On 2/14/07, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007/02/14 21:55, atstake atstake wrote:
> I'm getting this error & I understand that I need to symlink some file
> inside the chroot (/var/www) area but I'm not sure which file to be
> exact. I search previous misc@ archive but they seem
Hello all,
My OpenBSD firewall is still randomly stopping routing packets and I
still can't figure out why. :-(
I made the suggested patch to if_ether.c, ut now I just get the
following line in /var log messages:
Feb 14 18:08:41 bytor /bsd: arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for
192.168.1.1
El motivo de esta carta es la presentacisn de DIMARCOMP como posible
proveedor de Hardware; avalan nuestra empresa mas de 10 aqos de experiencia en
el rubro de la Informatica en sus diferentes aspectos.
Representa marcas reconocidas como LG, Intel, Kingston, Genius,
Codegen, SMC, N
On 2/14/07, Marco S Hyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, please educate me: couldn't a BSD driver be created by using the
> cleanroom approach? One person reads the GPL code, writes specs,
> another implements them? Or is this covered when people say "reverse
> engineer"?
[...]
Thanks f
On 2/14/07, Greg Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/14/07, Bryan Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm going to be installing on a soekris box (probably on flash media),
> and I'm trying to figure out what the bare minimum I need to install.
>
> Is there somewhere I can see what files are i
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:08:28 +, Jamie Penman-Smithson wrote:
>On 15/02/07, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I'm attempting to setup openbsd 4.0 as a router, the system has two
>> > interfaces, rl0 and rl1. It looks something like this (apologies if
>> > this looks really odd):
On 2/14/07, Bryan Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm going to be installing on a soekris box (probably on flash media),
and I'm trying to figure out what the bare minimum I need to install.
Is there somewhere I can see what files are included in the
base40.tgz, etc40.tgz etc... so I know what
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:00:55 -0800, Bryan Irvine wrote:
>I'm going to be installing on a soekris box (probably on flash media),
>and I'm trying to figure out what the bare minimum I need to install.
>
>Is there somewhere I can see what files are included in the
>base40.tgz, etc40.tgz etc... so I k
On 2/14/07, Bryan Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm going to be installing on a soekris box (probably on flash media),
and I'm trying to figure out what the bare minimum I need to install.
Is there somewhere I can see what files are included in the
base40.tgz, etc40.tgz etc... so I know what
On 15/02/07, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm attempting to setup openbsd 4.0 as a router, the system has two
> interfaces, rl0 and rl1. It looks something like this (apologies if
> this looks really odd):
>
> router [x.x.58.129] --- router2: rl0 [x.x.58.130]
>
I'm going to be installing on a soekris box (probably on flash media),
and I'm trying to figure out what the bare minimum I need to install.
Is there somewhere I can see what files are included in the
base40.tgz, etc40.tgz etc... so I know what don't fill up the flash
card at the start?
They are
> I'm attempting to setup openbsd 4.0 as a router, the system has two
> interfaces, rl0 and rl1. It looks something like this (apologies if
> this looks really odd):
>
> router [x.x.58.129] --- router2: rl0 [x.x.58.130]
>router2: rl1 [x.x.58.140] ---
Not so
On 14/02/07, Martin Schrvder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/2/14, Jamie Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I read afterboot(8) but I didn't see anything related to the issue
> that I'm experiencing.
If you wish to route packets between interfaces, add one or both of
the
followin
On 2/14/07, Chris C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 21:59, Chris C. wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm having issues with rsyncing ftp.rfc-editor.org through a PF firewall,
> other connections (also other rsync connections) work well.
>
> rsync -avz --delete ftp.rfc-editor.org::rfcs-te
Cool :-)
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:08:11AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 08:42:19PM +0100, frantisek holop said that
> > here i go again, describing usb problems. i am really not sure now
> > if it is a) my external disk, b) openbsd, c) bios/motherboard/usb port
>
hmm, on Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 08:42:19PM +0100, frantisek holop said that
> here i go again, describing usb problems. i am really not sure now
> if it is a) my external disk, b) openbsd, c) bios/motherboard/usb port
> that is giving me the headache...
none of them.
it seems that it was acpi after
2007/2/14, Jamie Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I read afterboot(8) but I didn't see anything related to the issue
that I'm experiencing.
--
If you wish to route packets between interfaces, add one or both of the
following directives (depending on whether IPv4
I've managed to solve a problem that was bodering me for some time now.
I decided to put this solution to the list just in case someday somebody
will be in similar situation.
How to solve the problem described on this picture:
193.x.x.x/27 193.y.y.y/27
| 192.168.1.0/24
On 13/02/07, Martin Schrvder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/2/14, Jamie Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Any hints?
afterboot(8) has a section on routing.
Best
Martin
I read afterboot(8) but I didn't see anything related to the issue
that I'm experiencing.
Time to go back to Linux
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 21:59, Chris C. wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm having issues with rsyncing ftp.rfc-editor.org through a PF firewall,
> other connections (also other rsync connections) work well.
>
> rsync -avz --delete ftp.rfc-editor.org::rfcs-text-only my-rfc-mirror
> receiving file list ... do
> From: Pete Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:33:25 +0100
>
> # ifconfig bge0
> bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> lladdr 00:17:a4:45:f5:25
> groups: egress
> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex)
> status: active
> inet6 fe
can i see a dmesg as well? if you're running the machine as an amd64,
can you try it again as an i386?
dlg
On 15/02/2007, at 3:38 AM, Jose Fragoso wrote:
thats very... vague...
Sorry. I agree.
where are you creating this 50G partitiong? in the installer, or in
the installed operating sys
Hello,
has anybody wrote a nagios plugin to check the presence of some
specified bgp-peers set up with openbgpd? In the past I used check_bgp
in combination with cisco routers, which checks the peer-state via snmp.
Regards,
Falk
Hi
I'm having issues with rsyncing ftp.rfc-editor.org through a PF firewall,
other connections (also other rsync connections) work well.
rsync -avz --delete ftp.rfc-editor.org::rfcs-text-only my-rfc-mirror
receiving file list ... done
./
rfc-index.xml
...
rfc1591.txt
rfc1592.txt
nothing is going
On Feb 14, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Darren Spruell wrote:
My alternative is to go blare my mouth on Slashdot, but I'm more than
a little outnumbered there.
Actually, someone should (has already?) start one of those projects/
campaigns like
"browse anywhere" (http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/) and
On 2/14/07, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 14, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Marc Ravensbergen wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 10:18 am, you wrote:
>> On 2/14/07, Jeff Rollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is becoming one of those topics which goes on way to long,
and in which all
On Feb 14, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Darren Spruell wrote:
On 2/14/07, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Linux, Gnu and other subjects
have their own mailing lists.
Only if you operate under the assumption that the actions of these
other groups don't undermine the efforts of your own.
No, I
On 2007/02/14 12:11, Darren Spruell wrote:
>
> Yeah, when I went through it scrub rules had nothing to do with it.
> All state, period. (Note that in -current the default is now to
> implicitly build rules with both 'keep state' and 'S/SA' without
> having to specify; default stateful behavior mak
On 2007/02/14 22:14, Soner Tari wrote:
> Therefore, I am hoping to have Asterisk+Sangoma cards running on OpenBSD
> sooner than most people are expecting. (Meaning that we won't need
> zaptel/libpri drivers.)
"The Sangoma cards work with their own drivers with zaptel loaded on top"
http://www.voip
On 2007/02/14 11:47, Tim Kuhlman wrote:
> So what is happening? It seems to me that either pf is broken or his linux
> kernel is broken and pf is catching it. Any ideas as to which is the cause?
Ruleset more likely. If you post it, people can make suggestions.
Might be useful to capture a SYN wi
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 12:11 pm, Darren Spruell wrote:
> On 2/14/07, Tim Kuhlman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have pf running on an OpenBSD 4.0 (patches 1-5, 7) router and I have
> > one user with two Gentoo Linux machines with kernel 2.6.18 who is having
> > troubles. Everyone else is h
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 12:24 pm, Darren Spruell wrote:
> On 2/14/07, Neil Joseph Schelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Also, please educate me: couldn't a BSD driver be created by using the
> > > cleanroom approach? One person reads the GPL code, writes specs,
> > > another implements the
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 11:09 +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> The only problem is that we don't support zaptel. It is an incredible ugly
> interface that only works with the digium cards that are not supported.
Head of the ftp://ftp.sangoma.com/OpenBSD/current_wanpipe/README reads:
Future release: Wa
Hello
I've got a new toy today, here's the dmesg:
What does this server contain?
* Intel Xeon 5130
* SuperMicro X7DVL-E
(http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon1333/5000V/X7DVL-E.cfm)
No other specialities.
The keyboard is connected via USB, works. Disks are attached to the SATA
On Feb 14, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Marc Ravensbergen wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 10:18 am, you wrote:
>> On 2/14/07, Jeff Rollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is becoming one of those topics which goes on way to long,
and in which all the modalities applicable to OpenBSD have been
exhaust
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Tim Kuhlman wrote:
[snip]
> So what is happening? It seems to me that either pf is broken or his linux
> kernel is broken and pf is catching it. Any ideas as to which is the cause?
>
> One other point I needs some clarification on, in my searching around I did
> find an a
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 10:18 am, you wrote:
> On 2/14/07, Jeff Rollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Nah, RMS doesn't want this. A lot of `GPL people' don't want this
> > > at all.
> > >
> > > This deal is meant to divide.
> >
> > And this discussion isn't? There are already plenty of div
On 2/14/07, Tim Kuhlman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have pf running on an OpenBSD 4.0 (patches 1-5, 7) router and I have one
user with two Gentoo Linux machines with kernel 2.6.18 who is having
troubles. Everyone else is having no problem at all. This user is having any
tcp connection he makes d
On 2/14/07, L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 10:24 AM 2/14/2007 -0700, you wrote:>
>No, the best case scenario is that the good intentions of the Linux
>driver project would be focused on getting vendors to provide open
>documentation from which any OSS project, including Linux, can pr
I have pf running on an OpenBSD 4.0 (patches 1-5, 7) router and I have one
user with two Gentoo Linux machines with kernel 2.6.18 who is having
troubles. Everyone else is having no problem at all. This user is having any
tcp connection he makes dropped by the firewall. The state shows up when I
Darren Spruell escreveu:
> On 2/14/07, Manuel Ravasio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I read that creating a dhcp-range entry in /etc/dnsmasq.conf makes
>> dnsmasq start the dhcp service automatically, but alas DHCP server
>> apparently doesn't work: linux and windows clients can't grab IP
>> address
On my OpenWRT router, dnsmasq needs to be told that it is
authoritative on dhcp requests with the ``dhcp-authoritative'' keyword
in dnsmasq.conf
On 2/14/07, Manuel Ravasio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all.
I'm trying to set up a firewall/web-proxy/dns-proxy/dhcp-server box at
home, using a q
On 2/14/07, Manuel Ravasio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I read that creating a dhcp-range entry in /etc/dnsmasq.conf makes
dnsmasq start the dhcp service automatically, but alas DHCP server
apparently doesn't work: linux and windows clients can't grab IP
addresses and other IP information, and nets
Since upgrading a couple firewalls this weekend from 3.8 to 4.0, I've
noticed a large increase in passive-mode FTP transfer timeouts. Before
the upgrade, I had no issues...but now there are a number of client's
FTP servers that I have to transfer files to and from that transfers
simply fail on. I
>> thats very... vague...
Sorry. I agree.
>> where are you creating this 50G partitiong? in the installer, or in
>> the installed operating system? what command did you use?
In the installer.
>> how long did it actually take? "a really long time" could be 5
>> seconds if you're expectations are
Programming documentation is restricted also because the hardware is
full of bugs and like Theo said there is no errata for a lot of
hardware.
On 2/14/07, Rod Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday, February 14, 2007, 10:42:43, Nick ! wrote:
> ...
> Also, please educate me: couldn't a
On 2/14/07, Neil Joseph Schelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, please educate me: couldn't a BSD driver be created by using the
> cleanroom approach? One person reads the GPL code, writes specs,
> another implements them? Or is this covered when people say "reverse
> engineer"?
I imagine tha
On 2/14/07, Nick ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/14/07, Steven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problems would be similar if one signed a NDA, and then released
> code with a BSD license. GPL, however, _requires_ that the code be
> shared, and so I imagine it will be more problematic. Serious
On Wednesday, February 14, 2007, 10:42:43, Nick ! wrote:
> ...
> Also, please educate me: couldn't a BSD driver be created by using the
> cleanroom approach? One person reads the GPL code, writes specs,
> another implements them? ...
And what, you get a new chunk of code that replicates misint
Hello!
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:42:43AM -0500, Nick ! wrote:
>[...]
>Also, please educate me: couldn't a BSD driver be created by using the
>cleanroom approach? One person reads the GPL code, writes specs,
>another implements them? Or is this covered when people say "reverse
>engineer"?
That's
> He might *actually* be telling the truth. Maybe not all NDAs are
> conspiracies against us, but are just marketers trying to keep things
> quiet, and beyond that the companies don't care. That code might
> actually be readable!
> --then again it might not. We'll see.
As an optimist, I tend to ag
Hi Greg,
I've read your FAQ
http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/free_drivers_faq.html
which was linked to from Slashdot
http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/13/0220233&from=rss,
and I have some concerns about the program. Now, I realize that
you're trying to get hardware developers on-b
Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:51:36PM +0100, Han Boetes wrote:
> > Most GPL fans don't want this deal at all.
>
> Real GPL fans appear to be an increasingly diminishing subset of
> Linux users today though. They're being supplanted by users who
> want snazzy 3D desktops an
Greetings:
I will not have time for a proper bug report until this evening when I
get home, but I thought I would throw this out there for now.
This issue is reproducible, and it occurred in the previous snapshot
as well. Briefly, here is how it happens:
I have net.inet.ip.forwarding=1, and two
On 2/14/07, Steven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070213 23:00]:
>Darren Spruell wrote:
>> Instead we end up with a GPL driver that has to be reverse
>> engineered and we end up with the same problems we already have.
>
>Since when is the GPL a close source license?
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:42:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Well, as my goal is to have a GPL driver for everything, I don't see how
> this can hurt :)
What's the point of making the driver GPL if only one person is has
the documentation to know how to change it? Don't you think it's
short sighted
Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:06:36AM +0100, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
> > You seem to be happy with signing NDAs. If the result is a
> > readable and understandable GPL'ed driver, companies will be
> > even less motivated to release programming documentation. This
> > will lead to a
On 2/14/07, Jeff Rollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nah, RMS doesn't want this. A lot of `GPL people' don't want this
> at all.
>
> This deal is meant to divide.
>
And this discussion isn't? There are already plenty of divisions within the
FOSS world - between the F and OS of FOSS, between Lin
Artur Grabowski wrote:
> Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Which is exactly what the GPL people want since that's the whole
> > > point of the license. Otherwise they wouldn't be using the
> > > GPL. Duh.
> >
> > Nah, RMS doesn't want this. A lot of `GPL people' don't want this
> > at al
* Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070213 23:00]:
Darren Spruell wrote:
Instead we end up with a GPL driver that has to be reverse
engineered and we end up with the same problems we already have.
Since when is the GPL a close source license?
GPL isn't, but a NDA would require that the documen
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:51:36PM +0100, Han Boetes wrote:
> Most GPL fans don't want this deal at all.
Real GPL fans appear to be an increasingly diminishing subset of Linux
users today though. They're being supplanted by users who want snazzy
3D desktops and simply embrace ``Free Software'' be
Man I *love* unforeseen consequences!
> > I did read your FAQ but I can't see how it rebuts what has just been
> > said.
>
> You seem to have missed:
> Q: What about the BSDs?
>
> A: What about them? They are free to do whatever they wish, I
> have no input into their develo
On 2/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How long have you people been reading these lists?
When are people going to realize that Han is just a troll.
I've been here since 2004 and i never noticed!
However i noticed that Han is sometimes bearer
of apparently unpopular opinions
Hi Greg,
if i understand correctly, you are advocating the program
described on http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/free_drivers.html
in order to enable one open source operating system to
support as much hardware as possible, which is certainly
a useful goal. In fact, i am using Linux myself for one
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:58:00 +0100, "mickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:45:06PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:18:16PM +, Jeff Rollin wrote:
> > | On 14/02/07, Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | >
> > | > Artur Grabowski wrote:
>
Hello all.
I'm trying to set up a firewall/web-proxy/dns-proxy/dhcp-server box at
home, using a quite old i386-based pc (AMD k6-2 300, 256mb RAM, 2x10G
IDE disks) and OpenBSD 4.0.
OS installation, disk management, additional software installation and
configuration... everything went fine.
Problem
Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Which is exactly what the GPL people want since that's the whole
> > point of the license. Otherwise they wouldn't be using the
> > GPL. Duh.
>
> Nah, RMS doesn't want this. A lot of `GPL people' don't want this
> at all.
I quoted too much. The part I m
when routing packets to another interface, is it then possible to do redirection
for those packets on the other interface ?
I am trying to:
- route subnets to a tunnel
- redirect the subnets to private ip
10.100.1.1 > bge0 --- route-to ---> tun0 --- rdr 10.100.1.1 -> 192.168.1.1
I am seeing
Hello!
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:19:04PM +0100, Markus Ritzer wrote:
>Hello!
>I would like to know when the CPU is switched into protected mode on i386?
>Before or after executing init386() ?
>Or does the bootloader / or the BIOS do this?
/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/boot/srt0.S, around line
mickey wrote:
> oh come fucking on!
> do not start this bsd vs gpl crap again!
On the contrary, this is BSD united with GPL crap. :-)
# Han
Pete Vickers a icrit :
I'm trying to track down the cause of poor network performance under
OpenBSD4.0/i386 on HP Proliants (DL380-G4 and DL360-G4p), which seems to
be concerning ethernet 802.3x flow control on the bge NICs.
Test topology is:
HP DL380-G4
int bge0 (BCM5704C auto at 1000baseT
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:45:06PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:18:16PM +, Jeff Rollin wrote:
> | On 14/02/07, Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | >
> | > Artur Grabowski wrote:
> | > > "Stephan A. Rickauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | > > > I did read your
On 14/02/2007, at 9:59 PM, Jose Fragoso wrote:
Hi,
I just installed OpenBSD 4.0 on an IBM xSeries 336. I have noticed
that, for
some reason,
I/O operations are not carried out as fast as one would expect for
a machine
with SCSI
disks. For instance, the creation of a 50GB partion took a re
2007/2/14, Jeff Rollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
And yet when a driver is released under the BSD licence, which conflicts
with the GPL
It doesn't. It simply doesn't work under Linux.
Best
Martin
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:18:16PM +, Jeff Rollin wrote:
| On 14/02/07, Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >
| > Artur Grabowski wrote:
| > > "Stephan A. Rickauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > > > I did read your FAQ but I can't see how it rebuts what has
| > > > just been said. You see
Hi,
I'm trying to track down the cause of poor network performance under
OpenBSD4.0/i386 on HP Proliants (DL380-G4 and DL360-G4p), which seems
to be concerning ethernet 802.3x flow control on the bge NICs.
Test topology is:
HP DL380-G4
int bge0 (BCM5704C auto at 1000baseT full-duplex)
On 14/02/07, Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Artur Grabowski wrote:
> > "Stephan A. Rickauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I did read your FAQ but I can't see how it rebuts what has
> > > just been said. You seem to be happy with signing NDAs. If the
> > > result is a readable and un
Hello!
I would like to know when the CPU is switched into protected mode on i386?
Before or after executing init386() ?
Or does the bootloader / or the BIOS do this?
Markus
Hi,
I just installed OpenBSD 4.0 on an IBM xSeries 336. I have noticed that, for
some reason,
I/O operations are not carried out as fast as one would expect for a machine
with SCSI
disks. For instance, the creation of a 50GB partion took a really long time.
The command
4tar xzvf ports.tar.gz4 took
atstake atstake escreveu:
> My named doesn't bind to my private IP and only binds to localhost.
>
> starting BIND 9.3.2-P1
> command channel listening on 127.0.0.1#953
> command channel listening on ::1#953
>
> I already have the listen-on option in /var/named/etc/named.conf file
> pointed to my pr
Artur Grabowski wrote:
> Steven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Which brings me back to the question, what can an OpenBSD/open
> > source/free software user do about it?
>
> Sue Linux for anti-competitive behavior?
Nah. You can't sue `linux,' complain to Greg Kroah Hartmann. Most
GPL fans don't wa
Artur Grabowski wrote:
> "Stephan A. Rickauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I did read your FAQ but I can't see how it rebuts what has
> > just been said. You seem to be happy with signing NDAs. If the
> > result is a readable and understandable GPL'ed driver,
> > companies will be even less mot
On 2007/02/14 21:55, atstake atstake wrote:
> I'm getting this error & I understand that I need to symlink some file
> inside the chroot (/var/www) area but I'm not sure which file to be
> exact. I search previous misc@ archive but they seem a bit confusing.
You probably didn't do the 'phpxs' afte
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 09:50:07PM +1100, atstake atstake wrote:
| My named doesn't bind to my private IP and only binds to localhost.
|
| starting BIND 9.3.2-P1
| command channel listening on 127.0.0.1#953
| command channel listening on ::1#953
|
| I already have the listen-on option in /var/named
I'm getting this error & I understand that I need to symlink some file
inside the chroot (/var/www) area but I'm not sure which file to be
exact. I search previous misc@ archive but they seem a bit confusing.
Warning: dl() [function.dl]: Unable to load dynamic library
'/var/www/lib/php/modules/my
My named doesn't bind to my private IP and only binds to localhost.
starting BIND 9.3.2-P1
command channel listening on 127.0.0.1#953
command channel listening on ::1#953
I already have the listen-on option in /var/named/etc/named.conf file
pointed to my private IP.
options {
listen-on { 192.16
"Stephan A. Rickauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I did read your FAQ but I can't see how it rebuts what has just been
> said. You seem to be happy with signing NDAs. If the result is a
> readable and understandable GPL'ed driver, companies will be even less
> motivated to release programming do
> I'm guessing that you did not read the followup FAQ about the program
> at:
> http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/free_drivers_faq.html
>
> Please see the final question and answer on that page.
It ia a fucking farce.
You are trying to make sure that maintainers of code -- ie. any
random joe
Steven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which brings me back to the question, what can an OpenBSD/open
> source/free software user do about it?
Sue Linux for anti-competitive behavior?
//art
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:06:36AM +0100, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:39:36AM +0100, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
> >> On the subject of http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/free_drivers.html
> >>
> >> Now these companies have a great excuse to keep specs lock
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:39:36AM +0100, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
> On the subject of http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/free_drivers.html
>
> Now these companies have a great excuse to keep specs locked up tight
> under NDA, while pretending to be "open."
>
> The OpenBSD project has been made cle
Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:39:36AM +0100, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
>> On the subject of http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/free_drivers.html
>>
>> Now these companies have a great excuse to keep specs locked up tight
>> under NDA, while pretending to be "open."
>>
>> The OpenBSD proj
Darren Spruell wrote:
> On 2/13/07, Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Darren Spruell wrote:
> > > Instead we end up with a GPL driver that has to be reverse
> > > engineered and we end up with the same problems we already have.
> >
> > Since when is the GPL a close source license?
>
> Who s
93 matches
Mail list logo
