yah theyre valid, there was a point when i first set this up i remember one of the nexthops being invalid but this hasnt been the case for sometime. cool, i think ill stick to the without ospf for now until it becomes a necessity. thanks.
On 5/7/07, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2007/05/07 16:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > when i do a bgpctl show fib i see the two routes, 1 thru connected > provider, > > 1 to other router's crossover interface - which is connected then to 2nd > > provider, so why would i need to redistribute my routes when its already > in > > the fib? maybe im confused but I dont think i necessarily need ospf in > my > > scenario. can anyone else clarify this? > > check 'bgpctl sh nex' to make sure your nexthops are valid. > if they are, you have this working ok. > > there are various ways to do this, some with ospf, some without.
