On 09/09/18 07:05, Monah Baki wrote:
Hi All,
I have a OpenBSD 6.3 server in Amazon AWS, and I am trying to install from
ports letsencrypt. Install was running fine till I got a Fatal message
after it was done with the patching process
...
Thanks
Monah
acme-client(1) is in base and is used
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 10:55:40AM -0700, jungle Boogie wrote:
> > Ken,
> >
> > Just curious, are you using pf to filter out the bad websites for
> > you kids? I find that to be more challenging for our older daughter
> > to not stumble into the bad stuff and not the wholesome sites like
> > ope
Yes, First was with qmail, and now is with OpenSMTPD, four domains. All
my servers are OpenBSD.
/Ama et fact quod vis/
*Óscar Rubén Cuéllar Valcárcel*
044 55 2678 1717
El 09/09/18 a las 11:34, Ken M escribió:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 08:49:26AM +, Tim Jones wrote:
>> Ken,
>>
>> Putting all
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 04:52:01PM +, Ken M wrote:
> But frankly they go to a friends house in our red neck area with non tech
> savvy
> parents and who knows what happens. But frankly anywhere they are there is
> always something that could happen. I feel like there is no winning the battle
>
On 9/9/18 5:54 PM, Ken M wrote:
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 05:49:31PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
In a nutshell, monitoring email is concentrating on what is really
likely to be one of the less problematic areas. The others, which IMO
are MUCH more likely to be involved if any problems do occu
On a side note to this whole chain. My wife and I had another conversation about
this, and I think we are on the same page that there is no win in monitoring
their email. So I think I can stay out of the mail server business for now,
which I like.
I pointed our how her dad was a cop and what happe
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 05:49:31PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> In a nutshell, monitoring email is concentrating on what is really
> likely to be one of the less problematic areas. The others, which IMO
> are MUCH more likely to be involved if any problems do occur, are less
> amenable to th
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 05:46:40PM +0100, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
> Maybe your ISP has option for "Parental Control"?? I know these days it is a
> big concern so many do offer this type of service
>
>
> Just a thought??
>
As I mentioned we use OpenDNS for the home internet, which handles all
c
On 2018/09/09 12:37, Ken M wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 10:08:39AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Scanning for troubling words is not going to work without being able to
> > see the email itself for context. Whether it's automated scanning or
> > reading the mails yourself there are still p
On 9/9/18 5:42 PM, Ken M wrote:
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 11:24:38AM -0500, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
While you should not take technical advice on mail servers from me,
I've raised two kids to adulthood with a 17 year old to go, and had
almost 200 foster children.
The impedance mismatch you have
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 11:24:38AM -0500, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
>
> While you should not take technical advice on mail servers from me,
> I've raised two kids to adulthood with a 17 year old to go, and had
> almost 200 foster children.
>
> The impedance mismatch you have with the missus is mor
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 10:08:39AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Scanning for troubling words is not going to work without being able to
> see the email itself for context. Whether it's automated scanning or
> reading the mails yourself there are still privacy issues. Plus whatever
> monitoring
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 08:49:26AM +, Tim Jones wrote:
> Ken,
>
> Putting all the OpenBSD evangelists to one side, there are two things to say.
>
> First, like me, you might use OpenBSD for many things. And like me, you might
> come to the conclusion that using OpenBSD for mail is not one of
On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 08:32:17 -0700
Chris Bennett wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 05:10:51AM +, Timo Myyrä wrote:
> > Chris Bennett writes:
> >
> > > I know that PostgreSQL can be accessed via a socket or through
> > > 127.0.0.1.
> > I read your mail and I still don't know what you are t
Funky connection so I skipped this on purpose.
dmesg:
OpenBSD 6.4-beta (GENERIC.MP) #285: Sat Sep 1 12:51:52 MDT 2018
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 4077236224 (3888MB)
avail mem = 3944423424 (3761MB)
mpath0 at root
scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 ta
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 05:10:51AM +, Timo Myyrä wrote:
> Chris Bennett writes:
>
> > I know that PostgreSQL can be accessed via a socket or through
> > 127.0.0.1.
> I read your mail and I still don't know what you are trying to accomplish.
> Could you give a more specific questions so they a
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 12:23:41PM +, Thomas Bohl wrote:
> > But the second (far more important) point I want to make is please *THINK
> > TWICE* if "running your own mail server" is something you are planning to
> > do on your home internet connection.
>
> For all intents and purposes, send
On 2018-09-09, Monah Baki wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a OpenBSD 6.3 server in Amazon AWS, and I am trying to install from
> ports letsencrypt. Install was running fine till I got a Fatal message
> after it was done with the patching process
In most cases, ports is really intended for ports develo
On 2018-09-09, Tim Jones
wrote:
>
>> "announce all" is probably missing here, since the default in 6.3 was
>> "announce self" and so transit routes would be filtered.
>>
>
> Fabulous ! Thanks for that.
>
> I was somewhere along the right lines, but I was confused with talk in the
> docs of "ann
> "announce all" is probably missing here, since the default in 6.3 was
> "announce self" and so transit routes would be filtered.
>
Fabulous ! Thanks for that.
I was somewhere along the right lines, but I was confused with talk in the docs
of "announce all" being no-op which I took to mean "
Hi All,
I have a OpenBSD 6.3 server in Amazon AWS, and I am trying to install from
ports letsencrypt. Install was running fine till I got a Fatal message
after it was done with the patching process
===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-setup_py
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text le
Am 09.09.2018 um 15:36 schrieb flipchan:
> Randomly jumping into this thread , does anyone have a quick and easy way to
> do auto matical responses to certain aliases in opensmtpd?
>
Not with OpenSMTPD, but with Dovecot's Sieve
https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Examples#Vacation_auto
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 01:17:40PM +, Tim Jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working with something in a lab environment at the moment, testing out
> OpenBGPD to see if it can replace "something else" on an internal network.
>
> I have three OpenBSD instances (A <->B<->C), and whilst B is learning r
Randomly jumping into this thread , does anyone have a quick and easy way to do
auto matical responses to certain aliases in opensmtpd?
On September 9, 2018 12:23:41 PM UTC, Thomas Bohl
wrote:
>> But the second (far more important) point I want to make is please
>*THINK TWICE* if "running your
Hi,
I'm working with something in a lab environment at the moment, testing out
OpenBGPD to see if it can replace "something else" on an internal network.
I have three OpenBSD instances (A <->B<->C), and whilst B is learning routes
from C, it is not pushing them out to A, no matter how relaxed I
My personal experience with vultr is good. At the moment I'm using my
own 6.2 iso. Everything runs smoothly.
Regarding network performance I noticed no problems till today but it is
just a small mail server.
On 9 September 2018 10:05:16 BST, Étienne
>
> On 8 September 2018 19:55:16 BST, Ken M
> But the second (far more important) point I want to make is please *THINK
> TWICE* if "running your own mail server" is something you are planning to do
> on your home internet connection.
For all intents and purposes, sending emails from a private internet
connection directly to the receiving
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 10:08:39AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> own email server, when I have never done it before on any OS, worth it
> >> over some
> >> other solution. And yes I am very open to other suggestions for a
> >> solution, even
> >> if it is something I have to pay for, to avoid
On 2018-09-09, Friedrich Locke wrote:
> if you demand for performance, FreeBSD + Qmail-ldap is THE way to go.
qmail-ldap (or, well, anything+ldap for that matter) is a relatively
complex setup and total overkill for a personal mail server.
>
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 12:26 PM Ken M wrote:
>
>> Ju
Ken,
Putting all the OpenBSD evangelists to one side, there are two things to say.
First, like me, you might use OpenBSD for many things. And like me, you might
come to the conclusion that using OpenBSD for mail is not one of those
things.Personally I prefer to use a decent Linux stack for my m
> Wiadomość napisana przez Ken M w dniu 08.09.2018, o godz.
> 20:55:
>
> 2. Is vultr a good place to host an openbsd box? If not interested in hearing
> alternatives.
my own experience:
1) Vultr gave me very bad support experience. If you restore from snapshot you
have to open support ticke
On 8 September 2018 19:55:16 BST, Ken M
> My questions are:
>
>1. Is it still current information that it would be better to use my
>own
>image/install/iso for openbsd on Vultr?
I just like to manage the disk my own way, so I don't use their install
process. But they provide iPXE and that
I think vultr is setting a great example that many hosting providers should
follow, I mean I bet 65% run kvm and then it is possible to run openbsd , but I
think many providers doesn't put in the energy to do it / configure a template
for it
On September 9, 2018 12:26:29 AM UTC, Ken M wrote:
>
33 matches
Mail list logo
