Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
i've got a few machines that have heatsinks and fans which are effective but
very loud. i would like to get some heatsinks and fans that are quiet, reliable
and reasonably priced. this has become a priority now that i've moved one of
these machines to my home and keep it
Hi misc,
I have, apparently, some sort of problem when burning DVDs with
dvd+rw-tools-5.21.4.10.8 using UDF on OpenBSD 3.8.
The DVDs are burned, but when I check them with tar (to list its
contents for example) I get invalid header errors. Also, when checking
the txt index file I also produc
I have a Lenovo R51e and I can tell you that the hardware is 100% compatible
with almost all live CD *nix distributions, no problem at all.
I am very satisfied of this product because it is robust and fair, battery life
is good and hardware seems to be largely supported.
Cheers!
Uwe Dippel <[E
i've got a few machines that have heatsinks and fans which are effective but
very loud. i would like to get some heatsinks and fans that are quiet, reliable
and reasonably priced. this has become a priority now that i've moved one of
these machines to my home and keep it in my bedroom.
these machi
>>Did you remember to uncomment:
>>"net.inet.ip.forwarding=1" in /etc/sysctl.conf?
>>
>> Mike
"net.inet.ip.forwarding=1" in /etc/sysctl.conf?
Yes this has been uncommented
-Justin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Justin Blackmore
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Justin Blackmore
> Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 6:36 PM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: DS21140(Tulip) Quad port nic and PF
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Ok here the deal,
>
> I have a test box with obsd 3
Hello everyone,
Ok here the deal,
I have a test box with obsd 3.9 stable with a Adaptec ANA-6944A/TX 4
port network card(PCI). I copied the pf configs from the production
firewall box (identical to my test box but it has intel nics) and
tweaked it to reflect the new 4 port nic, well all looks goo
I wonder. They have changed strategies, at least:
"We will not have models available for Linux, and we do not have custom
order, either," said Frank Kardonski, Lenovo's worldwide product manager
for Lenovo 3000 offerings. "What you see is what you get. And at this
point, it's Windows."
A Lenovo s
thanks. how did you achieve this? i downloaded an evaluation copy of vmware
workstation, created a machine with a raw disk pointing to my openbsd
partition but it won't boot. it says that there were no bootable drives
found.
konstantin
booting openbsd on a real partition both from bios and from v
Note the fourth question.
http://www.newsforge.com/articles/06/05/30/152219.shtml?tid=149
>From the land "down under": Australia.
Do we look from up over?
Do NOT CC me - I am subscribed to the list.
Replies to the sender address will fail except from the list-server.
On 6/4/06, akonsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
also, i think there is a way to run this machine from a "raw disk" instead
of a virtual disk. there is a discussion about using raw disks on the
vmware.com site. but as they say booting a VM from a raw disk and also being
able to boot your physical mac
Federico Giannici wrote:
>
>
> I have just switched to a multiprocessing kernel (3.9-stable i386) with
> a dual core Athlon 64.
>
> I noticed that "top" command now have two "CPUx" rows, one for each CPU.
> But "iostat" has only one "cpu" column.
>
> Question 1: are the iostat's cpu values a mean o
Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
The eventual plan is to get dom0 support in OpenBSD; we'll see how
long it takes.
Out of curiousity, do you know how the GPL licence of Xen affects dom0
support in OpenBSD?
Breeno
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, Federico Giannici wrote:
> I have just switched to a multiprocessing kernel (3.9-stable i386) with a dual
> core Athlon 64.
>
> I noticed that "top" command now have two "CPUx" rows, one for each CPU. But
> "iostat" has only one "cpu" column.
>
> Question 1: are the iostat's
I have just switched to a multiprocessing kernel (3.9-stable i386) with
a dual core Athlon 64.
I noticed that "top" command now have two "CPUx" rows, one for each CPU.
But "iostat" has only one "cpu" column.
Question 1: are the iostat's cpu values a mean of the values of both CPUs?
Regarding
Theo de Raadt wrote:
I thought my mail was clear enough.
Not necessarily. This thread was originally about the Hifn 7956 whereas
my interest is in the 7955. You stated that about a year ago Hifn
policies changed and that they decided they would no longer provide
documentation. I know the 7
Juha Erkkila wrote:
> i don't think this is true. just use vnconfig to attach a file to
> svnd0, and then do fsck /dev/rsvnd0c (maybe take a backup first?)
> OTOH, whether that works may depend on the disklabel on /dev/rsvnd0c,
> but at least i do this routinely in a similar script as yours,
> bef
>Matthias Kilian wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#SoftUpdates
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>that did the trick, thank you
>
>
>
i was a bit too fast with replying.
deleting is very fast now, but copying still takes forever, 11minutes
for 150mb...
any more thoughts?
hello,
this is just to share my experience running the os on a vmware player. may
be it will be of use to these like me who has hardware which is not yet
suppported completely. for example, i do not have any support for wireless
yet on my laptop, and i have to use windows for work, so dual boot wa
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 16:59:30 +0200
Simon Vallet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dmesg and the console output with RAIDDEBUG enabled follow -- it
> appears the two RAID members are indeed recognized, but they somehow
> can't be mounted as the root dev.
After some crude debugging, I was able to identi
Matthias Kilian wrote:
>On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 05:25:36PM +0200, Christian Pedaschus wrote:
>
>
>>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>
>Please don't hijack threads.
>
>
>
won't happen again, sorry
>>/dev/sd0e on /var type ffs (local, nodev)
>>
>>
>
>http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq
Matthias Kilian wrote:
>On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 05:25:36PM +0200, Christian Pedaschus wrote:
>
>
>>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
>
>Please don't hijack threads.
>
>
won't happen again, sorry.
I'm trying to debug why when I take either carp interface (only 2 in
a 2 pair fw) not all carp interfaces fail over. Only that interface
switches. If I take one of the physical interfaces down, both carp
interfaces switch over.
fw1 -
# uname -a
OpenBSD sabus 3.9 GENERIC#617 i386
# sysctl
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 05:25:36PM +0200, Christian Pedaschus wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please don't hijack threads.
> /dev/sd0e on /var type ffs (local, nodev)
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#SoftUpdates
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 05:23:53PM +0200, Dries Schellekens wrote:
> Peter Blair wrote:
>
> >Are you saying that OpenBSD is targetted as a Dom0 OS? I couldn't
> >tell from the above mentioned links.
>
> No, I think the goal is to run OpenBSD as DomU.
>
> It seems NetBSD can run in Dom0, so Open
On 6/4/06, Kroty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nick Guenther wrote:
> On 6/3/06, Kroty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>
Hi,
thanks for your reply.
I've run the program with MALLOC_OPTIONS="AFPG" and it doesn't
crash at all.
In fact, it works fine if I run it with the "G", but if I run
Nick Guenther wrote:
On 6/3/06, Kroty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm running OpenBSD 3.9 and I have a program that is giving
some unexpected output.
But, if I run it with MALLOC_OPTIONS="G", I works fine.
What does it mean? I've read the malloc(3) manpage, but
I don't quite understan
Hi list,
i'm about to install a webapplication on my obsd test system and noticed
that copying/deleting lots of small files (50.000 files with 150mb) is
very slow, around 50kb/sec. The system does nothing else, cpu-load is
99% idle and 100% idle, but system load is around 3-4 when deleting and
1-2
On 4 Jun 2006, at 15:55, Nick Guenther wrote:
> Being more restrictive will just end up being a pain. For example,
> maybe two friends want to share a connection, so the first gets on and
> then after a bit passes it off to the second who changes their IP and
> MAC to match, but then bam, they can'
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 16:09:03 +0200
Mitja Mu>enih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I even tried to replicate the problem locally on supposedly same
> hardware (HP Compaq dc5100 + 2x SATA HDDs) but here I couldn't get it
> to hang on raidframe. I did manage to consistently hang it by
> enabling the front
On 6/3/06, Gaby vanhegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3 Jun 2006, at 17:03, Clint M. Sand wrote:
> So all I have to do is *TRY* to login as you on another machine and
> your
> original legit connection is dropped?
>
> Think about this.
Only successful logins would update the IP associated with
I thought it might be nice to give some details about
what state opencvs is in after the hackathon.
the best way to do this is probably with some examples.
so here goes:
we need a repository to test on, lets import it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/test/misctest > opencvs -d ~/test/repo import -m "initial
On 6/3/06, Kroty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm running OpenBSD 3.9 and I have a program that is giving
some unexpected output.
But, if I run it with MALLOC_OPTIONS="G", I works fine.
What does it mean? I've read the malloc(3) manpage, but
I don't quite understand what the G option do
As you referenced my post - I never solved that. It was just too painful to
seriously debug it over a rented KVM from half the world away and requiring
me to open a trouble ticket for every reboot. I even tried to replicate the
problem locally on supposedly same hardware (HP Compaq dc5100 + 2x SATA
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 02:07:22AM -0700, Rott_En wrote:
> # Important Note: Under OpenBSD's current encrypted vnd filesystem
> # implementation, when a system with a mounted, encrypted vnd filesystem
> # is shutdown uncleanly, the encrypted vnd filesystem's structures get
> # damaged and, since
Hello and thank you for your initial reply.
I know mount has an issue but svnd accept the cryptofile, so it is a filesystem
problem wich a friend of mine had once in the past and fixed but can't remember
how exactly.
The data is not lost, I just need a proper fix solution for this as am not
Hi,
I'm just in the process of upgrading to 3.9 from a root-on-RAID 3.8
-stable install. I fetched the sources from the CD, built a
RAID-enabled kernel, and rebooted : the kernel hangs after issuing
"Kernelized RAIDframe activated" and won't go further.
Browsing through the archives, I notice thi
Hello
I had a power failure yesterday morning and because of that my server went down
because of no battery present.
When trying to mount the crypto partitions, I have figured out its not possible
anymore because a set of 2 errors, as follows:
# sh cryptfs -m -p /home -f /crypto/home/cryptof
Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
One possibility is that between the first ls -l and the rm that joe
changed just-testing to a symlink to /etc. However, I think this attack
scenario relies too much on joe's ability to blindly predict when the
sysadmin is about to run rm.
We do not know if joe is
39 matches
Mail list logo
