Here are the logs for my failed attempts at joining the
misc mailing list.
All with default spamd settings.
Like I said, it did not succeed until I added lists.openbsd.org
to the /etc/mail/nospamd and reloaded the pf rule.
May 15 23:48:58 mx spamd[6698]: new entry 192.43.244.163 from
to , helo
Can messages get dropped if mail servers fail to resend within
time interval, after receiving the initial temporary failure message?
/var/log/spamd
spamd[11000]: queueing deletion of x.x.x.x mx1.example.com
spamd[11000]: queueing deletion of y.y.y.y mx2.example.com
Both of these emails I wished to receive, as I corresponded
with them yesterday. :(
I am now trying spamd with the following:
/usr/libexec/spamd -d -G5:1:864
Since upgrading from 4.9 to 5.1, I am getting a lot of false positives
with spamd running in greylisting mode, from email addresses I
previously did not.
A number of false negatives are still getting through, too.
Eg: I needed to add lists.openbsd.org to /etc/mail/nospamd to receive
messages from
>>What do you guys think about the reliability of the news
>>(unfortunatelly in German only) on www.golem.de
>
>My German's rusty but the follow-up article quoting Symantec mentions
spyware/keylogging, which has been the >traditional "technique" used in
in the past.
>
>-- p
Quick, someone, how do
I hope some developer may bring some light to this.
Regards Johan
2012/5/24 Tyler Morgan :
> Weird, I didn't expect it to help, since the docs are pretty much always
> right.
>
> Looking through the changelog of files that seem relevant to me (ip_carp.h,
> man 4 carp, /www/faq/pf/carp.html), I do
On 5/24/2012 11:37 AM, Johan Ryberg wrote:
Fishy...
All documentation is pointing at the direction to default advskew on
the "primary" host and 100 on the secondary.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/carp.html
fw1: default
fw2: advskew 128
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=carp&sektion=
Peter Laufenberg wrote:
What do you guys think about the reliability of the news (unfortunatelly
in German only) on www.golem.de
My German's rusty but the follow-up article quoting Symantec mentions spyware/keylogging,
which has been the traditional "technique" used in in the past.
Yes, that
Cine-i acest maimuE#oi, Ce-a dat buzna peste noi?
De ce se mai vrea primar, Acest derbedeu hoinar! Cu faE#a lui de E#ipar?
E Eef peste mafioE#i! Un drogat,Etiut de toE#i!
E un vorbete banal, Un vierme intestinal!
Ce s-a-ntins ca un buboi... VotaE#i-l pe maimuE#oi!
Vrea sD transforme hoteluri
Fishy...
All documentation is pointing at the direction to default advskew on
the "primary" host and 100 on the secondary.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/carp.html
fw1: default
fw2: advskew 128
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=carp&sektion=4#end
host A: default
host B: advskew 100
Bo
Hi.
Running a standard OpenBSD 5.1 installation with 2 hosts (virtual for
this test).
The only things changed from default is that I added three interfaces
(em0, carp1 and carp2).
The problem is that I can't get Host 1 back as master automatically if
Host 2 becomes master. On the first test I bo
>What do you guys think about the reliability of the news (unfortunatelly
>in German only) on www.golem.de
My German's rusty but the follow-up article quoting Symantec mentions
spyware/keylogging, which has been the traditional "technique" used in in the
past.
-- p
* Jason Wagstaff [2012-05-24 17:43]:
> I am trying to configure a new server with OpenBSD 5.1 using CARP and
> I am having trouble configuring the internal interface. When
> configured the traffic flows out the physical interface (bge2) and not
> the carp interface (carp5). I am currently runni
On 2012-05-24 14:00:01 naddy () mips ! inka ! de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
> Stefan Wollny wrote:
>
> > that the German government
claims to be able to break PGP and SSH.
>
> I think you have to be cluelessly
paranoid to read such a claim
> into a meaningless statement.
>
> > Question:
> >
You wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> What do you guys think about the reliability of the news (unfortunatelly
> in German only) on www.golem.de
> (http://www.golem.de/news/bundesregierung-deutsche-geheimdienste-koennen-pgp-
> entschluesseln-1205-92031.html) that the German government claims to be
> able to
I am trying to configure a new server with OpenBSD 5.1 using CARP and
I am having trouble configuring the internal interface. When
configured the traffic flows out the physical interface (bge2) and not
the carp interface (carp5). I am currently running another set of
servers on OpenBSD 4.9 with
N>h(i''ce$)eg1f57e>7f hh(g#d8f,!cg=g:?g4+e7ce$'fce:
i";g'f/e
go<fg5h?h>h2;jqDyfDjn
hfd8g,e
h(;eg&ei(e=)e!f<i;ch?g
Stefan Wollny wrote:
> that the German government claims to be able to break PGP and SSH.
I think you have to be cluelessly paranoid to read such a claim
into a meaningless statement.
> Question:
> "3. Is the technique used also able to at least in part decode and/or
> analyze encrypted communi
Hi Stefan,
On May 24, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> Question:
> "3. Is the technique used also able to at least in part decode and/or
> analyze encrypted communication (e.g. by SSH of PGP)?"
>
> Answer:
> "Yes, the technique used is in principle able to do this, depending on
> the way
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 02:26:43PM +0200, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> What do you guys think about the reliability of the news (unfortunatelly
> in German only) on www.golem.de
> (http://www.golem.de/news/bundesregierung-deutsche-geheimdienste-koennen-pgp-
> entschluesseln-1205-92031.html
Hi there!
What do you guys think about the reliability of the news (unfortunatelly
in German only) on www.golem.de
(http://www.golem.de/news/bundesregierung-deutsche-geheimdienste-koennen-pgp-
entschluesseln-1205-92031.html) that the German government claims to be
able to break PGP and SSH. The of
Anyway I have decided on this:
Atom 1.8GHz, 3 x Intel 82583V Gigabit NICs.
http://www.commell.com.tw/product/SBC/LE-376.HTM
3 of them, to replace the geodes. I have an 8 core Xeon to replace
the Pentium 4 with also.
Then I certainly should get the 100Mbps throughput and not
need to upgrade hard
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:48:02AM -0500, Justin Haynes wrote:
> Thanks, that does work. I was then able to create a SCSI mirror with
> two drives using softraid, refer to that new volume by DUID in
> /etc/fstab, and see the machine automatically mount the volume on
> boot.
>
> Is there a way to
OBSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO
AMPIMPA
TUCUMAN - ARGENTINA
Declarado de Interis Educativo por el Ministerio de Educacisn de la
Nacisn
_
misc@openbsd.org
At.
Campamentos Cientmficos 2012/2013
- Aqos del Maximo Solar -
Docetes
Campamentos Cientmficos exclusivos para Docentes
"La ciencia en el Au
Thanks, that does work. I was then able to create a SCSI mirror with
two drives using softraid, refer to that new volume by DUID in
/etc/fstab, and see the machine automatically mount the volume on
boot.
Is there a way to pass a root device to bsd during the boot process?
I don't find one in the
25 matches
Mail list logo