On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 2:09 AM Philip Guenther wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 3:56 PM Anders Andersson wrote:
> > I'm trying to move my screen+irssi (irc client) setup from a linux
> > machine to OpenBSD 7.6 but I found that screen has a slightly
> > different
x I used
screen in much the way you described, and I always had the following in
my ~/.screenrc:
term screen-256color
Also be aware that depending on how you are invoking the detached screen
process that the environment may be setup by a different script
(.profile versus .bashrc) or not at al
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 3:56 PM Anders Andersson wrote:
> I'm trying to move my screen+irssi (irc client) setup from a linux
> machine to OpenBSD 7.6 but I found that screen has a slightly
> different behaviour that I can't debug further. I know I should switch
> to tmux
I'm trying to move my screen+irssi (irc client) setup from a linux
machine to OpenBSD 7.6 but I found that screen has a slightly
different behaviour that I can't debug further. I know I should switch
to tmux one of these days, but old habits die hard. I want to see if I
can fix this f
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2024-10-31, Divan Santana wrote:
>>>> How can one get both entries to work?
>>>
>>> By having them on different filesystems. You can't have diferent options
>>> on different directories exported from the s
On 2024-10-31, Divan Santana wrote:
>>> How can one get both entries to work?
>>
>> By having them on different filesystems. You can't have diferent options
>> on different directories exported from the same filesystem.
>>
>> See "BUGS" in e
>> How can one get both entries to work?
>
> By having them on different filesystems. You can't have diferent options
> on different directories exported from the same filesystem.
>
> See "BUGS" in exports(5).
Thanks Stuart for pointing that out. I did read
t; as the first
> entry seems to take precedence over the latter.
>
> If I swap the two entries, then I can write to /data/media from client
> uid 67:67 as 1000:1000. However then the second entry breaks.
>
> How can one get both entries to work?
By having them on different filesystems. You can't have diferent options
on different directories exported from the same filesystem.
See "BUGS" in exports(5).
--
Please keep replies on the mailing list.
Divan Santana writes:
>>> I would expert my NFS client uid 67 to be mapped to the remote NFS
>>> server and presented as 1000 therefore permission should be granted to
>>> write?
>>
>> Did you forget to send SIGHUP to mountd(8) to make it re-read
>> exports(5)?
>
> I did do a reload of mountd. I
>> I would expert my NFS client uid 67 to be mapped to the remote NFS
>> server and presented as 1000 therefore permission should be granted to
>> write?
>
> Did you forget to send SIGHUP to mountd(8) to make it re-read
> exports(5)?
I did do a reload of mountd. I also rebooted.
It seems this is
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024, at 00:51, Dan wrote:
> Two simple stuff:
>
> 1. Did you create the mx record among your dns records?
No, but I don't think there's any need, it works under rtable 0 and
should have access to the same DNS resolution if it remains in rdomain
0? So if I can shorten the steps:
1.
Two simple stuff:
1. Did you create the mx record among your dns records?
2. DigitalOcean has qualified support engineers to ask for anything technical
regarding your vps, including networking.
One curiousity:
- You got the passtime to install successfully OpenBSD on DigitalOcean? Let us
know a
Hello all,
So one thing I'm having issues to wrap my head around are rtables/domains... I
have a VPS on Digital Ocean and they have a set up with a public IP address + a
"floating" one which is accessed through another IP address on the same
interface. Eg.
vio0: flags
inet $publicIP
inet
Divan Santana:
> I would expert my NFS client uid 67 to be mapped to the remote NFS
> server and presented as 1000 therefore permission should be granted to
> write?
Did you forget to send SIGHUP to mountd(8) to make it re-read
exports(5)?
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber
Greetings :)
NFS server (openbsd) with /data/media and files are 1000:1000 uid:gid.
NFS client (openbsd) I want to mount the above files to
/var/www/nextcloud/data as 67:67 uid:gid.
I have attempted this on NFS server:
/etc/exports:
/data/media -mapall=1000:1000 -alldirs -network=192.168.1.10
On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 09:43:27 +0200, tomas.ri...@tutanota.com wrote:
> Hello, I am studying OpenBSD and I am currently working on file mods and the
> chmod(1) command. In that context, I have come across a behavior that I don't
> understand. My test directory contains two files: ll.out and power.
ple.
> > > The file size is information about the files themselves; to read it, you
> > > need to be in the directory. But as you can't, it's unreadable.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Denis
> > >
> >
> > It's a bit more complica
't, it's unreadable.
> >
> > --
> > Denis
> >
>
> It's a bit more complicated than that AFAICT. Although I can reproduce
> this inside /tmp, the behaviour is not consistent. If I try to ls the
> folder on a different shell -- e.g. a diffe
can reproduce
this inside /tmp, the behaviour is not consistent. If I try to ls the
folder on a different shell -- e.g. a different terminal, or after
exiting script(1) -- the files aren't shown. Also, if I rm -rf the
folder and recreate it (i.e. reuse the name) the files also aren't shown
the second time around.
--
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 09:43:27AM +0200, tomas.ri...@tutanota.com wrote:
> I would expect that without the 'x' bit, the directory is not searchable
> and I won't be able to list its contents. But in fact I can, unless I
> use a long format (-l, -g or -n).
>
> Can someone please explain the above b
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 09:43:27AM +0200, tomas.ri...@tutanota.com wrote:
> Hello, I am studying OpenBSD and I am currently working on file mods and the
> chmod(1) command. In that context, I have come across a behavior that I don't
> understand. My test directory contains two files: ll.out and p
Hello, I am studying OpenBSD and I am currently working on file mods and the
chmod(1) command. In that context, I have come across a behavior that I don't
understand. My test directory contains two files: ll.out and power.exe.
$ chmod 600 my-test-dir
$ ls -ld my-test-dir/
drw--- 2 user us
tton is held (say, moving the camera while
the rifle aim/sight is activated). To counteract it, I further emulate
the middle mouse button by simultaneously pressing the left and right
buttons; but that is a botch.
How can I configure each mouse separately?
Maybe I should make wscons list each mous
Thanks!
So much to learn ... so many printed pages with notes.
I'll get there.
On 9/2/24 06:15, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 05:09:14PM -0400, David Colburn wrote:
3. That's the addresses where the server daemon will listen to for
connections from clients. It has to b
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 05:09:14PM -0400, David Colburn wrote:
>> > >
>> > > 3. That's the addresses where the server daemon will listen to for
>> > > connections from clients. It has to be the address of one of the
>> > > machine's interfaces. See previous messages on the thread, to d
On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 05:09:14PM -0400, David Colburn wrote:
> /I don't know if this is the correct way to fork this specific question from
> /
>
> /the prior thread but thought it might be of interest to others./
>
> *WAS*: MariaDB install any different for OpenBSD
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 08:14:36PM -0400, David Colburn wrote:
>
> > > > > > chrooted daemons and MariaDB socket
> > > > > > ===
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For external program running under a chroot(8) to be
> > > > > > able to access the
> > > > > > MariaDB server w
chrooted daemons and MariaDB socket
===
For external program running under a chroot(8) to be able to
access the
MariaDB server without using a network connection, the socket must be
placed inside the chroot.
e.g. httpd(8) or nginx(8): connecting to MariaDB fr
On 8/26/24 04:41, Zé Loff wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 08:10:52PM -0400, David Colburn wrote:
On 8/25/24 17:55, Zé Loff wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 02:49:03PM -0400, David Colburn wrote:
After a cursory reading, it looks OK. But don't forget to read the
supplied documentation, after in
Hi,
On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 20:10:52 -0400
David Colburn wrote:
> On 8/25/24 17:55, Zé Loff wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 02:49:03PM -0400, David Colburn wrote:
> >>> After a cursory reading, it looks OK. But don't forget to read the
> >>> supplied documentation, after installing the package
On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 08:10:52PM -0400, David Colburn wrote:
> On 8/25/24 17:55, Zé Loff wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 02:49:03PM -0400, David Colburn wrote:
> > > > After a cursory reading, it looks OK. But don't forget to read the
> > > > supplied documentation, after installing the packa
On 8/25/24 17:55, Zé Loff wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 02:49:03PM -0400, David Colburn wrote:
After a cursory reading, it looks OK. But don't forget to read the
supplied documentation, after installing the package:
less /usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes/mariadb-server
Also, most of tho
On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 02:49:03PM -0400, David Colburn wrote:
> > After a cursory reading, it looks OK. But don't forget to read the
> > supplied documentation, after installing the package:
> >
> > less /usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes/mariadb-server
> >
> > Also, most of those steps do
After a cursory reading, it looks OK. But don't forget to read the
supplied documentation, after installing the package:
less /usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes/mariadb-server
Also, most of those steps don't have to do with mariadb, but with simple
system administration. Installing the pack
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 07:21:57PM -0400, David Colburn wrote:
> I found these instructions to install MariaDB Servers in OpenBSD.
>
> (They're for OpenBSD v6.4.)
>
> Any changes for 7.5, please, or should I just 'send it'?
>
> (From the 'It's better to ask than to be told 'If only you'd asked.'
I found these instructions to install MariaDB Servers in OpenBSD.
(They're for OpenBSD v6.4.)
Any changes for 7.5, please, or should I just 'send it'?
(From the 'It's better to ask than to be told 'If only you'd asked.'',
file.)
Thanks, in advance ...
*``` OpenBSD install MariaDB database s
Correction:
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4500U CPU @ 1.80GHz, 06-45-01,
patch 0026 (year 2014)
Dan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In my OpenBSD 7.5 stable temperature incrises timtotime remaining on
> 64-65°C; an old quad cores I5 cpu.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -dan
Hello,
In my OpenBSD 7.5 stable temperature incrises timtotime remaining on 64-65°C;
an old quad cores I5 cpu.
Thanks,
-dan
On Sun, 07 Apr 2024 12:02:05 +0200,
Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> softraid doesn't allow creating a 'degraded mirror' i.e. a single drive
> that you can later add another drive to make a RAID1. You would need at
> least one spare drive to do what you want.
>
Thanks, that is a kind of inside which
On 2024-04-06, Kirill A Korinsky wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Apr 2024 23:14:39 +0200,
> Peter Hessler wrote:
>>
>> RAID0 is called that because zero is what you'll recover if you lose a
>> disk. This is amazingly dangerous, and you're going to have a bad time.
>>
>> Do a backup, then restore from back
On Sat, 06 Apr 2024 23:14:39 +0200,
Peter Hessler wrote:
>
> RAID0 is called that because zero is what you'll recover if you lose a
> disk. This is amazingly dangerous, and you're going to have a bad time.
>
> Do a backup, then restore from backup.
>
I was totally misslead. I mean that I have
Kirill A. Korinsky writes:
> Folks,
>
> I'm looking for a way to migrate to different layout some OpenBSD systems.
>
> So, questions:
> 1. Has anyone done something like this before?
> 2. Do you have any instruction or that to expect?
Yes. What to expect? There is a ver
ng for a way to migrate to different layout some OpenBSD systems.
:
:All of them has RAID0 and as far as I think I may something like this:
:
:1. Remove second disk from RAID.
:2. Build a new RAID0 on the second disk.
:3. Make desires layout on the second RAID.
:4. dump | restore
:5. Boot from the
Folks,
I'm looking for a way to migrate to different layout some OpenBSD systems.
All of them has RAID0 and as far as I think I may something like this:
1. Remove second disk from RAID.
2. Build a new RAID0 on the second disk.
3. Make desires layout on the second RAID.
4. dump | restore
5.
Indeed, that is why I always added
0.0.0.0/0
Sorry for not mentioning it. On Tuesday, January 30, 2024 at 08:56:19 p.m.
GMT+9, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2024-01-07, All wrote:
> This is very much doable with DHCP one liner:
> add the following to your dhcpd.conf ((!) inside the bloc
On 2024-01-07, All wrote:
> This is very much doable with DHCP one liner:
> add the following to your dhcpd.conf ((!) inside the block of your
> 192.168.2.0/24 network)
> option classless-static-routes 192.168.3.0/24 192.168.2.1;
>
> This will install static route into all machines in 192.168.2.0
Dear colleagues,
A printer doesn't need internet access, and that is why I can block
the internet access. The printer on the white network a label printer
that just works. The other printer is a laser printer connected by USB
to an Ubuntu computer on the white network, because that was easier than
mbers confuses
me quickly.)
So you have a trusted network, an untrusted network, and of course,
the Internet, which we will just call "The Evil".
While you can do it with a bridge, I don't want to think that
hard. And it would be a lot of work.
[snip bridge stuff]
> I als
that
hard. And it would be a lot of work.
[snip bridge stuff]
I also tried setting different subnets.
yeah. that's the way I'd go.
trusted:
/etc/hostname.igc1:>inet 192.168.2.1/24
untrusted:
/etc/hostname.igc2:
inet 192.168.3.1/24
With this everything works as
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024, at 2:09 PM, Ibsen S Ripsbusker wrote:
> I also tried setting different subnets.
>
> /etc/hostname.igc1:
> inet 192.168.2.1/24
>
> /etc/hostname.igc2:
> inet 192.168.3.1/24
This is what I have done, with a pf rule to block connections originating
ables.)
The bridge worked exactly like I expected except that it seemed
tags weren't applied, based on what I saw in pfctl and tcpdump.
Since the tags weren't applied, I couldn't restrict
the communication as I wanted.
I also tried setting different subnets.
/etc/hostname.igc1:
Below comes the solution to this problem. For the explanations on why it works,
you may refer to the original answer [1].
# sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
# cat /etc/pf.conf
...
pass in on re0 proto tcp from any to (re0) port 1080 rdr-to 10.64.0.1 tag nat
pass out on wg0 proto tcp nat-to (w
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> There is a complication in Kaya's case because if my handle on the
> config is correct, there are likely to be nameservers learned from
> both DHCP (in one rdomain) and PPPOE (in another), but they won't
> work on the opposite connection.
>
> In this situation I would d
ppy? You can consider
it like a "configuration file, for the 0.001% of users who want it
to act different".
On 2023/04/12 13:20, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > On 2023-04-11, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > Kaya Saman wrote:
> > >
> > >> This somehow is overriding my resolv.conf file; another words the
> > >> information is *not* being used from resolv.conf and is instead being
> > >
On 4/12/23 20:20, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2023-04-11, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Kaya Saman wrote:
This somehow is overriding my resolv.conf file; another words the
information is *not* being used from resolv.conf and is instead being
used from the ipcp negotiation as
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023-04-11, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Kaya Saman wrote:
> >
> >> This somehow is overriding my resolv.conf file; another words the
> >> information is *not* being used from resolv.conf and is instead being
> >> used from the ipcp negotiation as part of the pppoe kern
On 2023-04-11, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>> This somehow is overriding my resolv.conf file; another words the
>> information is *not* being used from resolv.conf and is instead being
>> used from the ipcp negotiation as part of the pppoe kernel module.
>
> then the pppoe code sho
Kaya Saman wrote:
> This somehow is overriding my resolv.conf file; another words the
> information is *not* being used from resolv.conf and is instead being
> used from the ipcp negotiation as part of the pppoe kernel module.
then the pppoe code should submit a RTM_PROPOSAL route message ...
n take off the immutable flag too.
I take this time to wish you all an Happy Easter and obviously
lots of compliments for the 54th release of the ball fish system!
Do you mean setting resolv.conf as ReadOnly?
immutable is different, see chflags(1) schg. Used to be popular with
FreeBSD users to make
Please investigate also
>> when you can take off the immutable flag too.
>>
>> I take this time to wish you all an Happy Easter and obviously
>> lots of compliments for the 54th release of the ball fish system!
>>
>
> Do you mean setting resolv.conf as ReadOnly?
i
On 4/10/23 16:24, Daniele B. wrote:
Apr 10, 2023 12:52:22 Kaya Saman :
how do I override OpenBSD's
behavior to explicitly not use the dns servers obtained through ipcp but
instead use the ones form the resolv.conf file?
My solution both for security reasons (I'm using unbound)
for for practi
Apr 10, 2023 12:52:22 Kaya Saman :
>>> how do I override OpenBSD's
>>> behavior to explicitly not use the dns servers obtained through ipcp but
>>> instead use the ones form the resolv.conf file?
My solution both for security reasons (I'm using unbound)
for for practical reasons (as per your conc
On an OpenBSD 7.2 system, I have access to a SOCKS proxy server
through VPN. After the VPN connection is established, any program that
supports SOCKS proxy can reach it by setting the relevant local VPN
address, 10.64.0.1, and the usual port number 1080.
I want to share the access to this proxy se
On 4/10/23 11:40, Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:26:22AM +0100, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi,
I'll ask the second question first as it might be easier to implement...
Currently I have found that the dns servers specified in the resolv.conf
file are not being used. Instead my machi
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:26:22AM +0100, Kaya Saman wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'll ask the second question first as it might be easier to implement...
>
>
> Currently I have found that the dns servers specified in the resolv.conf
> file are not being used. Instead my machine is prioritizing the ISP o
Hi,
I'll ask the second question first as it might be easier to implement...
Currently I have found that the dns servers specified in the resolv.conf
file are not being used. Instead my machine is prioritizing the ISP
obtained servers from the ipcp protocol through the kernel ppp service.
W
Thank you for info, I was confused by the book.
Happy to see this is the intended behavior.
Kind regards,
Claudiu
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022, 11:36 Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 11:18:06AM +0300, Cristian Danila wrote:
> > Good day!
> > I hope someone could clarify if the following be
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 11:18:06AM +0300, Cristian Danila wrote:
> Good day!
> I hope someone could clarify if the following behavior is
> expected in a bridge configuration
> I have following rules added in hostname.bridge0
>
> ---
> #this will
Good day!
I hope someone could clarify if the following behavior is
expected in a bridge configuration
I have following rules added in hostname.bridge0
---
#this will result out to be blocked
rule block in on vic0
rule block out on vic0
rule pass
Hello,
I configured an Openbsd system as a VPN server with IKEV2.
It works great but I'd like to use a configuration with different policies
on per-user basis.
The clients connect from dynamic ip.
Does anybody have any hint or alternative?
thanks 😊
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 03:44:37PM -0300, Alceu Rodrigues de Freitas Junior
wrote:
>
> Hello there,
>
> I've being doing Perl development on OpenBSD for a while now, and one thing
> that I usually note is that is takes a noticeable difference of time to
> execute Perl modules instalation on Lin
PPPoE interface - since the manual
> pppoe(4) states "Two pppoe interfaces configured with the same wildcard
> destination address cannot share a routing table." I need to replicate
> above setup in a second rdomain.
You can however use different wildcard addresses for each pppo
W dniu 30.11.2021 o 21:22, Radek pisze:
Hello,
I have a router (6.9/amd64) with NATed subnets (vlan425, vlan426, etc..). This
box is also connected to another subnet via vlan43 and the box can ping gw of
vlan43 and machines inside this subnet.
I need to enable access for clients from vlan426 to
Hello,
I have a router (6.9/amd64) with NATed subnets (vlan425, vlan426, etc..). This
box is also connected to another subnet via vlan43 and the box can ping gw of
vlan43 and machines inside this subnet.
I need to enable access for clients from vlan426 to machines in vlan43 .
I have no idea how
Hi everyone,
I'm setting up an AlphaServer DS10 with 6.8. This model of AlphaServer has a
buggy IDE controller which prevents the use of DMA under most circumstances
so I installed a SATA controller. The controller is supported by OpenBSD, but
not the SRM console so it's not directly bootable.
I
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 09:40:37AM -0500, Ax0n wrote:
> I have a nice microphone attached to a USB sound device, but I'd like to
> rely on my computer's built-in line out for speakers from the same program
> (e.g. Audacity, Firefox). It feels like sndio might have some way to let
> programs use snd
On 2021-04-19, Ax0n wrote:
> I have a nice microphone attached to a USB sound device, but I'd like to
> rely on my computer's built-in line out for speakers from the same program
> (e.g. Audacity, Firefox). It feels like sndio might have some way to let
> programs use snd/0.play and snd/1.rec, or
I have a nice microphone attached to a USB sound device, but I'd like to
rely on my computer's built-in line out for speakers from the same program
(e.g. Audacity, Firefox). It feels like sndio might have some way to let
programs use snd/0.play and snd/1.rec, or a way to make snd/1 the default
devi
> esac
>>>
>>> This solves the problem. Thanks.
>>
>> You're welcome.
>>
>> But, out of curiosity, which option did you choose? TIA
>
> Ah sorry, I used the second option.
>
> I have this in .profile:
>
> export ENV="$HOME/.kshrc&q
Hi Ottavio,
Ottavio Caruso wrote on Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 09:22:11AM +0100:
> On a side note, there's no mention of startup files in sh(1)
> and I wonder why.
>From sh(1), second paragraph:
This manual page describes only the parts relevant to a POSIX
compliant sh. If portability is a conce
hich option did you choose? TIA
Ah sorry, I used the second option. I have this in .profile:
export ENV="$HOME/.kshrc"
and this in .kshrc:
case "$0" in
*ksh)
PS1='\u@\h:\w\$ '
;;
*sh)
PS1='${USER}@${HOST}:${PWD}\$ '
;;
esac
On my NetBSD VM, sh and k
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 3:16 PM Ottavio Caruso
wrote:
> On 17/09/2020 10:40, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> You've said that you're now sourcing "$HOME/.kshrc" if
>>"SKSH_VERSION" exists.
>>
>> You could add the sourcing of "$HOME/.shrc" if "$SH_VERSION" exists.
>>
>> Or you could export ENV and use a case-es
On 17/09/2020 10:40, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 9:33 AM Ottavio Caruso
wrote:
On 17/09/2020 00:58, Ashlen wrote:
On 20/09/15 05:49PM, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
Maybe it's just because OpenBSD sh is just ksh in disguise or there
might be other reasons that I obviously don't know.
Yep,
On 17/09/2020 00:58, Ashlen wrote:
On 20/09/15 05:49PM, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
Maybe it's just because OpenBSD sh is just ksh in disguise or there
might be other reasons that I obviously don't know.
Yep, you're right. They share the same inode.
ls -li /bin/{,k}sh
77862 -r-xr-xr-x 3 root bin
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 9:33 AM Ottavio Caruso
wrote:
> On 17/09/2020 00:58, Ashlen wrote:
>> On 20/09/15 05:49PM, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe it's just because OpenBSD sh is just ksh in disguise or there
>>> might be other reasons that I obviously don't know.
>>
>> Yep, you're right. They
On 20/09/15 05:49PM, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> Maybe it's just because OpenBSD sh is just ksh in disguise or there
> might be other reasons that I obviously don't know.
Yep, you're right. They share the same inode.
ls -li /bin/{,k}sh
77862 -r-xr-xr-x 3 root bin 613656 Sep 15 12:10 /bin/ksh
7786
On 15/09/2020 14:44, Vincenzo Nicosia wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:08:16PM +0100, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
Hi,
I have this in ~/.kshrc :
PS1="\u@\h:\w\$ "
which works fine in ksh:
oc@OpenBSD:~$
However, if I open a sh subshell, I get:
\u@OpenBSD:\w$
which is not very nice. The only hack
Hi,
I have this in ~/.kshrc :
PS1="\u@\h:\w\$ "
which works fine in ksh:
oc@OpenBSD:~$
However, if I open a sh subshell, I get:
\u@OpenBSD:\w$
which is not very nice. The only hack I've found is to append this to
~/.profile:
if [ -n "$KSH_VERSION" ]; then
if [ -f "$HOME/.kshrc" ]; t
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:08:16PM +0100, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have this in ~/.kshrc :
>
> PS1="\u@\h:\w\$ "
>
> which works fine in ksh:
>
> oc@OpenBSD:~$
>
> However, if I open a sh subshell, I get:
>
> \u@OpenBSD:\w$
>
> which is not very nice. The only hack I've found is to
On Wed, August 19, 2020 3:33 am, Hisacro Root wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 09:28:18PM -0400, trondd wrote:
>> The bug here is in how additional listen lines interact with the
>> remaining
>> configuration. The first listen line in a server block gets the tls
>> block
>> and it doesn't get appl
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 09:28:18PM -0400, trondd wrote:
> The bug here is in how additional listen lines interact with the remaining
> configuration. The first listen line in a server block gets the tls block
> and it doesn't get applied to the second listen line. Except for certs
> and keys whic
dditional listen line, allowing httpd to
start, my sub domain server is using the tls setup from the main server
tls block except for the cert and key to support SNI. Change the
additional listen line to tls and you'll see that one will pick up the tls
block as it's on a different port.
ning on
> port 8000 without tls first, the listen with tls is skipped along with the
> tls block below it.
No, listen TLS isn't skipped for sub.domain.tld
>> This indeed listen on same address ($ext_ip) and same port (443)
>> and works as intended with different cipher and ecdhe.
key "/etc/ssl/private/domain.tld.key
> }
> }
>
> This indeed listen on same address ($ext_ip) and same port (443)
> and works as intended with different cipher and ecdhe.
> Note: only when I add listen on 0.0.0.0 port 8000
>
>>Httpd allows you to configure multi
n 0.0.0.0 port 8000 # confusion?
listen on $ext_ip tls port 443
tls {
certificate "/etc/ssl/domain.tld.fullchain.pem"
key "/etc/ssl/private/domain.tld.key
}
}
This indeed listen on same address ($ext_ip) and same port (443)
and works as intended with
he, uncommenting
>> "listen on 0.0.0.0 port 8080"
>> bypasses this error
>>
>> I'm unsure what causes this, can someone shed some light?
>
>It's what the error says. You're listening twice on the same ip and port
>but with different tls bloc
>>> address/port
>>>
>>> instead of defining same cipher and ecdhe, uncommenting
>>> "listen on 0.0.0.0 port 8080"
>>> bypasses this error
>>>
>>> I'm unsure what causes this, can someone shed some light?
>>
>
I'm on -current, httpd throws tls misconfig error when different
cipher or ecdhe used but it's bypassed by listen statment.
server "domain.tld" {
listen on * tls port 443
log style combined
hsts
{
subdomains
}
root "/htdoc
On Sat, August 15, 2020 7:13 pm, hisacro wrote:
> I'm on -current, httpd throws tls misconfig error when different
> cipher or ecdhe used but it's bypassed by listen statment.
>
> server "domain.tld" {
> listen on * tls port 443
> log style combined
&
1 - 100 of 508 matches
Mail list logo
