Re: Sun E220R, cdrom problem

2006-02-11 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:03:12 +1300, Joshua Sandbrook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hello.. > >Im trying to install openbsd onto an E220R. It has a toshiba DVD drive in it, >and when I type boot cdrom, it just hangs.. the drive light does not blink or >anything. > >probe-scsi shows the cdrom drive,

Re: MIPS CPU

2006-02-11 Thread Alexander Yurchenko
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:00:30PM +0200, Edgars wrote: > I just want to know, is that MIPS cpu supported by openbsd, didn't find info > on hw pages. > http://www.routerboard.com/rb500.html nope. and since it's mips32 i doubt it will be supported. > > ***

Re: higher resolution on tty

2006-02-11 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:51:17 +0100, Moritz Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi list, > >i want to set up my screen resolution on tty to 1024x768 and smaller >fonts, >because i only work on tty on this maschine and this big fonts are a >very >bad on a 10,4" display. So is there a way to get thi

Re: OpenBSD USB question

2006-02-11 Thread jared r r spiegel
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 08:07:30PM +0200, Danny wrote: > > I would like to know if OpenBSD will be able to recognise and access > the SanDisk ImageMateR 12-in-1 Reader/Writer SDDR-89. > > More info on this piece of hardware can be found here: > http://www.sandisk.com/Products/Item(1145)-SDDR-89-S

Re: BSD on x86 and virus

2006-02-11 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:35:58 -0500, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >J.C. Roberts wrote: >> As others have pointed out, you simply misunderstood the article and >> then posted to the list what many people would consider an inflammatory >> question. This is not the first time where your r

Re: syslogd question

2006-02-11 Thread jared r r spiegel
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 05:51:41PM -0500, Mitch Parker wrote: > > I'm going to second this, even though I don't work at an ISP (however, I do > work with large amounts of syslog data). > > If you want to keep things organized, it's better to keep the syslog files > organized by service. i woul

Re: bash: delete key sends ~ instead of [del]

2006-02-11 Thread jared r r spiegel
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 05:17:29PM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote: > Yeah, it does that. I don't know why, I assume historical reasons, and > I would like to learn from someone here who does know. Use backspace > instead. > > On 2/11/06, Martin Schrvder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > on my fre

Re: OpenBSD USB question

2006-02-11 Thread David Higgs
I'm no security expert, but from that standpoint, just having the cards match the provided information doesn't sound very secure. An attacker could modify an existing card or simply present their own (compatible) card. Additionally, any information on a card would be compromised if one were ever

Sun E220R, cdrom problem

2006-02-11 Thread Joshua Sandbrook
Hello.. Im trying to install openbsd onto an E220R. It has a toshiba DVD drive in it, and when I type boot cdrom, it just hangs.. the drive light does not blink or anything. probe-scsi shows the cdrom drive, and devalias for cdrom points to the right device, slice f. Any ideas on what to try

Re: higher resolution on tty

2006-02-11 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 12/02/06, Moritz Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi list, > > i want to set up my screen resolution on tty to 1024x768 and smaller > fonts, > because i only work on tty on this maschine and this big fonts are a > very > bad on a 10,4" display. So is there a way to get this work. Because > i do

higher resolution on tty

2006-02-11 Thread Moritz Lutz
Hi list, i want to set up my screen resolution on tty to 1024x768 and smaller fonts, because i only work on tty on this maschine and this big fonts are a very bad on a 10,4" display. So is there a way to get this work. Because i don't find anything in the FAQ and with google. mfg eSpo

Looking Glass for OpenBGP in 3.9?

2006-02-11 Thread unixgeek
I read somewhere that there was a 'Looking Glass' implementaion 'in the works' for OpenBSD/OpenBGP 3.9. I was wondering if that was the case? Thanks, Glenn

Re: bash: delete key sends ~ instead of [del]

2006-02-11 Thread Craig M
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 00:53 +0100, Martin Schrvder wrote: > On 2006-02-11 23:36:11 +, Craig M wrote: > > I just installed bash to test this. > > Then I created /etc/.inputrc with the contents: > > "\e[3~": delete-char > > rebooted, got an xterm up, started bash and the delete key works. > > It

Re: bash: delete key sends ~ instead of [del]

2006-02-11 Thread Martin Schröder
On 2006-02-11 23:36:11 +, Craig M wrote: > I just installed bash to test this. > Then I created /etc/.inputrc with the contents: > "\e[3~": delete-char > rebooted, got an xterm up, started bash and the delete key works. > It produced a tilde, prior to the reboot. ~/.inputrc does the trick here

Re: X11 exploit info

2006-02-11 Thread Matthew Closson
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Dave Feustel wrote: On Saturday 11 February 2006 10:59, Roman Hunt wrote: Dude what is your major f*&^%! malfunction? Years ago this sh!^ would've never been allowed to fly on this list. Sorry. I don't intend to offend or to irritate. Just out of curiosity, how old are

Re: bash: delete key sends ~ instead of [del]

2006-02-11 Thread Craig M
CORRECTION I just installed bash to test this. Then I created ~/.inputrc with the contents: "\e[3~": delete-char logged out of X, or log out if you are in console mode, and then your del key will work as required. HTH. Regards, CraigOn Sun, 2006-02-12 at 00:05 +0100, Martin Schrvder wrote: > O

Re: bash: delete key sends ~ instead of [del]

2006-02-11 Thread Craig M
I just installed bash to test this. Then I created /etc/.inputrc with the contents: "\e[3~": delete-char rebooted, got an xterm up, started bash and the delete key works. It produced a tilde, prior to the reboot. HTH. Regards, Craig On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 00:05 +0100, Martin Schrvder wrote: > On

Re: bash: delete key sends ~ instead of [del]

2006-02-11 Thread Martin Schröder
On 2006-02-11 23:37:31 +0100, Juan J. Martmnez wrote: > Or look what says google: > http://www.google.es/search?q=delete+key+bash I did. > > On 2/11/06, Martin Schrvder wrote: > > > Hi, > > > on my freshly installed 3.7 in bash the delete key sends an ~ > > > instead of [del]. How can I fix this

Infomail regarding working Proliant DL380 G4

2006-02-11 Thread Per-Olov Sjöholm
Hi misc I have seen at http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html that Proliant DL380 G4 wont work on 3.8. Also I have seen misc list posts with different results (some work and some do not). So therefor I just wanted to post a dmesg for Proliant DL380 G4 whic

Re: OpenBSD USB question

2006-02-11 Thread Danny
Thank you for responding, Obviously I cannot say too much about the project though, but what I can say is this: (I know it sounds a bit like a "sci-fi" movie :-) ) Only a few employees would be required to use this authentication method, (the ones working on the sensitive information). And only t

Re: OpenBSD USB question

2006-02-11 Thread Nick Guenther
On 2/11/06, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > More info on this piece of hardware can be found here: > > http://www.sandisk.com/Products/Item(1145)-SDDR-89-SanDisk_ImageMate_12i > > n1_ReaderWriter.aspx > I actually just tested my ImageMate 6-in-1 and it works flawlessly and I assum

Re: BSD on x86 and virus

2006-02-11 Thread Daniel Ouellet
J.C. Roberts wrote: As others have pointed out, you simply misunderstood the article and then posted to the list what many people would consider an inflammatory question. This is not the first time where your reading skills have failed to comprehend the meaning of an article and you posted such q

Re: bash: delete key sends ~ instead of [del]

2006-02-11 Thread Juan J.
El sab, 11-02-2006 a las 17:17 -0500, Nick Guenther escribis: > Yeah, it does that. I don't know why, I assume historical reasons, and > I would like to learn from someone here who does know. Use backspace > instead. Or look what says google: http://www.google.es/search?q=delete+key+bash > On 2/1

Re: bash: delete key sends ~ instead of [del]

2006-02-11 Thread Nick Guenther
Yeah, it does that. I don't know why, I assume historical reasons, and I would like to learn from someone here who does know. Use backspace instead. On 2/11/06, Martin Schrvder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > on my freshly installed 3.7 in bash the delete key sends an ~ > instead of [del]. How

bash: delete key sends ~ instead of [del]

2006-02-11 Thread Martin Schröder
Hi, on my freshly installed 3.7 in bash the delete key sends an ~ instead of [del]. How can I fix this? Sorry if this is a FAQ, but Google et.al. don't allow searching for "~" :-( TIA Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de

Re: OpenBSD USB question

2006-02-11 Thread Nick Guenther
On 2/11/06, Danny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good Day, > > Background: > > I am busy with a project whereby all employees will be authenticated > with their > own SD cards. Read more about the cards here: > http://www.sandisk.com/Products/Catalog(1039)-SanDisk_SD_Cards.aspx > > The user will ente

Re: ohci3: ? scheduling overruns USB ural attached

2006-02-11 Thread Nick Guenther
On 2/11/06, Ed Wandasiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:54:21PM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote: > > On 2/11/06, Ed Wandasiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0xb00 rawdev=0xb02 > > > ohci3: 1 scheduling overruns > > > ohci3: 2 scheduling overruns > >

sorry to reask ... keyboard mapping not working in current Xorg 6.9 on a hp nc6000 laptop

2006-02-11 Thread Didier Wiroth
Hello, Regarding my previous post: x11 problem in current: "The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports..." (the dmesg and Xorg.0.log can be found in the 2 posts) Sorry to reask, but I searched via google etc and I did not find any solution. Loading the keyboard layout via setxkbmap does not

Re: ohci3: ? scheduling overruns USB ural attached

2006-02-11 Thread Ed Wandasiewicz
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:54:21PM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote: > On 2/11/06, Ed Wandasiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have the following dmesg with a ural device attached to a macppc, > > following current, as of 8 Feb 2006. > > > > Any suggestions? > > Ed. > > wd0(wdc1:0:0): using PIO mode

Re: ohci3: ? scheduling overruns USB ural attached

2006-02-11 Thread Nick Guenther
On 2/11/06, Ed Wandasiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have the following dmesg with a ural device attached to a macppc, > following current, as of 8 Feb 2006. > > Any suggestions? > Ed. > wd0(wdc1:0:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2, Ultra-DMA mode 2 > cd0(wdc1:0:1): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode

iwi(4): man-page needs update, Peter's address @intel does not work

2006-02-11 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
Our friend Peter seems to be gone or is hiding: Intel no longer accepts mail for his account as listed in manuals for ipw(4) and iwi(4). http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=109994542424009&w=2> (2004-11-08) Cheers, Constantine. -- Forwarded message -- From: Mail Delive

Re: X11 exploit info

2006-02-11 Thread Ricardo Lucas
wow... No more words!!! 2006/2/11, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Saturday 11 February 2006 10:59, Roman Hunt wrote: > > > > Dude what is your major f*&^%! malfunction? Years ago this sh!^ would've > > never been allowed to fly on this list. > > Sorry. I don't intend to offend or to irri

Re: BSD on x86 and virus

2006-02-11 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:10:41 +0530, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, > >BSD on x86 has also suffered at the hands of these maniac virus >coders, so much so that there are hardly any BSD x86 web servers on >the web that haven't been repeatedly p0wned. > >http://www.webpronews.com/experta

Re: Sudo

2006-02-11 Thread Martin Schröder
On 2006-02-11 11:58:29 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > all shells. There may be something in the sudo man page that > describes this behavior, but I haven't spotted it yet. SEE ALSO grep(1), su(1), stat(2), login_cap(3), sudoers(5), passwd(5), visudo(8) > My reading skills must be de

Re: Sudo

2006-02-11 Thread Tony
Tobias Weingartner wrote: > > On Saturday, February 11, Dave Feustel wrote: > > > > I found out via a google search on 'tickets sudo' about > > the behavior I had discovered and reported. Then after Otto > > let me know how pathetic my post was, I went back to man sudo > > but found nothing abou

Re: Sudo

2006-02-11 Thread Tony
You sudo something, it asks for your password You do it again soon after, it doesn't ask. So somehow it remembers you. Definitely more trouble, and probably opens some holes for nasties, if it also remembers which version of you. That's without knowing enough to have an opinion. > -Original M

external usb enclosure and ide hard disk

2006-02-11 Thread Carlos Alberto Pereira Gomes
Hi, is there a way to control an ide hard disk connected to an usb external enclosure, as to put it into idle or standby mode? I tried 'atactl' without success. here is the relevant part of my dmesg: umass0 at uhub0 port 2 configuration 1 interface 0 umass0: Myson Century, Inc. USB M

Re: Sudo

2006-02-11 Thread Dave Feustel
On Saturday 11 February 2006 12:17, Steve Tornio wrote: > man sudoers Thanks to all who replied. I will try hard to be more thorough in the future. Dave -- Lose, v., experience a loss, get rid of, "lose the weight" Loose, adj., not tight, let go, free, "loose clothing"

Re: Sudo

2006-02-11 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Dave Feustel wrote: > On Saturday 11 February 2006 11:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > man sudo for starters. > > (actually that's quite enough even for a noob like me) > > (even a very out of date linux is enough) > > sheesh > > Actually --with-tickets is not mentioned in su

Re: Sudo

2006-02-11 Thread Tobias Weingartner
On Saturday, February 11, Dave Feustel wrote: > > I found out via a google search on 'tickets sudo' about > the behavior I had discovered and reported. Then after Otto > let me know how pathetic my post was, I went back to man sudo > but found nothing about tickets or about sudo being active in >

Re: Sudo

2006-02-11 Thread Tony
man sudo for starters. (actually that's quite enough even for a noob like me) (even a very out of date linux is enough) sheesh > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Dave Feustel > Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 9:50 AM > To: Otto Moerbeek >

Re: Sudo

2006-02-11 Thread Dave Feustel
On Saturday 11 February 2006 11:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > man sudo for starters. > (actually that's quite enough even for a noob like me) > (even a very out of date linux is enough) > sheesh Actually --with-tickets is not mentioned in sudo. (I was sent '--with-tickets' info off-list by a help

Re: X11 exploit info

2006-02-11 Thread Roman Hunt
Dude what is your major f*&^%! malfunction? Years ago this sh!^ would've never been allowed to fly on this list. Maybe you think that posting all this ridiculous shit is funny but it's really not. Go take a class at a community college and learn the basics before you post again. PLEASE! And def

Re: X11 exploit info

2006-02-11 Thread Dave Feustel
On Saturday 11 February 2006 10:59, Roman Hunt wrote: > > Dude what is your major f*&^%! malfunction? Years ago this sh!^ would've > never been allowed to fly on this list. Sorry. I don't intend to offend or to irritate. Just out of curiosity, how old are you? Also, to which post are you refer

ohci3: ? scheduling overruns USB ural attached

2006-02-11 Thread Ed Wandasiewicz
I have the following dmesg with a ural device attached to a macppc, following current, as of 8 Feb 2006. Any suggestions? Ed. OpenBSD 3.9-beta (GENERIC) #0: Fri Feb 10 09:47:45 GMT 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/macppc/compile/GENERIC real mem = 1073741824 (1048576K) avail mem = 97

Re: Sudo

2006-02-11 Thread Martin Schröder
On 2006-02-11 10:49:54 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > On Saturday 11 February 2006 10:42, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > This is pathetic. Why don't you read the docs before posting such a > > "discovery"? > Which docs? Normal OBSD users start with man afterboot. You should try it too. Hint: It points t

Re: Sudo

2006-02-11 Thread Dave Feustel
On Saturday 11 February 2006 10:42, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Dave Feustel wrote: > > > I don't know whether this is or would be considered as a bug, > > or whether it is generally known, but sudo, when successfully > > invoked with a password in one shell, becomes active

Re: Sudo

2006-02-11 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Dave Feustel wrote: > I don't know whether this is or would be considered as a bug, > or whether it is generally known, but sudo, when successfully > invoked with a password in one shell, becomes active in all > shells of that user for the timed duration. This is patheti

Re: Sudo

2006-02-11 Thread Matthew Weigel
Dave Feustel wrote: I don't know whether this is or would be considered as a bug, or whether it is generally known, Take a look at the tty_tickets option of sudoers(5) and the -k and -K arguments to sudo(1). Some other operating systems use a default configuration file that turns it on, whi

Re: X11 exploit info

2006-02-11 Thread Nick Guenther
On 2/11/06, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 06:03:51AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > > 13-May-2004: The ease of (ab)using X11, Part 1 > > X11 is the protocol that underlies your graphical desktop > > environment, and you need to be aware of its security model.

Re: Upgrading 3.6 to 3.8, and compiling -current

2006-02-11 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 11/02/06, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm hardly an expert so I hope you get some other opinions but here > are my thoughts: > > On 2/10/06, Constantine A. Murenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At a remote location, I have two boxes that are connected with each > > other via a se

Re: Sudo

2006-02-11 Thread steven mestdagh
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 09:02:41AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > I don't know whether this is or would be considered as a bug, > or whether it is generally known, but sudo, when successfully > invoked with a password in one shell, becomes active in all > shells of that user for the timed durati

Sudo

2006-02-11 Thread Dave Feustel
I don't know whether this is or would be considered as a bug, or whether it is generally known, but sudo, when successfully invoked with a password in one shell, becomes active in all shells of that user for the timed duration. Dave Feustel -- Lose, v., experience a loss, get rid of, "lose t

Re: X11 exploit info

2006-02-11 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 06:03:51AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > 13-May-2004: The ease of (ab)using X11, Part 1 > X11 is the protocol that underlies your graphical desktop > environment, and you need to be aware of its security model. Whow! So if I get root access to your computer, I have access

Re: MIPS CPU

2006-02-11 Thread J.C. Roberts
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 13:00:30 +0200, Edgars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I just want to know, is that MIPS cpu supported by openbsd, didn't >find info on hw pages. >http://www.routerboard.com/rb500.html > (sigh) You should try reading *all* the hardware pages again: http://www.openbsd.org/plat.htm

X11 exploit info

2006-02-11 Thread Dave Feustel
at http://www.hackinglinuxexposed.com/articles/ is a 3-part series on X-11 exploits which those who think they understand x11 security might wish to read and comment upon. I clearly don't understand x11 security so I have no comments, but I will read with great interest comments by anyone else.

MIPS CPU

2006-02-11 Thread Edgars
I just want to know, is that MIPS cpu supported by openbsd, didn't find info on hw pages. http://www.routerboard.com/rb500.html ** Scanned by MailScan Anti-Virus and Content Security Software. Visit http://www.mwti.net for more info on

Re: netgear ma521

2006-02-11 Thread Moritz Lutz
On Feb 11, 2006, at 4:13 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote: On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 02:42:42AM +0100, Moritz Lutz wrote: Hi there, i got an problem here. I got an old laptop 100mhz 10,4". So there is no internal network interface so i want to run an wireless lan card in it (cardbus). But i don't get it w