Hello
To update mingw-freeimage to version 3.17.0 I'd need the following
packages reviewed:
- #1265854 - mingw-jxrlib - MinGW Windows JPEG XR library
- # 1265853 - mingw-openjpeg2 - MinGW Windows openjpeg2 library
Both straight forward, based on the native packages which I also maintain.
Hap
Hi Frantisek,
Thanks! I'll review the four packages you mentioned.
Best,
Sandro
On 12.01.2014 16:34, František Dvořák wrote:
Hi Sandro,
I've picked mingw-ilmbase and mingw-libmng.
My MinGW package requests are:
mingw-c-areshttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016887
mingw-flac
Hi Sandro,
I've picked mingw-ilmbase and mingw-libmng.
My MinGW package requests are:
mingw-c-areshttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016887
mingw-flac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051836
My other package requests are not for MinGW and are more hardcore
(glite-
On 07.01.2014 23:48, František Dvořák wrote:
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 22:56 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
Usually I do the mingw packages starting from the native ones. As far
as
freeimage itself is concerned, I opted for the newest version since
there is an RFE for the native version [1], and I poste
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 22:56 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Usually I do the mingw packages starting from the native ones. As far
> as
> freeimage itself is concerned, I opted for the newest version since
> there is an RFE for the native version [1], and I posted there my
> suggested patches for upd
Hi Frantisek,
Usually I do the mingw packages starting from the native ones. As far as
freeimage itself is concerned, I opted for the newest version since
there is an RFE for the native version [1], and I posted there my
suggested patches for updating the native version also. About LibRaw:
Th
Hi Sandro,
did you compare the packages with the native versions?:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW?rd=Packaging/MinGW#Track_Fedora_native_package_versions
There can be seen some differences in license fields (LibRaw has some
GPLv3 sources for example), or you can compare the bundle
Hi,
I needed freeimage for win32 and decided to package it (turns out this
was a bad idea, since I landed in bundled libraries hell). But hey,
having survived the pain I might as well submit it for review ;) (along
with dependencies):
* mingw-freeimage - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
On 07/13/2013 07:22 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
I'll also take https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566
(mingw-postgresql), in exchange for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984248 (mingw-shapelib).
OK, thanks.
___
mingw mailing list
mi
On 11.07.2013 02:02, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to get my two packages in Fedora sooner rather than later.
Feel free to contact me about review swaps for them. I see about 50
MinGW packages awaiting review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566
On 07/10/2013 07:20 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
I'll take mingw-sane-backends (will have a look tomorrow). I have
mingw-tesseract awaiting review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961408
Great. Thanks!
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedora
On 11.07.2013 02:02, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to get my two packages in Fedora sooner rather than later.
Feel free to contact me about review swaps for them. I see about 50
MinGW packages awaiting review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566
Hi all,
I'd like to get my two packages in Fedora sooner rather than later. Feel
free to contact me about review swaps for them. I see about 50 MinGW
packages awaiting review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979564
T
Hi,
If anyone would like to swap reviews I am available.
mingw-libarchive:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830388
mingw-nettle:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833623
Thanks,
Michael
___
mingw mailing list
mingw@lists.fedorapro
14 matches
Mail list logo