hey josh,
this should be fixed in src/sys/dev/pci/if_athn_pci.c r1.13.
sorry for the inconvenience, but thank you for the report, especially the
backtrace.
cheers,
dlg
On 23 November 2013 16:37, Josh Grosse wrote:
> Summary: with src/sys/dev/pci/if_athn_pci.c at revision 1.12,
> suspend/res
Summary: with src/sys/dev/pci/if_athn_pci.c at revision 1.12, suspend/resume
will produce a uvm_fault on resume. I cannot reproduce the panic if I revert
to revision 1.11.
Of note: ddb(4) produces a brief traceback and a prompt but is inoperative.
I am unable to get a dump if ddb.panic=0. This
On 11/22/2013 10:50 AM, Rick Pettit wrote:
Lewis,
If censorship is your thing, why don’t you start by censoring yourself.
What you are asking for here is offensive.
-Rick
+1
On Nov 22, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
Il 22/nov/2013 19:07 "J. Lewis Muir" ha scritto:
On 11/22/1
> It looks like a pretty one-sided deal you're proposing:
> passive-aggressive moves to control the speech of those who have
> respected your freedom to express your opinion and be heard. Pretty
> damned selfish behavior on your part as far as I can tell.
Michael -- well said.
On Nov 22, 2013, at 10:06 AM, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
> On 11/22/13 11:17 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
>> If it's offensive for you, compile your own spamd man page with
>> the diff you so happily provided, and live the rest of your life
>> happy. Remember to always take this pill again on 1st of
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Chris Smith wrote:
> Mentioned previously:
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
> > Note that the mongodb port is currently broken (and has been since
> 5.3-ish iirc).
>
> Wondering if mongodb is operational with -current?
>
> No
Mentioned previously:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Note that the mongodb port is currently broken (and has been since 5.3-ish
> iirc).
Wondering if mongodb is operational with -current?
Thank you,
Chris
On 2013-11-22, haris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first of all, thanks @sthen for your answer (OP has no net access atm).
>
> We are to the point where the clients get ip (windows/linux/OpenBSD) and
> traffic is passing through the server as expected.
>
> There is a very strange problem with ssh service thoug
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
> On 11/22/13 11:17 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> > If it's offensive for you, compile your own spamd man page with
> > the diff you so happily provided, and live the rest of your life
> > happy. Remember to always take this pill again on 1st of May, an
On 22 November 2013 10:06, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
> On 11/22/13 11:17 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
>> If it's offensive for you, compile your own spamd man page with
>> the diff you so happily provided, and live the rest of your life
>> happy. Remember to always take this pill again on 1st of May,
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 09:48:02PM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
>
> I'm pretty sure Bob has noticed (and likely quite some time ago
> ignored) this conversation.
>
> You made your point and argumented for it. It does not apply here
> though, so stop. Now. Please.
>
Actually, the longer it runs,
On 11/22/13 20:09, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
On 11/22/13 12:34 PM, System Administrator wrote:
Hi J. Lewis,
I am not a developer, but I've been lurking on this list for a very
long time and on that basis can tell you that you've committed two
cardinal sins as far as this mailing list is concerned:
J. Lewis Muir wrote:
If it's somehow offensive to them
and can be changed in a small way not to be, then I would accept the
patch to change it. Everybody wins--no big deal.
If everybody adapts what they say, to what they think others want to
hear, then we no longer have freedom of speach. Eve
On Nov 21 20:04:32, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 08:02:06PM +0100, za...@gmx.com wrote:
> > Different people have different concepts of morality. I believe it
> > would be better to remove anything that is controversial, for
> > whatever reason
You emails are controversial, ap
> > I don't see it that way. Huckleberry Finn is a book, and I don't need
> > to read it unless I want to. The spamd(8) man page is a man page I need
> > to read in order to understand how to use spamd.
>
> Let me fix that for you:
>
> "The spamd(8) man page is a man page I don't need to read i
> 2) OpenBSD is the ultimate volunteer effort -- the developers do it in
> their "free" time FOR PERSONAL FUN. Many of them have made it very
> clear that they would cease development if it stops being fun. Your
> original message (title and intro) goes to the heart of this issue. Its
> tone an
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 01:09:36PM -0600, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
> I don't see it that way. Huckleberry Finn is a book, and I don't need
> to read it unless I want to. The spamd(8) man page is a man page I need
> to read in order to understand how to use spamd.
Let me fix that for you:
"The spam
Hi J. Lewis,
I am not a developer, but I've been lurking on this list for a very
long time and on that basis can tell you that you've committed two
cardinal sins as far as this mailing list is concerned:
1) you failed to do your homework -- had you done some research, in
particular about the O
On 11/22/13 12:34 PM, System Administrator wrote:
> Hi J. Lewis,
>
> I am not a developer, but I've been lurking on this list for a very
> long time and on that basis can tell you that you've committed two
> cardinal sins as far as this mailing list is concerned:
>
> 1) you failed to do your homewo
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:06 PM, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
> On 11/22/13 11:17 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
>> If it's offensive for you, compile your own spamd man page with
>> the diff you so happily provided, and live the rest of your life
>> happy. Remember to always take this pill again on 1st o
Lewis,
If censorship is your thing, why don’t you start by censoring yourself.
What you are asking for here is offensive.
-Rick
On Nov 22, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> Il 22/nov/2013 19:07 "J. Lewis Muir" ha scritto:
>>
>> On 11/22/13 11:17 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
> Well, no one wants to maintain a patch forever.
You lead a charmed life, my friend. Be well.
Il 22/nov/2013 19:07 "J. Lewis Muir" ha scritto:
>
> On 11/22/13 11:17 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> > If it's offensive for you, compile your own spamd man page with
> > the diff you so happily provided, and live the rest of your life
> > happy. Remember to always take this pill again on 1st o
On 11/22/13 11:17 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> If it's offensive for you, compile your own spamd man page with
> the diff you so happily provided, and live the rest of your life
> happy. Remember to always take this pill again on 1st of May, and 1st
> of November, every year.
Hi, Giancarlo.
W
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 06:41:37PM +0200, Jeff Goettsch wrote:
> What does /etc/ssh/ssh_config look like on the OpenBSD client?
The file is the default that comes with OpenBSD. No change there...
--
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should I start my reply below the quo
Em 21-11-2013 18:44, J. Lewis Muir escreveu:
> Hi, Shawn. I understand that, and I'm not trying to tell people how
> they should talk on a mailing list. But to me documentation for a
> project like OpenBSD is different. It's not individual people talking
> however they like to talk. It's well-writt
What does /etc/ssh/ssh_config look like on the OpenBSD client?
--
Jeff Goettsch
Agricultural and Resource Economics
University of California, Davis
http://agecon.ucdavis.edu/
On Fri, November 22, 2013 6:52 am, haris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first of all, thanks @sthen for your answer (OP has no net acce
Hi,
first of all, thanks @sthen for your answer (OP has no net access atm).
We are to the point where the clients get ip (windows/linux/OpenBSD) and
traffic is passing through the server as expected.
There is a very strange problem with ssh service though. While internet
traffic
is being routed
28 matches
Mail list logo
