_
> From: Marek Olšák
> Sent: 08 February 2015 11:27
> To: Jose Fonseca
> Cc: Matt Turner; Emil Velikov; ML mesa-dev
> Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] Rename mesa/src/util (Was: gallium/util: add
> u_bit_scan64)
>
> I kind of like the "util_&q
seca
Cc: Matt Turner; Emil Velikov; ML mesa-dev
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] Rename mesa/src/util (Was: gallium/util: add
u_bit_scan64)
I kind of like the "util_" prefix everywhere. u_math only depends on
p_config.h and p_compiler.h. I don't think it would be hard to move
those two into src/
I kind of like the "util_" prefix everywhere. u_math only depends on
p_config.h and p_compiler.h. I don't think it would be hard to move
those two into src/util as well. We have always wanted Mesa to use
more of Gallium. This might be a good start.
Just my 2 cents.
Marek
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 3
On 07/02/15 00:10, Matt Turner wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
"util" is meant to be for shared utility across the entire code base -
both Mesa and Gallium. It's been growing slowly as people move things
there. It might make sense to move a lot of src/gallium/auxili
On 7 February 2015 at 00:10, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> "util" is meant to be for shared utility across the entire code base -
>>> both Mesa and Gallium. It's been growing slowly as people move things
>>> there. It might make sense to move a lot
On 02/06/2015 05:10 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
"util" is meant to be for shared utility across the entire code base -
both Mesa and Gallium. It's been growing slowly as people move things
there. It might make sense to move a lot of src/gallium/a
On Friday, February 06, 2015 11:58:52 PM Emil Velikov wrote:
[snip]
> If I can speculate - I would assume that bikeshedding is one of the
> reasons why things got copied over into gallium. People chose to have
> some form of explicit structure and naming scheme, that will be easier
> to follow as t
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> "util" is meant to be for shared utility across the entire code base -
>> both Mesa and Gallium. It's been growing slowly as people move things
>> there. It might make sense to move a lot of src/gallium/auxiliary/util
>> there, in fact - the
Hi all,
Fwiw, I'm 100% behind Jose's arguments, let me try and justify why:
On 4 February 2015 at 20:18, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 04, 2015 02:04:38 PM Jose Fonseca wrote:
>> This change broke MinGW/MSVC builds because ffsll is not available there.
>>
>>
>> There is a ffsll
On 04/02/15 20:18, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
On Wednesday, February 04, 2015 02:04:38 PM Jose Fonseca wrote:
This change broke MinGW/MSVC builds because ffsll is not available there.
There is a ffsll C fallback, but it's in src/mesa/main/imports.[ch]. So
rather than duplicating it in src/gallium
On Wednesday, February 04, 2015 02:04:38 PM Jose Fonseca wrote:
> This change broke MinGW/MSVC builds because ffsll is not available there.
>
>
> There is a ffsll C fallback, but it's in src/mesa/main/imports.[ch]. So
> rather than duplicating it in src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_math.h I'd
> pr
On 02/04/2015 07:04 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
This change broke MinGW/MSVC builds because ffsll is not available there.
There is a ffsll C fallback, but it's in src/mesa/main/imports.[ch]. So
rather than duplicating it in src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_math.h I'd
prefer move it to src/util.
And
This change broke MinGW/MSVC builds because ffsll is not available there.
There is a ffsll C fallback, but it's in src/mesa/main/imports.[ch]. So
rather than duplicating it in src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_math.h I'd
prefer move it to src/util.
And here lies the problem: what header name sh
13 matches
Mail list logo
