If a port has made its way into -current, it will be there when -current
turns into the next -release version. Thus all the new additions in
4.2-current will be in 4.3.
However, not all software packages in the ports collection can be
distributed, such as Java, 'till Sun changes its license.
On Sunday 09 December 2007 00:27:01 badeguruji wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there anything on OpenBSD like the one below for
> FreeBSD. It presents material very clearly and
> cleanly, makes look freebsd very attractive.
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/7.0
> Preview.pdf
>
> Thank you.
>
> -BG
Hello,
Is there anything on OpenBSD like the one below for
FreeBSD. It presents material very clearly and
cleanly, makes look freebsd very attractive.
http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/7.0
Preview.pdf
Thank you.
-BG
~~Kalyan-mastu~~
Hello,
while trying to setup my own CA i am getting below
error:
# openssl req -new -x509 -extensions v3_ca -keyout
private/cakey.pem -out cacert.pem
Generating a 2048 bit RSA private key
..+++
.+++
writing n
On Sunday 09 December 2007 00:12:57 Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> Dear All,
> I noticed significant number of very important desktop related
> applications ported for OpenBSD
> (TeXLive, HPLIP, Gutenprint, PJSIP among others)
> Some of these applications are already in ports for 4.2 but not among
> p
Dear All,
I noticed significant number of very important desktop related
applications ported for OpenBSD
(TeXLive, HPLIP, Gutenprint, PJSIP among others)
Some of these applications are already in ports for 4.2 but not among
pre-compiled binary packages (I personally prefer to use binaries in
hogo hogo wrote:
> I have got a problem during OpenBSD 4.2 installation.
> I install on a QEMU virtual machine on a hard disk with 7000M of size.
> In the end of installation process when the system writes MBR onto the disk
> I get such a message:
>
> Installing boot block...
> boot: /mnt/boot
>
On 19:19:30 Dec 08, Mats O Jansson wrote:
> This is the problem. You are trying to switch a daemon to be IPv6 centric
> when the majority of our users doesn't use IPv6. I can understand that
> KAME has that agenda but I dont think OpenBSD should.
>
I know only one thing and it is this.
I was
On 21:55:02 Dec 08, hogo hogo wrote:
> I have got a problem during OpenBSD 4.2 installation.
> I install on a QEMU virtual machine on a hard disk with 7000M of size.
> In the end of installation process when the system writes MBR onto the disk
> I get such a message:
>
> Installing boot block...
Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
reading about spamd having changed the database format (recently?), how
do I best achieve replicating and merging the spamdb database(s) across
a number of machines, maintaining consistent white- and greylisting
entries?
Or is this not yet supported (the docs suggest so)
Hi,
reading about spamd having changed the database format (recently?), how
do I best achieve replicating and merging the spamdb database(s) across
a number of machines, maintaining consistent white- and greylisting
entries?
Or is this not yet supported (the docs suggest so)?
Best,
--Toni++
On Dec 8, 2007 11:35 AM, Frank Bax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our hardware supplier deals almost exclusively with Windows users (no
> surprise); in the low-end business market, they sell many systems with:
> Intel D946GZIS motherboard
> SigmaTel* STAC9227 audio codec
>
I have the opportunity to install several low-end non-Windows desktops
in a non-profit agency. Over the past 5 years; we've tried a handful of
Linux distributions; each one a little better than the one before. I've
watched OpenBSD progress a lot in desktop arena over this time period
and I want
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I simply bought a USB serial adaptor. The cheapest that Bamboo Charlie
> > had in stock.
> >
> > It just worked. It was so low priced that if it didn't I'd have just
> > tossed it in the spare parts box and bought another. AFAIK most of them
> > work.
>
I have got a problem during OpenBSD 4.2 installation.
I install on a QEMU virtual machine on a hard disk with 7000M of size.
In the end of installation process when the system writes MBR onto the disk
I get such a message:
Installing boot block...
boot: /mnt/boot
proto: /usr/mdec/biosboot
devic
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 06:58:53PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I have 2 machines here running yesterdays snapshot which are suffering
| from X display corruption of some kind.
|
| a) My main desktop has problems with xterms. If you do something with
| large output like dmesg, then the outpu
Hi,
I have 2 machines here running yesterdays snapshot which are suffering
from X display corruption of some kind.
a) My main desktop has problems with xterms. If you do something with
large output like dmesg, then the output is complete junk. I mean bits
of characters all misaligned.
b) My lapt
On 08/12/2007, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a) My main desktop has problems with xterms. If you do something with
> large output like dmesg, then the output is complete junk. I mean bits
> of characters all misaligned.
Here is a screenshot of symptoms.
http://flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?
Reyk Floeter wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 01:03:42PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
I would much prefer, if possible for example having one relayd redirect
web traffic for example to a series of boxes that could reply directly
to the end users instead of having to come back through relayd box t
Mats O Jansson wrote:
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Marc Balmer wrote:
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 15:29]:
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 09:49]:
Frank Habicht wrote:
Hi misc,
[i guess misc is better than ports for that.
Frank Habicht wrote:
Hi misc,
[i guess misc is better than ports for that..]
I ran the patched httpdv6 with the stock httpd.conf
-> it was only bound to v6
README.v6 suggests _for_Vhost_operation_ one needs
Listen :: 80
Listen 0.0.0.0 80
I did put up a new diff on http://mini.vnode.ch/diffs/
Most companies tend to prefer the B2C model, where they send you an
email telling you that they have a secured email for you at their
website. This way they can maintain full control over those messages,
including revoking it. Just look at banks and healthcare for
examples.
On 12/7/07, new_guy
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> > * Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 15:29]:
> >> Henning Brauer wrote:
> >>> * Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 09:49]:
> Frank Habicht wrote:
> > Hi misc,
> >
> > [i guess misc is better tha
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 01:03:42PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> I would much prefer, if possible for example having one relayd redirect
> web traffic for example to a series of boxes that could reply directly
> to the end users instead of having to come back through relayd box to be
> sent bac
All this is great.
I have one question n this, that I am not able to get a clear answer on.
May be it's totally stupid and if so, just let me know as such and I
would even appreciate that.
So far looks like all the setup are design to be with relayd in from and
all traffic going through a bo
hi!
as you probably noticed, hoststated got renamed to relayd to reflect
the enhanced scope of the daemon. i also used the chance to do
significat changes to the configuration language. we may do a few
more changes with the goal to get something that is extensible, nice,
and consistent. this is
Hi.
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Marc Balmer wrote:
well, and now send me a diff please ;)
You're the one sending ipv6-enabled Apache-patches, not I :-)
Even though I used it for years (some time with ipv6 access enabled) I am
not using it currently, www/lighttpd fits *currently* my needs better.. :
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:23:55 +0100, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
so either people live with the fact that *:port becomes 0.0.0.0:port
for the IPv4 case and ::port for the IPv6 case
How about ditching support for * and just support 0.0.0.0:port and
::port?
Anyone who agrees on thi
> My question is, why is it that the rebuild-userland process doesn't
> copy the new /usr/src/etc/bind/root.hint to /var/named/standard/ ?
The build process does not install files which are generically
considered "configuration files".
Those are installed using a different target called "distribu
Igraj se i osvoji...
Top Shop
Kako do bonus nagrade? Lako! Ukljucite jos prijatelja.
Transcend USB Flash 4GB
Ponovo smo odlucili da vas iznenadimo!
Ucesnik koji pozove najveci broj prijatelja do 20. decembra - dobija USB
flash memoriju od 4GB kao bonus poklon za prijateljstvo.
Imamo i prvog d
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 15:29]:
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 09:49]:
Frank Habicht wrote:
Hi misc,
[i guess misc is better than ports for that..]
I ran the patched httpdv6 with the stock httpd.conf
-> it wa
Antti Harri wrote:
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Marc Balmer wrote:
* means all addresses in the default address family. and with this
diff, that means all IPv6 addresses. The default can be changed
on the command line using the -4 and -6 options (or by being explicit
in the config file).
Using IPv4 a
Linus Swdlas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intuitivly feel that * means IPv4 and IPv6,
That's the way it is in ntpd(8).
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 16:07]:
Right now I am looking if the code can be changed to make '*:port'
a synonym for '0.0.0.0:port', so the old notation would mean IPv4
only.
If this is possible, existing config files would continue to work,
with IPv4 onl
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Marc Balmer wrote:
* means all addresses in the default address family. and with this
diff, that means all IPv6 addresses. The default can be changed
on the command line using the -4 and -6 options (or by being explicit
in the config file).
Using IPv4 as the default addres
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Todd T. Fries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 16:06]:
I think you need to realize what you are saying is misleading at best.
not at all, you miss the point.
Yes this diff creates a mini flag day for httpd's conf file
which is absolutely not needed and stupid.
* mean
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 04:56:24PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
> hey, this my development box. I run experiments and from time to
> time it's IPv4 only, IPv6 only etc ;) Depending on what I am
> trying at the moment.
>
> You just hit the wrong time slot ;)
>
> It should be fine now.
>
:) i'm ju
I've just finished updating a 4.2-stable system by following the
instructions at http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html:
# cd /usr/src
# cvs -d $CVSROOT -q update -rOPENBSD_4_2 -Pd && echo $CVSROOT
>JT.CVS.timestamp
? JT.CVS.timestamp
? JT.CVSROOT.de
? xenocara
P etc/bind/root.hint
P s
Marc Balmer wrote:
Marc Balmer wrote:
Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:55:09PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 09:51]:
httpd with IPv6 support uses IPv6 addresses for ambigious constructs.
That is documented in the httpd(8) manpage.
Reyk Floeter wrote:
hopefully it is not running the patched httpdv6 (or is it IPv6 only?):
$ lynx http://mini.vnode.ch/manual/ipv6.html
Looking up mini.vnode.ch
Making HTTP connection to mini.vnode.ch
Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host.
lynx: Can't access startfile http://mini.vnode.ch/m
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Frank Habicht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 15:13]:
On 12/8/2007 4:55 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 09:51]:
httpd with IPv6 support uses IPv6 addresses for ambigious constructs.
That is documented in the httpd(8) manpage.
tha
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 15:50]:
so either people live with the fact that *:port becomes 0.0.0.0:port
for the IPv4 case and ::port for the IPv6 case or we forget about
IPv6 support in httpd for know. I certainly have neither time nor
the energy to invo
* Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 16:07]:
> Right now I am looking if the code can be changed to make '*:port'
> a synonym for '0.0.0.0:port', so the old notation would mean IPv4
> only.
>
> If this is possible, existing config files would continue to work,
> with IPv4 only.
that would
hopefully it is not running the patched httpdv6 (or is it IPv6 only?):
$ lynx http://mini.vnode.ch/manual/ipv6.html
Looking up mini.vnode.ch
Making HTTP connection to mini.vnode.ch
Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host.
lynx: Can't access startfile http://mini.vnode.ch/manual/ipv6.html
On S
* Todd T. Fries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 16:06]:
> I think you need to realize what you are saying is misleading at best.
not at all, you miss the point.
> Yes this diff creates a mini flag day for httpd's conf file
which is absolutely not needed and stupid.
* means v6? c'mon.
--
Hennin
* Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 15:29]:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
>> * Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 09:49]:
>>> Frank Habicht wrote:
Hi misc,
[i guess misc is better than ports for that..]
I ran the patched httpdv6 with the stock httpd.conf
* Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 15:50]:
> so either people live with the fact that *:port becomes 0.0.0.0:port
> for the IPv4 case and ::port for the IPv6 case or we forget about
> IPv6 support in httpd for know. I certainly have neither time nor
> the energy to involve in fights ove
* Frank Habicht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 15:13]:
> On 12/8/2007 4:55 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > * Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 09:51]:
> >> httpd with IPv6 support uses IPv6 addresses for ambigious constructs.
> >> That is documented in the httpd(8) manpage.
> >
> > that i
Linus Swdlas wrote:
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 15:41:36 +0100, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
the unspecified address is 0.0.0.0 for IPv4 and :: for IPv6. '*'
is ambigous and it makes no sense to assume '0.0.0.0' and '::' if
a user specifies '*'. This could lead to security problems if
some
Hi,
I am reporting a problem with one of our firewalls.
We are using carp.
Yesterday nagios told me that this firewalls is out.
First ssh was unavailable and a few hours later it did not even replied
to ping!
(In fact it replied, but with a large packet loss so about 80% of the
packets was lost.)
Marc Balmer wrote:
Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:55:09PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 09:51]:
httpd with IPv6 support uses IPv6 addresses for ambigious constructs.
That is documented in the httpd(8) manpage.
that is completely
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 03:41:36PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
> it would mean code changes for which I have not time right now.
>
> the unspecified address is 0.0.0.0 for IPv4 and :: for IPv6. '*'
> is ambigous and it makes no sense to assume '0.0.0.0' and '::' if
> a user specifies '*'. This cou
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 15:41:36 +0100, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
the unspecified address is 0.0.0.0 for IPv4 and :: for IPv6. '*'
is ambigous and it makes no sense to assume '0.0.0.0' and '::' if
a user specifies '*'. This could lead to security problems if
someone would not be awa
250797 (FWD)
| \
\\
37E7 D3EB 74D0 8D66 A68D B866 0326 204E 3F42 004A
http://todd.fries.net/pgp.txt
Penned by Henning Brauer on 20071208 14:55.09, we have:
| * Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:55:09PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 09:51]:
httpd with IPv6 support uses IPv6 addresses for ambigious constructs.
That is documented in the httpd(8) manpage.
that is completely wrong and disqualifi
Benjamin M. A'Lee-2 wrote:
>
> Also I assume you mean MUA, not MTA, since I don't know of any MTAs that
> directly support either PGP or S/MIME...
>
> Ben
>
Yes, sorry, it was late, I was tired, but at least I was consistently wrong
;)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:55:09PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 09:51]:
> > httpd with IPv6 support uses IPv6 addresses for ambigious constructs.
> > That is documented in the httpd(8) manpage.
>
> that is completely wrong and disqualifies this patch
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 09:49]:
Frank Habicht wrote:
Hi misc,
[i guess misc is better than ports for that..]
I ran the patched httpdv6 with the stock httpd.conf
-> it was only bound to v6
README.v6 suggests _for_Vhost_operation_ one needs
Listen
Frank Habicht wrote:
On 12/8/2007 4:55 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 09:51]:
httpd with IPv6 support uses IPv6 addresses for ambigious constructs.
That is documented in the httpd(8) manpage.
that is completely wrong and disqualifies this patch.
you are
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 09:51]:
httpd with IPv6 support uses IPv6 addresses for ambigious constructs.
That is documented in the httpd(8) manpage.
that is completely wrong and disqualifies this patch.
you are fucking everybody for no good reason, as
On 12/8/2007 4:55 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 09:51]:
>> httpd with IPv6 support uses IPv6 addresses for ambigious constructs.
>> That is documented in the httpd(8) manpage.
>
> that is completely wrong and disqualifies this patch.
> you are fucking ev
* Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 09:51]:
> httpd with IPv6 support uses IPv6 addresses for ambigious constructs.
> That is documented in the httpd(8) manpage.
that is completely wrong and disqualifies this patch.
you are fucking everybody for no good reason, as suddenly their httpds
* Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 09:49]:
> Frank Habicht wrote:
> > Hi misc,
> >
> > [i guess misc is better than ports for that..]
> >
> > I ran the patched httpdv6 with the stock httpd.conf
> > -> it was only bound to v6
> >
> > README.v6 suggests _for_Vhost_operation_ one needs
>
* Mattieu Baptiste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 12:28]:
> Anyone has succeed in sending a break with an uplcom ? I have the same
> model you described and it never worked with my unit.
all usb-cereals i ever bought (quite a few) turned out to be uplcoms,
and sending breaks Just Works on all of
Thanks, I think the build system should require xbase42.tgz &
xshare42.tgz explicit.
$ java -version
java version "1.5.0_12-p6"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
1.5.0_12-p6-root_07_dec_2007_22_18)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_12-p6-root_07_dec_2007_22_18,
mixed mo
On 2007/12/08 13:37, Antti Harri wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> On 2007/12/08 10:59, Antti Harri wrote:
>>> anyone figured out where the problem is with OpenBSD & CF?
>>
>> Naddy noticed that DMA is only used if the drive supports
>> multi-sector transfers.
>>
>>> wd1 at
mufurcz wrote:
Greetings,
It seems that the dumbing down of laptops is a constant
preoccupation/sadistic joy for the
laptop manufacturers, and the RS-232/422/485 protocols are destined to
be extinct by them.
My daily work requires to access a number headless *NIX systems in
different places
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/12/08 10:59, Antti Harri wrote:
anyone figured out where the problem is with OpenBSD & CF?
Naddy noticed that DMA is only used if the drive supports
multi-sector transfers.
wd1 at wdc2 channel 0 drive 0:
wd1: 1-sector PIO, LBA, 488MB, 100
On Dec 8, 2007 11:39 AM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007/12/07 22:31, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > uark(4) Arkmicro Technologies ARK3116 based USB serial
> adapter
>
> You don't want this one if you might need to send a break.
>
> Most I've seen are uplcom (good sup
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
On 06/12/2007, Benoit Chesneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
HAve currently problem with a server based on Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU
E6550
with a Realtek 8168 ( re(4) ). It freeze after some random time. I
don't know why.
No log about it
On 2007/12/08 10:59, Antti Harri wrote:
> anyone figured out where the problem is with OpenBSD & CF?
Naddy noticed that DMA is only used if the drive supports
multi-sector transfers.
> wd1 at wdc2 channel 0 drive 0:
> wd1: 1-sector PIO, LBA, 488MB, 1000944 sectors
My slow cards are 1-sector, my
On 2007/12/07 22:31, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> uark(4) Arkmicro Technologies ARK3116 based USB serial adapter
You don't want this one if you might need to send a break.
Most I've seen are uplcom (good support in most OS, you'll
find some if you search title&description on ebay for PL23
I have put a HTML version of the README content with some clarifications
(I hope...) online under the following URL:
http://mini.vnode.ch/manual/ipv6.html
This is work in progress and I will extend is as needed. The plan is to
install this file with the other HTML documentation (if others are f
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 03:23:13PM -0600, K K wrote:
> > the goal is to allow only users with
> > (1) a hardware token and
> > (2) the correct passwords to access services (IMAPS, etc) on openbsd
> > machines.
you may want to look at http://www.fatsquirrel.org/veghead/wot/skey.php and
its corresp
Hi,
anyone figured out where the problem is with OpenBSD & CF?
I got myself a cardbus-CF adapter and tested it, the
performance is pretty poor using two cards that worked
with Linux (couple of years ago though, when I still had those) about
~6MB/s both reading and writing.
The 512M card seeme
Frank Habicht wrote:
[i guess misc is better than ports for that..]
I ran the patched httpdv6 with the stock httpd.conf
-> it was only bound to v6
README.v6 suggests _for_Vhost_operation_ one needs
Listen :: 80
Listen 0.0.0.0 80
my test suggests even without vhosts these are needed to run bot
Frank Habicht wrote:
> Hi misc,
>
> [i guess misc is better than ports for that..]
>
> I ran the patched httpdv6 with the stock httpd.conf
> -> it was only bound to v6
>
> README.v6 suggests _for_Vhost_operation_ one needs
> Listen :: 80
> Listen 0.0.0.0 80
>
> my test suggests even without vhosts
77 matches
Mail list logo
