Hi,
I added an entry to want.html as I am looking for a laptop to replace
the laptop I have at the moment which has some really bad heat related
issues and I have been hobbling along with it for awhile now. I am in
the Toronto area. I thought I would post to misc@ for some greater
exposure. I
Hi, all.
CD sets arrived today in Tauranga, New Zealand.
Thanks to Theo and all the developers and other people behind OpenBSD -
your work is much appreciated.
I started playing around with FreeBSD back in the 2.2.7 days. I'd
describe myself as a casual desktop/workstation user. Back in the day
I was attracted to OpenBSD's heavy focus on security but was pulled
towards FreeBSD due to a good friend of mine being a FreeBSD
contributor ("dude, trust me, it's
Yes, I'd forgotten about demime. For anyone who is interested the screen dump
is now
posted at https://ubuntuone.com/3PBTfO0UENZO8yS8xvVqcF
Apologies to Monty, I'd intend to reply to the list and not personally. So this
is a
resend to the right address.
As it happens next week's lecture is on m
OK here is the screen dump.
Moss
- Original Message
-
Subject: Coursera
From:"McCarthy, Maurice"
Date:Wed, October 30, 2013 12:47 am
To: "'m...@mythic-beasts.com'"
--
Hi,
I lurk here as I'm learning OpenBSD but I write now because I'm a little
alarmed with a feature called Signature Track on Coursera.
I'm doing a free online course on the Introduction to Philosophy run from
the University of Edinburgh. https://www.coursera.org/course/introphil The
course is so
On 2013-10-28, Pieter Verberne wrote:
> What I actually wanted to do: I want to use two-factor authentication
> over ssh using passwd+yubikey. Is this possible? It looks like yubikey
> will 'replace' passwd authentication, and cannot supplement it.
You're right, login_yubikey does replace passwd
OCEANET - C?dric BASSAGET(ced...@oceanet.com) on 2013.10.29 18:27:09 +0100:
> Hi,
> Simple and general question :
> Is it a good thing to run PF on an openbgpd server (for security
> reasons), or should I de-activate PF ?
Yes, in general you should:
At least to make sure only traffic from your o
On 2013-10-29, OCEANET - Cédric BASSAGET wrote:
> Hi,
> Simple and general question :
> Is it a good thing to run PF on an openbgpd server (for security
> reasons), or should I de-activate PF ?
I use it, partly to mitigate ssh brute-force, partly so I can easily enable
pflow if I want to get sta
On 2013-10-29, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> It is a information added by the originating router of that route:
or in some cases, by a transit provider trying to steer traffic towards them ;)
Adam Thompson(athom...@athompso.net) on 2013.10.29 15:20:04 -0500:
> I've got two border gateways that peer (eBGP) with the same external AS;
> they also peer with each other (iBGP) as per normal BGP design.
>
> Naturally, the BGP RIB contains two copies of every route; one learned
> from the ex
Hi,
I use PF on some OpenBSD BGP+OSPF routers on Renater (IPv4 + IPv6), it
works like a charm.
Why this question ?
pf rule are simple:
pass in quick proto tcp from $bgp_neighbor_1 to $self_peering_1 port 179
pass out quick proto tcp from $self_peering_1 to $bgp_neighbor_1 port
179
--
Best regar
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 03:01:22PM +, Andy wrote:
> On Tue 29 Oct 2013 14:55:05 GMT, Adam Thompson wrote:
> >On 13-10-28 11:54 AM, Andy wrote:
> >>Would any of the esteemed OpenBSD developers be interested in adding
> >>support for BFD (Bidirectional Forward Detection) to OpenBSD.
> >>[...]
> >
I've got two border gateways that peer (eBGP) with the same external AS;
they also peer with each other (iBGP) as per normal BGP design.
Naturally, the BGP RIB contains two copies of every route; one learned
from the external peer and one learned from the internal peer.
However, when I run "b
(Posted last week to tech@, no bites there. Re-summarizing here.)
I've noticed that downing a vlan(4) interface does not remove the
associated link-local route from the default routing table.
This seems to directly contradict the ifconfig(8) manpage, which says
"This action automatically disab
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:16:20AM +, Andy wrote:
> Yea its 24.. Would even be happy to offer some champers..
>
> I think this is more of a Maudite crowd.. Connoisseurs on here...
>
> As I understand it you would need to write a small daemon to do the BFD
> state monitoring for the transmiss
On 10/29, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >I have a web program that attempts to access /dev/urandom from within the
> >/var/www chroot. Based on archive searches and googling, I've removed
> >the nodev flag from that mount and have created the random devices in
> >/var/www/dev/*
>
> So basically remov
Hi,
Simple and general question :
Is it a good thing to run PF on an openbgpd server (for security
reasons), or should I de-activate PF ?
Regards,
Cédric
--
OCEANET
---
[AGENCE DU MANS]
7, rue des Frênes
ZAC de la Pointe
72190 SARGE
I have the same problem but on a dell laptop with integrated NVidia
chip.
The chip is NVidia Geforce 8600M GS and since I upgraded to 5.4 my
laptop is
unusable (very slow window movement). I'm thinking of reinstall 5.3 to
have a
working laptop. I can't change GPU chipset.
There is a solution to
>I have a web program that attempts to access /dev/urandom from within the
>/var/www chroot. Based on archive searches and googling, I've removed
>the nodev flag from that mount and have created the random devices in
>/var/www/dev/*
So basically remove a layer of security. Awesome. See what
Hello Misc,
I have a web program that attempts to access /dev/urandom from within the
/var/www chroot. Based on archive searches and googling, I've removed
the nodev flag from that mount and have created the random devices in
/var/www/dev/*
This allows the program to work, but I'm wondering
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:15:38AM -0500, Adam Thompson wrote:
>> Are there any OpenBSD developers who don't like beer and/or caffeine?
>
> You can try bananas, but only monkeys will step up.
masturbating monkeys.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:15:38AM -0500, Adam Thompson wrote:
> Are there any OpenBSD developers who don't like beer and/or caffeine?
You can try bananas, but only monkeys will step up.
--
Antoine
Don't forget to vote!
On 9. oktober 2013 at 2:09 PM, openda...@hushmail.com wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>Could you guys help me vote for OpenBSD at Digital Ocean?
>
>https://digitalocean.uservoice.com/forums/136585-digital-ocean/suggestions/3232571-support-bsd-os-
>
>Basically it's the only SSD cloud hosting
On 2013 Oct 29 (Tue) at 17:44:51 +0200 (+0200), Gregory Edigarov wrote:
:On 10/28/2013 06:54 PM, Andy wrote:
:>Hi all,
:>
:>Would any of the esteemed OpenBSD developers be interested in adding support
for BFD (Bidirectional Forward Detection) to OpenBSD.
:>
:>The protocol itself seems pretty simpl
On 10/28/2013 06:54 PM, Andy wrote:
Hi all,
Would any of the esteemed OpenBSD developers be interested in adding support
for BFD (Bidirectional Forward Detection) to OpenBSD.
The protocol itself seems pretty simple and provides a sub-second keep-alive
mechanism to monitor links for routes. E.
No this is more than ping..
In essence it is, but is standardised and is supported on many vendors
equipment including Cisco and Juniper etc as used by all our Transit
providers..
It means that not only do we remove our BGP routes, but it means that
our carriers also remove the routes for our
On 13-10-29 10:01 AM, Andy wrote:
Amazing!
So we just need to find an alcoholic developer and we're on our way ;)
Could maybe send some caffeine and pro plus in the mean time ..
Are there any OpenBSD developers who don't like beer and/or caffeine?
Mind you, many of them are getting as old as
So this is an ICMP ping with some authentification (on the gateway of a
route) ??
Why is this not overkill ?
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Andy wrote:
> On Tue 29 Oct 2013 14:55:05 GMT, Adam Thompson wrote:
>
>> On 13-10-28 11:54 AM, Andy wrote:
>>
>>> Would any of the esteemed OpenBSD dev
On Tue 29 Oct 2013 14:55:05 GMT, Adam Thompson wrote:
On 13-10-28 11:54 AM, Andy wrote:
Would any of the esteemed OpenBSD developers be interested in adding
support for BFD (Bidirectional Forward Detection) to OpenBSD.
[...]
'+1's welcome from others who would be interested to show signs of
supp
On 13-10-28 11:54 AM, Andy wrote:
Would any of the esteemed OpenBSD developers be interested in adding
support for BFD (Bidirectional Forward Detection) to OpenBSD.
[...]
'+1's welcome from others who would be interested to show signs of
support/interest..
I can only agree, BFD support would
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 06:16:54AM -0400, Jiri B wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how would we define specific install.conf for specific host?
> We could you rewrite rules based on client's IP but what
> based on other attributes (hwaddr...)?
>
> I was thinking if it would be possible to pass such values
> as HT
On 10/29/13 13:45, Andy wrote:
Code snippets can be seen on;
http://sourceforge.net/projects/kbfd/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/bfdd/
Editing these to compile and work on OpenBSD and run 'bgpctl neighbor
$bfdpeer down' etc is beyond my skills..
No editing will make the license work in Ope
Thanks for ideas and examples guys :)
Cheers, Andy.
On 24/10/13 14:18, Comète wrote:
I use ifstated for that. This is my config file:
init-state auto
carp_up = "carp3.link.up && carp10.link.up && carp101.link.up &&
carp100.link.up && carp254.link.up && carp2.link.up && carp7.link.up
&& car
Code snippets can be seen on;
http://sourceforge.net/projects/kbfd/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/bfdd/
Editing these to compile and work on OpenBSD and run 'bgpctl neighbor
$bfdpeer down' etc is beyond my skills..
Thanks for reading, Andy.
On Tue 29 Oct 2013 11:16:20 GMT, Andy wrote:
Yea
Yea its 24.. Would even be happy to offer some champers..
I think this is more of a Maudite crowd.. Connoisseurs on here...
As I understand it you would need to write a small daemon to do the BFD
state monitoring for the transmission and reception of the heartbeats
with various peers. The proto
On 10/28/13 11:44, Brett Mahar wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:20:32 +0100
> "Peter J. Philipp" wrote:
>
> | I remember someone else writing to this list before saying the nvidia
> | driver is really slow. I just upgraded my main workstation from 5.3 to
> | 5.4 and it indeed is.
> |
> | So I'm
Hi,
how would we define specific install.conf for specific host?
We could you rewrite rules based on client's IP but what
based on other attributes (hwaddr...)?
I was thinking if it would be possible to pass such values
as HTTP headers values but our `ftp' seems to not allow us
to define own HTTP
Hi,
Just to signal that the last change on spec_vnops.c (1.77) correct my
problem: now the system don't deadlock.
Thanks a lot.
--
Sebastien Marie
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 09:59:43AM +0200, Sébastien Marie wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 05:54:22PM +0200, Sébastien Marie wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
39 matches
Mail list logo
