yah theyre valid, there was a point when i first set this up i remember one
of the nexthops being invalid but this hasnt been the case for sometime.
cool, i think ill stick to the without ospf for now until it becomes a
necessity. thanks.

On 5/7/07, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2007/05/07 16:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > when i do a bgpctl show fib i see the two routes, 1 thru connected
> provider,
> > 1 to other router's crossover interface - which is connected then to 2nd
> > provider, so why would i need to redistribute my routes when its already
> in
> > the fib? maybe im confused but I dont think i necessarily need ospf in
> my
> > scenario. can anyone else clarify this?
>
> check 'bgpctl sh nex' to make sure your nexthops are valid.
> if they are, you have this working ok.
>
> there are various ways to do this, some with ospf, some without.

Reply via email to