On Wednesday, 29 December 2010, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:47:11PM +1100, SJP Lists wrote:
> | This raises the PTR problem.
> |
> | Only one of those domains is going to have records that match forward
> | and reverse? If not, some anti-SPAM gateways will drop.
>
> How so ?
Ingo Schwarze wrote on Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:37:16PM +0100:
> MERIGHI Marcus wrote on Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 07:43:08PM +0100:
>> security(8) reports
>> ``/home/XXX/Daten/Edv/macs/macs-home/Library/Application''
>> as ``Setuid additions:'' where the real file name is
>> ``/home/XXX/Daten/Edv/mac
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 07:04:18PM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
>Five minutes' research shows that PeerGuardian is mainly used to block
>access to/from IP addresses believed to belong to anti-piracy groups.
Any list with govs ip ranges sorted by countries? :)
jirib
Hi Marcus,
MERIGHI Marcus wrote on Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 07:43:08PM +0100:
> security(8) reports
> ``/home/XXX/Daten/Edv/macs/macs-home/Library/Application''
> as ``Setuid additions:'' where the real file name is
> ``/home/XXX/Daten/Edv/macs/macs-home/Library/Application Support/\
> ProxyOnOff/pr
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 09:33:40AM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Mike Larkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 06:42:12PM -0800, Mike Larkin wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:18:56PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I am having a
security(8) reports
``/home/XXX/Daten/Edv/macs/macs-home/Library/Application''
as ``Setuid additions:'' where the real file name is
``/home/XXX/Daten/Edv/macs/macs-home/Library/Application Support/\
ProxyOnOff/proxyOnOffTool''
I have found the source of the wrong file name report to be in line 43
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:04:14AM -0800, S Mathias wrote:
> Are there any programs blocking ip, and has frequently updated lists,
> like the peerguardian on windows?
>
> sorry for the question, but i looking for this kind of application :O
Five minutes' research shows that PeerGuardian is mainly
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:25 AM, patsy wrote:
> I have written a program and would like to trace its memory usage as it runs
and output the data to a file for easy logging/comparison/graphing.
>
> getrusage(2) looks as though it would be appropriate for this. Unfortunately
I seem to be misundersta
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 07:48:24AM -0800, S Mathias wrote:
>If i'm using OpenBSD as Desktop OS, what kind of virtualization solutions do i
>have?
>
>Can anyone point to some howtos/docs regarding it? [for a beginner :\]
You forgot to make your homework - check /usr/ports/emulators.
jirib
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 06:42:12PM -0800, Mike Larkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:18:56PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I am having a few issues with this laptop including not being able to
>> > make it sleep/susp
Are there any programs blocking ip, and has frequently updated lists, like the
peerguardian on windows?
sorry for the question, but i looking for this kind of application :O
Thank you, and a happy christmas!
If i'm using OpenBSD as Desktop OS, what kind of virtualization solutions do i
have?
Can anyone point to some howtos/docs regarding it? [for a beginner :\]
On 29 Dec 2010 at 14:25, patsy wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have written a program and would like to trace its memory usage as it runs
> and output the data to a file for easy logging/comparison/graphing.
>
> getrusage(2) looks as though it would be appropriate for this. Unfortunately
> I seem t
Hello list,
I have written a program and would like to trace its memory usage as it runs
and output the data to a file for easy logging/comparison/graphing.
getrusage(2) looks as though it would be appropriate for this. Unfortunately I
seem to be misunderstanding how it should be used, since I
* Girish Venkatachalam [2010-12-29 11:52]:
> Since MX records do not understand TCP port numbers, we cannot have
> different MX records point to different
> SMTP servers on the same IP address.
>
> The reason this is a problem is that assume that I have to run
> spamd(8) against 100 domains. Do
BUONO OMAGGIO
VALIDO PER RICEVERE UNA COPPIA DI ORECCHINI IN BRONZO.
PER RICEVERE QUESTO OMAGGIO BASTA REGISTRARVI
NEL NOSTRO SITO WWW.BAYRIT.COM
SARA' NOSTRA CURA SPEDIRE L'OMAGGIO ALL'INDIRIZZO INDICATO IN FASE DI
REGISTRAZIONE.
IL PRESENTE BUONO NON E' LEGATO A NESSUN TIPO DI ACQUISTO VELATO E/
SJP Lists writes:
> Only one of those domains is going to have records that match forward
> and reverse? If not, some anti-SPAM gateways will drop.
That would only be much of a problem if the outbound mail server is
the same as the MX. The two do not need to be identical. Then again,
geeks li
Girish Venkatachalam writes:
> Since MX records do not understand TCP port numbers, we cannot have
> different MX records point to different
> SMTP servers on the same IP address.
>
> The reason this is a problem is that assume that I have to run
> spamd(8) against 100 domains. Do I need to have
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:47:11PM +1100, SJP Lists wrote:
| This raises the PTR problem.
|
| Only one of those domains is going to have records that match forward
| and reverse? If not, some anti-SPAM gateways will drop.
How so ?
a.example.com. IN MX 10 mx.example.com.
b.exampl
On 29 December 2010 22:47, SJP Lists wrote:
> On 29 December 2010 22:35, Gregory Edigarov
wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:22:33 +0530
>> Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
>>
>>> Dear folks,
>>>
>>> OpenBSD's spamd is a network level spam filter and consequently we
>>> need the MX records to point to
On 29 December 2010 22:35, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:22:33 +0530
> Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
>
>> Dear folks,
>>
>> OpenBSD's spamd is a network level spam filter and consequently we
>> need the MX records to point to spamd
>> before it hits our mail server thereby achiev
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:22:33 +0530
Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> Dear folks,
>
> OpenBSD's spamd is a network level spam filter and consequently we
> need the MX records to point to spamd
> before it hits our mail server thereby achieving bandwidth protection
> as well as spam protection.
>
> T
Dear folks,
OpenBSD's spamd is a network level spam filter and consequently we
need the MX records to point to spamd
before it hits our mail server thereby achieving bandwidth protection
as well as spam protection.
This is really fantastic.
Now the issue is this.
Since MX records do not underst
One day, wandering in Chinatown, suddenly listen to melodious sound, follow
it,found it's from a Chinese teahouse, curious I enter and look around, and the
dignified gril inside playing,environment of elegant,noble,primitive simplicity
deeply attracted me,since that in spare time I like to sippi
> > Could you pls explain, what is P and What is U displaying in
> > front?
>
>
> Please read the cvs(1) manual. :-)
>
Yes, thank you very much. I am reading. I fount what I want. Pls see below.
I can go ahead. Thanks once again for your support.
taken from the OUTPUT of *man 1 cvs*
update k
Wednesday 29 Dec 2010 ` 13:45 (+0530), Indunil Jayasooriya a icrit :
> Could you pls explain, what is P and What is U displaying in
> front?
Please read the cvs(1) manual. :-)
--
Sent from my iMug.
Hi list,
After downloading tree from anoncvs server, a few days later, I ran below 2
commands to update it.
# cd /usr/src && cvs -q up -rOPENBSD_4_8 -Pd
nothing returned. I think it is uptodate.
then, hit below command.
# cd /usr/ports && cvs -q up -rOPENBSD_4_8 -Pd
it returned below OUTPUT
27 matches
Mail list logo
