On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 11:46:11AM +0200, Sjöholm Per-Olov wrote: > > On 08 May 2016, at 00:39, Sjöholm Per-Olov <p...@incedo.org> wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > I have skipped all major releases of OpenBSD after 5.4 for one firewall due > to > > watchdog timeout resets on the em driver. Earlier today I fired up a 5.9 > > release and patched it up to 5.9 stable and let it take over from the old > one. > > It seems to go very well. But I do have one question. > > > > > > The system seems to work as it should. > > > > But what does this mean? > > Is it bad? > > > > > > root@xanadu:~#grep -i watchdog /var/log/messages > > May 8 00:12:15 xanadu /bsd: em1: watchdog: head 118 tail 182 TDH 118 TDT > 118 > > May 8 00:25:33 xanadu /bsd: em1: watchdog: head 181 tail 246 TDH 181 TDT > 181 > > May 8 00:26:35 xanadu /bsd: em1: watchdog: head 137 tail 202 TDH 137 TDT > 137 > > root@xanadu:~# > >
Hey, At the very least, you'll want to fire up the 5.9 install and provide a full dmesg output, or better yet ``sendbug -P''. Cheers! > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Regards > > Peo > > -- > > GPG keyID: 9429C093 > > GPG fingerprint: 5F37 4298 A07F C614 647B 458C A756 5C4E 9429 C093 > > > > > Well??? It was not good. I once again had to go back to the old 5.4 as the > network traffic was not stable. > > > I have two nics (PCI pass through in KVM). > em0 at pci0 dev 3 function 0 "Intel 82576" rev 0x01: irq 11, address > 00:1b:21:cc:51:7c > em1 at pci0 dev 4 function 0 "Intel 82576" rev 0x01: irq 10, address > 00:1b:21:cc:51:7d > > I use a couple of VLANs and also IPv6 on top on em0. em1 on the other hand is > just an interface with an IP and an IP alias on it, no VLANs or so. > > Any clues of how to track this down? I can fire the machine up again and to > some test... > > Thanks > Peo
