On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 05:35:31AM +, Edy Purnomo wrote:
> i keep having the "smmsp" daemon shows on the ps aux list.
> so it fills up my clientmqueue directory.
> how to rid off this thing ?
Disable the sendmail cronjob:
$ sudo crontab -l|grep sendmail
# sendmail clientmqueue runner
#*/30
This is more a "me too" than a solution, I'm afraid.
On 10/31/05, Hannah Schroeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I include an alias directive in /etc/dhclient.conf, dhclient exits
> after having acquired a lease, the syslog messages are like this:
This is quite similar to something I also exper
hi,
i keep having the "smmsp" daemon shows on the ps aux list.
so it fills up my clientmqueue directory.
how to rid off this thing ?
i've sendmail disabled already.
thanks in advance.
-edy-
I received my 3.8 CDs on Friday, and tonight I am installing it on my
SparcStation 5.
During boot, there was a huge stream of "phy not configured" error
messages for a quad-hme SBus card, and install refused to continue when
it could not find any disks. I saw the lines in dmesg for sd0 and sd
Hello!
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 02:55:47AM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
>[...]
>Oct 31 02:48:27 mamba dhclient[29778]: bound to 82.212.35.55 -- renewal in
>1800 seconds.
>Oct 31 02:48:27 mamba dhclient[23056]: connection closed
>Oct 31 02:48:27 mamba dhclient[23056]: exiting.
When running with
Hello!
This is on an OpenBSD 3.7-release, freshly upgraded (in fact, reinstalled
and merged etc and so on).
If I include an alias directive in /etc/dhclient.conf, dhclient exits
after having acquired a lease, the syslog messages are like this:
Oct 31 02:48:27 mamba dhclient[29778]: bound to 82.2
Robert Jacobs wrote:
> Please pardon my ignorance, I had difficulty finding an answer
> to this in the faqs/archives. How can I extend an FFS partition
> onto a second hard drive?
Add a symlink.
# Han
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 06:38:45PM -0500, Robert Jacobs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please pardon my ignorance, I had difficulty finding an answer to this in
> the faqs/archives. How can I extend an FFS partition onto a second hard
> drive?
>
> Say I have /var on a dedicated 20ggb hard drive and it got fill
Hi,
Please pardon my ignorance, I had difficulty finding an answer to this in
the faqs/archives. How can I extend an FFS partition onto a second hard
drive?
Say I have /var on a dedicated 20ggb hard drive and it got filled up and I
need to extend all of /var (not mount additional space inside of
Szechuan Death wrote:
> Okay, misc: As near as I can tell (been talking with Alexey offlist),
Okay, misc, I'm a dumbass. My Russian is really remarkably rusty.
Alexey wants to prevent some benighted ISP from counting hosts behind
a NAT device; the problem is that they're wise to the trick of set
> Can you try booting the i386 GENERIc kernel with pcibios disabled?
> And like Stuart Henderson suggested, can you also try the GENERIC.MP
> kernel. If that gets stuck at pcibios too, try disabling it on the mp
> kernel as well.
The original poster doesn't seem to be replying, but I am having
hmm, on Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 04:04:52PM -0500, Nick Holland said that
> I find that interesting, too.
> I was just explaining to my GF's six-year-old niece yesterday that you
> shouldn't believe everything someone says.
hello Nick, thanks for the tip :)
you surely realize you are 'someone' as well
Andrew Daugherity wrote:
I completely missed that you're running amd64 (I saw Intel Xeon, and
thought i386). You might try an i386 kernel (maybe the bsd.rd
installer, as you don't want to mix libs between i386 and amd64) to
see if the CD-ROM works there. If it works under i386, then it looks
l
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 02:41:25PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> hi there,
>
> poking around in the HP ssh docs, one can see the following in the FAQ:
>
> Q: How is the performance of HP-UX Secure Shell?
> A: Compared with conventional file transfer methods, the scp command
>is 2 - 3 times
Hello.
I want to set up tunnel between 2 networks
192.168.40.0/28 and 192.168.1.0/24 like bellow:
(a.a.a.a)pubIP<--(NAT)gw1<--172.16.0.0/12<--(NAT)gw2<--192.168.40.0/28
|
WAN
|
(b.b.b.b)pubIP<--(NAT)gw3<--192.168.1.0/24
i don't have access to 172.16.0.0/12 network and gw1
I was trying to
On 10/30/05, PARAMVIR DHINDSA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But CPU fan (constantly running) has never been a
> problem on MS-Windows and FreeDOS. In fact it seldom
> runs on these OSs if never.
Your comparison of "it works on X" is not really worthwhile as it is
unlikely to solve your problem wi
frantisek holop wrote:
> hi there,
>
> poking around in the HP ssh docs, one can see the following in the FAQ:
>
> Q: How is the performance of HP-UX Secure Shell?
> A: Compared with conventional file transfer methods, the scp command
>is 2 - 3 times slower than rcp, and sftp is 2 to 3 times
frantisek holop wrote:
so before anyone tags this mail as a trolling flamebait
(which it is not), i just would like to ask
-have others tried HPN-SSH?
-have ssh developers tried it?
-or simply, has ssh hit its performance limit and can't get any better?
the "HPN" patch greatly improves through
--On 30 October 2005 11:25 -0800, PARAMVIR DHINDSA wrote:
But CPU fan (constantly running) has never been a
problem on MS-Windows and FreeDOS. In fact it seldom
runs on these OSs if never. Can the problem be
resolved with some configurable settings in OpenBSD?
Your fans are probably controlle
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Matthew Weigel wrote:
SNIP
> HPN-SSH improves OpenSSH performance in situations that you and I don't
> deal with. Maybe I'm mistaken... do you have an OC-3 connection you're
> trying to scp files across? If you are dealing with T-1s and 100Mbps
nope, but will OC-48 or 10G su
frantisek holop wrote:
but a couple of months ago a link appeared here describing a HPN
(as in hihg performance enabled) ssh patch. i kept that mail for
a very long time because i was very much interested in the answers
of the ssh developers, but there was none. and so i assumed it must
be rub
> But CPU fan (constantly running) has never been a
problem on MS-Windows and FreeDOS. In fact it seldom
runs on these OSs if never. Can the problem be
resolved with some configurable settings in OpenBSD?
>--- Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if your fans are controlled by acpi, there's n
Okay, misc: As near as I can tell (been talking with Alexey offlist),
one of the things he wants is to get an OpenBSD router to not decrement
the TTL for packets that it is forwarding. That behavior seems to me
to be against RFCs, but I'll ask on the off chance that it's there:
is there an option
You should find somebody local that has a bit of experience, as you
are having problems that others do not have. btinternet.com is in
the UK, so you might try our two UK user groups, at
http://www.openbsd.org/groups.html#United
(If you're in another country, go to the top of the page and find th
paul,
>when I purchsed 3 there were all kinds of problems with
loading on a laptop
>
>Now I purchsed 3.7 and it looks like this is the final end of
the road
>for openbsd and me
>
>I tolerated figuring out the wireless settings and even
though there is
>some reason for a huge time lag installing pa
On 10/30/05, frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but a couple of months ago a link appeared here describing a HPN
> (as in hihg performance enabled) ssh patch. i kept that mail for
> a very long time because i was very much interested in the answers
> of the ssh developers, but there was
On 10/29/05, PARAMVIR DHINDSA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 29.10.2005
> Dear Sir,
> I installed the OpenBSD 3.7 on my Compaq PC. I'm
> facing a problem. The CPU fan runs constantly
> (non-stop) whenever I boot on OpenBSD which has become
> a nuisance for me as we
- WinXP - scrubed
- FreeBSD - passing
+ WinXP - passing
+ FreeBSD - scrubed
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 08:17:21 -0800
Geoff Sweet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's why you set min-ttl to it's highest value. You could also look
> at 'reassemble tcp'. It modifies ttl setting in the session as well.
> But it's meant more for normalizing traffic.
look that:
[
That's why you set min-ttl to it's highest value. You could also look
at 'reassemble tcp'. It modifies ttl setting in the session as well.
But it's meant more for normalizing traffic.
-Geoff
Alexey S. Malyshev wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:00:25 -0500
> Jeff Quast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On 2005/10/30 19:50:10, Alexey S. Malyshev wrote:
> How to set TTL to certain value on a certain interface in order
> to hide presence of LAN behind NAT?
Does min-ttl do what you want? See pf.conf(5).
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:00:25 -0500
Jeff Quast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> scrub on $ext_if min-ttl 255
>
> On 10/30/05, Alexey S. Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi misc@
> >
> > How to set TTL to certain value on a certain interface in order to hide
> > presence of LAN behind NAT?
> >
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:00:25 -0500
Jeff Quast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> scrub on $ext_if min-ttl 255
>
> On 10/30/05, Alexey S. Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi misc@
> >
> > How to set TTL to certain value on a certain interface in order to hide
> > presence of LAN behind NAT?
> >
scrub on $ext_if min-ttl 255
On 10/30/05, Alexey S. Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi misc@
>
> How to set TTL to certain value on a certain interface in order to hide
> presence of LAN behind NAT?
Hi misc@
How to set TTL to certain value on a certain interface in order to hide
presence of LAN behind NAT?
On Saturday 29 October 2005 03:34 pm, ed wrote:
> > rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from to $ext_ad3 port
> > ldap -> $server_1 port ldap
> >
> > ...where $server_1 is on the other side of $int_if, still needs a
> > pass out rule on $int_if. The "rdr pass" does not extend through to
> > the destina
The 3/DC works for sure since it was my development board. The megaraid 1600
is equivalent and should also work.
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 08:48:07AM -0500, marrandy wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Ref the new bioctl RAID management inteface.
>
> Has the Dell perc3/dc and the megaraid elite 1600 been tested
Hello.
Ref the new bioctl RAID management inteface.
Has the Dell perc3/dc and the megaraid elite 1600 been tested and proved to
work as I need to get a machine with supported RAID.
Regards...Martin
hi there,
poking around in the HP ssh docs, one can see the following in the FAQ:
Q: How is the performance of HP-UX Secure Shell?
A: Compared with conventional file transfer methods, the scp command
is 2 - 3 times slower than rcp, and sftp is 2 to 3 times slower than
ftp. This is because H
hmm, on Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 02:56:44PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet said that
> Some feedback already.
well, i did not get any feedback at all.
perhaps hp *does* hate dhl after all ;-)
anyway the docs are fixed now, even the BSD license
gets its 15 minutes of fame.
http://www.docs.hp.com/en/T1471-9001
40 matches
Mail list logo
