Re: news about BSD world

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Katarzyna Kaczor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Would you like to reach to the large audience of BSD Magazine? > > I am happy to announce that we started News Section on BSD Magazine website. > In this bookmark you can place news, press releases, latest a

Re: Zeroconf / Howl Problems.

On 2008-06-09, Jeremy Karlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone had any success setting up Howl (Zeroconf) on OpenBSD 4.3. > I've done a lot of Googling and read the (minimal) docs, but I can't get > it working. I'm unable to determine if I'm doing something incorrectly, > or if it is a pro

Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldattach(8)

So, this is not perl? :-) Actually, I heard another OS can have 5 or more APIs to do the same thing (say, listing a directory) because one team wants it this way, and another doesn't. On 6/9/08, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL P

Re: Zeroconf / Howl Problems.

On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Jeremy Karlson wrote: >Has anyone had any success setting up Howl (Zeroconf) on OpenBSD 4.3. >I've done a lot of Googling and read the (minimal) docs, but I can't get >it working. I'm unable to determine if I'm doing something incorrectly, >or if it is a problem with Howl, or

Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldattach(8)

On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:52:24PM -0700, James Hartley wrote: > For those interested, Marc has more information posted on undeadly.com. Ahem. http://undeadly.org/ > Thanks again, Marc! Indeed. :) -ME

Re: Lost sensors info when upgraded from 4.2 to 4.3

On 6/9/08, Per-Olov Sjvholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 05 June 2008 15.42.37 you wrote: > > On 2008-06-05, Per-Olov Sjvholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I did an upgrade (read reinstall) last week on a Dell PE830 server from > > > OpenBSD 4.2 to 4.3. It is a 4.3 RELEASE std ins

Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldattach(8)

On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:53 PM, James Hartley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If you are using a GPS device with nmeaattach(8), please switch to >> ldattach(8) now. > > Thanks Marc for passing on this information. Can you descr

Re: Zeroconf / Howl Problems.

> did you check /etc/netstart? there's a blurb in there about > configuring a multicast host. No I didn't. I'm pretty sure that's exactly what I'm looking for. Thanks a lot for the quick and helpful response. -- Jeremy

Re: restricting snmpd access on 4.3 to a single IP

On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Jurvis LaSalle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > >I've read the man page for snmpd.conf, but didn't see mention of a > way to restrict snmpd to only respond to gets and sets from one ip address. > Is there a way to do this in snmpd.conf or should I look to

restricting snmpd access on 4.3 to a single IP

Hi, I've read the man page for snmpd.conf, but didn't see mention of a way to restrict snmpd to only respond to gets and sets from one ip address. Is there a way to do this in snmpd.conf or should I look to a pf solution? Thanks, JL

Re: Zeroconf / Howl Problems.

> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Jeremy Karlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 224.0.0.251 is the multicast address for mDNS. That could be correct. Honestly, I'm not sure. I believe you. :-P But that's not the weird part to me. [howl] error sending packet to 224.0.0.251 (23126) [assert] erro

Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldattach(8)

> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you are using a GPS device with nmeaattach(8), please switch to > > ldattach(8) now. > > Thanks Marc for passing on this information. Can you describe in > short why this change was made? No need to have two ways to

Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldattach(8)

On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, James Hartley wrote: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you are using a GPS device with nmeaattach(8), please switch to > > ldattach(8) now. > > Thanks Marc for passing on this information. Can you describe in > short why this chan

Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldattach(8)

* James Hartley wrote: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you are using a GPS device with nmeaattach(8), please switch to > > ldattach(8) now. > > Thanks Marc for passing on this information. Can you describe in > short why this change was made? we do

Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldattach(8)

On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you are using a GPS device with nmeaattach(8), please switch to > ldattach(8) now. Thanks Marc for passing on this information. Can you describe in short why this change was made?

Re: How to overwrite MSS value in SYN packets?

Hello everybody, I fully agree with Daniel, here we've correct values. May i suggest (in order to clarify situation) we use the same host/IP during exchanges (because it's a bit difficult to diagnose what's happening0) :-) Precedent message was between OpenBSD/Linux (IP were 10.137.8.104 -> 10.1

nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldattach(8)

If you are using a GPS device with nmeaattach(8), please switch to ldattach(8) now. The nmeaattach command has been removed in -current, so has the nmeaattach_flags option in /etc/rc.conf (replaced with ldattach_flags). Please note that ldattach(8) has a slightly different synopsis than nmeaattac

Re: Zeroconf / Howl Problems.

On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Jeremy Karlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Starting Howl in debug mode > seems to indicate that it's sending the multicast packets to somewhere I > can't explain - 224.0.0.251. 224.0.0.251 is the multicast address for mDNS.

Re: Lost sensors info when upgraded from 4.2 to 4.3

On Thursday 05 June 2008 15.42.37 you wrote: > On 2008-06-05, Per-Olov Sjvholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I did an upgrade (read reinstall) last week on a Dell PE830 server from > > OpenBSD 4.2 to 4.3. It is a 4.3 RELEASE std install, but a stable update > > of kernel and userland from May 29.

Re: libstdc++.so.44.1 missing in latest snapshot

On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 05:34:51PM +0200, fulvio ciriaco wrote: > Hi, > as mentioned in the title libstdc++.so is not in the iso, nor in comp43. > Fulvio $ tar ztf base43.tgz | grep libstdc ./usr/lib/libstdc++.so.44.1 Which snapshot on which arch do you use? Snapshot from June 7th here on sparc6

Zeroconf / Howl Problems.

Has anyone had any success setting up Howl (Zeroconf) on OpenBSD 4.3. I've done a lot of Googling and read the (minimal) docs, but I can't get it working. I'm unable to determine if I'm doing something incorrectly, or if it is a problem with Howl, or something else. I'm looking for suggestions o

Re: Are there any Open Source / Free Software vt220 / vt320 / vt400 terminal emulators out there?

gnome-terminal, and compiz with the blur effect heavily applied, no scrollbar and window decorations which cast large shadows and match the transparency and color of your terminal atop a very busy desktop background, is where it's at. On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:42 -0700, Unix Fan wrote: > Christia

libstdc++.so.44.1 missing in latest snapshot

Hi, as mentioned in the title libstdc++.so is not in the iso, nor in comp43. Fulvio

Re: "remove any unwanted devices from the kernel. "

Nick Holland wrote: > The biggest reasons to do this are because you have too much > time on your hands, and you want to impress people by having > things break, then you swoop in to rescue everyone from your > fabricated disaster. Actually I think most people do it because you are tought to do so

My Book Studio Edition II problem

Hello, I'm attempting to get a Western Digital My Book Studio Edition II working with my OpenBSD 4.2 machine. The drive is formatted for FAT32 and functions while the machine is booted into Windows. I have it attached via USB, but when I attempt to mount the drive, it fails: % sudo mount -t msdo

Re: Are there any Open Source / Free Software vt220 / vt320 / vt400 terminal emulators out there?

> > The best VT220 emulator is the underappreciated xterm(1). > > The s/underappreciated/under appreciated terminal know as "xterm", > would be more appreciated if they modernized it a little... Anyone who > peddles a terminal emulator without pseudo transparency should be > locked up indefinitely

Re: Are there any Open Source / Free Software vt220 / vt320 / vt400 terminal emulators out there?

Christian Weisgerber wrote: > The best VT220 emulator is the underappreciated xterm(1). The s/underappreciated/under appreciated terminal know as "xterm", would be more appreciated if they modernized it a little... Anyone who peddles a terminal emulator without pseudo transparency should be l

Re: spamd sync question

Hi, I apologize to replying to myself. I am just trying to provide more info about my question so that maybe someone will be able to give an answer. 1) I wanted to run the new version of spamd (with the up to date sync protocol) without having to upgrade to CURRENT. I guess I can not or should no

snmp MIB variables

Hello, Reyk Floeter mentioned in his ONLamp interview (link below) that snmpd "currently supports most of the SNMPv1/v2c MIBs, IP-MIB, BRIDGE-MIB, HOST-RESOURCES-MIB, IF-MIB, and the OPENBSD-SENSORS-MIB" http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2008/04/29/puffy-and-the-crytonauts-whats-new-in-openbsd-43.h

Re: How to overwrite MSS value in SYN packets?

On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:06 AM, B A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > bash-3.2# pfctl -sr > scrub all no-df random-id max-mss 1400 fragment reassemble > pass in quick all flags S/SA keep state > pass out quick all flags S/SA keep state > Ok. Here is openbsd tcpdump. But I still see len 1440 packets. >

Re: How to overwrite MSS value in SYN packets?

07.06.08, 21:04, "Alexey Suslikov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Now I tested wuth very simply topology: just 2 pc's and switch > > One OpenBSD another Linux with web server. > > Now I have only one line in my pf.conf: > > > > scrub all max-mss 1400 fragment reassemble

Re: Are there any Open Source / Free Software vt220 / vt320 / vt400 terminal emulators out there?

Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am referring to the old hardware "dumb terminals", which had the vt320 > "standards" etc. A client of mine uses a legacy database application > that absolutely requires such an emulator (and is using Accuterm right The best VT220 emulator is the underappreciated

Re: 4.2 xenocara make build problem

xavier brinon escribis: On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Jesus Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Hi, using 4.2. Today I downloaded the xenocara.tar.gz from ftp.openbsd.org and it seems to have a problem. I untared the

Re: 4.2 xenocara make build problem

Matthieu Herrb escribis: On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Jesus Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, using 4.2. Today I downloaded the xenocara.tar.gz from ftp.openbsd.org and it seems to have a problem. I untared the source into /usr/src/xenocara, cleaned the /usr/xobj/* dir and set a DES

Re: small, random essay on performance tuning, was: "remove...."

On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 13:23 +0300, Lars Noodin wrote: > It seems from the messages, and my limited > experience, that many come to OpenBSD from other systems where messing > with the kernel is both required and expected[1], that includes Linux > and FreeBSD. > > [1] Case in point see AFS client

Re: OpenBSD 4.2 guest on Linux Host, run problem

This appears to be a qemu error and is probably best posted on the qemu-users mailing list. On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Boril Boyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > I found out that you have tested successfully OpenBSD 4.2 guest on qemu > Linux, > I have problems running OpenBSD 4.2

Re: 4.2 xenocara make build problem

On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Jesus Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, using 4.2. > > Today I downloaded the xenocara.tar.gz from ftp.openbsd.org and it seems > to have a problem. > > I untared the source into /usr/src/xenocara, cleaned the /usr/xobj/* dir > and set a DESTDIR. As root, I ru

Re: Are there any Open Source / Free Software vt220 / vt320 / vt400 terminal emulators out there?

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 10:33:02AM -0700, Jon wrote: > o;? > I am referring to the old hardware "dumb terminals", which had the vt320 > "standards" etc. A client of mine uses a legacy database application Ehh, it's a bit rewriting history to call the vt line "dumb terminals". vt terminals were co

Re: Are there any Open Source / Free Software vt220 / vt320 / vt400 terminal emulators out there?

Hi, On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Jon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > o;? > I am referring to the old hardware "dumb terminals", which had the vt320 > "standards" etc. A client of mine uses a legacy database application > that absolutely requires such an emulator (and is using Accuterm right > now)

OpenBSD 4.2 guest on Linux Host, run problem

Hi there, I found out that you have tested successfully OpenBSD 4.2 guest on qemu Linux, I have problems running OpenBSD 4.2 on Linux qemu and i have attached the result in this letter. Can you help me? Thank you in advance for your time. [EMAIL PROTECTED] virt]# ./run.sh Could not open '/dev/kqem

Re: 4.2 xenocara make build problem

On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Jesus Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, using 4.2. > > Today I downloaded the xenocara.tar.gz from ftp.openbsd.org and it seems > to have a problem. > > I untared the source into /usr/src/xenocara don't go any further http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade43.