how to "aggregate" a single TCP connection, is posible?

2013-08-21 Thread Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
Is there a way to duplicate the throughput of a single TCP connection using two servers having two gigabit NICs? I have tried using LACP but I cannot get more than 900MB of throughput... dmesg both servers are equal: OpenBSD 5.2 (GENERIC.MP) #368: Wed Aug 1 10:04:49 MDT 2012 dera...@amd64.o

Re: relayd crash

2013-08-21 Thread Bogdan Andu
yes. we waiting for tests to finish - I launched 3 concurrent tests. tomorrow I'll give you the results. From: Stuart Henderson To: Bogdan Andu Cc: "misc@openbsd.org" Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 6:06 PM Subject: Re: relayd crash On 2013/08/21 06:32,

Re: ssh/sftp performance

2013-08-21 Thread Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On 2013-08-21 15:28, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Darren Tucker wrote: > > > > I noticed my CPU supports AES, but not AESNI, so at first, I though that > > > that might be using up all my CPU, but that only accounts for for 48% of > > > CPU usage. Is there anything else I can do to improve perfor

Re: Updating past 5.4-current flag day w/ SSH only (amd64, maybe others)

2013-08-21 Thread Peter Hessler
On 2013 Aug 21 (Wed) at 17:12:56 +0200 (+0200), Paul de Weerd wrote: :On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:55:26PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: :| On 2013-08-19, Paul de Weerd wrote: :| >| :| >| 12. Re-add packages as per current.html: :| >| :| >| # pkg_add -z -l /root/pkg_list_manual :| >| # pkg_add -z

Re: ssh/sftp performance

2013-08-21 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Darren Tucker wrote: > > I noticed my CPU supports AES, but not AESNI, so at first, I though that > > that might be using up all my CPU, but that only accounts for for 48% of > > CPU usage. Is there anything else I can do to improve performance? > > Try one of the faster MACs (umac...@openssh.co

Re: Updating past 5.4-current flag day w/ SSH only (amd64, maybe others)

2013-08-21 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:55:26PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: | On 2013-08-19, Paul de Weerd wrote: | >| | >| 12. Re-add packages as per current.html: | >| | >| # pkg_add -z -l /root/pkg_list_manual | >| # pkg_add -za -l /root/pkg_list_full | > | > I don't really understand why you're doing

Re: relayd crash

2013-08-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/08/21 06:32, Bogdan Andu wrote: > [Switching to thread 1027726] > 0x029e250da81a in kevent () at :2 > 2 : No such file or directory. > in > Current language: auto; currently asm > (gdb) oh, I forgot, you will need to "continue" here ;) > > launched qualys scan and now

Re: ssh/sftp performance

2013-08-21 Thread Darren Tucker
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 01:29:50AM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: [...] > I noticed my CPU supports AES, but not AESNI, so at first, I though that > that might be using up all my CPU, but that only accounts for for 48% of > CPU usage. Is there anything else I can do to improve performance? Try

Re: Updating past 5.4-current flag day w/ SSH only (amd64, maybe others)

2013-08-21 Thread Nick Holland
On 08/20/2013 06:22 PM, Moritz Grimm wrote: Reverse the list of files and you won't need your /bin54/tar (and you can continue using gzip'ed tarballs). In fact, all you really need is to stick base54 at the end of the list. Yes, even though that deviates from the order the installer uses. The

Re: relayd crash

2013-08-21 Thread Bogdan Andu
ok, I checked out relayd -current, compiled with debug symbols, launched gdb and attached to pfe pid : pwd: /usr/src/usr.sbin/relayd $ sudo gdb ./relayd GNU gdb 6.3 Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome

Re: Updating past 5.4-current flag day w/ SSH only (amd64, maybe others)

2013-08-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013-08-19, Paul de Weerd wrote: >| >| 12. Re-add packages as per current.html: >| >| # pkg_add -z -l /root/pkg_list_manual >| # pkg_add -za -l /root/pkg_list_full > > I don't really understand why you're doing the -za dance with the full > pkg list. For all those dependencies that were requ

Re: relayd crash

2013-08-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013-08-21, Bogdan Andu wrote: > I tried relayd -current and crashed with the error: > pwd: > /usr/src/usr.sbin/relayd > > $ sudo ./relayd -f /etc/relayd.conf -d > . A LOT > OF LOGS > relay www_ssl, session 1368 (1 active), 0, > 64.39.111.90 -> :0, SSL accept error > relay

Re: relayd crash

2013-08-21 Thread Bogdan Andu
I tried relayd -current and crashed with the error: pwd: /usr/src/usr.sbin/relayd $ sudo ./relayd -f /etc/relayd.conf -d . A LOT OF LOGS relay www_ssl, session 1368 (1 active), 0, 64.39.111.90 -> :0, SSL accept error relay www_ssl, session 1369 (1 active), 0, 64.39.111.90 -> 1

Re: relayd crash

2013-08-21 Thread Peter Hessler
On 2013 Aug 21 (Wed) at 02:16:32 -0700 (-0700), Bogdan Andu wrote: : : From: Alexey E. Suslikov :To: misc@openbsd.org :Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 11:40 AM :Subject: Re: relayd crash : : :Bogdan Andu yahoo.com> writes: : :> machine is OpenBSD 5.3/amd64 GENER

Re: relayd crash

2013-08-21 Thread Alexey E. Suslikov
Bogdan Andu yahoo.com> writes: > From: Alexey E. Suslikov gmail.com> > To: misc openbsd.org > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 11:40 AM > Subject: Re: relayd crash > > Bogdan Andu yahoo.com> writes: > > > machine is OpenBSD 5.3/amd64 GENERIC.MP > > relayd on 5.3 is buggy. you either need

Re: relayd crash

2013-08-21 Thread Bogdan Andu
From: Alexey E. Suslikov To: misc@openbsd.org Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 11:40 AM Subject: Re: relayd crash Bogdan Andu yahoo.com> writes: > machine is OpenBSD 5.3/amd64 GENERIC.MP relayd on 5.3 is buggy. you either need newer version, or backport a f

Re: relayd crash

2013-08-21 Thread Alexey E. Suslikov
Bogdan Andu yahoo.com> writes: > machine is OpenBSD 5.3/amd64 GENERIC.MP relayd on 5.3 is buggy. you either need newer version, or backport a fix.

relayd crash

2013-08-21 Thread Bogdan Andu
Hello, I'm experiencing a strange behavior of relayd. relayd is used for reverse-proxy an Apache[localhost] web server instance and ssl acceleration. relayd engine crashes with the following errors: $ cat /var/log/daemon Aug 21 04:41:47 www-apps-int relayd[1592]: pfe exiting, pid 1592 Aug

Re: is it possible to block BT.UTP traffic in PF ?

2013-08-21 Thread Alexey E. Suslikov
Илья Шипицин gmail.com> writes: > I'm investigating whether it is possible to block certain UDP signatures ? > Maybe, I'd like not to block them, but lower priority using ALTQ, > > for instance, this kind of traffic: > > http://www.wireshark.org/docs/dfref/b/bt-utp.html > > traffic signatures

USB problem after time_t change

2013-08-21 Thread Tristan Le Guern
Hi, I upgraded to a 64 bits time_t snapshots and can't connect my phone anymore. When I plug it in any usb port I have these errors: uhub3: port 1, set config at addr 4 failed uhub3: device problem, disabling port 1 I tried with an usb mouse and an usb stick, and everything is fine: uhidev0 at u

is it possible to block BT.UTP traffic in PF ?

2013-08-21 Thread Илья Шипицин
Hello! I'm investigating whether it is possible to block certain UDP signatures ? Maybe, I'd like not to block them, but lower priority using ALTQ, for instance, this kind of traffic: http://www.wireshark.org/docs/dfref/b/bt-utp.html traffic signatures are known. Cheers, Ilya Shipitsin

Re: spamd database breaks after time_t change

2013-08-21 Thread Boudewijn Dijkstra
Op Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:33:46 +0200 schreef Renaud Allard : I just found out that spamd database breaks after upgrading to a snapshot with the 64 bits time_t resulting in: Aug 20 16:04:18 pippin spamd[26092]: scan of /var/db/spamd failed Aug 20 16:05:18 pippin spamd[26092]: bogus entry in spamd