HEy,
sorry found my mistake :) had some urls referred that seems to be no
longer available so I removed them from the config.
regards
Markus
Am 10.05.2016 um 06:36 schrieb Bob Beck:
it has been back for quite some time
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Markus Rosjat wrote:
Hi there,
just
> >It's great to see OpenBSD Project supporting Let's Encrypt.
>
> I am absolutely not supporting Let's Encrypt. The client scares the
> shit out of me, and shows me how low the bar has become.
"client effectively containing millions of lines of code, connects
to server on the internet to get a c
it has been back for quite some time
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Markus Rosjat wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> just a short question about the site coming up again.
> Since our spamd-setup tries to get some blacklists form the site I was
> wondering if there is any info about the the time schedule fo
>It's great to see OpenBSD Project supporting Let's Encrypt.
I am absolutely not supporting Let's Encrypt. The client scares the
shit out of me, and shows me how low the bar
has become. Considering all I need is put something on a web site that
I can convince a DNS server is the one they'll check,
These are the lines from the robots.txt [1] file.
Disallow: /cs/donations.html
Disallow: /de/donations.html
Disallow: /es/donations.html
Disallow: /fr/donations.html
Disallow: /hu/donations.html
Disallow: /ja/donations.html
Disallow: /lt/donations.html
Disallow: /nl/donations.html
Disallow: /pt/don
On 5/9/16 4:26 PM, Daniel Jakots wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2016 15:03:30 -0600, Jeff Ross
wrote:
Trying to install apache-httpd-openbsd in -current
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports-cvs&m=146186762111571&w=2
Hmm--I went through all of the ports@ messages looking for a removal
announcement but
On 5/9/16 4:25 PM, Fred wrote:
On 05/09/16 22:58, Jeff Ross wrote:
On 5/9/16 3:21 PM, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote:
try pkg_add
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/apache-httpd-2.4.20p1.tgz
That's apache 2.4, I want the 1.3.9 version that is, as my subject line
say
On 5/9/16 4:30 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2016-05-09, Jeff Ross wrote:
Trying to install apache-httpd-openbsd in -current and it seems the
package is no longer available.
Correct.
Options:
- (preferred) migrate your configuration to a maintained http
server version.
I need mod_rewrite
On 2016-05-09, Jeff Ross wrote:
> Trying to install apache-httpd-openbsd in -current and it seems the
> package is no longer available.
Correct.
Options:
- (preferred) migrate your configuration to a maintained http
server version.
- install 5.9 release.
- checkout an old version of the port
On 05/09/16 22:58, Jeff Ross wrote:
On 5/9/16 3:21 PM, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote:
try pkg_add
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/apache-httpd-2.4.20p1.tgz
That's apache 2.4, I want the 1.3.9 version that is, as my subject line
says, apache-httpd-openbsd.
Jeff
It
On Mon, 9 May 2016 15:03:30 -0600, Jeff Ross
wrote:
> Trying to install apache-httpd-openbsd in -current
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports-cvs&m=146186762111571&w=2
On 5/9/16 3:21 PM, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote:
try pkg_add
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/apache-httpd-2.4.20p1.tgz
That's apache 2.4, I want the 1.3.9 version that is, as my subject line
says, apache-httpd-openbsd.
Jeff
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 08:42:32PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016-05-09, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote:
> > - Do you plan to support ftp.openbsd.org? Would be great to
> > download packages with more security
>
> https is meant to provide privacy from eavesdroppers on the network
> path b
> Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> > It is really nice to finally see TLS on openbsd.org. How about redirecting
> > http to https?
>
> I dislike the idea.
Let me be more clear, both of you.
Those decisions will made by the people (Bob et all) who maintain the
back end.
They don't need your opinio
> Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> > It is really nice to finally see TLS on openbsd.org. How about redirecting
> > http to https?
>
> I dislike the idea.
And noone cares what you like or dislike. It is not your site.
Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> It is really nice to finally see TLS on openbsd.org. How about redirecting
> http to https?
I dislike the idea.
An http->https redirect does not prevent a MITM by itself.
It also prevents the easy use of caching or proper proxies with the site.
Purely informative s
On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 11:46:11AM +0200, Sjöholm Per-Olov wrote:
> > On 08 May 2016, at 00:39, Sjöholm Per-Olov wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I have skipped all major releases of OpenBSD after 5.4 for one firewall due
> to
> > watchdog timeout resets on the em driver. Earlier today I fired up a 5.9
>
Hi Ville,
> Am 09.05.2016 um 18:04 schrieb Ville Valkonen :
>
> On 9 May 2016 at 16:03, Axel Rau wrote:
>> A firewall box (dual Atom N270, 2GB, 5 nics, running 5.8-current
> (GENERIC.MP)
>> #1219)
>> suddenly started logging
>>v_type 1
>>f_type 1
>> (up to 40 times/sec) and stopp
Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> It is really nice to finally see TLS on openbsd.org. How about redirecting
> http to https?
I dislike the idea.
For one, it does not stop a MITM by itself.
In addition, enforced encryption makes it hard to cache and/or use proper
http proxies with the site.
Pure
try pkg_add
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/apache-httpd-2.4.20p1.tgz
Hi all,
Trying to install apache-httpd-openbsd in -current and it seems the
package is no longer available. I cvs uped my src and ports and built
the system from source but when I try to install apache-httpd-openbsd
from ports I'm getting the "reading plist|Error: unknown fragment SHARED
at /
On 2016-05-09, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote:
> - Do you plan to support ftp.openbsd.org? Would be great to
> download packages with more security
https is meant to provide privacy from eavesdroppers on the network
path between the endpoints. security is a different matter (packages
have been signe
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 06:23:51PM +, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> > Let's Encrypt uses 4096.
> >
>
> I think lets encrypt uses by default 2048, not 4096.
You're right. The default is 2048.
> Also, 4096 might indeed cause trouble with some old software. I recall
> issues with mono and older
Hi,
I got a "kernel: protection fault trap, code=0" on OpenBSD 5.9-current
(GENERIC.MP) #2008: Sat May 7 08:16:29 MDT 2016 snapshot.
It seems that this is not a kernel panic:
ddb{2}> show panic
the kernel did not panic
If you need more info just ask.
kernel: protection fault trap, code=0
On 2016-05-09, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote:
> - The RSA is 4096 bits. If I remember correctly, reyk@ said once
> that 4096 is overkill. Any specific reason to use 4096 instead of
> 2048?
That was then, this is now.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
I have a couple questions regarding IKED use that I couldn’t find in the
docs:
Is it capable of use for host-to-host tunnels or just net-to-net?
In my case I’m trying to do a simple tunnel between hosts for spamd synching
and a few other misc things. Running OpenBSD 5.9.
PF rules:
set skip on e
I have a couple questions regarding IKED use that I couldn’t find in the
docs:
Is it capable of use for host-to-host tunnels or just net-to-net?
In my case I’m trying to do a simple tunnel between hosts for spamd synching
and a few other misc things. Running OpenBSD 5.9.
PF rules:
set skip on e
Hi misc@,
Just a user experience for your consideration.
I picked up a new bsd.rd from snapshots in toronto. Checked the sha256
and signify to make sure it's good. Moved it to / and rebooted with:
boot> hd0a:/bsd.rd
selected Install with standard options.
clean download from the mirror followed
On Mon, May 9, 2016 12:57 pm, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote:
>
> - I don't know in modern browsers, but Links 2.12 say that the
> certificate is not valid. It's just old browsers, or firefox also
> have this same problem?
Make sure you go to www.openbsd.org as it seems the cert is not valid for
openb
> Just a user experience for your consideration.
>
> I picked up a new bsd.rd from snapshots in toronto. Checked the sha256
> and signify to make sure it's good. Moved it to / and rebooted with:
>
> boot> hd0a:/bsd.rd
> selected Install with standard options.
> clean download from the mirror foll
Hi there,
just a short question about the site coming up again.
Since our spamd-setup tries to get some blacklists form the site I was
wondering if there is any info about the the time schedule for the
maintenance?
Regards
Markus
Am 08.05.2016 um 23:44 schrieb Stefan Wollny:
Am 05/08/16 um
Let's Encrypt uses 4096.
I think lets encrypt uses by default 2048, not 4096. Also, 4096 might indeed
cause trouble with some old software. I recall issues with mono and older java
versions.
It is really nice to finally see TLS on openbsd.org. How about redirecting
http to https? Also, it seem
2016-05-09 18:57 GMT+02:00 :
> - I don't know in modern browsers, but Links 2.12 say that the
> certificate is not valid. It's just old browsers, or firefox also
> have this same problem?
All's good. See
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?viaform=on&d=www.openbsd.org
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 06:57:52PM +0200, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote:
> It's great to see OpenBSD Project supporting Let's Encrypt. I don't
> know if you folks still configuring it, but there's some points
> that I noticed:
> - I don't know in modern browsers, but Links 2.12 say that the
> certi
It's great to see OpenBSD Project supporting Let's Encrypt. I don't
know if you folks still configuring it, but there's some points
that I noticed:
- I don't know in modern browsers, but Links 2.12 say that the
certificate is not valid. It's just old browsers, or firefox also
have this same prob
m...@pmars.jp writes:
> Hi,
> Thanks a lot for all the really nice job you re doing here.
>
> I'm trying to install Claws-mail without Dbus but that seems not
> possible.
The ports tree tries to provide packages usable by most. What if
another user wants claws-mail linked against dbus, but not a
On 2016-05-08, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> Am 05/08/16 um 20:03 schrieb Bob Beck:
>> There will be an extended downtime of the main ftp and www sites for
>> an upgrade today starting in approximately one hour's time from now.
>>
>> The mirror sites should be unaffected - so use a mirror if you
>> disc
On 9 May 2016 at 16:03, Axel Rau wrote:
> A firewall box (dual Atom N270, 2GB, 5 nics, running 5.8-current
(GENERIC.MP)
> #1219)
> suddenly started logging
> v_type 1
> f_type 1
> (up to 40 times/sec) and stopped routing.
>
> The effect went away after disconnecting all but one nic
Hi,
Thanks a lot for all the really nice job you re doing here.
I'm trying to install Claws-mail without Dbus but that seems not
possible.
Is there a way to do that via pkg_add or pkg_delete?
I saw smtg on the man with the -D option and 'libdepends' value,
stating the lib might not be fulfille
A firewall box (dual Atom N270, 2GB, 5 nics, running 5.8-current (GENERIC.MP)
#1219)
suddenly started logging
v_type 1
f_type 1
(up to 40 times/sec) and stopped routing.
The effect went away after disconnecting all but one nic.
Any help appreciated,
Axel
---
PGP-Key:29E99DD6 ☀ c
Hello,
on 08.05.2016 23:44, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Anyone know of an up2date mirror of 'current.html'?
(Google just found one with the latest entries from 2005...)
:-(
In case of doubt,
http://web.archive.org/web/20160401125246/http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html
isn't far too "way back",
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:46:48AM +0100, Zé Loff wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have a IKEv1 setup that allows my roaming laptop (amd64 -current) to
> connect to the office LAN (i386 patched 5.6) using outgoing NAT. Everything*
> works fine, I can ssh machines, browse internal websites, the works.
>
> Th
On 08/05/16 18:44, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Am 05/08/16 um 20:03 schrieb Bob Beck:
There will be an extended downtime of the main ftp and www sites for
an upgrade today starting in approximately one hour's time from now.
The mirror sites should be unaffected - so use a mirror if you
discover the ma
> Am 05/09/16 um 08:20 schrieb Holger Glaess:
>> hi
>>
>> is there an possiblity to forward dhcp request from
>> an rdomain X to the runing dhcp server in rdomain 0 ?
>>
>>
>> if i start the dhcrelay -i em1 192.168.131.250,
>>
>> i see that he forward the request but never reach the server.
>>
>> t
Am 05/09/16 um 08:20 schrieb Holger Glaess:
> hi
>
> is there an possiblity to forward dhcp request from
> an rdomain X to the runing dhcp server in rdomain 0 ?
>
>
> if i start the dhcrelay -i em1 192.168.131.250,
>
> i see that he forward the request but never reach the server.
>
> the clien
45 matches
Mail list logo
