Well, I actually told you to "Give up" in my first mail :) So do it.
In your env. in is(probably) better to run Linux. Do it. I just tell you MINE point of view. If your don't want to hear it - I'll shut up. P.S. std. answer to ANY on this list - You ever contribute with code or you wait for your turn (or you solve it other way by yourself). "If you want it right - you have to do it yourself". P.S.S. No offense. It's just how it works in real world - you DO it yourself or you don't. //mxb On 19 apr 2013, at 21:57, Kostas Zorbadelos <kzo...@otenet.gr> wrote: > mxb <m...@alumni.chalmers.se> writes: > >> From mine point of view, OpenBSD is a stable OS (even some aged snapshots). >> I don't put any "performance pressure" on it. I just want services to >> be STABLE. > > I really can't speak for the developers, but achieving less that 1/4 of > the performance of Linux for DNS and mainly, achieving LESS with thread > support than before threads sound like an issue to me. > > Perhaps it is just the beginning of a lot of work than lies ahead after > the thread introduction. > >> If I want STABLE, I replace Linux or any other with OpenBSD. >> > > I don't see why stable and decently performant should be contradictory. > > Regards > >> //mxb > > -- > Kostas Zorbadelos > twitter:@kzorbadelos http://gr.linkedin.com/in/kzorba > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > () www.asciiribbon.org - against HTML e-mail & proprietary attachments > /\
