Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??

2007-04-30 Thread Rob Waite
One thing I neglected to include in my hand written dmesg was that amd64 seems to use CDBOOT 1.08 and i386 uses CDBOOT 1.06, unless my video capture made the 6 look like an 8. Maybe this is by design. Anyway.. I will stop flooding this board with my messages. Sorry ; )

Re: Bridge between a jumboframe and a normal 1512byte network

2007-04-30 Thread Markus Hennecke
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Bob wrote: I tried to look this up with google, but didn't find any sensible answers. I.e. I'm building a gigabit network at home, and I now have an 100Base-TX network here. I would like to add a gigabit network to it. This gigabit network will ofcourse run with jumbo frames.

Bridge between a jumboframe and a normal 1512byte network

2007-04-30 Thread Bob
Hi, I tried to look this up with google, but didn't find any sensible answers. I.e. I'm building a gigabit network at home, and I now have an 100Base-TX network here. I would like to add a gigabit network to it. This gigabit network will ofcourse run with jumbo frames. Now my question is basically

Re: About C++ and licensing on OpenBSD

2007-04-30 Thread Nate Montague
> 2. OpenBSD is known as a very anti-GPL project... so, what would be > the OpenBSD position on front of some LGPL code implemented > specifically for OpenBSD? Well Ernesto, OpenBSD doesn't really care what you do with your own code, regardless of what platform it is developed for. You can put it

Re: About C++ and licensing on OpenBSD

2007-04-30 Thread Adam Hawes
Hi, > I want to develop an OpenBSD specific set of libraries, implementing > it on C++ and using the LGPL or the Classpath::License licenses for my > code (both are almost identical). Well, I will be the initial owner of > my code and I can do (again, initially) anything with it, but: It's your c

Re: About C++ and licensing on OpenBSD

2007-04-30 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Ernesto Bascon wrote: I want to develop an OpenBSD specific set of libraries, implementing it on C++ and using the LGPL or the Classpath::License licenses for my code (both are almost identical). Well, I will be the initial owner of my code and I can do (again, initially) anything with it, but:

Re: 4.1, patch 003, need help with the application instructions.

2007-04-30 Thread Chris Kuethe
On 4/30/07, Allie Daneman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can someone help out with how to properly build and install spamd as per patch 003 ? Usually the application instructions are a bit more informative,Thanks ;) Apply by doing: cd /usr/src patch -p0 < 003_spamd.patch Then buil

About C++ and licensing on OpenBSD

2007-04-30 Thread Ernesto Bascon
Hi everybody: I do not want to start a flamewar about licensing and hope some concrete answers to my questions (maybe I seem aggressive, I am not at all :) ). I want to develop an OpenBSD specific set of libraries, implementing it on C++ and using the LGPL or the Classpath::License licenses for

Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??

2007-04-30 Thread Rob Waite
Another interesting thing... I installed the amd64 version of 4.1 and it works without a hitch. I also noticed a line that says: RTC BIOS diagnostic error 80 It does seem to boot okay and everything seemed stable. I have installed win xp on this machine for a week and no problems at all. I wen

4.1, patch 003, need help with the application instructions.

2007-04-30 Thread Allie Daneman
Can someone help out with how to properly build and install spamd as per patch 003 ? Usually the application instructions are a bit more informative,Thanks ;) Apply by doing: cd /usr/src patch -p0 < 003_spamd.patch Then build and install spamd. -- ~Allie D. My advice to you,

Re: OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??

2007-04-30 Thread Ted Unangst
On 4/30/07, Rob Waite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is a new computer so I was worried that the hardware was not supported. I popped in my OBSD 4.0 boot disk and it started up no problem.. so my question is this: Do the FTP sites put out some sort of incomplete boot iso before the official rel

OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??

2007-04-30 Thread Rob Waite
Hello.. I know that OpenBSD is released officially on May 1st. I noticed however that it is available on the FTP's (all of this just happened in the last 30 minutes). I made the boot cd and then tried to install but it seems to be very unhappy. After it mentions the ramdrive... some text flashes f

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

2007-04-30 Thread Aaron Hsu
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:17:34 -0500, Ben Calvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:04 AM, Aaron Hsu wrote: I am wondering what problems I am going to run into with the 4.1- RELEASE and a Macbook Pro. Right now I have tried to boot up the latest snapshot on my Core Duo Macb

OpenBSD 4.1 install issue??

2007-04-30 Thread Rob Waite
I couldnt figure out how to get my dmesg when it wouldnt even boot so I took a picture... it says the following (basically): booting cd0a:4.1/i386/bsd.rd: blah blah entry point at blah blah avm_page_physload: unable to load physical memory segment. 5 segments allocated, ignoring blah blah increas

Re: ipsec slave

2007-04-30 Thread Prabhu Gurumurthy
Steven Surdock wrote: Prabhu Gurumurthy wrote: Steven Surdock wrote: Can anyone provide some insight as to the correct configuration of a sasyncd slave server with respect to /etc/rc.conf.local? For example, is the following correct? ... Can you provide details of your /etc/sasyncd.conf file

Re: NFS mount by non-root

2007-04-30 Thread Mike Erdely
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 09:34:44PM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote: > Benoit Myard wrote: > >By the way, is anyone aware of the reason why this option is not > >present in OpenBSD's mount [2] (technical, security) ? > > man sysctl, man mount. Look for usermount. > No idea if that works for NFS though.

Re: ipsec slave

2007-04-30 Thread Steven Surdock
Prabhu Gurumurthy wrote: > Steven Surdock wrote: >> Can anyone provide some insight as to the correct configuration of a >> sasyncd slave server with respect to /etc/rc.conf.local? For >> example, is the following correct? ... > Can you provide details of your /etc/sasyncd.conf file ... > on both t

Re: Remove x11/ion

2007-04-30 Thread Vijay Ramesh
>Naw, I like bananawm better =). Such features could include: >. Changing the mouse cursor to a banana. >. A theme song is absolutely necessary... >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bananaphone >. Banana background! >. Floating bananas like xsnow! >. A banana clock... hrm, analog sounds good, but binar

Re: Remove x11/ion

2007-04-30 Thread Sevan / Venture37
. A Pulp Fiction themed FPS with the only weapons being bannanas... hey, a wm has to have it all, after all! See http://www.flickr.com/photos/i-capture/16136112/ for an artistic example we can base it off of. Banana, mofo, do you speak it? This classic piece of graffiti artwork was painted ove

Re: Binary kernel and base update

2007-04-30 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 04:21:34PM +0200, Maurice Janssen wrote: > On Sunday, April 29, 2007 at 02:35:06 +0100, mal content wrote: > >I'm extremely interested in binary updates as I don't yet have the resources > >to put together a build server and compiling updates in qemu is very > >painful. > >

Re: ipsec slave

2007-04-30 Thread Prabhu Gurumurthy
Steven Surdock wrote: Can anyone provide some insight as to the correct configuration of a sasyncd slave server with respect to /etc/rc.conf.local? For example, is the following correct? --- ntpd_flags= # enabled during install sasyncd_flags=""# for normal use: "

Re: 4 port router card

2007-04-30 Thread Nick Holland
Steve Glaus wrote: I bought a Realtek based 4 port pci 10/110 card off of ebay. I was hoping I would be able to use this card to set-up for individual networks. When I boot the card in openbsd it only comes up with one (ral0) interface. Is it possible this is just a 'switching' card and I can

ipsec slave

2007-04-30 Thread Steven Surdock
Can anyone provide some insight as to the correct configuration of a sasyncd slave server with respect to /etc/rc.conf.local? For example, is the following correct? --- ntpd_flags= # enabled during install sasyncd_flags=""# for normal use: "" pf=YES

Re: 4 port router card

2007-04-30 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/X11R6.8.0/doc/scanpci.1.html On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 14:14 -0400, Bret Lambert wrote: > On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 14:03 -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > > Full lspci(8) / pciconf(8) and dmesg(8) output would help us answer the > > question. > > > > ~~BAS > > >From

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

2007-04-30 Thread Ben Calvert
search the archives under 'macbook pro' and 'acpi' On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:04 AM, Aaron Hsu wrote: Hello all, I am wondering what problems I am going to run into with the 4.1- RELEASE and a Macbook Pro. Right now I have tried to boot up the latest snapshot on my Core Duo Macbook Pro and it

4.1 and Macbook Pro

2007-04-30 Thread Aaron Hsu
Hello all, I am wondering what problems I am going to run into with the 4.1-RELEASE and a Macbook Pro. Right now I have tried to boot up the latest snapshot on my Core Duo Macbook Pro and it hang right after the usb and rd0 line. From what I understand, this is the last line before enteri

Re: 4 port router card

2007-04-30 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
Full lspci(8) / pciconf(8) and dmesg(8) output would help us answer the question. ~~BAS On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 13:30 -0400, Steve Glaus wrote: > nterface. Is it possible this is just a 'switching' card and I > cant route traffic across the ports? > > It has a realtek RTL8305SC controller chip o

Re: 4 port router card

2007-04-30 Thread Ted Unangst
On 4/30/07, Steve Glaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I bought a Realtek based 4 port pci 10/110 card off of ebay. I was hoping I would be able to use this card to set-up for individual networks. When I boot the card in openbsd it only comes up with one (ral0) interface. Is it possible this is just

Re: 4 port router card

2007-04-30 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2007/04/30 13:30, Steve Glaus wrote: > I bought a Realtek based 4 port pci 10/110 card off of ebay. It's probably single-port + a built-in switch. The RTL8305SC is a vlan-capable switch. Looks like it can be controlled from the host: http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/dev/mii/rlswitch.c > I was

4 port router card

2007-04-30 Thread Steve Glaus
I bought a Realtek based 4 port pci 10/110 card off of ebay. I was hoping I would be able to use this card to set-up for individual networks. When I boot the card in openbsd it only comes up with one (ral0) interface. Is it possible this is just a 'switching' card and I cant route traffic acro

Re: Remove x11/ion

2007-04-30 Thread Travers Buda
* Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-30 09:49:19]: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:24:07AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > Sure we can keep ion3 ad is but I'd like to pick up the new changes in a > > forked project called bananawm :-) > > bananawm? I don't get it. How about FreeIon for a

Re: Networking issue: two routers with the same IP

2007-04-30 Thread Renaud Allard
Frank Denis wrote: > Hello, > > I currently have a remote server with a trivial network setup: > > [Server 10.0.0.1]-[NAT router 10.0.0.30 - external IP 1]-ADSL > > A second ADSL line and router have just been added. Unfortunately I > have no > control over the routers. Both routers

Re: Binary kernel and base update

2007-04-30 Thread Maurice Janssen
On Sunday, April 29, 2007 at 02:35:06 +0100, mal content wrote: >I'm extremely interested in binary updates as I don't yet have the resources >to put together a build server and compiling updates in qemu is very >painful. > >Until these binaries are trusted by the OpenBSD project though (which is

Re: Binary kernel and base update

2007-04-30 Thread Maurice Janssen
On Sunday, April 29, 2007 at 09:06:28 +0200, Johan Linner wrote: >A great initiative! >I have tried the i386 stable-build and it is working as expected. >I will definately have use for your work, can't wait for the first patch >to the 4.1 release ;) Thanks for the feedback. Nice to know that at

Re: NFS mount by non-root

2007-04-30 Thread Lars Hansson
Benoit Myard wrote: By the way, is anyone aware of the reason why this option is not present in OpenBSD's mount [2] (technical, security) ? man sysctl, man mount. Look for usermount. No idea if that works for NFS though. --- Lars Hansson

Re: NFS mount by non-root

2007-04-30 Thread Benoit Myard
On 29/04/07, Douglas Maus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is it possible for users (non-root) to mount NFS exports? Well, on Linux, and depending on the amount of regular users who should be able to mount their private shares, you could add a line to your fstab (I think this is the 'users' or 'user'

Re: pf - drop or return - is stealth mode overrated?

2007-04-30 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 09:35:02AM +0930, Adam Hawes wrote: > > I find 'return' to be easier to work with. The LAN I am primarily > > thinking about is both infested with Windows and accessible via VPN - > > and the VPN has some Windows clients. Considering the people on said > > LAN, who are both

Re: booting openbsd and blowing out old windows os

2007-04-30 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 12:38:01PM -0400, Chris Smith wrote: > On 4/29/07, bubka20 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Nothing different happens when I restart my computer. The windows os just > > comes up like always. I'm not prompted with any choices to install > > openbsd...I've tried several t

Networking issue: two routers with the same IP

2007-04-30 Thread Frank Denis
Hello, I currently have a remote server with a trivial network setup: [Server 10.0.0.1]-[NAT router 10.0.0.30 - external IP 1]-ADSL A second ADSL line and router have just been added. Unfortunately I have no control over the routers. Both routers come with the same IP address, it'

Re: bgpd crash

2007-04-30 Thread Jon Morby
On 30 Apr 2007, at 10:51, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 04:39:07AM +0100, Jon Morby wrote: I've updated to the latest snapshot and am seeing the following from bgpd Apr 29 03:35:18 l3-c1 bgpd[28142]: fatal in RDE: aspath_count: bula bula Apr 29 03:35:18 l3-c1 bgpd[30043]: Los

Re: bgpd crash

2007-04-30 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 04:39:07AM +0100, Jon Morby wrote: > I've updated to the latest snapshot and am seeing the following from > bgpd > > Apr 29 03:35:18 l3-c1 bgpd[28142]: fatal in RDE: aspath_count: bula bula > Apr 29 03:35:18 l3-c1 bgpd[30043]: Lost child: route decision engine > exited

Re: OpenBGPd: error in UPDATE message, attribute length wrong

2007-04-30 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 06:34:01PM +0200, Falk Brockerhoff wrote: > Ben Calvert schrieb: > > > there are differences between OPENBSD_4_1 ( what's on the CD ) and HEAD > > ( current ) If you expect people to answer your questions, you have to > > choose one or the other. > > Hm, ok, I will updat

4.1-stable build fails for sparc64

2007-04-30 Thread Maurice Janssen
Hi, I'm trying to build a release(8) of 4.1-stable for a couple of architectures. I installed 4.1-release from the CD on i386, sparc and sparc64. I untarred the srs.tar.gz from the CD on an NFS server (also running 4.1-release) and updated the cvs tree through anoncvs (cvs -qd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Re: pf - 1 firewall 2 wans

2007-04-30 Thread Johan Linner
Joel Knight skrev: --- Quoting Johan L on 2007/04/25 at 14:31 +0200: Hi, We have two internet connection with 2 different firewalls that we want to merge into a new single pf based firewall. . . . You should order a 4.1 CD, install it, and then do 'man pf.conf' and then 'man route'. Look