Claudio Jeker writes:
> Don't forget to increase the UDP recvbuffer space. The default is somewhat
> small and will result in drops. At least you should invest some time to
> play with that value and see if it helps.
I played with the net.inet.udp.recvspace sysctl option today. The
maximum allow
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:50:52PM +0300, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> Stuart Henderson writes:
>
> > On 2013-04-19, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> >> root@dmeg-dns1 ~ # /usr/local/sbin/named -V BIND 9.9.2-P2 built with
> >> --enable-shared' '--enable-threads'
> >
> > You could try rebuilding the port
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2013-04-19, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
>> root@dmeg-dns1 ~ # /usr/local/sbin/named -V BIND 9.9.2-P2 built with
>> --enable-shared' '--enable-threads'
>
> You could try rebuilding the port without --enable-threads and see if it's
> any different.
>
I rebuilt the port
I've never used BIND in this sort of instance, so I can't speak to that. I
can say, however, I've run reasonably "large" authoritative anycast DNS
setups with NSD and OpenBSD. two north american sites, 10Kqps average, with
one notable 80K spike.
the whole system ran practically untouched (minor BG
On 2013-04-19, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> root@dmeg-dns1 ~ # /usr/local/sbin/named -V
> BIND 9.9.2-P2 built with
> '--enable-shared' '--enable-threads'
You could try rebuilding the port without --enable-threads and see if i
Well,
I actually told you to "Give up" in my first mail :)
So do it.
In your env. in is(probably) better to run Linux. Do it.
I just tell you MINE point of view. If your don't want to hear it - I'll shut
up.
P.S.
std. answer to ANY on this list - You ever contribute with code or you wait for
y
mxb writes:
> From mine point of view, OpenBSD is a stable OS (even some aged snapshots).
> I don't put any "performance pressure" on it. I just want services to
> be STABLE.
I really can't speak for the developers, but achieving less that 1/4 of
the performance of Linux for DNS and mainly, ach
>From mine point of view, OpenBSD is a stable OS (even some aged snapshots).
I don't put any "performance pressure" on it. I just want services to be STABLE.
If I want STABLE, I replace Linux or any other with OpenBSD.
//mxb
On 19 apr 2013, at 20:22, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> mxb writes:
>
>
mxb writes:
> Give up.
>
> For the record.
> I had BIND on Ubuntu 12.04 on Dell R610. It constantly segfaulted for yet
> unknown reason (lazy to debug).
> This machine was overloaded with resources.
>
> However, not much of load as yours, but I'v tired of this and put all zones
> to R620 with O
Kostas Zorbadelos writes:
Here is the missing dmesg:
OpenBSD 5.3-current (GENERIC.MP) #40: Tue Mar 26 10:25:59 MDT 2013
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 17082220544 (16290MB)
avail mem = 16619790336 (15849MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0:
Give up.
For the record.
I had BIND on Ubuntu 12.04 on Dell R610. It constantly segfaulted for yet
unknown reason (lazy to debug).
This machine was overloaded with resources.
However, not much of load as yours, but I'v tired of this and put all zones to
R620 with OpenBSD 5.3.
So far not a soun
Hello all,
quite a few months ago I had evaluated OpenBSD for a large scale anycast
DNS resolving setup:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=133828399728289&w=2
The findings at the time (using VMs in a lab environment) was that
OpenBSD failed to meet my performance requirements and the main
suspi
12 matches
Mail list logo
