On 7 February 2015 at 00:10, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> "util" is meant to be for shared utility across the entire code base - >>> both Mesa and Gallium. It's been growing slowly as people move things >>> there. It might make sense to move a lot of src/gallium/auxiliary/util >>> there, in fact - there's always been a lot of duplication between Mesa >>> and Gallium's utility code. But that's up to the Gallium developers. >>> >> Imho currently the util library is growing on the basis of "we can >> share X let's throw it in there" rather than putting much thought >> about the structure/"design" of it - unlike in gallium. > > Are you serious? Let's be honest with ourselves. I probably would have > been a better plan to not put commonly useful code deep in Gallium in > the first place. > > Apparently this is what I get for trying to do the right thing an pull > the atomics code out into a place the rest of the Mesa project can use > it. > Seems like I offended you (and others involved). Please accept my apology on the matter, I meant the above with no disrespect.
-Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
