2006/03/16 01:13, edgarz wrote:
> As i remember only server with Opteron from fujitsu was Primergy RX220,
> where did you found with WC (water cooling)? :)
Just (some of) the racks, not the servers. Anyway this is straying a
bit far from OpenBSD...probably better off-list.
As i remember only server with Opteron from fujitsu was Primergy RX220,
where did you found with WC (water cooling)? :)
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/03/15 15:19, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Just my own feedback on the DL 145 version. I do not have the DL 385, so
for that one, I have nothing to sa
On 2006/03/15 15:19, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Just my own feedback on the DL 145 version. I do not have the DL 385, so
> for that one, I have nothing to say!
DL385 is much better than the DL145 (if you don't need 1U).
Fujitsu-Siemens also have kit which looks good (they tend to use
ami RAID on th
If we look on DL 385, we see hot swap hard drives, since it's U2, we can
use more than 2 drives, integrated raid controlled with raid 5. :)
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Just my own feedback on this.
>
> I have both the DL 145 & DL 145 G2. The first generation was much
better to the point that I
Just my own feedback on this.
I have both the DL 145 & DL 145 G2. The first generation was much better
to the point that I look at alternative to the G2 version.
I got the IBM 326m and I have to say each day make me wonder why I got
the HP to start with.
So far the IBM beat the new G2 of HP
On 2006-03-14 23:36:15 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/03/14 22:50, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
> > On 3/14/06, edgarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NB the DL145 are neither hotswap nor simple-swap: you must open the case
> to gain access to the drives. On the + side, it does have IPMI and light
Here's my feedback on the DL385 on a recent 3.9 snapshot.
It's a ULTRA 320 SCSI/RAID version.
What works: everything but RAID management through bioctl, I hope
to find a way to at least retrieve RAID status.
The RAID array is super fast but I haven't tried anything but stress to
test the machine
My budget is limited, and that one box will be cheaper than a lot of
cheaper per unit boxes :)
There will not be any user mail acounts, it will function as
mail/spam/virus filter and then forward mails to pop3/imap server (which
runs on windows) :D Existing windows server is dual 2.4ghz xeon. No
On 2006/03/15 08:24, edgarz wrote:
> Maybe you can suggest optimal configuration for mail server?
> It will be used for spam/virus filtering (~4000 mail accounts), proxy
> server (~100 clients). I think it's enought with 1CPU DL 145 system, but
> local dealer gives 2nd CPU for free for DL 385 :)
Maybe you can suggest optimal configuration for mail server?
It will be used for spam/virus filtering (~4000 mail accounts), proxy
server (~100 clients). I think it's enought with 1CPU DL 145 system, but
local dealer gives 2nd CPU for free for DL 385 :)
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/03/14 2
On 2006/03/14 22:50, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
> On 3/14/06, edgarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I will be a very happy if those two servers (DL 145 and DL 385) will
> > work. Means hardware will detect and work without strange things, like a
> > slow hdd system, unusable raid or similar crap :)
On 3/14/06, edgarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will be a very happy if those two servers (DL 145 and DL 385) will
> work. Means hardware will detect and work without strange things, like a
> slow hdd system, unusable raid or similar crap :)
I would choose the SCSI version of DL145 G2, since SA
Ouu, sounds interesting. Sometimes it can be a very usefull thing :)
Can't wait for 3.9 anymore :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
edgarz wrote:
Looks good!
but what is that:
> "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 0 not configured
> "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 2 not configur
I will be a very happy if those two servers (DL 145 and DL 385) will
work. Means hardware will detect and work without strange things, like a
slow hdd system, unusable raid or similar crap :)
Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
On 3/14/06, edgarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks good!
but what is that:
edgarz wrote:
Looks good!
but what is that:
> "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 0 not configured
> "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 2 not configured
iLO (integrated Lights-Out) is an onboard mini-computer on a chip
which can control the machine's state, e.g. reboot it, s
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:43:30PM +0200, edgarz wrote:
> Looks good!
> but what is that:
> > "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 0 not configured
> > "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 2 not configured
> ?
>
It is a remote server management card, can be afaik on-board or
as a a
On 3/14/06, edgarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks good!
> but what is that:
> > "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 0 not configured
> > "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 2 not configured
That's just Integrated Lights Out stuff. You don't need that from OpenBSD.
And yes
Looks good!
but what is that:
> "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 0 not configured
> "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 2 not configured
?
Stuart Henderson wrote:
DL385: sorry it's only from bsd.rd, but here's a dmesg. NICs and disks
are seen. Haven't tested performance unde
DL385: sorry it's only from bsd.rd, but here's a dmesg. NICs and disks
are seen. Haven't tested performance under OpenBSD. BBU for the RAID
card has a cable that seems exceptionally short until you realise it's
been wrapped around (hey, don't laugh, took me half an hour to spot
that!).
OpenBSD 3.9
edgarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So SCSI/RAID is working or no? :)
All i know, the fix is in 3.9 :)
So SCSI/RAID is working or no? :)
Martin Reindl wrote:
"Andrew Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
According to this url ->
http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html,
SCSI/RAID does not work.
They should test again, the PR was fixed and closed.
"Andrew Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to this url ->
> http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html,
> SCSI/RAID does not work.
They should test again, the PR was fixed and closed.
On 2006/03/14 15:50, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/03/14 17:36, edgarz wrote:
> > Hello, one our customer is interested in that HP server.
> > It will run OpenBSD.
ahhh sorry - I am confused between DL385 and DL145. (I am sitting next
to one of each at the moment and the noise is burrowing int
According to this url ->
http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html,
SCSI/RAID does not work.
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:50:49 +, "Stuart Henderson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 2006/03/14 17:36, edgarz wrote:
> > Hello, one our customer is interested in that HP
On 2006/03/14 17:36, edgarz wrote:
> Hello, one our customer is interested in that HP server.
> It will run OpenBSD.
SATA version will run, but OpenBSD does not get on well with the disk
controller: disk throughput is really *really* bad.
SCSI version, not sure, the host adapter used to hide behi
Hello, one our customer is interested in that HP server.
It will run OpenBSD. I want to ask about NIC:
Dual HP NC7781 PCI-X Gigabit server adapters (embedded)
So looks like it's not supported by OpenBSD, didn't fint on hw page :/
Forget question :)
Any cahnces to get it working?
Edgars.
Hello, one our customer is interested in that HP server.
It will run OpenBSD. I want to ask about NIC:
Dual HP NC7781 PCI-X Gigabit server adapters (embedded)
So looks like it's not supported by OpenBSD, didn't fint on hw page :/
Edgars.
29 matches
Mail list logo
