On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Eric wrote:
> Most documents I found on the web focus on setting up things through tunnels
> as most providers still don't offer IPv6 connectivity yet.
> What am I missing here?
Someone already pointed out that you are trying to ping outside your
net. Try your loc
> i would liket to implement openldap as my ldap server to store
> user/group information for ypldap.
> I could see OpenBSD (amd64/4.9) comes with its own ldap server. Is
> ypldap able to fetch user and group information from a openldap
> server?
This might be of help to you: http://blogs.helion-
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Peter Hallin wrote:
> It only got up to about 450 Mbit/s (standard TCP iperf test) and there
> was an unbalance between ix0 and ix1 when it came to interrupts. ix1
> only got up to 4000 intr/s whereas ix1 got up to 13000 intr/s (when
> monitoring live with systat
Thanks for all the replies guys, it makes sense now :)
Steph
Hello,
I am running OpenBSD 4.9 on a soekris which was in a closet for a few
months. NTP is slowly drifting back the time to normal but I am
wondering if anyone has seen this. It seems that every 5mn, the time
gap decreases, this is not a behavior I have seen.
Running from the command line with "
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:43 AM, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> (Just for the record)
> Regarding PR#6523, OpenBSD 4.9 works with pci.c 1.88 (from OPENBSD_4_9),
> patched with kettenis@'s pci.c patch 1.72 [1].
> I was afraid it won't apply, or there will be incompatibilities with
> other parts, but so far
Hello Moritz,
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Moritz Grimm wrote:
> The IPv6 setup (broken):
Have you tried pinging the local interface first? Does ping ::1 works?
Then does ping fe80:xxx (replace by output of your interface) works?
etc...
> The IPv6 network is supposed to be 2a01:4f8:110:436
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> On this one, I will make a leap of fate here. I suppose you are right. Would
> be nice to know for sure anyway. The only way to know if for me to gt one I
> guess and test it for real.
leap of faith you mean? :D
Steph
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:12 PM, roberth wrote:
> I'll point out the most obvious:
> Since there are no tagged states, everyone of those three "match" rules
> matches and the last one wins.
Hello Robert,
Thanks for responding, I have changed the rules to tag packets coming
from the laptop but st
Hello list,
I have this page trying to load balance my some of my devices (for now
my laptop as a test) to my second internet connection but have been
unable to make it work.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing
I would be grateful if someone could explain my own mistakes in that
set
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> if so that would be sheer luck and bite back the worst later.
well, mounted the system partition read-only so apparently, it does
work. Still working on the other partitions though.
Cheers,
Steph
Hello list,
Forgive my ignorance on the topic but a quick glance around didn't
give me what I was looking for. Could someone confirm that using
OpenBSD, i could mount and use a journaled UFS file system created on
FreeBSD?
Cheers,
Steph
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> I bet they don't like IPX either.
ah, context and relevance :)
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I'm proud of it.
Well actually, University of Alberta doesn't sound v6 enabled either...
Steph
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
> in that regard i disagree, but perhaps only in tone.
>
> With ipv6, they decided to create a bunch of new problems that
> people now find they care deeply about
>
>- they created a totally new problem by avoiding arp. the
> benefit
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
> The design process followed by the NFSv4 team members matches the
> methodology taken by the IPV6 people. (As in, once a mistake is made,
Sorry, I'll bite. What exactly is wrong with IPv6 here? I gathered
from this list not a lot of develop
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> What the value of short_open_tag in php.ini and what is the exact
> content of your test file.
Hello Otto, thanks for your reply, this was the error, been using
mostly
Hello list,
Sorry for stating the obvious but I don't get this. I am trying to
load up apache (which is working) with php5. I have then installed
php5-core and linked the proper stuff into /var/www/conf/
ln -s /var/www/conf/modules.sample/php5.conf /var/www/conf/modules/php5.conf
/var/www/conf c
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Gregory Edigarov
wrote:
> trying to set different speeds on the port doesn't help me either.
Have you tried with screen directly ? screen /dev/xxx
Also i'd give it a go with and without parity (look at the man page)
Cheers,
Steph
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Joachim Schipper
wrote:
>> I would like to make a firewall / router running OpenBSD.
> Okay, but what is your question?
I guess he is asking if all Atom processors are compatible with
OpenBSD, which i guess is pretty much a given :)
My question (sorry for hijack
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:56 AM, wrote:
> Take a look at :
> http://www.justsearching.co.uk/JustBlog/iis-vs-apache.html
> Criticism is easy and art is difficult
How cute, you think i'm going to justify myself :)
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 7:18 AM, wrote:
> I'm writing (in French) a guide about how to protect Company using OpenBSD
> and PF.
>
> Here a sample : http://mouedine.net/ruleset47.aspx
>
> If you have advices ...
Yes, more like a troll but i cannot resist... .aspx, seriously?
Server: Microsoft-IIS/
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Andrew Back >
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios)
> mem address conflict 0xe000/0x1000
You might want to browse the list back for ibm server x336 that i
started, try to disable a few flags, might be the same bug as me. As
from 4.7, this is
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joel Sing wrote:
> The issue has already been investigated and kettenis@ committed a fix during
> n2k10. However, the fix that allowed these servers to work happened to break
> other systems that were previously working, hence the change was backed out.
> I believe
I use a variety of servers with OpenBSD mostly for DNS. Recently I
have been luring into systems such as Alix Boards to build a small
power system with a 19' rack enclosure. Anyone would have suggestions
on that type of boards (ALIX) or any other equivalent to perform as a
server on compact flash?
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Corey wrote:
> I saw them, yes. Soekris Engineering says the net5501 itself draws 20W
max.
> My power supply is rated for 40W. I doubt that little miniPCI card draws
> 20 watts.
Yes, but how many amps?
Steph
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 4:34 AM, corey clingo wrote:
> Reposting this, as I posted Friday evening when fewer people were
> probably reading and haven't heard anything. If that's not the
> reason, then sorry for the noise.
Hello, have you looked at the ML posts? Which power supply are you
running
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Then why don't you use pfsense and port it back to OpenBSD.
I have never used pfsense but I see from the frontpage that it has
been forked from m0n0wall. Back then, m0n0wall did not support IPv6
(although now it does:
http://m0n0.ch/wall/li
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Joel Sing wrote:
> The issue has already been investigated and kettenis@ committed a fix during
> n2k10. However, the fix that allowed these servers to work happened to break
> other systems that were previously working, hence the change was backed out.
> I believe
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:00 PM, FRLinux wrote:
> Hey guys, sent an acpi dump with dmesg info a couple of months ago to
> this list hoping the developers might be able to fix this. Just
> letting you know that 4.7 snapshot still reboots the box unless you
> disable ppb*. Any wa
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
> correctly routed on my firewall. But as I don't want to route a giant
> port range for FTP on this firewall, I intend to use ftp-proxy. But
> the rdr-to rule doesn't seem to redirect packets to the ftp-proxy
> process.
I get you now. Sinc
Hey guys, sent an acpi dump with dmesg info a couple of months ago to
this list hoping the developers might be able to fix this. Just
letting you know that 4.7 snapshot still reboots the box unless you
disable ppb*. Any way i can help?
Cheers,
Steph
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
>> I d'like to make it accessible through my IPv6 connectivity (gif
>> tunnel with hurricane electric). With this IPv6 connectivity, all my
>> servers have public addresses. But I can't find a way to do it with
>> ftp-proxy which seems to sup
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> Now, tell me again how horrible it is that OpenBSD doesn't let you
> trust your data (and OpenBSD's reputation) to these incompetent assholes?
Thanks for the update, you convinced me the last time but have
definitely so now. We have about 2 s
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> You just think that it's running perfectly under Linux ;-) See eg. this post
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=125783114503531&w=2
Ah, I had actually skipped that one back then, thanks for pointing
that to me. So I now officially have a lum
Hello, i read from the current documentation that it is not advised to
purchase hardware containing the following (taken from
http://www.openbsd.org/i386.html)
Adaptec FSA-based RAID controllers (aac), including: (*)
Note: In the past years Adaptec has lied to us repeatedly about
forthcoming docum
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:08 AM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> Found one tcl/tk at:
> http://www.linux-kheops.com/pub/vcron/vcronGB.html
> but running an X tool would app would be too complicated for this
> requirement.
Wow, from the page "BE CARREFUL, some Slackware seem to have an access
right proble
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 7:50 PM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> Yep, .. that's one reason I don't want to use it. We'll probably end up
> creating our own tool with nCurses that looks something like vcron. It
> just feels like we're recreating the wheel, however.
Well, I believe that dropping a badly des
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Kapetanakis Giannis
wrote:
> Did you put any openbsd in front/behind that Cisco?
> Bandwidth? packets/sec? What kind of server?
I do, but it is used as a backup, so i am not looking for performance
but rather as a slower replacement able to run (openbsd 4.5 as 4.6
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:35 AM, Kapetanakis Giannis
wrote:
> b) 10G Xenpack for C6500 costs around $25K if I'm not wrong.
Err, the backplane cost us about 10.000 euros for the card and 2500
euros per xenpack, and we have 4. So that sounds about right :)
> If future demands for more than 1G I wi
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Kapetanakis Giannis
wrote:
> perfectly ok for my test case. I'm pretty sure that with Intel network
> controllers the setup will rock and beat the hell out of my Cisco 6500 with
> the features of pf.
Mmmh, you picked my interest here. You mentioned your cisco 650
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Shi Jie Gung wrote:
> Sorry I did not mention that I run OpenBSD on virtualbox, host MAC OS X 10.6.
> The interface I used to dial pppoe is bridged to Macbook's ethernet.
> I think it might has something to do with VirtualBox's bridge implementation.
Yes, this is
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Shi Jie Gung wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am running OpenBSD-current.
>
> My ppp.conf:
> # A PPPoE (PPP over Ethernet) setup may look like this:
Just as a reference, this is what i'm using which has been rock stable
for years:
http://frbsd.net/doku.php?id=openbsd_pppoe
C
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Antoine Jacoutot
wrote:
> HUH? wtf Jason?
> Do you like playing with other people's life? I don't have a heart
> condition and I almost died of laughing!
> Next time, please add a warning... I'm sure you just killed several
> people with this...
Give credit to th
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:41 PM, T. Tofus von Blisstein
wrote:
> which filesystem are you using on that device?
Sorry realized I had forgotten to specify that in my reply. Key is a
8GB formatted with FAT.
Steph
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 9:10 PM, T. Tofus von Blisstein
wrote:
> this is an example. Attached is a 1GB (fat!) usb memory stick. It took
> 40 minutes to copy 285M.
Mmmh, clearly your key. Just did a test on my OpenBSD laptop (Samsung
Q35) with that key connected:
umass0 at uhub0 port 1 configurat
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Stefan Rinkes
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My name is Stefan Rinkes. I'm from munich in germany and I want to
> introduce my OpenBSD-Project.
Hey Stefan, for your own benefit (and possibly this list too), please
take a look at the (long) following thread which took place n
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> The reason disabling the last line /sometimes/ works is that if it's a
> bus, you then prevent probing of all the attached devices.
Sorry, my formulation was not the most accurate. I meant that in my
case, when disabling the whole ppb*, it is
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Marcin wrote:
> I tried current - the good news is the problem with freeze at startup is
gone
> - kernel boots immediately.
>
> However, it hangs later on just after printing out following lines:
>
> pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios)
> mem addres
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Marcin wrote:
> I ran into the same issue with IBM x336 while trying to launch 4.6
> after installation.
> I checked 4.6 ISO and -current, neither of them booted successfully.
>
> My x336s are fairly standard machines (4GB of RAM, 2x3.2GHz Xeon, 2x73GB SCSI)
> how
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 3:05 PM, dark knight neo wrote:
> Since when announcing is spam ?
> Being that the Comixwall is OpenBSD
> Why Theo don't announcing or put a link in the OpenBSD website to Comixwall
> website ?
> Why no think in the collective one ?
Regardless of the words exchanged betwee
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Todd T. Fries wrote:
> I'd say at least 90% of the book is still relevent, but thats an arguably
> biased guess..
Yes, did notice the book was a few years back but the content seems
unlikely to be deprecated that fast. I do own books about PF listed on
the same pa
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> http://www.openbsd.org/books.html#book3
Thanks for that, was unaware of that book. Just ordered my copy now :)
Steph
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 3:19 PM, spamtester spamtester
wrote:
> Seriously, theo wtf ?
> Openbsd slow "masterbating monkies", Always late to the security party
(how
> many years late for PIE ? etc.)
nice troll
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM, wrote:
> I have no idea what to do now. Any ideas maybe?
Your default route should have another interface. Is that native IPv6
we are talking about?
I am dubious about your IPv6 address: 2a01:238:426e:5c00::1 prefixlen 56
My IPv6 address is a /64, and this is p
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:47 PM, wrote:
> I try to setup a new webserver with IPv6 and IPv4 connection. The IPv4
connection works great. I'm new in IPv6 and got some routing problems. I
called the provider support and he told me how to setup the gateway and the
interface... but for linux and no
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:59 PM, rhubbell wrote:
> Why did I say that? Let's take a poll on this list of how many people are
> using one of those cards? Or any list, anywhere.
>
> I have not contributed to it in anyway. But why is that relevant? Can you
> explain? And how did you contribute?
Man,
Hello,
I have two questions about the ixgb driver.
I saw it supports [1] some oldish Intel 10g cards. Do you know if it
might support more recent ones? (such as specifically: 10g XF SR [2]
or NetEffect SFP+SR [3]).
Also, when i registered on this list about a year ago, there had been
a thread on
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> Yeah, I think you show signs of being capable of learning with just a
> few hints to point you in the right direction.
Thanks, certainly hope so too :)
I came to realize yesterday how little i understood about PF and IPv6
filtering but am no
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> You need to do a little more study on IPv6.
> Besides that my hands are not up to punching out long stories... ;)
> Oh and please don't CC me. I AM on the list and I cannot read an email
> with each eye ;))
Thanks :)
Steph
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:21 AM, FRLinux wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:01 AM, FRLinux wrote:
>> I do have another problem though. I am also using rtadvd and cannot at
>> the moment ping6 out whereas ping6 from the outside to a host on
>> rtadvd works...
>
> With p
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:01 AM, FRLinux wrote:
> I do have another problem though. I am also using rtadvd and cannot at
> the moment ping6 out whereas ping6 from the outside to a host on
> rtadvd works...
With pftop, i can see the packets, first a successful one (pinging
from the outsi
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> I saw your email saying you had fixed your problem BUT that last line
> above negates both of your icmp rules. A 'block in' statement would
> normally be the first filter rule and then only explicit allowed
> traffic gets in and you could tak
Forgive my own siliness, the ipv6 address was not the right one, sorry
for the noise...
Steph
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:21 AM, FRLinux wrote:
> I have a small problem with IPv6. I am trying to allow ssh via v6 from
> a remote host and whilst the same ruleset works for IPv4, it fails for
> IPv6. Could anyone point me in the right direction? If i disable PF,
> everything wor
Hello,
I have a small problem with IPv6. I am trying to allow ssh via v6 from
a remote host and whilst the same ruleset works for IPv4, it fails for
IPv6. Could anyone point me in the right direction? If i disable PF,
everything works of course.
Here is my pf.conf (this is my home soekris router,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:16 PM, wrote:
> pass in on $int_if inet proto { tcp, udp } from any to $gw_obsd port 67
> keep state
Hello, you're also missing 68. Just as a point, you shouldn't need tcp
at all, all 67,68 is udp, also keep state is implied now.
Cheers,
Steph
*bump*
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:51 PM, FRLinux wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:07 PM, FRLinux wrote:
>> Cannot really send an acpidump, as it reboots the server...
>
> Here is the acpidump from 4.5 running on the same server:
>
> # acpidump
> /*
> RSD PTR: Checksum
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:49 PM, sonjaya wrote:
> yes already pkg_delete but still same show up that problem
Delete the partial again and try pkg_add -r
Cheers,
Steph
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:24 AM, FRLinux wrote:
> I am doing some testing on OpenBSD 4.6-release and when i insert that
> Linksys Wireless key (WUSB600N), if I assign a wep key to it to
> connect to a test access point (due to some situation, I cannot change
> the access point just n
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> dmesg, trace, ps.
>
Device is at home but will provide that tomorrow.
Cheers,
Steph
Hello,
I am doing some testing on OpenBSD 4.6-release and when i insert that
Linksys Wireless key (WUSB600N), if I assign a wep key to it to
connect to a test access point (due to some situation, I cannot change
the access point just now), i get a panic then get put in dbd. Does
anyone know of tha
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> no. kettenis needs to see a pci -v -xx of this machine. Send in the
> acpidump -o as well. I can't volunteer his time so he'll look at it
> whenever he'll look at it.
# pcidump -v -xx
Domain /dev/pci0:
0:0:0: Intel E7520 Host
0
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> Run a -current system. This could be a pci resource allocation issue.
Hello again,
It surely is, even leaving acpi enabled, the only way to allow the
machine to boot is to disable ppb*
It affect all the IBM Xseries 336 that I have.
I j
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Joachim Schipper
wrote:
>> Hello, the problem is related to the network cards alright. Disabling
>> ppb* allows it to boot. My problem is that even if I disable a card in
>> the bios, i cannot boot the system. I tried to disable ppb2 but it
>> doesn't seem to take
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Joachim Schipper
wrote:
> Just to check the obvious: did you disable acpi when booting after the
> install? (And did you try both bsd and bsd.mp? The latter is less like
> the install kernel than the former.)
>
Hello, the problem is related to the network cards a
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> Does it have broadcom nics?
>
> if do disable those and try again.
Hello still the same problem. Out of curiosity, tried to boot off the
amd64 CD but failing the same. Suggestions?
As I asked, can anyone tell me which flags are disabled d
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> Does it have broadcom nics?
>
> if do disable those and try again.
I do. I'll try that tomorrow.
On a related matter, can anyone tell me which switches are disabled
during an OpenBSD install (using the official ISO) ? That would help
me n
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:28 PM, FRLinux wrote:
> 2009/10/23 Vadim Zhukov :
>> My $0.02: try to disable intagp, agp, inteldrm, drm devices.
>
> Thanks, tried disabling a fair few based on successful boot log but
> still fails after wsdisplay0
>
> Also, as pointed out, b
2009/10/23 Vadim Zhukov :
> My $0.02: try to disable intagp, agp, inteldrm, drm devices.
Thanks, tried disabling a fair few based on successful boot log but
still fails after wsdisplay0
Also, as pointed out, before 4.6, it just works.
Cheers,
Steph
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:08 AM, FRLinux wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have generated a verbose trace using a com port on the server, this
> is by booting the official 4.6 i386 install CD.
Alright, disabling ACPI allows me to install the system, but then on
reboot, even disabling ACPI make
Hello
I have generated a verbose trace using a com port on the server, this
is by booting the official 4.6 i386 install CD.
boot> boot -c
booting cd0a:/4.6/i386/bsd.rd: 5651156+913072 [52+211008+196339]=0x6a6260
entry point at 0x200120
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
The Regen
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:20 PM, wrote:
> I've seen the same on IBM x346 - install goes fine, reboot, and then it does
> not
> want to play nice.
Installs and boot of all previous versions up until 4.6 work. I rolled
back the server to 4.5 home release and it is back and running.
Hello,
I have several IBM x series 336 servers and attempted to upgrade them
today. My usual way is to use a build server which makes a release for
my servers. It went well on that server (which is the only one not
being an IBM x336, that will teach me...) so decided to deploy the new
build to the
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 4.6.
> This is our 26th release on CD-ROM (and 27th via FTP). We remain
> proud of OpenBSD's record of more than ten years with only two remote
> holes in the default install.
And t
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:40 PM, jean-francois wrote:
> Ok. I tried the dovecot-sql-example.conf. Is that a mistake ?
> If the password is a complete sentence, how to handle it ? with
> password='password is yet another sentence' or maybe with "" ?
> That's another point where I could not find much
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:
> $ sudo ifconfig em0 up
Indeed, I'll go back to my cave now. Thanks!
Steph
Hello,
I am trying to replicate some traffic from a Cisco 6500 onto an
OpenBSD 4.5 vanilla machine. I have two NICs, rl0 which is the
administration interface and em0 which I hope to use for the ethernet
tap. So far, my cisco replicates traffic happily, i can see the packet
count in/egress increas
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> That was fixed in 4.6. Can you please verify that this works for you?
Thanks a lot, boots fine with ACPI enabled! (tried from 17082009 snapshot)
Cheers,
Steph
Hello,
I have installed OpenBSD 4.5 amd64 on an Intel based motherboard for a
server (S3210SH) and it hangs when acpi is enabled. Booting with boot
-c + "disable acpi" allowed it to boot. Here is the copy/paste of the
boot with ACPI and without:
* with ACPI *
OpenBSD 4.5 (GENERIC) #2052: Sat Feb
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
>
> Not totally true I hope. Many does, just doesn't look like it.
>
> But, you are "150%" right however, it sure DO NOT get the "RESPECT" it
> deserves!
I believe he meant that no one cares about the fact that someone might
be able to repla
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> OK, I need to stop feeding the trolls!
Told you it was going to be a long thread ;)
And thanks to Gilles (and of course, all the other developers on the
OpenBSD project, I have been propagating more systems at work year
after year), that
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> you don't sound like a complete moron giving advices about a software that
> you
> don't even use ...
+1 !
Steph (aka FRbsd)
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Felipe Alfaro Solana
wrote:
> Why isn't Postfix included?
> The license is not free, and thus can not be considered.
>
> And anyways, I found that switching from sendmail to postfix is
> extremely easy in OpenBSD.
Yay, another 20k long thread for nothing...
Consi
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:07 AM, James Peltier
wrote:
> There was mention of calomel.org recently. This is a great resource,
however,
> it needs to be a bit more updated. For example the following page advises
> *not* to use the GENERIC.MP kernel, however, considering how much work has
> gone int
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Vasiliy Kiryanov
wrote:
> I would want to use ypldap with our ldap server that work over ssl.
> The problem is how to change ypldap.conf to work with ldaps.
Hello,
I took this as a base :
http://kerneltrap.org/index.php?q=mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2008/10/11/358961
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Bob Beck wrote:
>The best place to get OpenBSD is from an official CD set, produced
in
> a secured location
Received my official CD set today, thank you all for your hard work!
Steph
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> The bright people that did the code said it wasn't good to do so. The normal
> operations of such a setup needs more resources from the same box to do the
> same things, showing in practice that it's not the most efficient way to do
> so wit
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Jean-Francois wrote:
> This is just to have the taste of how good is the actual achievement of
> security in openbsd.
Well, reading from the archives, that should give you a fairly good taste.
> Sorry please tell me how to proceed then ? For example gmail has
>
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Jean-Francois wrote:
> I intend to use the box as a simple firewall so I do not intend to have
> possible break into. The simple task is NAT rule
So this is nat + firewalling, not one task, two.
> Sorry I don't understand. I have just simple questions.
I believ
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
