Hi Jared,
On 25/08/2005, at 1:55 PM, jared r r spiegel wrote:
the thread has kinda gone this way already, but i believe the only
way you can get true "i don't have NAT" on PPPoA, outside of
getting a
"business class" service plan (or anything else with static IP WAN
and LAN allocatio
"Will H. Backman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Running today's snapshot on an old laptop (Dell Latitude PPL),
> and I put the cover down to see if it would go to sleep and
> wake up properly. After it went to sleep, I opened the laptop
> back up, and it started to come back alive, but the screen
>
Hi Art,
On 24/08/2005, at 9:38 PM, Artur Grabowski wrote:
Genadijus Paleckis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Oh well -- we've decided that we will try to ship with this
protection
mechanism in any case, and try to solve the problems as we run into
them.
Is that means
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:55:50PM -0600, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> take a phone cord coming in and an ethernet cord going out.
>
> it's possible
>
> i suppose
> there could be a
please forget this train of thought.
> > it may be possible to use OpenBSD as a
> > *replacement* for t
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:54:46AM -0700, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 08:20:33 +0100, Simon Farnsworth
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Tuesday 16 August 2005 06:34, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> >> You seem to be confused on your terms. The term "PPPoA" means
> >> Point-to-Point Protoco
2005/8/24, Ray Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 01:03:04AM -0500, Gerardo Santana Gsmez Garrido wrote:
> > 2005/8/24, Gerardo Santana Gsmez Garrido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > This has been discussed before. I think many people here agree this
> > > would be very useful. Some
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:53:33 -0700, Bryan Irvine wrote:
> Apache of course! ;)
This goes off-topic, but there must be something wrong. Somewhere.
This is not default behaviour of Apache. Did some research on this two
years back, on OpenBSD, P233 and 64 MB, to check its behaviour. It
wouldn't cras
Sean Knox wrote:
Hi,
We had 2 T1 routers freeze a couple days ago and I'm left scratching my
head as to why. There was no kernel panic or error message on either
console, though both consoles were frozen- neither responded to the
keyboard. I rebooted both boxes and they came up fine. The inte
It's interesting, I got those same messages on my router with the same
sangoma card, my secondary router was down at the time for other reasons, so
I don't know if it would have had the same issue. However, as far as I can
tell, it continued to operate appropriately.
Just as a reminder, you need t
--- Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2005/08/25 at 01:20 +0200:
(can you try wrap your lines at a reasonable 72 chars?)
> No, the rl0 gateway (PC_B) is 192.168.3.254. Client1 is .3.70, PC_B's
> internal network is, of course, 192.168.3.0/24.
Oops, I should've seen that 3.70 was an ARP entry. It'
Hi,
We had 2 T1 routers freeze a couple days ago and I'm left scratching my
head as to why. There was no kernel panic or error message on either
console, though both consoles were frozen- neither responded to the
keyboard. I rebooted both boxes and they came up fine. The interesting
log snipp
> --- Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2005/08/24 at 18:35 +0200:
> > 1) From Client1, I cannot ping its default gateway (.3.254) anymore. No
> > ping replies. ssh connection is frozen.
>
> What machine and interface is .3.254 on? From the information below it does
> not look like it's on PC_B.
* Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-24 13:16]:
> Edd Barrett wrote:
> > Is there any reason why we can not include a raid enabled kernel in
> > the distribution? (not as default, but in the same way bsd.mp is).
> > I believe this would save me (and others?) time when upgrading OpenBSD
> > machines
--On 25 August 2005 01:42 +0300, Chris wrote:
I get the message
/bsd: arp: ether address is broadcast for IP address xxx.xxx.xx.xxx
excerpt from arp(4) ('man 4 arp'):
arp: ether address is broadcast for IP address %s! ARP requested
infor-
mation for a host, and received an answer i
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 11:10:41AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > A few things that get bitten are some packages doing their own and very
> > > different memory management, but can't avoid malloc altogether.
> > > That is ports/lang/clisp, that seems to be also gprolog
> > Can you describe how
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 04:35:13PM -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
> 1. Packages get installed in a sub-optimal order. Quite often one
> package on the list will have already been installed as a dependency. I
> think my script downloads the redundant package before deciding that it
> was already in
I get the message
/bsd: arp: ether address is broadcast for IP address xxx.xxx.xx.xxx
The box is a 3.6 Stable if that helps
can someone have a clue whats wrong?
Or for what to look for?
The box is up for almost a year
and still have no problems.
# ifconfig -A
lo0: flags=8049 mtu 33224
Hey -f,
> what is happening with ftp.openbsd.org?
> it stalls the downloads every couple of minutes.
> anybody else experiencing this?
Not me. I use a nearby mirror: http://www.openbsd.org/ftp.html.
;-) ... Nico
Yeah, I just figured it must be some bizarre bug, mainly because I
find it hard to belive I used up all my space in a few hours from
using one, also because I am running a snapshot. If I had an even
bigger brain (which I don't) I would have actually remembered about
the negative space thing which I
On Thursday, August 25, John Kintaro Tate wrote:
>
> Hrm, I was installing the mono port and I ran into an error. The error
> was simple and we all know what it means.
>
> Trying 62.243.72.50...
> Unimplemented command.
> 61% |**| 8922 KB04:55
I'm looking for hints and criticism for a package installation script.
I do a full install, and then install a set of packages.
To get the list of packages to install on another machine, I just
grabbed a directory listing from /var/db/pkg, put them in my script, and
then run that script on a fresh
Bienvenido a la Web de MarceloBuenosAires
~ Sistemas para PC ~
- Administracion Standard
- Fidelizacion de Clientes
- Mas Sistemas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello!
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:57:27PM -0500, Andrew Dyer wrote:
>It was very frustrating to try and make things better and get ignored.
I can share some frustration. About a year ago, I made a port for erlang
(the "current" port just doesn't work at all, and it's ancient anyway,
so *anything*
Diana Eichert wrote:
> Bob Sidhu has always been very helpful to me in the past. Iron Systems
> even helped me out in one of the hardware fundraisers I did or maybe they
> actually provided hardware, gee I can't remember.
I too have been getting quotes from them the past few days. Although
I can
At 02:21 PM 8/24/05, John Kintaro Tate wrote:
Hrm, I was installing the mono port and I ran into an error. The error
was simple and we all know what it means.
Trying 62.243.72.50...
Unimplemented command.
61% |**| 8922
KB04:55 ETA
/: write
--- Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2005/08/24 at 18:35 +0200:
> 1) From Client1, I cannot ping its default gateway (.3.254) anymore. No ping
> replies. ssh connection is frozen.
What machine and interface is .3.254 on? From the information below it
does not look like it's on PC_B. PC_B is .3.70.
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 03:25 pm, John Kintaro Tate wrote:
> Okay.
>
> I am wondering where all the space nicked off to, since I only
> installed it not long ago. I havn't run out of space on a system for a
> long time, how do I figure out what the biggest files and stuff are
> again?
>
> Thank
hi there,
what is happening with ftp.openbsd.org?
it stalls the downloads every couple of minutes.
53% [==> ] 19,162,576 6.98K/s ETA 38:08
and just hangs. then starts again, then hangs...
anybody else experiencing this?
-f
--
it takes about ten years to
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:56:32PM +0200, Erik Wikstrvm wrote:
> On 2005-08-24 20:21, John Kintaro Tate wrote:
> >Hrm, I was installing the mono port and I ran into an error. The error
> >was simple and we all know what it means.
> >
> >Trying 62.243.72.50...
> >Unimplemented command.
> > 61% |
On 8/24/05, John Kintaro Tate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hrm, I was installing the mono port and I ran into an error. The error
> was simple and we all know what it means.
>
> Trying 62.243.72.50...
> Unimplemented command.
> 61% |**| 8922 KB
Okay.
I am wondering where all the space nicked off to, since I only
installed it not long ago. I havn't run out of space on a system for a
long time, how do I figure out what the biggest files and stuff are
again?
Thanks in advance.
Kintaro.
On 8/25/05, Bryan Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's in the FAQ, specifically http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#NegSpace
John Kintaro Tate wrote:
Hrm, I was installing the mono port and I ran into an error. The error
was simple and we all know what it means.
Trying 62.243.72.50...
Unimplemented command.
61% |
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:13:08 +0200, Michael Adam
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Jonathan Schleifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Michael Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > which is the right or preferred way to do so (since there are, as
>> > I pointed out several possible ways).
>>
>> I already a
> WTF is going on here? -30.6M sounds kinda weird.
Yup it's true. OpenBSD has put everything in the FAQ.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#NegSpace
:-)
--Bryan
John Kintaro Tate wrote:
[snip]
So I did the next thing that comes naturally, I aborted and did a df -h...
# df -h
FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/wd0a 787M778M -30.6M 104%/
WTF is going on here? -30.6M sounds kinda wei
> Hrm, I was installing the mono port and I ran into an error. The error
> was simple and we all know what it means.
>
> Trying 62.243.72.50...
> Unimplemented command.
> 61% |**| 8922 KB04:55
> ETA
> /: write failed, file system is full
>
>
--- Quoting Daniel Eyholzer on 2005/08/24 at 08:33 +0200:
> Yes, I have tried to filter on VPN client ip addresses on the enc0
> interface. This works, but the problem is that not all users should be
> allowed to do the same things. Since the VPN client ip address can be
> chosen arbitrary on the
On 2005-08-24 20:21, John Kintaro Tate wrote:
Hrm, I was installing the mono port and I ran into an error. The error
was simple and we all know what it means.
Trying 62.243.72.50...
Unimplemented command.
61% |**| 8922 KB04:55 ETA
/: write fa
> > nice try, but i Don't use pppoe.
> > We have a DSL-Router from our providewr and as I mentioned before, we
> > had no Problems with the cisco-router doing the firewall job (Nat).
>
> so, yes you DO use PPPoE.
Not necessarily, it could be in bridged mode.
--Bryan
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Feustel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 2:29 PM
> To: Will H. Backman
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: 3.8 snapshot laptop sleep issues
>
> On Wednesday 24 August 2005 12:31, Will H. Backman wrote:
> > Running today's snap
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 12:31, Will H. Backman wrote:
> Running today's snapshot on an old laptop (Dell Latitude PPL), and I put
> the cover down to see if it would go to sleep and wake up properly.
> After it went to sleep, I opened the laptop back up, and it started to
> come back alive, but
Hrm, I was installing the mono port and I ran into an error. The error
was simple and we all know what it means.
Trying 62.243.72.50...
Unimplemented command.
61% |**| 8922 KB04:55 ETA
/: write failed, file system is full
So I did the next thi
> The real problem is people who encounter a problem and fail to report
> it. They just think "this is crap" and go on to something else.
I think the developers need to address the problems that get brought up, too.
I took the time to post a complete bug report (good and failing dmesg) about a
b
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Nick Holland wrote:
Guido Tschakert wrote:
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
I don't see where you set the MTU/MSS? Are you sure you have set them
somewhere else? eBay is known to have problems with bad/wrong MTU/MSS.
Try adding scrub out on $ext_if max-mss 1414 to your pf.conf an
If you guys care about this diff making 3.8 I suggest that someone sends me
some feedback.
/marco
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 12:19:11PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> Note that pcidevs_data.h and pcidevs.h are part of the diff. I did this for
> easy patching and testing.
>
> Give it a go and let
Running today's snapshot on an old laptop (Dell Latitude PPL), and I put
the cover down to see if it would go to sleep and wake up properly.
After it went to sleep, I opened the laptop back up, and it started to
come back alive, but the screen stayed blank.
I couldn't switch virtual consoles. Rese
[IMAGE]
Dear eTimeBanker Customer,
This is your official notification from Bank Of The West that the
service(s) listed below
will be deactivated and deleted if not renewed immediately. Previous
notifications have
been sent to the Billing Contact assigned to this account. As the
Prima
> > A few things that get bitten are some packages doing their own and very
> > different memory management, but can't avoid malloc altogether.
> > That is ports/lang/clisp, that seems to be also gprolog
>
> Can you describe how these programs manage to seg fault doing their
> memory management? H
Hello!
I'm having troubles with IPsec, but I'm not really sure whether it's an
IPsec issue, a routing problem or just that I'm missing something big, very
big... So any help is more than welcome!
Here's the setup: PC_A is acting as a NAT gateway with three network cards.
sis0 goes to an
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 10:56, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:09:36AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> > On Wednesday 24 August 2005 07:04, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> >
> > > A few things that get bitten are some packages doing their own and very
> > > different memory management, b
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Stuart Henderson wrote:
--On 24 August 2005 10:37 +0200, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
pciide0:0:1: bus-master DMA error: missing interrupt, status=0x61
wd1a: device timeout reading fsbn 1489200 of 1489200-1489203 (wd1 bn
1489263; cn 1477 tn 7 sn 6), retrying
wd1: soft error (corre
On 8/25/05, -f <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmm, on Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 09:23:27AM -0700, Raymond Lillard said that
> > Maybe a slogan along the lines of, "Is your software good enough
> > for OpenBSD"!! Perhaps it could be worked into the release's
> > theme.
>
> that is truly a brilliant idea
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:09:36AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 August 2005 07:04, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
>
> > A few things that get bitten are some packages doing their own and very
> > different memory management, but can't avoid malloc altogether.
> > That is ports/lang/clisp,
> What crashed? Apache or OpenBSD?
>
Apache of course! ;)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 05:41:15PM +0300, slack _usr wrote:
> First of all, I'm sorry for such stupid question. I know, that I need
> few details, but I can't figure out what are they. I'm plaing with
> Intel(r) PRO/Wireless2200BG wifi card and it's configuration. I have
> found different descripti
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> slack _usr
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 10:41 AM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: stupid wifi question
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> First of all, I'm sorry for such stupid question. I know, that I need
Spruell, Darren-Perot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there any reason to use FFS on a floppy? Won't FAT (-12, or whatever)
> work fine? Could you just mformat it and be along?
Yes, in fact there are:
1. As a matter of principle.
2. I need the FFS file permissions and ownerships on the floppy.
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 09:15:48 -0400, Timothy Donahue proclaimed...
> "A Good Thing"(TM) when done correctly, it is NAT that is not necessarily a
> good thing. Filtering incoming (and possibly outgoing traffic) helps do
> several things, first it decreases the burden on your hosts. It also all
Hello!
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 07:57:55AM -0700, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
>[...]
>Is there any reason to use FFS on a floppy? Won't FAT (-12, or whatever)
>work fine? Could you just mformat it and be along?
Of course there is. Just take a look at the boot floppies, for example.
Or think of t
On 8/24/05, Bryan Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I personally like to 'pass keep state' with a 'scrub all' rule. This
> > at least gives me some interesting statistics to poke at when I'm
> > bored. Plus, I can firewall who gets to ssh into my machine.
>
> Another good use is {max-src-state
Hi everyone,
First of all, I'm sorry for such stupid question. I know, that I need
few details, but I can't figure out what are they. I'm plaing with
Intel(r) PRO/Wireless2200BG wifi card and it's configuration. I have
found different descriptions for the /etc/dhclient.conf file. I have
read "iwi"
From: Michael Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What puzzles me even more is the fact, that in the boot
> "Absolute OpenBSD"
> by Michael W. Lucas, it is said on page 310, that "FFS file
> systems need
> a valid partition table on every disk" and then the author
> desribes the
> following steps:
hmm, on Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 09:23:27AM -0700, Raymond Lillard said that
> Maybe a slogan along the lines of, "Is your software good enough
> for OpenBSD"!! Perhaps it could be worked into the release's
> theme.
that is truly a brilliant idea ;-)
any artists here? make a "designed for puffy" log
> is there a possibility to tell pf.conf to accept malformed packets.
turn off 'reassemble tcp' in your scrub rule if you don't want to
validate the packets.
> pfctl -x loud tells me:
> Aug 24 09:50:43 gw-bonn /bsd: pf_normalize_tcp_stateful: Did not receive
> expected RFC1323 timestamp
> 09:50
--On 24 August 2005 07:10 -0700, Bryan Irvine wrote:
They were very low bandwidth, but there went all available
connections.
Low-bandwidth is often worse if it's a dynamic website (especially if
it needs a lot of RAM to service a connection), placing an
http-accelerator in front can sometime
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:15:48AM -0400, Timothy Donahue wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 August 2005 11:58 pm, eric wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 16:53:25 -0600, Theo de Raadt proclaimed...
> >
> > > It is plain simple bad advice. And totally ridiculous.
> >
> > And plus, with ipv6, it's imperative tha
Nick Holland wrote:
Guido Tschakert wrote:
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
I don't see where you set the MTU/MSS? Are you sure you have set them
somewhere else? eBay is known to have problems with bad/wrong MTU/MSS.
Try adding scrub out on $ext_if max-mss 1414 to your pf.conf and adding
-mtu
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Diana Eichert
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 10:08 AM
> To: Miscellaneous OBSD
> Subject: Re: 3.8 beta requests
>
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Damien Miller wrote:
>
> > Remember that most of the develop
> I personally like to 'pass keep state' with a 'scrub all' rule. This
> at least gives me some interesting statistics to poke at when I'm
> bored. Plus, I can firewall who gets to ssh into my machine.
Another good use is {max-src-states ##} for webservers and the like.
I have a webserver that w
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Bryan Irvine
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 10:11 AM
> To: Misc OpenBSD
> Subject: Re: /usr/share/pf/ suggestion
>
> > I personally like to 'pass keep state' with a 'scrub all' rule. This
> > at lea
Guido Tschakert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW. this morning I tried the suggestions from Jonathan and it didn't
> work :-(
This is normal. I thought you use the OpenBSD Box for PPPoE and NAT
directly, not through another router, which is a hardware box.
I noticed in the past that hardware ro
Jonathan Schleifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > which is the right or preferred way to do so (since there are, as
> > I pointed out several possible ways).
>
> I already answered that before:
> Jonathan Schleifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Floppies u
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Damien Miller wrote:
> Remember that most of the developers run -current throughout the
> development cycle (often in production).
>
> -d
and Theo get's really pissed off when someone breaks the tree so it won't
compile and/or the change creates disfunction in other parts of
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 11:58 pm, eric wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 16:53:25 -0600, Theo de Raadt proclaimed...
>
> > It is plain simple bad advice. And totally ridiculous.
>
> And plus, with ipv6, it's imperative that the filters be pushed down to the
> end-host so we can quit relying on stup
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 08:04, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:02:54AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> >On Wednesday 24 August 2005 07:04, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> >> I *am* a bit sad about the fact that there're no running Lisp
> >> implementations for OpenBSD
>
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 07:04, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> A few things that get bitten are some packages doing their own and very
> different memory management, but can't avoid malloc altogether.
> That is ports/lang/clisp, that seems to be also gprolog
Can you describe how these programs mana
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Look at this http://www.mand4la.info/index.php/NagiosObsd
I've wrote this doc in italian, bat the code is the same :P
BTW..try to lunch apache with -u "httpd -u"
Bye
Matteo
Joco Salvatti wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I installed and configured Nagios on m
Hello!
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:02:54AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
>On Wednesday 24 August 2005 07:04, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
>> I *am* a bit sad about the fact that there're no running Lisp
>> implementations for OpenBSD
>Does (X)emacs work?
Yes, but I meant (and neglected to say explicitly
Michael Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, as I wrote above, I know about the fdformat program,
> and low level formatting is actually not what my question
> was aimed at -- it was aimed at the disklabel / filesystem
> level of formatting. But this may have got lost in my overly
> long email
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 07:04, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> I *am* a bit sad about the fact that there're no running Lisp
> implementations for OpenBSD
Does (X)emacs work?
--
Tired of having to defend against Malware?
(You know: trojans, viruses, SPYWARE, ADWARE,
KEYLOGGERS, rootkits, worms an
Genadijus Paleckis wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Oh well -- we've decided that we will try to ship with this protection
mechanism in any case, and try to solve the problems as we run into
them.
Is that means that 3.8 might be unstable ? Maybe all who wants/needs
stable systems need to run 3.7
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:53:45PM +0200, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
>
> Yes!, I am using a 40 GB (aprox 4 years old) as master, and 1GB (around
> 10) as slave. Cable is 40-conductor, I think. Both at the same cable.
>
hmmm... can you try to put slow devices and fast devices on separate cables.
by slo
Nick Holland wrote:
Guido Tschakert wrote:
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
I don't see where you set the MTU/MSS? Are you sure you have set them
somewhere else? eBay is known to have problems with bad/wrong MTU/MSS.
Try adding scrub out on $ext_if max-mss 1414 to your pf.conf and adding
-mtu 1454 t
On 7/27/05, Matthew Bettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can anyone recommend a decent rack server from HP, Dell, IBM or CDW
> that will run OpenBSD for webserver use? I would prefer a machine
> that has SCSI drives with Mirror Raid capabilities. I know I can go
> piecemeal one from
Artur Grabowski wrote:
> Genadijus Paleckis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > Oh well -- we've decided that we will try to ship with this
> > > protection mechanism in any case, and try to solve the
> > > problems as we run into them.
> >
> > Is that means that 3.8 might be
One point in favour of a GENERIC RAID Kernel(s), consider when a user
posts the following request for help:
'I've compiled my own kernel and Xyz is broken'
Now after being on the mailing list for a quite a while I know the stock
answer always seems to be 'drop back to GENERIC and stop playing
On 2005/08/24 14:28:25, Genadijus Paleckis wrote:
> well, from base system side I gues it will be minimal problems, but what
> about ports ? because almost everyone using it.
If software segfaults because of this, it's because it's already
doing something wrong, and it could already be giving unp
Hello!
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 02:28:25PM +0300, Genadijus Paleckis wrote:
>[...]
>>>Is that means that 3.8 might be unstable ? Maybe all who wants/needs
>>>stable systems need to run 3.7 ?
>well, from base system side I gues it will be minimal problems, but what
>about ports ? because almost e
Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:37:46AM +0200, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
>
>>First, thank you very much for your interesting responses.
>>
>>Yesterday in the evening I installed OpenBSD again on the same disk,
>>just to be sure if I could reproduce the errors. Yes!, I did not have
Hello,
Can you recommand a performant scsi raid controller (with external
connector as it will be connected to an external HD TOWER !!) for use in
an OpenBSD3.7 file server?
Many thanks for the any comments/recommendations
didier
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Of course not. HOW CAN IT? Get real! The hardware is STILL only
providing permissions at the page level!
If you have aggressive amounts of ram and/or patience you could have
something along the malloc.conf "P"-option for ALL sizes.
Of course it would suck for any app mo
Genadijus Paleckis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> > Oh well -- we've decided that we will try to ship with this protection
> > mechanism in any case, and try to solve the problems as we run into
> > them.
>
> Is that means that 3.8 might be unstable ? Maybe all who wants/
Genadijus Paleckis wrote:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Oh well -- we've decided that we will try to ship with this
> > protection mechanism in any case, and try to solve the
> > problems as we run into them.
>
> Is that means that 3.8 might be unstable ? Maybe all who
> wants/needs stable systems nee
Antonios Anastasiadis wrote:
No,it is clear that he is talking about the problems *other* people's
(buggy) software will have.
On 8/24/05, Genadijus Paleckis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Oh well -- we've decided that we will try to ship with this protection
mechanism in a
> For one, what if you don't want "RAID_AUTOCONFIG"?
> It would save YOU time if we set the options you needed. If not, it
> would cause more complaints about "how could you chose such an option?"
True
>
> Further, it would probably need to be TWO new kernels -- bsd.raid and
> bsd.raid.rd, as y
Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Is there any reason why we can not include a raid enabled kernel in
> the distribution? (not as default, but in the same way bsd.mp is).
>
> I believe this would save me (and others?) time when upgrading OpenBSD
> machines.
>
> The kernel would need static dev
Guido Tschakert wrote:
> Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
>> I don't see where you set the MTU/MSS? Are you sure you have set them
>> somewhere else? eBay is known to have problems with bad/wrong MTU/MSS.
>> Try adding scrub out on $ext_if max-mss 1414 to your pf.conf and adding
>> -mtu 1454 to the route.
Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:37:46AM +0200, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
>
>>First, thank you very much for your interesting responses.
>>
>>Yesterday in the evening I installed OpenBSD again on the same disk,
>>just to be sure if I could reproduce the errors. Yes!, I did not have
No,it is clear that he is talking about the problems *other* people's
(buggy) software will have.
On 8/24/05, Genadijus Paleckis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> > Oh well -- we've decided that we will try to ship with this protection
> > mechanism in any case, and try to sol
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Oh well -- we've decided that we will try to ship with this protection
mechanism in any case, and try to solve the problems as we run into
them.
Is that means that 3.8 might be unstable ? Maybe all who wants/needs
stable systems need to run 3.7 ?
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
