On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:50:04AM -0400, Ernesto Bascon wrote:
> Hi everybody:
>
> I do not want to start a flamewar about licensing and hope some
> concrete answers to my questions (maybe I seem aggressive, I am not at
> all :) ).
>
> I want to develop an OpenBSD specific set of libraries, impl
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 15:09 +0930, Adam Hawes wrote:
> It's your code. You could license it any way you please, even
> charging people for it,
Commercial ("charging people for") distribution is a different issue
than the license itself. Please don't confuse the two.
> as long as it can't be cons
> 2. OpenBSD is known as a very anti-GPL project... so, what would be
> the OpenBSD position on front of some LGPL code implemented
> specifically for OpenBSD?
Well Ernesto, OpenBSD doesn't really care what you do with your own
code, regardless of what platform it is developed for. You can put it
Hi,
> I want to develop an OpenBSD specific set of libraries, implementing
> it on C++ and using the LGPL or the Classpath::License licenses for my
> code (both are almost identical). Well, I will be the initial owner of
> my code and I can do (again, initially) anything with it, but:
It's your c
Ernesto Bascon wrote:
I want to develop an OpenBSD specific set of libraries, implementing
it on C++ and using the LGPL or the Classpath::License licenses for my
code (both are almost identical). Well, I will be the initial owner of
my code and I can do (again, initially) anything with it, but:
Hi everybody:
I do not want to start a flamewar about licensing and hope some
concrete answers to my questions (maybe I seem aggressive, I am not at
all :) ).
I want to develop an OpenBSD specific set of libraries, implementing
it on C++ and using the LGPL or the Classpath::License licenses for
6 matches
Mail list logo
