Mats O Jansson wrote:
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Marc Balmer wrote:
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 15:29]:
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-08 09:49]:
Frank Habicht wrote:
Hi misc,
[i guess misc is better than ports for that..]
I ran the patched httpdv6 with the stock httpd.conf
-> it was only bound to v6
README.v6 suggests _for_Vhost_operation_ one needs
Listen :: 80
Listen 0.0.0.0 80
my test suggests even without vhosts these are needed to run both v4 and
v6.
Of course you need this.
wait.
if an existing OpenBSD installation with existing httpd.conf gets upgraded
(without changing the httpd.conf) and after that the httpd suddenly only
listens on v6 and not v4 any more, then the patch is wrong.
here, a change to the software requires a change in the configuration
as well.
In this case it is well documented and the change is trivial.
and we have enough ways to teach users about it.
bullshit.
the diff is plain wrong and willfuck users.
and the fix is so obvious and reasonably easy...
(no af specified = both, OF COURSE)
This diff assumes IPv6 as default if no AF is specified, this is what
is expected from IPv6 software and what the original authors intended,
This is the problem. You are trying to switch a daemon to be IPv6 centric
when the majority of our users doesn't use IPv6. I can understand that
KAME has that agenda but I dont think OpenBSD should.
see my latest diff. it lets the default be IPv4 and makes IPv6
optional.
It is like we should have disabled SSHv1 the same moment we implemented
SSHv2 in OpenSSH.
The change is so trivial that this will not fuck any users.
Get real...
I have no problems with it listening on both. But one might change the
example config file to not use the * syntax.
with the latest diff, * means all IPv4 address, like before.
-moj
