Hans-Joerg, Markus - Thanks for the advice and the help. I sat down and did
some more testing at work. I definitely have an IPSEC tunnel from one point
to the other. Any suggestions on how I can now have my users route all of
their traffic through our end? I'd like them to be able to safely browse
Dear gentleman,
i have just setted up a new natted firewall server after some period
of inactivity. I got surprised with the new ftp-proxy utility!
Now, it writes new pf rules, the prior one did not! I feel like
unconfortable by the current ftp-proxy approach, since i cannot
understand the ration
These cards are in the $5000 range and if you are lighting up fiber then
you need some xenpaks that start around $1000 to $15000 ea. (If you want to
light up strands from, say, Lansing to Ann Arbor, you would be using the
$15000 part at each end, one with a 60 mile rating anyways)
Before you go
Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> on the same interface but HTTP connections traversing vr0->vlan0 hang
> while similar connections going vlan0->vr0 work fine. the firewall plugs
> vr0: flags=8943 mtu 1500
> vlan0: flags=8843 mtu 1496
You need a newer if_vr driver that supports IFCAP
Ok, the dmesg is here :)
BTW, is it normal to still have access the the ctrl-alt-del keys when
I'm (or at least I should be) using the serial to redirect all the i/o
from the other computer ?
DMESG :
OpenBSD 4.1 (GENERIC.RAID) #0: Sun Jul 8 22:16:34 CEST 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys/arch/i386
On 2007/08/20 21:17, nicodache wrote:
> I use a windows computer for it, only because I know this machine's
> serial port works, and the configuration I set up for my cisco (which
> is the same config as the one for openbsd) works in that machine.
Doesn't mean the cable is suitable. Check that fir
I wouldn't try to set set tty com0 in my /boot.conf, as it does not
even work from boot prompt : I wouldn't like to have my computer stuck
at boot, without beeing able to get OpenBSD up (seems like my computer
does not continue booting after switching to the serial console).
However, good news, I
On 7/25/07, Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Storm wrote:
> > Is openbsd bind vulnerable to attacks on binds PRNG described here:
> > http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5VP0L0UM0A.html
>
> A glance at the README.OpenBSD file for 4.1 in /usr/src/usr.sbin/bind
> shows (among other thing
On 2007/08/20 16:33, stuart van Zee wrote:
> allow users to use the ftp service. So, I was looking at the
> possibility of dropping an OpenBSD box in that is setup to serve as
> a filtering bridge but I have been unable to find information about
> how to setup a transparent bridge in front of an F
"stuart van Zee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A point in the right direction would be appreciated. I tried
> looking up on google, but I found a bazillion hits on how to setup a
> firewall on a network and still being able to reach an ftp server on
> the internet from the network, but nothing on
Hello,
I was just looking this webpage when I got your answer ; as Michael
Lucas didn't talk about this file in his talk about consoles, I though
console ports were active by default... (but I found this file in this
book's index, however)
So, tty00 is "tty00 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt2
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:33:28PM -0400, stuart van Zee wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I currently have an FTP server on the internet for use transferring
> files back and forth with customers and have now been given the
> requirement to put a firewall between it and the internet but still
> allow user
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 03:55:50PM -0400, Jim Razmus wrote:
> * nicodache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070820 15:26]:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm almost done configuring some little 1U server for my own
> > edutainment, and I'm busy trying to configure the serial console.
> > I have the excellent book of Micha
Hello all,
I currently have an FTP server on the internet for use transferring
files back and forth with customers and have now been given the
requirement to put a firewall between it and the internet but still
allow users to use the ftp service. So, I was looking at the
possibility of dropping
* nicodache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070820 15:26]:
> Hello,
>
> I'm almost done configuring some little 1U server for my own
> edutainment, and I'm busy trying to configure the serial console.
> I have the excellent book of Michael W. Lucas calld "Absolute
> OpenBSD", and he tells about serial consol
The default pf.conf had the nat configuration I have been using:
nat on $ext_if from !($ext_if) -> ($ext_if:0)
and it works fine. The problem seems to be with my use of dnsmasq.
-Lars
Hello,
I'm almost done configuring some little 1U server for my own
edutainment, and I'm busy trying to configure the serial console.
I have the excellent book of Michael W. Lucas calld "Absolute
OpenBSD", and he tells about serial console, that by entering "set tty
com0", we can access the machin
I know that OpenBSD developers are the best developers on earth and they
are doing the best they can to make this already great OS even greater...
Thank you OpenBSD developers, we appreciate the work you do.
Marc Espie wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 04:42:33AM -0500, Will Maier wrote:
On
My usb printer works very slow under OpenBSD,
I mean, when compared to other operating systems.
According to dmesg, the printer operates through
usb version 1. Is there any way, like kernel
configuration or so, to make it operate under
usb version 2?
I'm asking because I want to erase that other
o
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 04:42:33AM -0500, Will Maier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:48:34AM +0300, Tomas wrote:
> > I'm having some trouble installing clamav-0.90.3.tgz package. I'm using
> > OpenBSD_4_1.
> > My steps:
> > 1. export PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.1/packages/i386
On Monday 20 August 2007 12:37:03 Toni Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in my network, I have five OSPF routers and hosts which learn their routes
> via OSPF, all in one area. One of the routers is a Cisco, all other
> affected routers and hosts are OpenBSD/i386 4.1-stable as of May 24th. The
> problem is
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:37:03PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in my network, I have five OSPF routers and hosts which learn their routes via
> OSPF, all in one area. One of the routers is a Cisco, all other affected
> routers and hosts are OpenBSD/i386 4.1-stable as of May 24th. The prob
On 8/20/07, Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Unexepected EOF" ? That means that the download never completed that the
> file is truncated (which leads to the SHA1 and Size mismatch)
Thanks to all who replied. The SHA1 for jdk1.5 in OpenBSD 4.1 is
correct. The issue was with downloa
Hi,
in my network, I have five OSPF routers and hosts which learn their routes via
OSPF, all in one area. One of the routers is a Cisco, all other affected
routers and hosts are OpenBSD/i386 4.1-stable as of May 24th. The problem is
that some machines establish an adjacency with some, but not all
24 matches
Mail list logo
