On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 08:26:05PM -0400, Brennan Vincent wrote:
> Updated yesterday from 6.7 to a snapshot, and now:
>
> $ doas pkg_add -u
doas pkg_add -u -Dsnap
You need to do some things different once you change to -current
snapshots.
Might also have to wait for -current packages to match th
Stuart Longland wrote:
> On 21/10/20 9:55 am, Lee Nelson wrote:
> >> Alternatively use a single nic with vlans, and break out to separate
> >> ports on a managed switch.
> >>
> > Yes, that could work too, but this is one side of a pfsync/carp
> > redundant firewall setup, so I want to keep it as
On 21/10/20 9:55 am, Lee Nelson wrote:
>> Alternatively use a single nic with vlans, and break out to separate
>> ports on a managed switch.
>>
> Yes, that could work too, but this is one side of a pfsync/carp
> redundant firewall setup, so I want to keep it as simple as possible.
Silly question,
On 20 Oct 21:01, Uwe Werler wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> before opening a bug report I'll ask here because I want to make sure that I
> have not missed something.
>
> With the upgrade to 6.8 my cert validation seems to be broken because the
> hashed certs in /etc/ssl/certs are not honored anymore. I us
On 20 Oct 21:01, Uwe Werler wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> before opening a bug report I'll ask here because I want to make sure that I
> have not missed something.
You should probably submit a real bug report instead of jumping to
conclusions on misc@
>
> With the upgrade to 6.8 my cert validation se
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 05:32:48PM -0700, Andrew Robertson wrote:
> What's the standard way to upgrade installed ports after a system upgrade?
>
>
> I've been trying to figure out how to do this properly, and it doesn't seem
> to
>
> have any mention in the FAQ. Thanks in advance.
>From https:/
Every now and then people post a "question" about printing to this
mailng list which exposes their confusion. I am putting this email
together so that anybody capable of searching through the mailing list
can at least have terminology straight before asking for help.
Information presented here is
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:32:48 -0700, Andrew Robertson
wrote:
> What's the standard way to upgrade installed ports after a system
> upgrade?
>
>
> I've been trying to figure out how to do this properly, and it
> doesn't seem to
>
> have any mention in the FAQ. Thanks in advance.
>
"Finish up b
What's the standard way to upgrade installed ports after a system upgrade?
I've been trying to figure out how to do this properly, and it doesn't
seem to
have any mention in the FAQ. Thanks in advance.
Hi folks,
before opening a bug report I'll ask here because I want to make sure that I
have not missed something.
With the upgrade to 6.8 my cert validation seems to be broken because the
hashed certs in /etc/ssl/certs are not honored anymore. I usually stored our
L1 and L2 ca certs in /etc/ssl/c
Updated yesterday from 6.7 to a snapshot, and now:
$ doas pkg_add -u
quirks-3.458 signed on 2020-10-18T13:56:14Z
Can't update spidermonkey-60.9.0v1->spidermonkey78-78.3.1v1: no update
found for spidermonkey-60.9.0v1
Can't install polkit-0.116p1->0.118: can't resolve spidermonkey78-78.3.1v1
Is
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2020-10-20, Lee Nelson wrote:
The only real solution here, aside from using better hardware, seems to be
to use adapters with different drivers. That is the approach I'm trying
next.
Alternatively use a single nic with vlans, and break out
In relayd.conf(5), the tls section under PROTOCOLS states the following:
no session tickets
Disable TLS session tickets. relayd(8) supports stateless TLS
session tickets (RFC 5077) to implement TLS session resumption.
The default is to enable session tickets.
However, an SSL Labs
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 09:48:44AM +0530, Anirudh Oppiliappan wrote:
> Firefox 81 gives the below errors, and tabs hang for about ~2-3 minutes
> before becoming usable, when unveil is enabled:
>
> libGL error: failed to open /dev/drm0: No such file or directory
> libGL error: failed to loa
Thank you so much Chris and Tom for your thoughtful and detailed
replies. I found them inspiring and full of wisdom and appreciate your
time in putting them together.
Hakan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> A contrived test of network performance, using httpd(8) to serve a
> large file from an mfs ramdisk over plain http, yields about 175 mbit/s
> sustained transfer speed. I was not expecting to reach even 100 mbit/s
> so this was a positive surprise, even if it's nowhere near the full
> gigabit tha
Le mardi 20 octobre 2020 à 12:41 +, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> On 2020-10-20, Bastien Durel wrote:
> > Le lundi 19 octobre 2020 à 17:17 +0100, Tom Smyth a écrit :
> > > Hi Bastien,
> > Hello
> >
> > > can you do a
> > > route show -n |grep 10\.42
> >
> > Boot time:
> >
> > default
On 2020-10-20, Bastien Durel wrote:
> Le lundi 19 octobre 2020 à 17:17 +0100, Tom Smyth a écrit :
>> Hi Bastien,
> Hello
>
>> can you do a
>> route show -n |grep 10\.42
>
> Boot time:
>
> default10.42.42.1 UGS55 - 8 em0
> 10.42.2/24 10.42.42.21
On 2020-10-20, SOUL_OF_ROOT 55 wrote:
Oh it must be release time, the trolls come out.
Note to other readers: please don't bother replying.
https://marc.info/?a=14761972861&r=1&w=2
On 2020-10-20, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 10/19/20 9:46 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2020-10-19, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>>
>>> What would these bypass problems look like? Hopefully the bypass feature
>>> can be turned off/ignored.
>>
>> If there are problems then possibly 2 of the ports eithe
On 2020-10-20, Lee Nelson wrote:
> The only real solution here, aside from using better hardware, seems to be
> to use adapters with different drivers. That is the approach I'm trying
> next.
Alternatively use a single nic with vlans, and break out to separate
ports on a managed switch.
On 2020-10-19, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
>
> Thanks Stuart for the quick answer. We'll see if and when UFPR
> (Universidade Federal do Paraná) updates their mirror.
>
>> http://openbsd.c3sl.ufpr.br/pub/OpenBSD/ exists again (it was
>> previously broken so was removed from the list) but does not have 6
On 2020-10-20, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering why the upgrade guide at
> https://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade68.html
>
> doesn't contain more list of files to remove.
>
> Sysclean gives out a lot more names, but I haven't removed them yet cuz I
>
> trust the upgrade guide more as it
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:19:26 -0600, "Raymond, David" wrote:
> I tried putting a filter that drives an HP Deskjet printer (works with
> lprng on linux) as an output filter in printcap and it didn't work.
> Would it be more proper to put it as an input filter? I am still on
> version 6.7 of the OS.
Le lundi 19 octobre 2020 à 17:17 +0100, Tom Smyth a écrit :
> Hi Bastien,
Hello
> can you do a
> route show -n |grep 10\.42
Boot time:
default10.42.42.1 UGS55 - 8 em0
10.42.2/24 10.42.42.21UGS00 - 8 em0
10.42.42
On 10/19/20 9:46 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2020-10-19, Harald Dunkel wrote:
What would these bypass problems look like? Hopefully the bypass feature
can be turned off/ignored.
If there are problems then possibly 2 of the ports either won't work
or will be connected directly to 2 of the
26 matches
Mail list logo
