On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:23:31PM +0100, chefren wrote:
> A few people mail things like "submit a patch" but those simple minds
> don't understand that there is nothing to patch here.
those are usually the minds that make openbsd possible
anyway, i will shut up and wait for the day you have cod
* Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> i am planning on pulling live rate data from some manufacturing equipment
> using
> a red lion rate meter with RS-232 or 485 interface
>
> http://www.redlion.net/Products/DigitalandAnalog/Counters/CounterRate/CUB5.html
>
> what is the best way to pull this data, usin
* Francisco Valladolid wrote:
> I have 202 days using OpenBSD 3.6 as router/firewall/ PPPOE.
we bring out a new release every ~180 days, with fixes and new features.
If your uptime is longer than this, it is an indication that you did not
buy any new cd-roms from us, which you really should if y
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:47:38 -0800
"Greg Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/10/07, Francisco Valladolid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have 202 days using OpenBSD 3.6 as router/firewall/ PPPOE.
> >
> > I want to share this screenshot.
> >
> > http://farm1.static.flickr.com/147/353353577_
On 1/10/07, Antti Harri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was able to make `dump` dump core when I pressed
control-4 <...>
Control-4 generates character 28 (FS), which is usually known as
control-backslash. That character is, by default, the 'quit'
character in canonical mode of the terminal line
Hello,
I was able to make `dump` dump core when I pressed
control-4, I didn't test any other key combinations.
I was able to do this with 3.8-release and 4.0-current:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/test bs=1m count=100
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 1
i am planning on pulling live rate data from some manufacturing equipment using
a red lion rate meter with RS-232 or 485 interface
http://www.redlion.net/Products/DigitalandAnalog/Counters/CounterRate/CUB5.html
what is the best way to pull this data, using base OS utilities if possible? if
coding
On 1/10/07, Michael Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/10/07, chefren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I see it we have to design something beyond FFS before it's
> possible to start coding at all.
Anyways, where would you conduct this design and thinking.
I'm curious, taking away som
On 1/10/07, Francisco Valladolid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have 202 days using OpenBSD 3.6 as router/firewall/ PPPOE.
I want to share this screenshot.
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/147/353353577_e8e875083d_o.jpg
Wow, I am impressed, your dick is wy bigger than mine because I
have be
On 1/10/07, J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only outstanding question is, has "bofh" gotten 1.5 to compile and
install correctly on his amd64 box with Kurt's previous suggestion?
? The first note from Kurt says he's working on a patch, and the
second mentioned a thread in ports@, a
I have 202 days using OpenBSD 3.6 as router/firewall/ PPPOE.
I want to share this screenshot.
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/147/353353577_e8e875083d_o.jpg
Regards,
--
---
Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone,
the new has come! - 2 Corinthians 5:17 (NIV)
On 1/10/07, chefren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 01/10/07 22:00, Nick Guenther wrote:
> I'm interested in this topic too, but I know that misc@ is not the
> place for it.
How do you know? I can see lot's of people are interested in it.
> Anyway, if you want to play with different filesystems
Bonjour
Nous espirons que vous aurez profiti de l'annie 2006.
Toute liquipe OptiVente vous souhaite de bonnes fjtes de fin dannie, et tous
nos meilleurs souhaits pour vos projets 2007, tant professionnels que
personnels.
Cordialement
Thierry CRAYE
Girant OptiVente
PS :
Quelques i
Hello,
I am experiencing a problem connecting to a specific mail server through
an openbsd 4.0 firewall. From any unix host (tested both freebsd and
debian) I will get a timed out connection if i telnet to the remote
server and attempt to send mail. From a windows 2000 host, there is no
timeo
Welcome to the Namm Show in Anaheim California
18th - 21st of january 2007
www.thenammshow.com
Visit us at our booth # 2977 and check out our new
designed website & our new products.
www.triggerhead.com
thanxs for your recommendation to your friends
Best Regards
DDRUM AG
P.O. Box 816
Riedstr
this is intended as a warning to users of disk encryption products, as i am to
understand some of you are on [EMAIL PROTECTED] i strongly discourage anyone
from
purchasing securedoc personal edition for use on windows, as it is a poorly
designed product that offers zero support in the event of pro
thus Clint Pachl spake:
Timo Schoeler wrote:
hi misc@,
having OpenBSD 4.0 installed on my ThinkPad A22p (dmesg below) and
wearing the appropriate oBSD shirt i'd like to ask whether it's
possible to get max speed from this notebook without having the
battery built in.
i booted without it a
I run -current on my T43. Have used external VGA out for the past 6
months. I don't have any xorg.conf and I get 1280x1024. It looks like
you have a different video chip though.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 03:46:59PM +0100, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running OpenBSD 3.9-stable on a
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 01:22:27PM -0500, Andrey Shuvikov wrote:
> On 1/9/07, Marc Espie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The checkout from ports always spend quite some time at the end.
> >It comes from the way cvs works: creates every directory, then
> >prunes them at the end.
> >
> >Something in yo
On 01/10/07 22:00, Nick Guenther wrote:
I'm interested in this topic too, but I know that misc@ is not the
place for it.
How do you know? I can see lot's of people are interested in it.
> Anyway, if you want to play with different filesystems
go to linux.
I'm not interested in Linux and I
On 1/10/07, chefren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 01/10/07 01:21, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
> Could you guys please take this completely useless discussion off-list ?
> It has absolutely zero value to anyone running or developing OpenBSD.
Ah, it's clueless to try to think beond FFS and aim a
On 01/10/07 01:21, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
Could you guys please take this completely useless discussion off-list ?
It has absolutely zero value to anyone running or developing OpenBSD.
Ah, it's clueless to try to think beond FFS and aim a little higher?
+++chefren
Hmmm - should sis1 have an IP?
On 9-Jan-07, at 3:54 PM, Stephen Schaff wrote:
That's what I'm starting to think...
hostname.sis0: (management interface)
inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.0 NONE
hostname.sis1:
up
hostname.sis2:
up
bridgename.bridge0:
add sis1
add sis2
up
pf.conf: (as per ht
On 2007/01/10 15:55, Chuck Robey wrote:
> Look, as far as emergencies go, I have the orignal Linux OS sitting in
> back as a emergency,
boot> bsd.rd
then you can do an upgrade install.
> I could reinstall everything, or maybe just my /etc/ but could anyone
> give me guesses as to what sort of scr
It seems that it was a hardware issue. We put the hard disk in another
machine and the problem was gone.
Though, i would like to know what exactly caused it, i guess it was buggy
memory (Kingston, so they have life warranty).
I got this:
# gdb
GNU gdb 6.3
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation,
hi misc@,
having OpenBSD 4.0 installed on my ThinkPad A22p (dmesg below) and
wearing the appropriate oBSD shirt i'd like to ask whether it's possible
to get max speed from this notebook without having the battery built in.
i booted without it as i don't need it; i use this machine as my energ
I have a problem with my Zaurus, let me paint the scenario. I am a rank
newbie with OpenBSD, so I was trying (as a startup experiment) to build
all of it. I have my main machine sitting nearby (running FreeBSD
current, at which I have years of experience), so I NFS mounted the
little Zaurus's /us
On 1/9/07, Marc Espie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The checkout from ports always spend quite some time at the end.
It comes from the way cvs works: creates every directory, then
prunes them at the end.
Something in your network path is unhappy that you spend long enough
not doing enough, from i
Interesting. I hadn't tried using the external VGA output on my laptop.
I'm seeing pretty much what you describe, only I find that if I set the
Boot Display Device in the BIOS to VGA+LCD, then I get external video
output on the monitor. There's output in X, too. Even the Fn-F7
toggling seems
Hi all,
i just received a Soekris 4801 which i want to use as a file and print
server. However, i cannot get the printer to work. For testing purposes
i am using a HP Deskjet 600 connected via a USB/Parallel cable.
When i connect the printer it shows up as:
ulpt0 at uhub0 port 1 configuration
this diff changes the way ps/2 and AT keyboards are handled in
attempt to gain support for some quirky ones. this includes most
laptops that have internally connected ps/2 keyboards.
if you want your keyboard to continue working for the 4.1 release,
please test this change now and report back to
On 1/10/07, Marcos Laufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I had strange crash twice in 30 minutes today on a server
running OpenBSD 3.9 stable with generic kernel. The machine
rebooted inmediately, and i am not locally on the datacenter
I have no clue on where too look at. Any ideas?
man c
Hi,
I'm running OpenBSD 3.9-stable on a Lenovo (formerly IBM) Thinkpad T43p.
X (X.org 6.9.0) works fine either
(a) without any /etc/X11/xorg.conf, or
(b) using the /etc/X11/xorg.conf from http://www.enting.se/T43/xorg.conf
(which is linked from the T43 entry in
http://www.openbsd.org/i386-
Brian Candler wrote:
Well, maybe there is something useful that can be salvaged :-)
maybe, maybe not.
(3) Further to the above: some form of shared filesystem where the remote
copy can be mounted read-write and changes propagate both ways. This can
land you into problems when conflicting off-
Hello,
I had strange crash twice in 30 minutes today on a server
running OpenBSD 3.9 stable with generic kernel. The machine
rebooted inmediately, and i am not locally on the datacenter
in order to run a trace or ps, but i've seen this unusual lines in
the messages log:
Jan 10 11:17:03 corsair sa
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:47:16PM +, Brian Candler wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:21:45AM +0900, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
> > Could you guys please take this completely useless discussion off-list ?
> > It has absolutely zero value to anyone running or developing OpenBSD.
>
> Well, m
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:21:45AM +0900, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
> Could you guys please take this completely useless discussion off-list ?
> It has absolutely zero value to anyone running or developing OpenBSD.
Well, maybe there is something useful that can be salvaged :-)
I think the issu
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:54:35PM +0200, Dominik Zalewski wrote:
> I would like to install OpenBSD on my 1GB Kingston USB stick. Does OpenBSD
> supports well USB sticks? Does anybody tried to do such a setup?
This has been tried before, and aside from maybe getting a little tricky
with the boot
Thanks for all replies.
--
raff
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 01:10:32PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-10 12:12]:
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:05:11AM +0100, raff wrote:
> > > Hello misc.
> > >
> > > I want to block traffic from 192.168.9.8 to 192.168.1.0/24
> > > excluding 192.168.1.
I would like to install OpenBSD on my 1GB Kingston USB stick. Does OpenBSD
supports well USB sticks? Does anybody tried to do such a setup?
any help welcome
thanks,
Dominik
* Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-10 12:12]:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:05:11AM +0100, raff wrote:
> > Hello misc.
> >
> > I want to block traffic from 192.168.9.8 to 192.168.1.0/24
> > excluding 192.168.1.6
> > Is there any difference between:
> >
> > block in all
> > pass in on
Hello,
Just wondering, if there is a way to set a route priority manually? Is
there plans to implement it? It would be a great feature, after all.
Thank you.
--
With best regards,
Gregory Edigarov
raff schrieb:
> I want to block traffic from 192.168.9.8 to 192.168.1.0/24
> excluding 192.168.1.6
> Is there any difference between:
>
> block in all
> pass in on xl1 from 192.168.9.8 to !192.168.1.0/24 modulate state
> pass in on xl1 from 192.168.9.8 to 192.168.1.6 modulate state
>
> and
>
> b
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:05:11AM +0100, raff wrote:
> Hello misc.
>
> I want to block traffic from 192.168.9.8 to 192.168.1.0/24
> excluding 192.168.1.6
> Is there any difference between:
>
> block in all
> pass in on xl1 from 192.168.9.8 to !192.168.1.0/24 modulate state
> pass in on xl1 from
Hello misc.
I want to block traffic from 192.168.9.8 to 192.168.1.0/24
excluding 192.168.1.6
Is there any difference between:
block in all
pass in on xl1 from 192.168.9.8 to !192.168.1.0/24 modulate state
pass in on xl1 from 192.168.9.8 to 192.168.1.6 modulate state
and
block in all
pass in on
Stefan Krah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Stefan Krah wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > it seems that the interval timer is incorrect for a process that is
> > > started _after_ a sudden date change. Could someone reproduce this
47 matches
Mail list logo
