On 5/7/07, Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/7/07, Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An attacker sets up a system with two wireless NICs: one associated to
> my network and another configured as an access point pretending to be
> an access point for my network. He runs
I've just stumbled across the SoftUpdates section in the FAQ, and was rather
surprised that I had never seen/heard of this feature before. Before
I mount any
partition using softdep, I thought I'd google, browse the archives, etc. for any
information about when/where they should be used.
Althoug
On 5/7/07, Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Suppose I setup a wireless network and use authpf to restrict access
to some resource (e.g., Internet access) to registered users. It
seems there's a fairly simple man-in-the-middle attack:
An attacker sets up a system with two wireless N
Suppose I setup a wireless network and use authpf to restrict access
to some resource (e.g., Internet access) to registered users. It
seems there's a fairly simple man-in-the-middle attack:
An attacker sets up a system with two wireless NICs: one associated to
my network and another configured as
On Mon, 7 May 2007 23:01:15 -0600, Joel Knight wrote:
>--- Quoting RW on 2007/04/30 at 16:52 +1000:
>
>> Existing setup:
>>
>> Head Office:
>> WAN IP=165.x.y.z
>> LAN = 172.22.22.0/24
>> Extranet gateway = 10.x.y.1
>>
>> Branch Office:
>> WAN IP=150.x.y.z
>> LAN= 172.22.23.0/24
>>
>> IPsec end
--- Quoting RW on 2007/04/30 at 16:52 +1000:
> Existing setup:
>
> Head Office:
> WAN IP=165.x.y.z
> LAN = 172.22.22.0/24
> Extranet gateway = 10.x.y.1
>
> Branch Office:
> WAN IP=150.x.y.z
> LAN= 172.22.23.0/24
>
> IPsec endpoints are OpenBSD firewalls and LAN to LAN connectivity is
> fine.
>
On May 7, 2007, at 4:11 PM, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 02:02:19PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
On May 7, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
I'm using a thecus 2100 with raidframe to do raid 1. A bit slow, but
with 512MB RAM it's acceptable.
Would ccd(4) be any f
On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 11:14 +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Default User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-05 05:03]:
> > cbb0 at pci1 dev 4 function 0 "ENE CB-1410 CardBus" rev
> > 0x01pci_intr_map: no mapping for pin A
> > : couldn't map interrupt
>
> there's your problem, your cardbus slot is not w
On 5/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: Sebastian Benoit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>If you want deny users the possiblility to smuggle data outside of
their
>workplace (or whatever) then don't connect them to the internet.
No, no, no. You must go one step beyond this if you w
Michael Dexter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have found references to: /pub/OpenBSD/3.6/tools/booteasy suggesting that
> it was part of the distribution but I do not see it listed for 3.7 and newer.
> I do not see a 3.7 changelist entry for it and I the online man pages to not
> seem to refer to it. Fr
Hi all,
OpenBSD CD(4.1 -release) and T-Shirts arrivaled at China(Shenzhen) this
morning,
It looks really nice.
Thanks to all OpenBSD developers for the hard work, thanks to Wim for the
patience.
^_^
MB
2007.05.08
--
OpenBSD Store in China Mainland: http://shop34421310.taobao.com/
Bret wrote:
Greetings All.
I will start with my dmesg: See below--->
I have tried many ways to get the 300mw Z-COM WLAN PC Card, RP-MMCX,
802.11b Higher Power card to work with the system. I am trying to
setup the first Wlan (wi0) as an access point and the second (wi1) as
a bridge/link
Greetings All.
I will start with my dmesg: See below--->
I have tried many ways to get the 300mw Z-COM WLAN PC Card, RP-MMCX,
802.11b Higher Power card to work with the system. I am trying to setup
the first Wlan (wi0) as an access point and the second (wi1) as a
bridge/link to a distant s
On 4/25/07, Allen Theobald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greetings! Included below is my pf.conf set up to use
dansguardian (proxyport 3128, filterport 8080)
and tinyproxy (listen port 3128) as a transparent
proxy.
What changes do I need to make to keep someone on
int_if/int_net from circumventing
On Mon, 07 May 2007 16:51:32 -0500, Bruce Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Don't beat a dead horse.
This should do whatever you need:
http://gag.sourceforge.net/
Aaah, yes, I remember someone recommending this to me before. It does work
well.
--
Aaron Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"No one co
Guys if you realy "care" about security why does nobody asks about
using gzsig.
Even useable for the packages...
Kind regards,
Sebastian
yah theyre valid, there was a point when i first set this up i remember one
of the nexthops being invalid but this hasnt been the case for sometime.
cool, i think ill stick to the without ospf for now until it becomes a
necessity. thanks.
On 5/7/07, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>From: Sebastian Benoit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>If you want deny users the possiblility to smuggle data outside of
their
>workplace (or whatever) then don't connect them to the internet.
No, no, no. You must go one step beyond this if you want to
prevent employees from smuggling data. To do thi
On 2007/05/07 16:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> when i do a bgpctl show fib i see the two routes, 1 thru connected provider,
> 1 to other router's crossover interface - which is connected then to 2nd
> provider, so why would i need to redistribute my routes when its already in
> the fib? maybe im c
when i do a bgpctl show fib i see the two routes, 1 thru connected provider,
1 to other router's crossover interface - which is connected then to 2nd
provider, so why would i need to redistribute my routes when its already in
the fib? maybe im confused but I dont think i necessarily need ospf in my
On 5/5/07, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-03 20:58]:
> > Any recommendations on running BGP on redundant firewalls to multiple
> > providers advertising the same network thru both links, and talking iBGP
> > with the other firewall?
>
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 04:23:00PM -0500, K K wrote:
> Am I the only one having a difficult time keeping track of which cards
> on the "Supported hardware" list are merely tolerated, and which
> vendors/chipsets are truly "supported" and cooperative?
No, that's why http://www.vendorwatch.org exist
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 02:02:19PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> On May 7, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
>
> >I'm using a thecus 2100 with raidframe to do raid 1. A bit slow, but
> >with 512MB RAM it's acceptable.
>
> Would ccd(4) be any faster? Also, what sort of RAM does it take?
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 12:42:55PM -0700, Bruce Bauer wrote:
> On 5/7/07, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On May 7, 2007, at 12:20 PM, Bruce Bauer wrote:
> > >This system has been running flawlessly since mid-March with GENERIC
> > >plus the 010 patch. dmesg below
> > >This morning I fo
* K K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-07 23:52]:
> Am I the only one having a difficult time keeping track of which cards
> on the "Supported hardware" list are merely tolerated, and which
> vendors/chipsets are truly "supported" and cooperative?
>
> On 5/5/07, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Hello
I've noticed a bit different behaviour with regard to delayed acks on OBSD.
Some other systems (2 linux distros, win2k/xp) I tested, pretty much acted
as I've always seen it - 1 ack per max. 2 segments, but no bigger delay than
some arbitrary value (looking at rfc, no more than 500ms, bu
Don't beat a dead horse.
This should do whatever you need:
http://gag.sourceforge.net/
On 5/7/07, Aaron Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:09:34 -0500, Michael Dexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have found references to: /pub/OpenBSD/3.6/tools/booteasy suggesting
> that
Am I the only one having a difficult time keeping track of which cards
on the "Supported hardware" list are merely tolerated, and which
vendors/chipsets are truly "supported" and cooperative?
On 5/5/07, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/4/07, K K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This wo
On Mon, 07 May 2007 15:09:34 -0500, Michael Dexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I have found references to: /pub/OpenBSD/3.6/tools/booteasy suggesting
that it was part of the distribution but I do not see it listed for 3.7
and newer. I do not see a 3.7 changelist entry for it and I the online
On May 7, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
I'm using a thecus 2100 with raidframe to do raid 1. A bit slow, but
with 512MB RAM it's acceptable.
Would ccd(4) be any faster? Also, what sort of RAM does it take?
Thanks for your response.
Bryan
Hello,
I have found references to: /pub/OpenBSD/3.6/tools/booteasy suggesting that it
was part of the distribution but I do not see it listed for 3.7 and newer. I do
not see a 3.7 changelist entry for it and I the online man pages to not seem to
refer to it. From the looks however, it was an of
* Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> have been coding touchscreen-driven applications using visual basic
> lately and am sick of VB. i would much rather be using openbsd with
> another programming language that allows me to accomplish the same sort
> of stuff.
>
> i have no "formal" CS background so am
* * A recent post and a router blowout
today has sparked me to report this * *
Hey all,
We've had a router running openbsd for a while now. A few months ago
we upgraded from 3.8 to 4.0 (upgrade technically was 3.8 -> 3.9 ->
4.0) and it seemed to go as smooth as possible.
Then we started havi
On 5/7/07, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 7, 2007, at 12:20 PM, Bruce Bauer wrote:
This system has been running flawlessly since mid-March with GENERIC
plus the 010 patch. dmesg below
This morning I found it totally unresponsive both through network and
at the console. Had to
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:20:00AM -0700, Bruce Bauer wrote:
> This system has been running flawlessly since mid-March with GENERIC
> plus the 010 patch. dmesg below
> This morning I found it totally unresponsive both through network and
> at the console. Had to use the power switch to recover.
>
On May 7, 2007, at 12:20 PM, Bruce Bauer wrote:
> This system has been running flawlessly since mid-March with GENERIC
> plus the 010 patch. dmesg below
> This morning I found it totally unresponsive both through network and
> at the console. Had to use the power switch to recover.
>
> Where do I
On 5/7/07, Bryan Vyhmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was just wondering about whether the Thecus N2100 running OpenBSD/
armish can operate in RAID 1 mode. Maybe this is a stupid question
but I couldn't find anything about it and I am interested to know.
Obviously I would not be running the fi
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 14:42 +0200, Michael wrote:
> I got a sparc64 (Sun Ultra 5) running here which I upgraded from
> 4.0-stable to 4.1-stable. Just recompiled the kernel without any problems.
I've got an Ultra 5 too. I'll retry a fresh source checkout from CVS.
thanks
Luca
This system has been running flawlessly since mid-March with GENERIC
plus the 010 patch. dmesg below
This morning I found it totally unresponsive both through network and
at the console. Had to use the power switch to recover.
Where do I start trying to track this down?
The system is running ss
Maurice Janssen wrote:
Now, why PERL would do this, I have no clue, but it does anyway in the
usage done by awstats.
So far I reproduce this 5 times, so it's pretty consistent.
What may cause this, I do not know more, but look like when PERL needs
to process huge amount of data, it end up aff
On 5/7/07, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cool. What I am not sure about is if we want to have a bunch of little
vendor drivers or a big driver that does all the vendor stuff. I need
to think this through. Any comments?
this could all be taken care of by button, no? even if they
On Monday, May 7, 2007 at 11:27:50 -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
>Maurice Janssen wrote:
>>On Monday, May 7, 2007 at 03:11:41 -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
>>>Every time, I process the logs with webalizer, no problem what so ever.
>>>Then a few customers wants the awstats version. So, I process th
Artur,
> Have you done forced fsck of the partitions? This sounds like a
> problem with the data you have on disk. It would be even nicer if you
> could update to a newer fsck because it has been updated to deal with
> many new strange corner cases we've been seeing. Although, that might
> or migh
Hi all,
I have tried to setup a new pflog interface to monitor ipsec traffic and it
works ok. Afterwards I have setup another pflogd daemon to store logs on another
pcap file under /var/log. But I have one question: how do i to configure
newsyslog.conf entry for this new pflogd daemon? If I p
I have yet to receive any response to the panics I have
been experiencing. Is there something else I need to provide
that will get me pointed in the right direction?
Are there tools available to test the connection to the
hard drive, or to test the hard drive itself? I used format
when administ
have been coding touchscreen-driven applications using visual basic
lately and am sick of VB. i would much rather be using openbsd with
another programming language that allows me to accomplish the same sort
of stuff.
i have no "formal" CS background so am at a loss for good candidates.
the a
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 09:38:02AM +0200, Little Red Riding Hood marching
through the forest wrote:
> Not sent to bugs@ because I'm not sure it could do much there. I'm hoping
> someone may be able to give hints on what to check, so I can resolve this
> small issue.
Why would you wanna do that
Maurice Janssen wrote:
On Monday, May 7, 2007 at 03:11:41 -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Every time, I process the logs with webalizer, no problem what so ever.
Then a few customers wants the awstats version. So, I process that as
well, however it's also processing multiple logs, but when the aw
bdz writes:
> I have an ASUS notebook that uses the azalia driver for the
> sound. The problem is that I can not adjust the volume with
> applicaions' volume control. That includes xfce and xmms
> too. In xfce's Sound setting panel there is only one mixer
> (mixer0) that is set, in xmms there is n
A subscription change or cancellation request for your email address
misc@openbsd.org was just received on GISCafe. This message is to inform
you of this action and to provide you with a personalized URL that you
can use to make such modifications now or at any time in the future.
If you did not r
GIS Weekly Review
May 07, 2007
From: GISCafe
Previous Issues
NAVTEQ
Review Article eMail Article Print Article
Susan Smith - Managing Editor
Goog
On 5/7/07, Tobias Ulmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Btw, pgp requires a working web of trust, it's not secure just because
you can sign something.
Joe Cracker can easily generate a key with "Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
and provides you with "signed" filesets. Who steps up to organise key
si
Cool. What I am not sure about is if we want to have a bunch of little
vendor drivers or a big driver that does all the vendor stuff. I need
to think this through. Any comments?
giovanni wrote:
hello,
because I could not change the excessive lcd brightness of my laptop
under openbsd I sta
Hi,
Luca Corti schrieb:
> No. I've just reextracted it just to be sure, but I still get the same
> error.
I got a sparc64 (Sun Ultra 5) running here which I upgraded from
4.0-stable to 4.1-stable. Just recompiled the kernel without any problems.
Michael
OpenBSD 4.1-stable (GENERIC) #1: Mon May
On Monday, May 7, 2007 at 03:11:41 -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
>Every time, I process the logs with webalizer, no problem what so ever.
>Then a few customers wants the awstats version. So, I process that as
>well, however it's also processing multiple logs, but when the awstats
>PERL stuff kic
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:57:50AM +0200, Martin Schr?der wrote:
> 2007/5/7, Adam Hawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >MD5 is proven weak. It's possible to take almost any file and its
> >MD5 then create an identically sized file with the same hash in a
> >reasonable time. This can be used to pass out a
I have an ASUS notebook that uses the azalia driver for the sound. The
problem is that I can not adjust the volume with applicaions' volume
control. That includes xfce and xmms too. In xfce's Sound setting panel
there is only one mixer (mixer0) that is set, in xmms there is no mixer
in the drop
Gordon Willem Klok wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:32:17AM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
acpicpu0 at acpi0: CPU0: 866, 667 MHz
apmd -C is your friend, without acpi this is done in SMM by
the bios at least it was on my lattitude before it kicked the
bucket.
$ pgrep -fl apmd
214 /usr/sbin/apmd
2007/5/7, Adam Hawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
MD5 is proven weak. It's possible to take almost any file and its
MD5 then create an identically sized file with the same hash in a
reasonable time. This can be used to pass out an arbitrary CD
image that completely trashes the contents of your hard dis
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 03:52:11PM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> Beautiful! Thanks a lot!
>
> But, which FM should I R? I have searched high and low
> alas apparently not right.
>
Found it! Not a very illogical place, just one of many possible.
The "HP ProLiant Lights-Out 100 Remote Management
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 14:11 -0400, Josh Grosse wrote:
> Just a wild guess, but did you forget to include comp41.tgz in your
> install/upgrade?
No. I've just reextracted it just to be sure, but I still get the same
error.
ciao
Luca
OK,
I have some update on this one. It's not fix, but I was finally able to
isolate how that problem is trigger. May be fix now, I don't know, but I
am passing the informations in case it's useful and also if someone
could tell me if there was a logic behind it and if yes it would not
happen
62 matches
Mail list logo
