Hi,
On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 15:44:13 -0400
Mike wrote:
> Authenticating from a file is working now...
>
> # radiusd -d -f /etc/radius/radiusd.conf
> 2024-08-17 15:37:00:INFO: Start listening on [redacted]:1812/udp
> 2024-08-17 15:37:00:DEBUG: Module `file' started successfully
> 2024-08-17 15:37:00:
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 19:29:58 -0400
Mike wrote:
> It's me again... :)
>
> OK, working in OpenBSD [hostname] 7.6 GENERIC.MP#247 amd64
>
>
> I was able to get bsdauth to work successfully.
>
> So, now I have moved to looking at file auth.
>
> In man radiusd_file I see...
> ---
> CONFIGURATI
On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 15:48:34 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 02:15:38 -0400
> Mike wrote:
>> I'm not sure if this is the correct place to report this issue. Please
>> correct me if it is wrong.
>>
>> I am running a version of OpenBS
On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 02:15:38 -0400
Mike wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is the correct place to report this issue. Please
> correct me if it is wrong.
>
> I am running a version of OpenBSD current that I downloaded earlier today.
>
> uname -a presents...
> OpenBSD [hostname] 7.6 GENERIC.MP#247 am
Hello,
On Sat, 3 Aug 2024 21:37:12 -0400
Mike wrote:
> OK, in that endeavor, I get an error message when I run radiusd -d, one
> for which I cannot find any explanation.
>
> 2024-08-03 21:22:42:INFO: Received Access-Request(code=1) from
> 10.11.4.234:45955 id=22 username=e5 q=1: `bsdauth' authen
Hi,
On Sun, 28 Jul 2024 12:11:57 -0400
John McCue wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 09:40:29AM -0400, openbsd_fr...@mail2tor.com
> wrote:
>>Can OpenBSD write to exFAT and NTFS partitions?
>>Thanks.
>
> See 'man 8 mount_ntfs' (ro) and I think mount_msdos(8) for exfat.
mount_msdos(8) doesn't suppo
On Sat, 02 Dec 2023 11:53:25 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 11:21:22 -0800
> Johnathan Cobden-Nolan wrote:
>> I have installed OpenBSD on hd0l: in my case it is for multi-booting,
>> but I imagine there are other use cases where boot and/or root a
Hello,
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 11:21:22 -0800
Johnathan Cobden-Nolan wrote:
> I have installed OpenBSD on hd0l: in my case it is for multi-booting,
> but I imagine there are other use cases where boot and/or root are
> installed on partitions other than 'a'.
>
> This is a UEFI system so I've installe
nt/challenge-length-edit-dynamic-profiles-chap.html
the max challenge length can be configured 63 at the maximum.
I'm thinking change the limit in npppd to 96.
On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 20:33:21 +
Ryan Freeman wrote:
> Thank you for the reply! I have been given permission to show a bit
&g
> Feb 8 11:43:06 edge9 npppd[86416]: l2tpd ctrl=5477 call=1626 SendCDN
> result=ERROR_CODE/2 error=WRONG_LENGTH/2 messsage=none
>
> [1] at some point over the course of debugging, I did notice that this
> error would /sometimes/ print on the connections from the 'old' equipment,
> but would continue to work anyway:
>
> Mar 5 10:21:44 edge9 npppd[35209]: ppp id=4108 layer=chap proto=unknown
> "Proxy Authen Challenge" is too long.
>
> This now also prints on all the 'new equipment' successful connections since
> disabling the AVP_MAXLEN_CHECK.
--
YASUOKA Masahiko http://yasuoka.net/~yasuoka/
mailto:yasu...@yasuoka.net mobile:090-8801-1637
92.168.255.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
option classless-ms-static-routes 10.109.3.0/24 192.168.255.254;
option classless-static-routes10.109.3.0/24 192.168.255.254;
}
---
$ doas /usr/sbin/dhcpd -u255.255.255.255 -c /etc/dhcpd-l2tp.conf
> On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 23:18:19 +0900 (JST)
> YASUOKA M
Hello,
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 21:14:24 +0100
Radek wrote:
> I have a router with VPN server (npppd). LAN net is 10.109.3.0/24, gw
> 10.109.3.254, the VPN net is 10.109.4.0/24, gw 10.109.4.254.
> If the client is conencted to VPN all client's traffic to 10.0.0.0/8 goes via
> 10.109.4.254
>
> clien
n X.Y.Z.13
> }
X.Y.Z.13 ? Or a NAT is there?
It is directly connected do X.Y.Z.13, no NAT.
On Thu, 07 Jan 2021 16:27:57 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 21:33:49 +0100
Radek wrote:
> I have a box with relatively fresh install of 68/amd64, fully
> syspa
Hi,
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 21:33:49 +0100
Radek wrote:
I have a box with relatively fresh install of 68/amd64, fully
syspatched. There is a npppd server running on it. The problem is
that I can have only one nppp session at one time. If the second
vpn user connects the box, the first nppp session
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 09:59:24 +0800
Kevin Shell wrote:
> I want to try out OpenBSD UEFI.
> How to install OpenBSD with UEFI boot on qemu?
> The install68.iso has no UEFI support.
> My following command on Linux can't boot OpenBSD UEFI.
>
> qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm \
>-mac
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:37:48 -0700
Johan Hattne wrote:
> On 2020-05-29 17:01, Johan Hattne wrote:
>>
>>> On May 28, 2020, at 20:38, YASUOKA Masahiko
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 28 May 2020 09:46:23 -0700
>>
Hi,
On Thu, 28 May 2020 09:46:23 -0700
Johan Hattne wrote:
>> On May 28, 2020, at 06:42, Nick Holland wrote:
>>
>> On 2020-05-28 05:15, Johan Hattne wrote:
>>> On 2020-05-28 00:56, Johan Hattne wrote:
>>>> On 2020-05-28 00:43, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>
Hi,
On Wed, 27 May 2020 22:32:58 -0700
Johan Hattne wrote:
> I've been trying to boot the 6.7 installation media from USB via EFI
> on a Dell PowerEdge R610. The screen goes blank and then the thing
> resets (so no kernel output or anything). I can boot the same stick
> via BIOS.
>
> I've been
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 18:32:28 +
Charlie Burnett wrote:
> Hey, I'm looking to get OpenBSD working in UEFI only mode on newer Thinkpad
> X1 devices, because for whatever reason it hangs when loading into memory
> without CSM enabled, and some of the X1 devices no longer have a CSM
> option. Does
Hi,
On Sun, 24 Dec 2017 03:32:05 +0530
Dinesh Thirumurthy wrote:
>> The conversion on github is done with cvs2gitdump.
>
> git2cvsdump dumps core on latest current.
> I am stumped after some basic investigation.
>
> /usr/local/bin/cvs2gitdump dumps core.
(snip)
> What I did:
>
> mkdir x
> cd
On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:50:50 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:46:20 -0400
> Ken Withee wrote:
>> I had something similar and had to change to legacy in bios or something
>> like that.
>>
>> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>>
>&
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:46:20 -0400
Ken Withee wrote:
> I had something similar and had to change to legacy in bios or something like
> that.
>
> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Pedro Ramos wrote:
>
>> Hello, I am having troubles installing OpenBSD 6.2 on a whi
The problem is fixed
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=150702971726161&w=2
Thank you for your report.
On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:33:50 +0800
"Fung" wrote:
> snapshots/amd64/
> Build date: 1506531075 - Wed Sep 27 16:51:15 UTC 2017
>
> how to repeat the problem
>
> # config -ef /bsd
> [...]
> Ente
On Fri, 12 May 2017 16:15:52 +0200
Michele Curti wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 06:01:35PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> > And something like this?
>>
>> Yes. What we need to do is comparing the device path node before
>> MEDIA_DEVICE_PATH type. So I rewr
On Fri, 12 May 2017 09:33:04 +0200
Michele Curti wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 07:27:45AM +0200, Michele Curti wrote:
>>
>> The efi_device_path_cmp() compares only a path node.
>> I tried the following diff just to see if I undestood something,
>> hd0 is now set corrctly to the 29GB disk.
>>
On Thu, 11 May 2017 23:45:17 +0200
Michele Curti wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 08:35:28PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote:
>>
>> I don't think this is the correct fix. It might solve your issue, but I
>> don't think it's completely right. So EFI has those so called device
>> paths. A path is bas
Hi,
Thank you for your tests,
On Thu, 11 May 2017 07:40:42 +0200
Michele Curti wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 08:35:28PM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote:
>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 03:14:30PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 09:47:14PM +0200, Michele Curti wrote:
>> > > On
Hi,
On Tue, 9 May 2017 10:20:03 +0200
Michele Curti wrote:
> I also tried a fresh install, but things do not change.
> Boot fails and when I do a "machine diskinfo" I got a lot of "?"
> symbols (a video here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsomNX-oFTQ )
Hanging on "machine diskinfo" seems to be
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 01:50:31 +
Pete Zabagel wrote:
> I noticed in the radiusd.conf man page that the bsdauth module only
> supports PAP:
>
> "It only supports PAP, password based authentication."
>
> Is there a specific reason as to why CHAP isn't implemented?
This limitation is come from t
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 18:24:38 -0800
Byron Klippert wrote:
> This setup gets as far as shown below and then stops...
>
> probing: pc0 mem[572K 64K 3039M 11M 60K 48K]
> disk: hd0
>>> OpenBSD/amd64 BOOTIA32 3.32
> boot>
> booting hd0a:/bsd: 6979304+2212872+258624+0+765952
> [72+710280+477696]=0xae235
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 20:19:19 +0100
Piotr Isajew wrote:
> There seems to be a problem with a bootloader though. Once the
> system is installed on the SSD, the bootloader just stucks after
> probing HDDs. Also it's not possible to boot from the
> installation USB anymore.
I'd like you to try t
On Tue, 24 May 2016 16:02:21 -0400
Steve Shockley wrote:
> I have an HP BL460c blade I'm using with OpenBSD. I was able to get
> 5.8 to install by disabling ACPI; since I'm lazy I didn't submit a bug
> report. I tried to upgrade to 5.9 (and -current), but booting from
I hit a similar problem on
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 21:17:20 -0300
Friedrich Locke wrote:
> I wonder if that's possible to boot obsd amd64 5.9 CD on a computer whose
> bios is setted to boot UEFI secure mode off.
5.9 CD doesn't support UEFI boot. If the computer doesn't have legacy
mode BIOS, you need to use an USB memory
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 10:41:39 -0300
Friedrich Locke wrote:
> i would like to know if there is anyone in this list that is running
> Windows and OBSD 5.9 amd 64 on the same machine with UEFI and doing,
> naturally, multiboot.
Both my vaio laptops and dell desktop boot both OpenBSD and Windows.
As
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:37:14 +0200
Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:43 AM, Sly Midnight wrote:
>> I don't mean to bring up an old thread, but I was wondering if anyone
>> else was experiencing issues with OpenBSD 5.8 and Android 6.0.1
>> (preferably the version on the Nexus lin
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 00:26:11 +0800
Jiahao Dai wrote:
> I am a new openBSD user and I found it's extramly difficult to setup a
> L2TP/IPSec(IKEv1) Road Warrior server to getting work with Android devices.
>
> I followed the tutorial here Configuring L2TP Over IPSec on OpenBSD for Mac
> OS X
>
Hi,
On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 01:11:40 -
"torsten" wrote:
> I'm, running OpenBSD 5.8, npppd, mpath and have tried the same on 5.7 and 5.3.
> npppd is works fine and clients can connect using windows pptp client.
> The Client has the pptp connection set as default gateway and can access the
> intern
Can you check "net.pipex.enable"?
pppxwrite() is not used if "net.pipex.enable=1".
--yasuoka
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 20:41:15 +
Callum Davies wrote:
> I have two "devices" using IA32 UEFI firmware with 64-bit
> hardware. An Asus EeeBook X502TA and qemu-system-x86_64 with
> an IA32 TianoCore firmware. Neither of these will boot from
> snapshots/amd64/install58.fs.
>
> Attempting to run b
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:51:03 -0500
"Joe Gidi" wrote:
> On Thu, November 26, 2015 11:27 am, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:10:33 -0500
>> "Joe Gidi" wrote:
>>> On Thu, November 26, 2015 10:59 am, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>>&g
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:10:33 -0500
"Joe Gidi" wrote:
> On Thu, November 26, 2015 10:59 am, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:57:12 -0500
>> "Joe Gidi" wrote:
>>> On Thu, November 26, 2015 5:20 am, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>>&g
Hi,
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:57:12 -0500
"Joe Gidi" wrote:
> On Thu, November 26, 2015 5:20 am, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 15:33:06 -0500
>> "Joe Gidi" wrote:
>>> I recently installed a UEFI-capable Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 motherboard in
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 15:33:06 -0500
"Joe Gidi" wrote:
> I recently installed a UEFI-capable Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 motherboard in one
> of my systems and tried to boot the November 11th amd64 miniroot58.fs
> image to test UEFI booting. I get to the bootloader, but it appears to
> fail while loading the
On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 21:22:04 -0800
Nathan Wheeler wrote:
> I ran into this exact same issue when I was trying to create a
> rollback install with CRYPTO for a sort of appliance I develop/manage
> for my company. We only have remote access with console and remote
> hands aren't easy to get so when u
On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 11:52:48 +0100
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 07:57:05PM -0500, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
>> At this point the machine can boot and run sd1[aeg] fine. *But* if I
>> enter "boot sr1d:/bsd" at the "boot>" prompt, the machine boots sd1[aeg],
>> not the desired sd
On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 10:14:08 -0800
Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 03:23 AM, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> I fixed the problem with the booted device on cvs repository.
>> Thank for your report.
>>
>> > Is this something unique to Apple hardware or i
On Sun, 01 Nov 2015 10:09:37 -0800
Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> Perhaps this is related to something else but on my 2013 MacBook Air
> with an OpenBSD-only EFI install, boot fails to attempt booting from
> hd0a:/bsd but instead tries fd0a:/bsd several times. I tried adding
> /etc/boot.conf with boot
1.70 addr 2
> uhidev1: iclass 3/0, 1 report id
> uhid at uhidev1 reportid 1 not configured
> umass0 at uhub2 port 2 configuration 1 interface 0 " Patriot Memory"
> rev 2.00/1.00 addr 2
> umass0: using SCSI over Bulk-Only
> scsibus1 at umass0: 2 targets, initiator 0
>
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:40:52 -0500
Brian Conway wrote:
>> This picture shows
>>
>> Load address: Loader Data (2) 0xd0 for 4096KB FATAL
>>
>> This is what I want to know. 0xd0 + 4M is overlapping the kernel
>> area.
>>
>> I think the following diff or
>>
>> http://yasuoka.net/~yasuoka/
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:20:22 -0500
Brian Conway wrote:
>> Can you try the diff following or
>>
>> http://yasuoka.net/~yasuoka/BOOTX64.EFI
>>
>> ? Then enter "machine memory" on "boot> " prompt and check the last line.
>> It shows whether the memory area for kernel is free or not. Like
>>
>>
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 20:47:22 -0500
Brian Conway wrote:
> The NUC 2820 I was previously testing snapshots with has moved on to a
> better place (and lacked any meaningful serial console support), but
> here are some logs from an MSI AM1I motherboard, both the attempted
> UEFI boot and the succ
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 23:35:16 +0100
Toby Slight wrote:
> On 15 September 2015 at 18:09, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
>> Sounds like a bug in the brand new EFI boot blocks which affects your uefi
>> firmware and not some others. It seems all of your tests are pointing in
>> the
>> same direction, they ar
Hi,
Thank you for your report. Can you provide a result of
machine memory
machine disk
on boot prompt?
>>> Also, is it normal that the resolution is a tiny cropped box in
>>> the middle of the screen?
The resolution is limitted to 100x31 or 80x25 since efifb was too slow
at least on my ta
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 11:38:31 -0500
trondd wrote:
> I had this set up for an Android and an OSX client. Ignore the networks
> part and configure the connections for the end points. I took the npppd
> assigned IPs out of my DHCP range.
I think I misunderstood your question. You want to make two c
Yes. But there is a bug with Windows clients. See
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=141627574522930&w=2
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 12:42:41 +0100
Christer Solskogen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is it possible to setup npppd so that the clients are on the same
> network as the local network behind the router/
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 00:48:44 +
James McGoodwin wrote:
> However Windows clients are limited to only one connection at a
> time. Subsequent connections cause the current session to die and
> be replaced by the new one.
(snip)
> In short, many security associations (for each windows client) but
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:22:25 +0200
Jens Hansen wrote:
> Thank you for your response. I've investegated a little further, I see the
> following in /var/log/messages on the l2tp npppd server:
> l2tpd ctrl=1 timeout waiting ack for hello packets.
> l2tpd ctrl=1 call=28732 logtype=PPPUnbind
>
> The c
Hi,
On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:00:31 +0200
Jens Hansen wrote:
> I can successfully connect to my opensbsd 5.5. isakmpd / npppd IPSEC L2TP
> vpn setup.
> But (not knowing too much about netwoking) i think i'm having a mtu
> problem. I can do low volume traffic fine, but transmitting larger files
> stal
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 15:06:59 +0600
"Ivan Solonin" wrote:
> I tried to compile custom kernel in the 5.5 release of OpenBSD on
> landisk platform with PIPEX, but found requirment of IPSEC by PIPEX.
> As I've found in file /sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c it uses IPSEC only
> with L2TP to distinguish IPsec
On Wed, 28 May 2014 22:04:34 +0300
Mike Jackson wrote:
> If npppd tunnel listen address can't be changed and l2tp-ipsec-require
> isn't supported,
You can change the listen address by npppd.conf:
tunnel L2TP protocol l2tp {
listen on xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
}
l2tp-ipsec-require isn't supporte
On Tue, 27 May 2014 20:03:54 +0200
Marko Cupać wrote:
> I have relatively busy npppd pptp server, and it logs a lot of output
> into /var/log/messages.
>
> How can I move npppd and pipex log messages into separate file?
As far as syslog.conf(5), you can use !!npppd for that purpose.
Currently n
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 21:05:35 -0700
"Paul B. Henson" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:22:51AM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> pppx will be fixed.
>
> Great :). This is a known bug then?
It's new for me. I had not even try MAKEDEV pppx1 yet.
> Should I just
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:45:46 -0700
"Paul B. Henson" wrote:
> After successfully setting up an L2TP VPN with npppd and pppx, I tried
> to add a second VPN subnet with a different authentication base. I was
> working remotely, and after starting npppd in debug mode:
pppx will be fixed.
You can use
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:39:50 +0200
Атанас Владимиров wrote:
> I was running PPTP client pptp-1.7.2p4 with userland ppp(8). It was a basic
> setup from pptp(8) manual page and specifically "PPTP on a router" example.
> What are my alternatives to run PPTP to connect to Microsoft VPN server?
> May I
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:55:51 -0800
"Paul B. Henson" wrote:
>> From: YASUOKA Masahiko
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:20 AM
>>
>> % ospfctl show fib | grep 128
>> *56 10.128.120.0/24 127.0.0.1
>> *56 10.128.120.213/32
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:50:10 -0800
"Paul B. Henson" wrote:
>> From: YASUOKA Masahiko
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 1:48 AM
>>
>> "framed-ip-netmask" in npppd-user to set the netmask of the route to
>> the PPP link. But it is not to set the c
On Sat, 1 Mar 2014 18:42:11 -0800
"Paul B. Henson" wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 07:41:10PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> I could repeat the problem. ospfd seems not to be able to use routes
>> set by npppd. The problem seems to be come from pppx(4)'s
On Sat, 1 Mar 2014 18:23:08 -0800
"Paul B. Henson" wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 01:48:06PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> > on the other side? Right now it looks like the client is setting a
>> > route to 10.0.0.0/8 across the tunnel, that should actual
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:41:16 -0800
"Paul B. Henson" wrote:
> I'm currently setting up an L2TP VPN with npppd. I've got the VPN piece
> working, and can send packets between the client and the openbsd box
> running the vpn. However, I'm currently using ospfd for routing between
> the rest of the ne
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 19:42:26 -0800
"Paul B. Henson" wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 11:23:01AM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> I'm not sure whether it works. Can you try it by static route?
>
> A static route on the network on the other side of the openbsd b
Hi,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 11:54:07 -0800
"Paul B. Henson" wrote:
> According to the npppd.conf man page:
>
> pool-address address-range | address-mask [for dynamic | static]
> Specify the IP address space that is pooled for this IPCP
> setting. The address space can
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:41:16 -0800
"Paul B. Henson" wrote:
> I'm currently setting up an L2TP VPN with npppd. I've got the VPN piece
> working, and can send packets between the client and the openbsd box
> running the vpn. However, I'm currently using ospfd for routing between
> the rest of the ne
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:51:10 -0800
"Paul B. Henson" wrote:
>> From: YASUOKA Masahiko
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:46 PM
>> sysctl net.pipex.enable=1
>
> Hmm, yeah, that... I had updated my /etc/sysctl.conf with that change, but
> the system h
Hi,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:32:34 -0800
"Paul B. Henson" wrote:
> I currently have the following in pf.conf:
>
> -
> pass quick proto { esp, ah } from any to any
> pass in quick on em1 proto udp from any to 96.251.22.154 port {500, 4500,
> 1701} keep state
> set skip on enc0
> set skip on ppp
Hi,
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 20:58:03 -0500
Matt Carlson wrote:
> # grep -v ^# /etc/ipsec.conf
>
>
> ike passive esp transport \
>proto udp \
>from any to any port 1701 \
>main auth "hmac-sha1" enc "aes" group modp1024 \
>quick auth "hmac-sha1" enc "aes-256" \
>psk "1"
AFAIK, fi
The mail I replied to was too old.. sorry.
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:52:25 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 19:34:57 +0200 (IST)
> Or Elimelech wrote:
>> I'm having trouble configuring Windows clients with l2tp over ipsec,
>> This config works g
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 19:34:57 +0200 (IST)
Or Elimelech wrote:
> I'm having trouble configuring Windows clients with l2tp over ipsec,
> This config works great on OSX/iOS/Android/Linux
>
> I do not know which type of auth/enc/group I should use for Windows clients
>
> I currently use OpenBS
On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 09:38:50 +0200 (IST)
Or Elimelech wrote:
> I've configured nppd server and clients for Linux, Android, iOS, OSX
> and Windows. This works on all platforms when routing all traffic
> through VPN except for Windows clients.
Usually npppd can work with Windows client without prob
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 02:31:39 +0200
Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> On 08/11/13 17:50, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>>> What I'm wondering is what you guys do to setup the ipsec path of the
>>> tunnel.
>>>
>>> One option is to use a unique pre-shared key for al
On Fri, 08 Nov 2013 14:38:33 +0200
Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> Playing around with npppd was straight forward and I was quite
> impressed with it. Good job.
Thanks.
> EAP-TLS would also be a very nice feature to have.
Do you mean npppd should *directly* authenticate the clients with the
TLS (c
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 21:10:25 +0200
Gruel Bruno wrote:
> As i thought that it's doesn't read my users file i changed the
> username & password but nothing else.
Yes, the log shows the session is terminated because the passwords are
mismatched.
I checked by below snapshots, but I could not re
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:39:31 +0200
Gruel Bruno wrote:
> ### On OBSD 5.3 release :
(snip)
> Segmentation fault
>
> After de DISCOVERY message the server crash with "Segmentation fault"
This bug had been fixed on April 16. PPPoE server (by npppd) on 5.3
is completely broken.
> ### On OBSD 5
Hi,
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 13:55:45 +0200
Marko Cupać wrote:
> In last 10 days machine hanged twice. I do not have hang message from
> the first time, but this time i read this:
>
> uvm_fault(0xd8f5f680, 0x0, 0, 3) -> e
> kernel: page fault trap, code=0
> Stopped at pipex_close_session+0xc4: mov
Hi,
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 15:03:58 +
Brad Brad wrote:
> Hi, setting up npppd I get the following in the logs when connecting from
> Iphone 5
>
> Jun 30 22:23:43 fire53 npppd[17905]: ppp id=0 layer=lcp No authentication
> protocols are agreeable. peer's auth proto=eap
If you just want to co
Hi,
On Mon, 13 May 2013 15:28:38 +0100
Joe Holden wrote:
> YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> On Wed, 08 May 2013 12:32:16 +0100
>> Joe Holden wrote:
>>> YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 07 May 2013 22:38:46 +0100
>>>> Joe Holden wrote:
>>&
On Wed, 08 May 2013 12:32:16 +0100
Joe Holden wrote:
> YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
>> On Tue, 07 May 2013 22:38:46 +0100
>> Joe Holden wrote:
>>> I'm testing out npppd as a termination device which is being fed from
>>> existing LACs (in this particular setup, m
Hi,
On Tue, 07 May 2013 22:38:46 +0100
Joe Holden wrote:
> I'm testing out npppd as a termination device which is being fed from
> existing LACs (in this particular setup, mpd on FreeBSD) - if the LAC
> begins LCP to challenge the client for it's username in order to
> lookup the destination LNS,
Hi,
Thank you for your feedbacks.
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:09:36 +0900
trick star wrote:
> I have question. npppd pppx session need the inet6?
No, it doesn't matter the inet6.
> I usually kill the interface's inet6.
> npppd pppoe connection for tun0 work.
> but, pppx0's didn't work!
I don't thi
Hi,
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 01:00:14 +0900
trick star wrote:
> hi, I have problem in the OpenBSD -snapshots 5.3 npppd pppoe setting!
> server's npppd was down for segmantation fault. when client to attache
> the server.
> before -current version was fine. but new -snapshots is suck.
> if anyone could
Hi,
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 16:35:51 -0500
Jason Markowitz wrote:
> I'm receiving the following errors when attempting to establish a vpn
> session via l2tp, the ipsec side works fine and phase 1 authenticates
> perfectly, i dont see pf blocking anything in pf log (egress wide
> open, inbound is set t
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:44:58 +0900 (JST)
YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:16:12 +0200
> csszep wrote:
>> I wanted to try a simple npppd setup and i got a panic.
>
> I'm looking into this problem and fixing it. But it will take more
> days.
oops, I f
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:07:05 +0100
mxb wrote:
> Yasuoka forgot to commit his fix.
> I have it working.
Oops, I forgot about that fix...
I've commited. Also here is the diff. Thanks,
Index: npppd_auth.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.
Hi,
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:20:24 +0100
csszep wrote:
> I tried to start npppd with the default config with tun0 interface on
> my Alix board:
>
> I get the following error message:
>
> # npppd -d
> 2013-01-29 19:54:38:NOTICE: Starting npppd pid=13464 version=5.0.0
> 2013-01-29 19:54:38:NOTICE:
Hi,
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 22:29:44 +0400
pavel pocheptsov wrote:
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/src/usr.sbin/npppd/Attic/HOWTO_PIPEX_NPPPD.txt?rev=1.3;content-type=text%2Fplain
(snip)
> # uname -vrp
> 5.1 GENERIC.MP#188 i386
HOWTO_PIPEX_NPPPD.txt revsion 1.3 is too old for 5.1.
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 02:27:07 -0400
Andrew Ngo wrote:
> On 28 September 2012 03:17, YASUOKA Masahiko
> >
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:41:52 -0400
>> Andrew Ngo > wrote:
>>> (By the way, the daemon goes absolutely bananas if you use a
>>> "f
Hi,
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:41:52 -0400
Andrew Ngo wrote:
> Hm. I can't seem to get npppd to map users to static addresses in the
> npppd-users file, after trying various permutations of "pool-address
> ##-## " and such. The client is an iPhone running iOS 6.0,
> and is definitely able to set up a
Hello,
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:16:12 +0200
csszep wrote:
> I wanted to try a simple npppd setup and i got a panic.
I'm looking into this problem and fixing it. But it will take more
days.
To workaround the problem, please add
mppe no
to the tunnel configuration.
--yasuoka
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:45:15 -0700
"Justin Lindberg" wrote:
> I recently bought a Microsoft Wireless Mobile Mouse 3500, and I assumed
> it would work like most any other mouse on OpenBSD. Unfortunately it
> did not. After googling, I found a patch on the following page,
> which again unfortunate
Hi,
> real.local.concentrate: tun0
this should be
realm.local.concentrate: tun0
I hope this will help you.
--yasuoka
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 09:11:06 -0700
Johan Beisser wrote:
> I've hit a bit of a wall digging around getting L2TP working with OpenBSD 5.1.
>
> I've enabled pipex in kernel:
Hi,
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:52:40 +0100
"Sebastian Reitenbach" wrote:
> since there is the limitation in npppd that it doesn't support multiple
> clients behind the same NAT host for IPSec/L2TP, I'm looking
> into using PPTP with EAP-TLS authentication. But I'm wondering, whether this
> is supp
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
