>From mine point of view, OpenBSD is a stable OS (even some aged snapshots). I don't put any "performance pressure" on it. I just want services to be STABLE. If I want STABLE, I replace Linux or any other with OpenBSD.
//mxb On 19 apr 2013, at 20:22, Kostas Zorbadelos <kzo...@otenet.gr> wrote: > mxb <m...@alumni.chalmers.se> writes: > >> Give up. >> >> For the record. >> I had BIND on Ubuntu 12.04 on Dell R610. It constantly segfaulted for yet >> unknown reason (lazy to debug). >> This machine was overloaded with resources. >> >> However, not much of load as yours, but I'v tired of this and put all zones >> to R620 with OpenBSD 5.3. >> >> So far not a sound of any slow queries because of segfaulted BIND-slave. >> > > Never had an issue with custom compiled latest BIND version on CentOS 5 > or 6. > Although I proceed with my project on CentOS Linux, I want to keep an > eye to OpenBSD developments. I guess all the threading work is happening > to give a performance boost and not the other way round, correct? > Either way I am willing to test. > > -- > Kostas Zorbadelos > twitter:@kzorbadelos http://gr.linkedin.com/in/kzorba > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > () www.asciiribbon.org - against HTML e-mail & proprietary attachments > /\
