On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:25:46AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> Did you read the upgrade minifaq ?
>
> This kind of stuff is mentioned. Switching from one release to another
> through src is tricky, as it often involves several major changes.
If you mean ~/upgrade37.html, yes, but I went back and re
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:05:25PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
| On May 5, 2005, at 6:00 PM, Paul de Weerd wrote:
|
| >Hi all,
| >
| >I'm a wee bit confused with carp(4). This is my first carp setup, so I
| >probably miss a good whacking with a cluestick.
| >
| >I want to set up a failover firewall
heh, i got my cd's today too. which is awsome. also i finally got
something special.
i fully understand this new approach, to give the people who actually
bought cd's a better time, having it before everyone else. only problem
is that with the current state of the ports tree, there are no op
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:23:38AM +1000, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
Saw this today:http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3502786
Haven't found a licence yet to see how "free" it really is but it
like progress.
Anyone know more/better ?
"This is not the first ti
On Fri, 6 May 2005 03:13:07 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:23:38AM +1000, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
>> Saw this today:http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3502786
>>
>> Haven't found a licence yet to see how "free" it really is but it
>> like progress.
>>
>
> Hi dear misc-Mailinglist,
>
> After I repaired my IBM-Webserver I did a little "burn-in"-Test and
> noticed a "freeze" (no reaction..) if I do the followring (using bsd.mp).
>
> Login as root (local): top -s 1
> Login as user and switch to root (via SSH using 4096Bit DSA-Key): john
> /etc/master.
Hi dear misc-Mailinglist,
After I repaired my IBM-Webserver I did a little "burn-in"-Test and
noticed a "freeze" (no reaction..) if I do the followring (using bsd.mp).
Login as root (local): top -s 1
Login as user and switch to root (via SSH using 4096Bit DSA-Key): john
/etc/master.passwd
Login a
Adam PAPAI wrote:
Adam PAPAI wrote:
Regards.
I tried to upgrade my 3.6 OpenBSD to 3.7.
kernel: integer divide fault trap, code=0
Stopped atsdstrategy+0x44divl0x28(%edi),%eax
ddb>
I forgot to send the trace output:
ddb>trace
sdstrategy(d6a972e4,1,2000,d05bba80,0) at sdstrategy+0x44
dkcsu
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:23:38AM +1000, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
> Saw this today:http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3502786
>
> Haven't found a licence yet to see how "free" it really is but it
> like progress.
>
> Anyone know more/better ?
>
"This is not the first time Ather
Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
On Thu, 5 May 2005 10:31:56 -0700 (PDT), Brian W. wrote:
Anyone else notice this performing slowly. I did a tcpdump and it appears
localhost gets queried 2-3 times before a packet goes out.
I see quite a few delays and some failures to resolve that work with
one or
ALERT!
This e-mail, in its original form, contained one or more attached files that
were infected with a virus, worm, or other type of security threat. This e-mail
was sent from a Road Runner IP address. As part of our continuing initiative to
stop the spread of malicious viruses, Road Runner s
Saw this today:http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3502786
Haven't found a licence yet to see how "free" it really is but it
like progress.
Anyone know more/better ?
>From the land "down under": Australia.
Do we look from up over?
Do NOT CC me - I am subscribed to the list.
Repli
Mikeal Clark wrote:
Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Hi All,
I have a co-located 3.4 web/mail box at a remote location with a P3
1.2Ghz and
1Gb RAM (on-board LAN and video). At home I have another copy of the
exact
same motherboard but with a Celeron 1.1Ghz and 512 Gb RAM.
The question is, can I insta
Tobias Walkowiak wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 08:02:46PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>>
>> process is already done. What will appear on the ftp sites will be the
>> same code base as the CD's.
>
> thanx for all the answers. but then, what is the reason to release the CD
> version three weeks
On May 5, 2005, at 6:00 PM, Paul de Weerd wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a wee bit confused with carp(4). This is my first carp setup, so I
probably miss a good whacking with a cluestick.
I want to set up a failover firewall that has only one external IP
address. But if I have only one shared IP, how can I tel
Tobias Walkowiak wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 08:02:46PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
process is already done. What will appear on the ftp sites will be the
same code base as the CD's.
thanx for all the answers. but then, what is the reason to release the CD
version three weeks later?
So that th
Even though the motherboards are the same, there is a part of me that wonders
if there might be a subtle difference between using those two CPUs. I've seen
too many weird weird problems in the past. I am extremely cautious about
this. For critical systems I always reccomend buying two identical
Hi all,
I'm a wee bit confused with carp(4). This is my first carp setup, so I
probably miss a good whacking with a cluestick.
I want to set up a failover firewall that has only one external IP
address. But if I have only one shared IP, how can I tell carp which
interface should be carped ? In th
On Thu, 5 May 2005 10:31:56 -0700 (PDT), Brian W. wrote:
>Anyone else notice this performing slowly. I did a tcpdump and it appears
>localhost gets queried 2-3 times before a packet goes out.
>
I see quite a few delays and some failures to resolve that work with
one or two retries. I am using t
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 08:02:46PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> process is already done. What will appear on the ftp sites will be the
> same code base as the CD's.
thanx for all the answers. but then, what is the reason to release the CD
version three weeks later?
--
[id]
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Niall O'Higgins wrote:
> As of 2005/02/01 ccd(4) man page mentions mirroring. So we now have:
>
> A ccd may be either serially concatenated, interleaved, or mirrored.
> To serially concatenate partitions, specify an interleave factor of 0.
> Mirroring configurations require an
On 5/5/05, Ian Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 5 May 2005, Niall O'Higgins wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 12:10:58PM -0700, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
> > > The only thing is that I run 2 HDDs in RAID1 mirror with RAIDFRAME and
> > > so my kernel is generic + pseudo-device raid (i
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:21:41PM -0400, Ian Watts wrote:
> Except that Gary is using a mirror and ccd(4) claims to provide either
> concatenated or interleaved disks, not mirroring:
Nah dude, it does indeed support mirroring.
> I use RAIDframe and haven't used ccd, so I'm just going by what the
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Niall O'Higgins wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 12:10:58PM -0700, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
> > The only thing is that I run 2 HDDs in RAID1 mirror with RAIDFRAME and
> > so my kernel is generic + pseudo-device raid (if I remember correctly -
> > it was a while ago I last did
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 12:10:58PM -0700, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
> The only thing is that I run 2 HDDs in RAID1 mirror with RAIDFRAME and
> so my kernel is generic + pseudo-device raid (if I remember correctly -
> it was a while ago I last did this and I've lost my notes).
For such a setup I
Hello,
In the man page of pf.conf(5), it's written:
round-robin
The round-robin option loops through the redirection
address(es).
When more than one redirection address is specified,
round-robin is
the only permitted pool type.
So, I can see that I can't set
On Thursday 05 May 2005 14:57, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
> STeve Andre' wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 May 2005 14:15, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
> >>Hi All,
> >>
> >>I have a co-located 3.4 web/mail box at a remote location with a P3
> >>1.2Ghz and
> >>1Gb RAM (on-board LAN and video). At home I have
Niall O'Higgins wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:15:35AM -0700, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
I have a co-located 3.4 web/mail box at a remote location with a P3
1.2Ghz and
1Gb RAM (on-board LAN and video). At home I have another copy of the exact
same motherboard but with a Celeron 1.1Ghz and 512 G
STeve Andre' wrote:
On Thursday 05 May 2005 14:15, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Hi All,
I have a co-located 3.4 web/mail box at a remote location with a P3
1.2Ghz and
1Gb RAM (on-board LAN and video). At home I have another copy of the exact
same motherboard but with a Celeron 1.1Ghz and 512 Gb RAM.
STeve Andre' wrote:
On Thursday 05 May 2005 14:15, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
Hi All,
I have a co-located 3.4 web/mail box at a remote location with a P3
1.2Ghz and
1Gb RAM (on-board LAN and video). At home I have another copy of the exact
same motherboard but with a Celeron 1.1Ghz and 512 Gb RAM.
On Thursday 05 May 2005 14:15, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a co-located 3.4 web/mail box at a remote location with a P3
> 1.2Ghz and
> 1Gb RAM (on-board LAN and video). At home I have another copy of the exact
> same motherboard but with a Celeron 1.1Ghz and 512 Gb RAM.
>
> The
The wonderful thing about using the GENERIC kernel is that it'll work
on any box with supported hardware. The only thing I can think of that
you may have to compensate for is any network cards that might be
different. If all your using is the onboard LAN, and no addon cards,
then that should even b
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 09:43:13AM -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of
> > Claudio Jeker
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 4:18 PM
> > To: misc@openbsd.org
> > Subject: Re: openbgpd nexthop blackhole
> >
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:15:35AM -0700, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
> I have a co-located 3.4 web/mail box at a remote location with a P3
> 1.2Ghz and
> 1Gb RAM (on-board LAN and video). At home I have another copy of the exact
> same motherboard but with a Celeron 1.1Ghz and 512 Gb RAM.
>
> The
As long as they are the same arch (i386 to i386), and the target
machine has enough memory (32 is a safe bet for minimum, but make sure
you have plenty of swap at that point), you'll be hunky dory.
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:15:35AM -0700, Gary Clemans-Gibbon wrote:
:Hi All,
:
:I have a co-loca
I do this with -very- different computers all the time. As long as
you're keeping GENERIC as your kernel, it should be fine.
Chris
On Thursday 05 May 2005 12:15, you wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a co-located 3.4 web/mail box at a remote location with a P3
> 1.2Ghz and
> 1Gb RAM (on-board LAN an
Thus spake Gary Clemans-Gibbon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05/05/05 14:20]:
: I have a co-located 3.4 web/mail box at a remote location with a P3
: 1.2Ghz and
: 1Gb RAM (on-board LAN and video). At home I have another copy of the exact
: same motherboard but with a Celeron 1.1Ghz and 512 Gb RAM.
:
: The
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 10:54:43 -0700, Brian W. proclaimed...
> I see now there's a patch, apologies for not checking errata first.
Just as a follow-up; the patch definitely helps. I'd be interested in seeing
what performance tweaks people have for high-activity caches.
Hi All,
I have a co-located 3.4 web/mail box at a remote location with a P3
1.2Ghz and
1Gb RAM (on-board LAN and video). At home I have another copy of the exact
same motherboard but with a Celeron 1.1Ghz and 512 Gb RAM.
The question is, can I install 3.7 on the box at home and then simply
take
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Tobias Walkowiak wrote:
> i wonder whether there will be differences between the already sent CDs and
> the coming release of 3.7 on the net. the snapshots are still updated and
> when they turn into release they will be about three weeks more up-to-date
>
> am i right or did
I see now there's a patch, apologies for not checking errata first.
Brian
The path to a desireable destination
is often more difficult than the path to stay where you are.
Anyone else notice this performing slowly. I did a tcpdump and it appears
localhost gets queried 2-3 times before a packet goes out.
Brian
The path to a desireable destination
is often more difficult than the path to stay where you are.
Thank you for contacting EarthLink,
We received your email on 5/3/05 however, it contained a virus in the form of
an attachment and we do not accept these types of messages for security
reasons. You can find more information on viruses at the following webpage .
http://www.earthlink.net/home/t
I need to add some bad sectors to an ide disk, to keep it alive for another
day or so while we finish testing the replacment machine, .. but bad144
doesn't seem to work.
Tried:
bad144 wd0 -a 977088
...
bad144 wd0 -a 977151
rebooted
same bad sector problems (on those sectors).
Did I miss somethin
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:49:10AM +0200, Esben Norby wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 May 2005 23:47, Stephen Marley wrote:
> > Can anyone forsee any problems doing this with the current state of ospf
> > within openbsd? Or gif instead of gre perhaps?
>
> One of the things that usally comes back and bites
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> Claudio Jeker
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 4:18 PM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: openbgpd nexthop blackhole
>
> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:55:56PM -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
> > Anyone hav
On May 5, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-04 21:56]:
I've been working on an IP accounting project for use with PF labels.
The entire concept is based on the label macros that can be assigned
to
each filter rule, using values like $dstaddr, $srca
I'd also be very interested in hearing your results; I have a similar
project in my queue.
Esben Norby wrote:
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 23:47, Stephen Marley wrote:
Can anyone forsee any problems doing this with the current state of ospf
within openbsd? Or gif instead of gre perhaps?
One of the thi
* Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-04 21:56]:
> I've been working on an IP accounting project for use with PF labels.
> The entire concept is based on the label macros that can be assigned to
> each filter rule, using values like $dstaddr, $srcaddr, $dstport, etc.
> Unfortunately, I ju
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:42:27PM +0200, Georg Kremsner wrote:
> vgonel(d72584f0,d72c33e8,d059c8c0,d72584f0,0) at vgonel+0x7d
> vgone(d72584f0,0,d72c33e8,e8a0bdcc,d72584f0) at vgone+0x17
> layer_inactive(e8a0bdd4,d72c33e8,e8a0bdf0,d020aa99,0) at
> layer_inactive+0x32
> VOP_INACTIVE(d72584f0,d72c33
Hi!
I got a problem with my OpenBSD machine.
It is used primarily as a fileserver via ftp and smb and as a
ntp-server.
Sometimes the system freezes and falls back to a ddb-prompt.
I thought it was a power problem and disconnected two hdds but it didn't
solve the problem.
I tried to figure out, wha
> i wonder whether there will be differences between the already sent CDs
> and
> the coming release of 3.7 on the net. the snapshots are still updated and
> when they turn into release they will be about three weeks more up-to-date
>
> am i right or did i miss something?
>
> tobias
I'm sure it's
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> any csh guru out here who wants to help rewriting
> src/usr.bin/vgrind/vgrind.sh in ksh?
I don't know what it does, and I didn't run it, but it should be
pretty close to something working. I assume you can fix the rest.
Remove the -x in the shebang if you are content.
Go
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 09:11:16AM -0300, Joco Salvatti wrote:
> I'd like to know which compiler is used in OpenBSD's kernel compiling
> process.
Microsoft Visual Studio C++
krw fixed that a few days ago. Use a snap.
On May 5, 2005, at 4:07 AM, Adam PAPAI wrote:
Regards.
I tried to upgrade my 3.6 OpenBSD to 3.7.
I tried to upgrade from CD, but the kernel faulted.
dmesg results:
umass0: DATAFB Flash Reader, rev 2.00/11.25, addr 2
umass0: using SCSI over Bulk-Only
gnu c compiler, 'man cc' next time
On 5/5/05, Joco Salvatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to know which compiler is used in OpenBSD's kernel compiling
> process.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Joco Salvatti
Hello!
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 09:11:16AM -0300, Joco Salvatti wrote:
>I'd like to know which compiler is used in OpenBSD's kernel compiling
>process.
>Thanks.
Just look what's happening when you compile a kernel. You'll
see calls to as (the assembler, which is gas 2.15 at least on current,
i38
Hi all,
I'd like to know which compiler is used in OpenBSD's kernel compiling
process.
Thanks.
--
Joco Salvatti
I've been banging my head against this problem for a few days and was
wondering (hoping) someone around here has an answer. I'm trying to set
up a VPN with OpenBSD on my end, and a Cisco PIX on the other. The PIX
is hiding behind a NAT firewall (God only knows why - I asked nicely and
I'm not i
Hi,
any csh guru out here who wants to help rewriting
src/usr.bin/vgrind/vgrind.sh in ksh?
bye,
//mirabile
--
Hey, I just realized that OpenBSD CDs are $45. Any chance I could get
you to update your sig?
-- Steve Shockley after reading my previous signature
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 10:41:52PM -0500, Benjamin A. Collins wrote:
> I just downloaded the OPENBSD_3_7_BASE sources and tried building the
> kernel and userland. Everything *seemed* to work fine, but after a
> reboot, the c++ compiler no longer seemed to support exceptions.
> Any suggestions as
Adam PAPAI wrote:
Regards.
I tried to upgrade my 3.6 OpenBSD to 3.7.
I tried to upgrade from CD, but the kernel faulted.
Any suggestions?
Yes, send a proper bug report.
http://www.openbsd.org/report.html
-d
Adam PAPAI wrote:
Regards.
I tried to upgrade my 3.6 OpenBSD to 3.7.
kernel: integer divide fault trap, code=0
Stopped atsdstrategy+0x44divl0x28(%edi),%eax
ddb>
I forgot to send the trace output:
ddb>trace
sdstrategy(d6a972e4,1,2000,d05bba80,0) at sdstrategy+0x44
dkcsumattach(d056c378,3
Regards.
I tried to upgrade my 3.6 OpenBSD to 3.7.
I tried to upgrade from CD, but the kernel faulted.
dmesg results:
umass0: DATAFB Flash Reader, rev 2.00/11.25, addr 2
umass0: using SCSI over Bulk-Only
scsibus1 at umass0: 2 targets
sd0 at scsibus targ 1 lun 0: SCSI0
0/direct removable
sd0:
Anyone know a reliable, consistent *and* cheap supplier in the UK ?
Peter
i wonder whether there will be differences between the already sent CDs and
the coming release of 3.7 on the net. the snapshots are still updated and
when they turn into release they will be about three weeks more up-to-date
am i right or did i miss something?
tobias
--
[id][
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote:
Hi everyone,
I just assembled a new pc for my friend and seeing all the little
stickers (to stick in front of the case) that come in the various
cpu/mobo/etc... boxes, I started to wonder HOW COME I DON'T HAVE A
WIREFRAME PUFFY STICKER ON MY C
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 23:47, Stephen Marley wrote:
> Can anyone forsee any problems doing this with the current state of ospf
> within openbsd? Or gif instead of gre perhaps?
One of the things that usally comes back and bites you is the lack of
multicast support (or buggy multicast support). All
68 matches
Mail list logo
