Lewis, If censorship is your thing, why don’t you start by censoring yourself.
What you are asking for here is offensive. -Rick On Nov 22, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Paolo Aglialoro <paol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Il 22/nov/2013 19:07 "J. Lewis Muir" <jlm...@imca-cat.org> ha scritto: >> >> On 11/22/13 11:17 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: >>> If it's offensive for you, compile your own spamd man page with >>> the diff you so happily provided, and live the rest of your life >>> happy. Remember to always take this pill again on 1st of May, and 1st >>> of November, every year. >> >> Hi, Giancarlo. >> >> Well, no one wants to maintain a patch forever. I'd maintain it for a >> while if there was a good chance it would get accepted at some point, >> but if there's no chance, then I wouldn't bother. >> >> I'm a little puzzled over the whole resistance to the patch. If I >> wrote a man page for some software I wrote, and if an example in it was >> considered off-color by someone, and that someone submitted a patch to >> me to change it slightly to no longer be off-color to them, and they >> asked in a kind way, and the patch didn't hurt the clarity of the man >> page in any way, I would likely accept the patch. How am I hurt by it? >> I may not agree with the person, but why would I insist on keeping an >> example that seems off-color to them? If it's somehow offensive to them >> and can be changed in a small way not to be, then I would accept the >> patch to change it. Everybody wins--no big deal. >> >> Lewis > > +1
